Advertisement

Determinants of Employment, Wage and Productivity

  • Mohammad Zulfan Tadjoeddin
  • Anis Chowdhury
Chapter
  • 120 Downloads
Part of the Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific book series (CSAP)

Abstract

This chapter econometrically investigates the determinants of real wage, productivity and employment in the manufacturing sector by firm size and factor intensity. This exercise is important to identify policy instruments in order to influence their trends at various levels to achieve the desired objective of guiding the economy towards a high-wage and high-productivity trajectory and to address socio-economic deprivation such as working poverty and earnings inequality. The chapter begins with an examination of wage and productivity functions, followed by employment functions. The chapter finds that the modern and dynamic LM section of manufacturing industry displays an ideal outcome where wages and employment increase when the overall economy (gross domestic product) expands. This finding across firm size and factor intensity should affirm the call for re-industrialisation to reverse the trend of premature de-industrialisation since the 1997–1998 Asian financial crisis.

Keywords

Employment Function Real Wages (RW) Identify Policy Instruments Small And Medium Enterprises (SMEs) First-step Regression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amiti, M. and D. Davis 2011. “Trade, firms, and wages: Theory and evidence.” Review of Economic Studies 79(1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amiti, M. and J. Konings 2007. “Trade liberalization, intermediate inputs, and productivity: Evidence from Indonesia.” American Economic Review 97(5): 1611–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arai, M. 2003. “Wages, profits, and capital intensity: Evidence from matched worker-firm data.” Journal of Labor Economics 21(3): 593–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arellano, T. and O. Bover 1995. “Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error components models.” Journal of Econometrics 68: 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arellano, T. and S. Bond 1991. “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations.” Review of Economic Studies 58(2): 277–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ariff, M. and H. Hill 1985. Export-oriented industrialisation: The ASEAN experience. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  7. Bagger, J., B.J. Christensen and D.T. Mortensen 2014. Wage and labor productivity dispersion: The roles of total factor productivity, labor quality, capital intensity and rent sharing. Mimeo, Royal Holloway.Google Scholar
  8. Barbera, F. and K. Moores 2011. “The impact of family involvement on the productivity of the firm.” Working Paper. Grand Valley State University. Available at: http://www.fambiz.org.au/wp-content/uploads/Impact-of-Family-Involvement-on-Productivity-Francesco-Barbera.pdf. Accessed on 22 February 2017.
  9. Bhattacharya, M., P.K. Narayan, S. Popp and B.N. Rath 2011. “The productivity-wage and productivity-employment nexus: A panel data analysis of Indian manufacturing.” Empirical Economics 40(2): 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blanchard, O. and L.F. Katz 1999. “Wage dynamics: Reconciling theory and evidence.” American Economic Review 89(2): 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blundell, R. and S. Bond 1998. “Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models.” Journal of Econometrics 87: 115–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cameron, A.C. and P.K. Trivedi 2010. Microeconometrics using Stata. Stata Press.Google Scholar
  13. Chu, W. 2009. “The influence of family ownership on SME performance: Evidence from public firms in Taiwan.” Small Business Economics 33(3): 353–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fu, D., Y. Wu and Y. Tang 2010. “The effects of ownership structure and industry characteristics on export performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms.” Discussion Paper 10/09. University of Western Australia – Business School.Google Scholar
  15. Galindo-Rueda, F. and J. Haskel 2005. “Skills, workforce characteristics and firm-level productivity: Evidence from the matched ABI/employer skills survey.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 1542. Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar
  16. Goh, S.K and K.N. Wong 2010. “Analyzing the productivity-wage-unemployment nexus in Malaysia: Evidence from the macroeconomic perspective.” Discussion Paper 12/10. Monash University.Google Scholar
  17. Hellerstein, J.K., D. Neumar and K. Troske 1999. “Wages, productivity and worker characteristics: Evidence from plant-level production functions and wage equations.” Journal of Labour Economics 17(3): 409–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hijzen, A. P. Martins, T. Schank and R. Upward 2013. “Foreign-owned firms around the world: A comparative analysis of wages and employment at the micro-level.” European Economic Review 60(C): 170–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ILO 2015. World Employment and Social Outlook 2015: ‘The changing nature of jobs’. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  20. Islam, I. and S. Nazara 2000. Estimating employment elasticity for the Indonesian economy. Jakarta: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
  21. Klein, N. 2012. “Real wage, labour productivity, and employment trends in South Africa: A closer look.” IMF Working Paper 12/92. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lebedinski, L. and V. Vandenberghe 2014. “Assessing education’s contribution to productivity using firm-level evidence.” International Journal of Manpower 35(8): 1116–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lim, D. 1997. “Forecasting employment growth in Indonesia.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 33(3): 111–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. London Economics 2008. “Study on the impact of co-operative groups on the competitiveness of their craft and small enterprise members.” Final Report to European Commission DG Enterprise and Industry. Available at: http://www.pedz.uni-mannheim.de/daten/edz-h/gdb/08/study_impact_cooperative_groups_final_report_jan_2008_3406.pdf. Accessed on 22 February 2017.
  25. Martins, P. 2011. “Paying more to hire the best? Foreign firms, wages and worker mobility.” Economic Inquiry 49(2): 349–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mourougane, A. 2012. “Promoting SME development in Indonesia.” OECD Economic Department Working Papers (995): 0_1.Google Scholar
  27. Narjoko, D. and C.T. Putra 2015. “Industrialization, globalization and labour market regime in Indonesia.” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 20(1): 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nunes, P. M., M. Goncalves and Z. Serrasqueiro 2013. “The influence of age on SMEs’ growth determinants: Empirical evidence.” Small Business Economics 40(2): 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pangestu, M. and M. Hendytio 1997. “Survey responses from women workers in Indonesia’s textile, garment, and footwear industries.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1755.Google Scholar
  30. Patel, S.H. 2005. Business age and characteristics of SME performance. Kingston Business School, Kingston University.Google Scholar
  31. Ramstetter, E.D., and S. Takii 2006. “Exporting and foreign ownership in Indonesian manufacturing 1990–2000.” Economics and Finance in Indonesia 54(3): 317–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rand, J. and N. Torm 2012. “The benefits of formalization: Evidence from Vietnamese manufacturing SMEs.” World Development 40(5): 983–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roodman, D. 2009. “How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata.” The Stata Journal 9(1): 86–136.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, R. and L. Hendrickson 2016. The effect of age on Australian small-to-medium enterprises. Research Paper 1/2016. Available at: https://industry.gov.au/Office-of-the-Chief-Economist/Research-Papers/Documents/The-effect-of-age-on-Australian-Small-to-Medium-Enterprises.pdf. Accessed on 22 February 2017.
  35. Suryadarma, D., A. Suryahadi and S. Sumarto 2007. “Reducing unemployment in Indonesia: Results from a growth-employment elasticity model.” SMERU Working Paper, January.Google Scholar
  36. Tadjoeddin, M.Z. and A. Chowdhury 2012. “Employment function for Indonesia: An econometric analysis at the sectoral level.” Journal of Developing Areas 46(1): 265–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. van Ours, J.C. and L. Stoeldraijer 2010. “Age, wage and productivity.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 4765. Bonn: IZA.Google Scholar
  38. Villa, A. and G. Bruno 2013. “Promoting SME cooperative aggregations: Main criteria and contractual models.” International Journal of Production Research 51(23–24): 7439–7447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wooldridge, J.M. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press.Google Scholar
  40. World Bank 2012. Picking up the pace: Reviving growth in Indonesia’s manufacturing sector. Jakarta: World Bank.Google Scholar
  41. Zhang, J. and X. Liu 2013. “The evolving pattern of the wage–labor productivity nexus in China: Evidence from manufacturing firm-level data.” Economic Systems 37(3): 354–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Zulfan Tadjoeddin
    • 1
  • Anis Chowdhury
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social Sciences and PsychologyWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations