Skip to main content

Consumer Choice as Decision: Meso-Cognitive Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1189 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter continues to seek to link the micro- and macro-depictions of decision making by means of a meso-cognitive psychology (MeCP) that demonstrates the capacity of individual consumers to choose and even create the contingencies to which their behavior will be subject. It does this by tracing the ways in which reinforcement histories support short- and long-range interests which interact in order to dominate the behavioral strategy of the consumer. Picoeconomic analysis provides a means of not only linking MiCP and MaCP but of suggesting the form that the necessary account of intra-personal, inter-agent communication, and cooperation takes. The picoeconomic strategy of bundling may enable the consumer who habitually selects a sooner-appearing but inferior reward so as to arrange the contingencies that he or she is more likely to forgo this and to wait patiently for a later-appearing but superior reward. It is appropriate to derive the decision perspective of the BPM when these considerations have been discussed and this is the subject of the concluding part of the chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At the risk of repetition, I want to emphasize that I am not drawing the conclusion that the theories and models I have considered in the contexts of MiCP and MaCP are conceptually deficient in this regard. Rather, I have for analytical reasons regarded each type of theory as having a particular directional focus outwards from the personal level toward either the sub-personal or the super-personal.

Bibliography

  • Ainslie, G. (1992). Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainslie, G. (2001). Breakdown of will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ainslie, G. (2007). Emotion: The gaping hole in economic theory. In B. Montero & M. D. White (Eds.), Economics and the mind (pp. 11–28). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ainslie, G. (2011). Free will as recursive self-prediction: Does a deterministic mechanism reduce responsibility? In J. Poland & G. Graham (Eds.), Addiction and responsibility (pp. 55–87). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (2015). Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. Revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. R. (2013). Intentionality, symbol, and situation in the interpretation of consumer choice. Marketing Theory, 13, 105–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. R. (2014a). Neurophilosophy of explanation in economic psychology: An exposition in terms of neuro-behavioral decision systems. In L. Moutinho et al. (Eds.), Routledge companion to the future of marketing (pp. 134–150). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. R. (2016a). Addiction as consumer choice: Exploring the cognitive dimension. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxall, G. R. (2016b). Metacognitive control of categorial neurobehavioral decision systems. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H. (2000a). The science of self control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachlin, H. (2000b). The lonely addict. In W. K. Bickel & R. E. Vuchinich (Eds.), Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. (2009). Economic models of procrastination. In C. Andreou & M. White (Eds.), The thief of time (pp. 28–50). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, D. (2012). The economic agent: Not human, but important. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Philosophy of economics (pp. 691–736). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, N., Boldt, A., Bang, D., Yeung, N., Heyes, C., & Frith, C. D. (2014). Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 186–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1981, July 31). Selection by consequences, Science, 213, 501–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Foxall, G.R. (2016). Consumer Choice as Decision: Meso-Cognitive Psychology. In: Perspectives on Consumer Choice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50121-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics