Skip to main content

The Protest Events

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Civic Participation in Contentious Politics

Abstract

This chapter introduces the social movement organisations (SMOs) staging the protest events reviewed in the book. The latter ranged from an activist protest festival to protest camps or synchronised demonstrations taking place across Europe on the same day of action. The organisations running them shared many traits discussed comparatively in the chapter. Ensuing reflections pinpoint the strategic choices about action repertoires made by the organisations as these interpreted their wider societal and communicational contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the latter case, one key agent that may facilitate that transfer are trans-national activists. They have been described as individuals or groups who act in support of ‘goals they hold in common with transnational allies’ (2005, p. 43) both within their own societies and internationally.

  2. 2.

    Pseudonyms are used throughout this thesis to reference the interviews conducted by this author.

  3. 3.

    ‘Cooperating Partners of Alburnus Maior’ available on http://www.rosiamontana.org/ [01 March 2008].

  4. 4.

    Badescu and his colleagues examined both the density of NGOs and the nature of their activities as well as the friendship networks stemming from them. They described activist infrastructures as a structural factor fundamental to the development of civil society as well as for mobilisation into collective action (2004, pp. 327–329).

  5. 5.

    The Resource Center for Public Participation together with the Babeş-Bolyai University conducted a survey in August–September 2012 on a representative, multistage, stratified sample of 1100 individuals aged over 18 at the 95 % confidence level, with an error margin of ±3 %. Respondents were asked if they were members of sports, religious, environmental, animal rights, pensioners’, charity, cultural and professional organisations or any other volunteer organisations apart from political parties and trade unions.

  6. 6.

    ‘Maybe FânFest could have been a sort of…forum for all sort of organisations, or people or any sort of groups that want to do something for Rosia in the future, for the area or something like that…or a meeting forum for the broader social movement in Romania. But people have said, well, ‘but do we have an environmental movement in Romania? And haven’t we tried, in previous years, to bring environmental NGOs that could run exhibitions and have stalls and to’… And no, they didn’t come and they didn’t do it and (because there are very few militant NGOs, environmental ones, in Romania.. that would want to present their message and do, erm, mobilise people and collect signatures and, you know. I mean, people who would be interested in coming along to such an event because that’s why you come, in the first place, right?! Because the NGOs that get money from Coca-Cola to collect PET containers from the banks of the Dambovita don’t need to come because they don’t see any practical benefit in coming to FânFest’ (Galia 2008).

  7. 7.

    The only prerequisite to participation in the protest festival at Roşia Montană was an interest to discover the village of Roşia Montană and a readiness to explore the festival’s rich programme (Keira 2012) comprising music concerts, theatre plays and activist workshops and culminating with a final demonstration against the mining project.

  8. 8.

    Melucci described how music was instrumental to the spawning of activist groups that convened around the new cultural symbols of social movements. Such symbols would replace the purportedly jaded ‘political forms of collective action’ of the New Left. The latter had been drawing on the established tenets of socialist revolutionary politics. Melucci described the flagging support for the New Left as ‘the crisis of militantism which in turn reflected the steady withdrawal of individuals from Leninist-style politics in the name of self-realization, expressiveness, and affective communication’ (emphasis added, 1989, p. 58).

  9. 9.

    Vernacularly also referred to as the Climate Camp.

  10. 10.

    Radical ecology predicates the fundamental transformation of society that would not only stop but would also reverse those processes that threaten life on the planet (Earth First Journal 2009).

  11. 11.

    The Climate Camp had an NGO policy designed as a consistent response to questions about the stake of large environmental NGOs in its protest. The policy reflected the already recognised scepticism of EDA groups towards such organisations (Larry 2008). The large EMOs, Greenpeace or FoE were not officially involved in the running of the actual camp. Objections to their involvement touched on the long-standing differences between EDA groups and EMOs: the former were organised as heterarchies, the latter as hierarchies. EMOs worked within the polity and sanctioned the conventional mechanisms of political decision-making while EDA groups resorted to using only public demonstrations and disruption in their actions. However, particularly Greenpeace assisted the camp by making available material resources. In part, this ‘background support’ (Larry 2008) may have been offered by Greenpeace as a result of a pragmatic calculation about the benefits of opening a larger protest front against plans to build a new power station at Kingsnorth (Tom 2008). Greenpeace had been running its own campaign against it and had first taken direct action at the power station two months prior to the start of the camp (Benjamin 2007). The Climate Camp was ready to welcome individual members from any environmental NGO, the Green Party, other parties and NGOs as long as they did not canvass the participants for their own benefit. Ultimately, the Camp for Climate Action seemed to be socially integrated into the ‘activist’—as opposed to the conservationist—environmental movement to which Doherty (2002) and Saunders (2007) alluded. Nevertheless, the camp chose to distance itself from that purported movement’s forms of action and organisation and embarked on developing a radical social movement on climate change.

References

  • Agarwal, S., Barthel, M. L., Rost, C., Borning, A., Bennett, W. L., & Johnson, C. N. (2014). Grassroots organizing in the digital age: Considering values and technology in Tea Party and Occupy Wall Street. Information, Communication and Society, 17(3), 326–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alburnus Maior (2006) “Letter of Contestation against the report of the Environmental Impact Assessment Study for the Roşia Montană project” [online] available from <http://www.rosiamontana.ro/doc/contestatie_EIM.doc> [10 Dec. 2008].

  • Andersen, M. S. (2002). Ecological modernization or subversion? The effect of Europeanization on Eastern Europe. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(9), 1394–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, C. (2012). ACTA protests break out as EU states sign up treaty. The Guardian. Retrieved February 29, 2012, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/jan/27/acta-protests-eu-states-sign-treaty.

  • Badescu, G., Sum, P., & Uslaner, E. M. (2004). Civil society development and democratic values in Romania and Moldova. East European Politics and Societies, 18(2), 316–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastos, M. T., Mercea, D., & Charpentier, A. (2015). Tweets, tents, and events: The interplay between street protests and social media. Journal of Communication. doi:10.1111/jcom.12145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, A. (2007) “Greenpeace protesters take over plant”. In The Guardian, 8 October 2007 [online] available from <http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/oct/08/climatechange.energy > [3 July 2009].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. L. (2003). Communicating global activism. Information, Communi-cation & Society, 6(2), 143–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A., & Walker, S. (2014). Organization in the crowd: Peer production in large-scale networked protests. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 232–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botcheva, L. (1996). Focus and effectiveness of environmental activism in Eastern Europe: A comparative study of environmental movements in Bulgaria, Hungary, Slovakia and Romania. The Journal of Environmental Development, 5(3), 292–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buza, M., Dimen, L., Pop, G., Turnock, D. (2001) “Environmental protection in the Apuseni Mountains: the role of environmental NGOs (ENGOs)”. GeoJournal, 54 (2-4), 631-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp for Climate Action. (2008). Decision making. Retrieved July 29, 2008, from http://climatecamp.org.uk/node/15

  • Caden (2007) Member of the FânFest Coordination Team [interview by author] Cluj, Romania, 05 September 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, E. S. (1996). Organizational form as frame: Collective identity and political strategy in the American Labor Movement, 1880–1920. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings, Cambridge [England] (pp. 205–226). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Connor. (2008). Climate camp activist [interview by author]. London, U.K., 07 June 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conover, M., Davis, C., Ferrara, E., McKelvey, K., Menczer, F., & Fammini, A. (2013). The geospatial characteristics of a social movement communication network. PloS One, 8(3), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Convergence (2005) “Activists to set up eco-village in Stirling”. In Indymedia Scotland [online] available from <http://scotland.indymedia.org/node/1006>, [05 Sept. 2008].

  • Dahlgren, P. (2006). Doing citizenship: The cultural origins of civic agency in the public sphere. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(3), 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daphne. (2012). Participant at occupy Amsterdam [interview by author]. Amsterdam: 21 November 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deletant, D. (2006). Ceausescu and the Securitate: Coercion and Dissent in Romania, 1965–89. London: Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • della Porta, D., Andretta, M., Mosca, L., & Reiter, H. (2006). Globalization from below: Transnational activists and protest networks. Mineapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements: An introduction (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca, K. M., Lawson, S., & Sun, Y. (2012). Occupy wall street on the public screens of social media: The many framings of the birth of a protest movement. Communication, Culture and Critique, 5(4), 483–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinan, D. (2004). Europe recast: A history of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani, M., Donato, P. (1999) “Organizational change in Western European environmental groups: a framework for analysis”. In C. Rootes, Environmental Movements: Local, National and Global. London, Portland OR: Frank Cass, 13-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B. (2002). Ideas and actions in the green movement. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B., Paterson, M., & Seel, B. (2000). Direct action in British environmentalism. In B. Seel, M. Paterson, & B. Doherty (Eds.), Direct action in British environmentalism (pp. 1–24). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B., Plows, A., & Wall, D. (2007). Environmental direct action in Manchester, Oxford and North Wales: A protest event analysis. Environmental Politics, 16(5), 805–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DutchNews.nl. (2011). Occupy movement spreads to The Netherlands. Retrieved February 21, 2015, from http://www.dutchnews.nl/news/archives/2011/10/occupy_movement_spreads_to_the/

  • Earth First! U.K. (2009) “Summer Gathering 2009”. In Earth First Journal [online] available from <http://earthfirstgathering.org.uk/2009/front.html> [27 June 2009].

  • El Pais. (2011). America toma el relevo de les protestas. Retrieved November 20, 2011, from http://internacional.elpais.com/internacional/2011/10/15/actualidad/1318670174_243153.html.

  • European Commission. (2011). Civil society meeting. Retrieved February 29, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2011/february/tradoc_147497.pdf

  • European Commission. (2012). What ACTA is about, Fact sheet. Retrieved February 30, 2012, from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/cfm/doclib_section.cfm?sec=663&langId=en.

  • Fagan, A., Jehlicka, P. (2003) Contours of the Czech environmental movement: a comparative analysis of Hnuti Duha (Rainbow Movement) and Jinoceske matky (South Bohemian Mothers). Environmental Politics, 12(2), 49-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, A., Frenzel, F., & McCurdy, P. (2013). Protest camps. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenzel, F., Feigenbaum, A., & McCurdy, P. (2014). Protest camps: An emerging field of social movement research. The Sociological Review, 62(3), 457–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel Resources (2006) “Non-technical summary”. In EIA Study Report, ch. 9 [online] available from <http://www.rmgc.ro/en/raport/files/RMP_EIA_MAY_06/1%20-%20EIA%20Chapters/9%20Non-Technical%20Summary%20-%20Chapter%209/RMP_EIAch9_NonTechSummary_May06.pdf> [20 Aug. 2007].

  • Galia (2008) Member of the FânFest Coordination Team [interview by author] Cluj, Romania, 21 August 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandel, S. (2011) The leaders of a leaderless movement in Time Editors What is Occupy? Inside the Global Movement (Kindle Edition), New York: Time Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbaudo, P. (2013). Protest diffusion and cultural resonance in the 2011 protest wave. The International Spectator, 48(4), 86–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, B. (2013). #Occupy Wall Street: Exploring informal learning about a social movement on Twitter. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(7), 966–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goţiu, M. (2013). Afacerea Roşia Montană [The Roşia Montană Affair]. Cluj-Napoca: Tact.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graeber, D. (2014). The democracy project. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hann, C. M., Dunn, E. (eds.) (1996) Civil Society: Challenging Western Models, London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, S.L. (2002) “Selling Civil Society: Western Aid and the Nongovernmental Organization Sector in Russia”. Comparative Political Studies, 35 (2), 139-167.

    Google Scholar 

  • In Green Report, 19 March 2009 [online] available from http://www.green-report.ro/stiri/certificatul-de-urbanism-la-proiectul-rosia-montana-fost-suspendat [05 May 2009].

  • Ivy. (2008). Climate camp activist [interview by author]. London, UK, 13 July 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, J. M. (1997). The art of moral protest: Culture, biography and creativity in social movements. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, G., & Maloney, W. A. (1997). The protest business? Mobilizing campaign groups. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jowers, P., Dürrschmidt, J., O’Docherty, R., & Purdue, D. (1999). Affective and aesthetic dimensions of contemporary social movements in South West England. Innovation, 12(1), 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juris, J. (2005). The new digital media and activist networking within anti-corporate globalization movements. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 597, 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juris, J. (2008). Networking futures: The movements against corporate globalization. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Juris, J. (2012). Reflections on #occupy everywhere: Social media, public space and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keira. (2012). Member of the FânFest coordination team [interview by author]. Cluj, Romania, 10 August 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 519–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (1999). Political claims analysis: integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization, 4(1), 203–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H. (1989). New social movements and the new class in the Netherlands. American Journal of Sociology, 94(5), 1078–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larry. (2008). Climate camp activist [interview by author]. London, UK, 08 June 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, J.J., Stepan, A. (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe, Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liscka, K. (2010). Die wichtigsten Fragen zum Copyright-Pakt. Der Spiegel. Retrieved February 29, 2012, from http://www.spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzpolitik/0,1518,674802,00.html

  • Loader, B. D., & Mercea, D. (2011). Networking democracy? Social media innovations and participatory politics. Information, Communication and Society, 14(6), 757–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losey, J. (2014). The anti-counterfeiting trade agreement and European civil society: A case study on networked advocacy. Journal of Information Policy, 4, 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maireder, A., & Schwarzenegger, C. (2012). A movement of connected individuals. Information, Communication and Society, 15(2), 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, W. A., Jordan, G., & McLaughlin, A. M. (1994). Interest groups and public policy: The insider/outsider model revisited. Journal of Public Policy, 14, 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of Freedom Summer. The American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 64–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercea, D. (2012). Digital prefigurative participation: The entwinement of online communication and offline participation in protest events. New Media and Society, 14(1), 153–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercea, D., Nixon, P., & Funk, A. (2013). Unaffiliated socialization and social media recruitment: Reflections from occupy the Netherlands. In P. Nixon, R. Rawal, & D. Mercea (Eds.), Politics and the Internet in comparative context: Views from the cloud. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, A., & Matulionyte, R. (2011). (coord.) Opinion of European Academics on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. Retrieved March 1, 2012, from http://www.iri.uni-hannover.de/tl_files/pdf/ACTA_opinion_110211_DH2.pdf

  • Micó, J. L. & Casero-Ripollés, A. (2014). Political activism online: organization and media relations in the case of 15M in Spain. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 858-871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Occupy Wall Street. (2012) Statement against the anti-counterfeiting trade agreement. Retrieved March 4, 2013, from http://www.nycga.net/resources/documents/statement-against-the-anti-counterfeiting-trade-agreement-acta/

  • Papacharissi, Z., & Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parau, C. E. (2009). Impaling dracula: How E.U. accession empowered civil society in Romania. West European Politics, 32(1), 119–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrova, T., & Tarrow, S. (2007). Transactional and participatory activism in the emerging European polity: The puzzle of East-Central Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 40(1), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickavance, C. G. (1999). Democratization and the decline of social movements: The effects of regime change on collective action in Eastern Europe, Southern Europe and Latin America. Sociology, 33(2), 353–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickerill, J., & Krinsky, J. (2012). Why does occupy matter? Social Movement Studies, 11(3–4), 279–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porumb, A., Gheorghe, C., Lazar, C., Pirtoc, D. (2000) “Review of Donor Support for the NGO Sector in Romania”. In Romanian Donors’ Forum [online] available from “http://www.allavida.org/downloads/donorreview.pdf”, [15 Jan. 2006].

