Advertisement

Epilogue: Looping Feminist Threads

Sustaining Knowledge, Creating Possibility
  • Aristea Fotopoulou
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change book series (PSCSC)

Abstract

In this book, I set off to answer a key question: What do feminism and queer activism mean in the digital era, when digital technologies are so inextricably linked to culture, economy and politics? By asking what feminism and queer activism are in the digital era, I have focused on the contradictions, tensions and often-paradoxical aspects of these politics, in relation to both identity and activist practice. I started from the premise that today both feminism, as forceful critique and praxis, and the figure of the feminist are often missing in digital as well as activism studies. This final chapter revisits the key premise of the book, that doing feminism and being feminist involves enacting ourselves as activists – as embodied – and political subjects through media practices, technologies and their imaginaries. While digital networks help us maintain a dialogue with the past, feminism creates conditions of possibility in the present, for a livable future – by making claims for rights, and social justice, across networks, media, and technologies. This epilogue is a reminder that the recursive loops of feminism – across time, linking past, present and future – matter.

Keywords

Digital Technology Digital Medium Digital Network Social Networking Platform Gender Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Barassi, V. (2015). Social media, immediacy and the time for democracy: Critical reflections on social media as ‘temporalizing practices’. In L. Dencik & O. Leistert (Eds.), Critical perspectives on social media and protest: Between control and emancipation. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  2. Bassett, C. (2015). Not now? Feminism, technology, postdigital. In Postdigital aesthetics (pp. 136–150). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bassett, C., Fotopoulou, A., & Howland, K. (2015). Expertise: A report and a manifesto. Convergence, 21(3), 328–342. http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84938271985&partnerID=40&md5=81fb98620628957e3e05314b3aece240.Google Scholar
  4. Haraway, D. J. (1997). ModestWitness@secondMillennium. FemaleManMeetsOncoMouse: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Jarrett, K. (2016). Feminism, labour and digital media: The digital housewife. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Kaun, A. (2015). ‘This space belongs to us!’: Protest spaces in times of accelerating capitalism. In L. Dencik & O. Leistert (Eds.), Critical perspectives on social media and protest: Between control and emancipation. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  7. Mejias, U. (2013). Off the network. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Murphy, M. (2012). Seizing the means of reproduction: Entanglements of feminism, health, and technoscience. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Wajcman, J. (2014). Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aristea Fotopoulou
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BrightonBrightonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations