We are now at the conclusion of this journey through the development of environmental thinking, which explored the debate on the mainstreaming and subsequent death of environmentalism, together with the most recent scholarly and practitioners’ contributions on post-environmentalism. This chapter, thus, summarizes it and, building upon the transformation of post-environmentalism into postenvironmentalism (a transformation entailing a new worldview, rather than the simple removing a hyphen), it traces a tentative manifesto of the future environmental thinking in action. Particularly, it criticizes the idea that we are really facing the end of environmentalism and, rather, suggest that new postenvironmentalist practices are already mushrooming worldwide.
KeywordsDe-politicization environmentalism institutionalization material semiotics postenvironmental agency
- Barry, A. 2001. Political Machines. Governing a Technological Society. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
- Bennet, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter. The Political Ecology of Things. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Blühdorn, I., and Welsh, I. 2008. The Politics of Unsustainability: Eco-Politics in the Post-Environmental Era. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Braun, B., and Whatmore, S.J. 2010. Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy and Public Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Castree, N. 2006. “The Future of Environmentalism.” Soundings n. 34, Nov.Google Scholar
- Darier, E. 1999. Discourses of the Environment. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- El-Hinnawi, E. 1985. “Environmental Refugees.” UNEP, Nairobi.Google Scholar
- Hayward, T. 1994. Environmental Thought. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Homer-Dixon, T.F. 2001. Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Katz, C. 1998. “Whose Nature, Whose Culture? Private Productions of Space and the ‘Preservation’ of Nature’.” In Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium edited by B. Brawn and N. Castree. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Ksentini, Z. 1994. “Human Rights and the Environment.” UNHRC. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/9.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. 2008. “‘It’s Development, Stupid !’ or: How to Modernize Modernization.” In Post-environmentalism edited by J. Proctor. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Law, J. 2007. Actor Network Theory and Material Semiotics. Lancaster. Lancaster University Centre for Science Studies. http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/centres/css/ant/ant.htm.
- Martinez Alier, J. 2003. The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (MA): Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
- Murdoch, J. 2006. Post-Structuralist Geography. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Neri, V. 2004. “FAI modelli organizzativi e dialettica istituzionale di un’associazione postambientalista.” Equilibri. Il Mulino.Google Scholar
- Sachs, W. 1993. “Global Ecology and the Shadow of ‘Development’.” In Global Ecology: A New Arena of Political Conflict edited by W. Sachs. Halifax (Nova Scotia): Fernwood Books.Google Scholar
- Shellenberger, M., and T. Nordhaus. 2004. The Death of Environmentalism. Global Warming Politics in a Post-Environmental World. The Breacktrought institute. http://thebreakthrough.org/archive/the_death_of_environmentalism.
- Taylor, B. 2013. “Resistance: Do the Ends Justify the Means?.” In Is Sustainability Still Possible? edited by Worldwatch Institute (Linda Stark, ed.), State of the World 2013, 304–316, 421–423. Washington (DC): Island Press.Google Scholar
- U.N. 1992. “Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.” Conference on Environment and Development. Rio de Janeiro, June 3–14.Google Scholar
- Whatmore, S. 2003. “Introduction: More than Human Geographies.” In Handbook of Cultural Geography edited by K. Anserson, M. Domosh, S. Pile and N. Thrift. London: Sage.Google Scholar