  • Rachel. (2008). Climate camp activist [interview by author]. Kingsnorth, UK, 5 August 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawcliffe, P. (1998) Environmental Pressure Groups in Transition, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resource Center for Public Participation (RCPP). (2012). Sondaj de opinie la nivel naţional, August–September 2012, Bucharest: unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romantan, A. (2006) “The role of the E.U. in civic opposition to gold mining in Romania”. Unpublished. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Budapest, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rob (2007) Member of the FânFest Coordination Team [interview by author] Cluj, Romania, 03 September 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rootes, C. (Ed.). (2003). Environmental protest in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, C. (2008). Double-edged swords? Collective identity and solidarity in the environmental movement. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(2), 227–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, C., & Price, S. (2009). One person’s eu-topia, another’s hell: Climate camp as a heterotopia. Environmental Politics, 18(1), 117–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • See, B., & Plows, A. (2000). Coming live and direct: Strategies of Earth First! In B. Seel, M. Paterson, & B. Doherty (Eds.), Direct action in British environmentalism (pp. 112–133). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloat, A. (2005). The rebirth of civil society: The growth of women’s NGOs in Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12(4), 437–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C.S. (2007) “Fighting over gold in the land of Dracula”. In The New York Times [online] available from <http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/03/business/worldbusiness/03gold.html> [30 March 2008]

  • Street, J., Hague, S., & Savigny, H. (2008). Playing to the crowd: The role of music and musicians in political participation. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 10(2), 269–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements, collective action and politics (2nd ed.). Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. (2005). The new transnational activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tharoor, I. (2011). Hands across the world. In Time (Ed.), What is occupy? Inside the global movement (Kindle Edition). New York: Time Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theocharis, Y. (2012). The wealth of occupation networks? Communication patterns and information distribution in a Twitter protest network. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 10(1), 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., van Deth, J. W., & Garcia-Albacete, G. (2015). Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados and Aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication and Society, 18(2), 202–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, N. (2007) “Romania’s gold stays in the hills”. From Our Own Correspondent, BBC News [online] available from <<http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/7087194.stm>> [11 Nov 2007]

  • Thorson K, Driscoll K, Ekdale B, Edgerly S, Gamber Thompson L, Schrock A, Swartz L, Vraga EK and Wells C (2013) ‘Youtube, Twitter and the Occupy movement: connecting content and circulation practices’. Information, Communication and Society 16 (3):421-451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1986). The contentious French. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tismaneanu, V. (1989) “The tragicomedy of Romanian communism”. In East European Politics and Societies, 3 (2), 329-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tom. (2008). Climate camp activist [interview by author]. London, UK, 13 July 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2002). New media, new movements? The role of the Internet in shaping the ‘anti-globalization’ movement. Information, Communi-cation & Society, 5(4), 465–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, M. (2009) “Drax protest trial judge relaxes warning on talk of climate change”. In The Guardian, [online] available from <http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jul/01/drax-climate-change-protest-court> [4 July 2009].

  • Wong, G. (2013). Protests continue in Bucharest against gold mine plan in Rosia Montana. The Guardian. Retrieved December 01, 2013, from http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/sep/04/protest-rosia-montana-gold-mine-protest

  • Xenia (2007) Member of the FânFest Coordination Team [interview by author] Cluj, Romania, 29 July 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman E. (2014) New Media, New Civics? Policy & Internet 6(2), 151-168.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mercea, D. (2016). The Protest Events. In: Civic Participation in Contentious Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50869-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics