Advertisement

Earnings, Productivity and Inequality

  • Mohammad Zulfan Tadjoeddin
  • Anis Chowdhury
Chapter
  • 119 Downloads
Part of the Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific book series (CSAP)

Abstract

This chapter examines real wage-earnings, productivity and earnings inequality in Indonesia, disaggregated into provinces and economic sectors. It finds that the post-Asian financial crisis (AFC) and democratic Indonesia mimics the global trend of disconnection between wage and productivity growth both across the sectors and provinces, resulting in a growing earnings inequality. This disjoint is most prominent during 2001–2008 but converged in the manufacturing sector since 2008. The productivity-earnings disjoint is more pronounced in the provinces with higher growth rates of provincial real gross domestic product, indicating that better economic performance did not benefit the labour. This disconnection has three consequences. First, it affects income or earnings distribution. The chapter argues that the declining income share of labour, or declining wage-productivity ratio, may help explain the continuous rise in economic inequality in Indonesia since the late 1990s’ AFC. Second, it implies a vicious circle of low-wage economy, instead of a productivity-driven high-wage dynamic trajectory of an economy. Third, it casts doubts about the quality of growth in post-AFC Indonesia. Interestingly, the chapter finds that compliance with minimum wage has an equalising effect. That is, wage-earnings inequality declines with the increase in the minimum wage compliance rate, as this improves labour’s bargaining power.

Keywords

Real Earnings Growing Earnings Inequality post-Asian Financial Crisis Sakernas Regular Wage Employment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akerlof, G.A. 1982. “Labour contracts as partial gift exchange.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 97(4): 543–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang, H.J. 2010. 23 things they don’t tell you about capitalism. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  3. Comola, M. and L. de Mello 2013. “Salaried employment and earnings in Indonesia: New evidence on the selection bias.” Applied Economics 45(19): 2808–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dhanani, S., I. Islam and A. Chowdhury 2009. The Indonesia labour market: Challenge and changes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Fabricant, S. 1959. “Basic facts on productivity change.” Occasional Paper 63. New York: NBER.Google Scholar
  6. Goh, S.K. 2009. “Is productivity linked to wages? An empirical investigation in Malaysia.” MPRA Paper No. 18095. (https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18095/)
  7. Guschanski, A. and Ö. Onaran 2017. “Why is the wage share falling in emerging economies? Industry level evidence.” Greenwich Papers in Political Economy No. 52. University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
  8. ILO 2013. Global wage report 2012/13: Wages and equitable growth. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  9. ILO 2015. Global wage report 2014/15: Wages and income inequality. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  10. IMF 2017. World economic outlook 2017. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  11. Islam, I. and S. Nazara 2000. Estimating employment elasticity for the Indonesian economy. Jakarta: International Labor Organization.Google Scholar
  12. King, John 2015. Advanced introduction to post Keynesian economics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  13. Schmid, G. 1995. “A new approach to labour market policy: A contribution to the current debate on efficient employment policies.” Economic and Industrial Democracy 16(3): 425–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shapiro, C. and J.E. Stiglitz 1984. “Equilibrium unemployment as a worker discipline device.” American Economic Review 74(3): 433–44.Google Scholar
  15. Sharpe, A., J.F. Arsenault and P. Harrison 2008. “The relationship between labour productivity and real wage growth in Canada and OECD countries.” CSLS Research Report No. 2008-8. Ottawa: Centre for the Study of Living Standards (CSLS).Google Scholar
  16. Stiglitz, J.E. 2012. The price of inequality. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  17. Tadjoeddin, M.Z. 2015. “Spatial dimensions of key employment outcomes in Indonesia.” Comparative Asian Development 14(3): 466–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. World Bank 2015. Indonesia’s rising divide: Why inequality is rising, why it matters and what can be done. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Zulfan Tadjoeddin
    • 1
  • Anis Chowdhury
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social Sciences and PsychologyWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations