• Inela Selimović


Argentine women filmmakers have made significant contributions to the film industry since the mid-1990s. Despite the fortified and professionalized bond between women and cinema in Argentina, academic research still continues to be patchy. This book fills in parts of such lacunae, as it draws more nuanced attention to the place of affect in the films of Argentina’s most prominent, prolific, and internationally reputable women directors. In a recent and illuminating piece, film scholar B. Ruby Rich reaffirms the need for deepening scholarly “conversations” about Latin American women directors’ prolific work. Women directors and producers, explains Rich, have engendered “a new expanded Latin American cinema shaped by female experiences—and reconfigured to give as much importance to the home as to the street and as much attention to the subtle signifiers of lives lived under the surface as to the headline-making gestures in the public sphere.” Affective Moments in the Films of Martel, Carri, and Puenzo adds to this conversation—without sealing off categorically these cinematographic works under “women’s cinema” in an outmodedly essentialist spirit—by examining these filmmakers’ appeals to affect. While each of these filmmakers has individually received scholarly attention to different degrees, Albertina Carri, Lucrecia Martel, and Lucía Puenzo have not been juxtaposed in relation to each other regarding the manifestation of affect, especially as it serves as their shared aesthetic denominator for capturing the social.


  1. Aguilar, Gonzalo. Otros mundos: un ensayo sobre el Nuevo Cine Argentino. Buenos Aires: Santiago Arcos, 2006.Google Scholar
  2. ———. Other Worlds: New Argentine Film. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. ———. Más allá del pueblo: imágenes, indicios y políticas del cine. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2015.Google Scholar
  4. Andermann, Jens. New Argentine Cinema. London: I.B. Tauris, 2012.Google Scholar
  5. André, María Claudia, and Viviana Rangil, eds. El cine argentino de hoy entre el arte y la política. Buenos Aires: Biblos, 2007.Google Scholar
  6. Barthes, Roland. The Neutral. Translated by Rosalind E. Krauss and Denis Hollier. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  7. Beceyro, Raúl, et al. “Estética del cine, nuevos realismos, representación.” Punto de Vista 23, no. 67 (2000): 1–9.Google Scholar
  8. Bernini, Emilio. “Un estado (contemporáneo) del documental.” Kilómetro 111, no. 5 (2004): 41–57.Google Scholar
  9. Bettendorff, Paulina, and Agustina Pérez Rial, eds. Tránsitos de la mirada: mujeres que hacen cine. Buenos Aires: Libraria, 2014.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, Pierre. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
  11. Brennan, Teresa. The Transmission of Affect. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. Bruno, Giuliana. “Pleats of Matter, Folds of the Soul.” In Afterimages of Gilles Deleuze’s Film Philosophy, edited by D. N. Rodowick, 213–233. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  13. Burton-Carvajal, Julianne. “María Luisa Bemberg’s Miss Mary: Fragments of a Life and Career History.” In Redirecting the Gaze: Gender, Theory, and Cinema in the Third World, edited by Diana Robin and Ira Jaffe, 331–352. Albany: SUNY, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. Carri, Albertina. Los rubios: cartografía de una película. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Gráficas Especiales, 2007.Google Scholar
  15. Clough, Patricia. “The New Empiricism: Affect and Sociological Method.” European Journal of Social Theory 12, no. 1 (2009): 43–61.Google Scholar
  16. Clough, Patricia, and Jean Halley, eds. The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  17. Colombetti, Giovanna. The Feeling Body: Affective Science Meets the Enactive Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014.Google Scholar
  18. Deleuze, Gilles. Francis Bacon: The Logic of Sensation. Translated by Daniel W. Smith. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  19. ———. Cinema 1: The Movement-Image. Translated and edited by Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Habberjam. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986.Google Scholar
  20. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. What Is Philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  21. Eisenstein, Sergei. Writings, 1922–1934. Translated by Richard Taylor. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  22. Erll, Astrid. “Literature, Film, and the Mediality of Cultural Memory.” In A Companion to Cultural Memory Studies, edited by Astrid Erll and Ansgar Nünning, 389–398. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2008.Google Scholar
  23. Foster, David William. Contemporary Argentine Cinema. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  24. Garcés, Elizabeth M., and Carolina Rocha, eds. Violence in Argentine Literature and Film (1989–2005). Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  25. Greco, Monica, and Paul Stenner. “Introduction: Emotion and Social Science.” In Emotions: A Social Science Reader, edited by Monica Greco and Paul Stenner, 1–21. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
  26. Gregg, Melissa, and Gregory J. Seigworth, eds. The Affect Theory Reader. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  27. Hall, Stuart. “Encoding/Decoding.” In Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79, edited by Stuart Hall, Dorothy Hobson, Andrew Lowe, and Paul Willis, 128–138. London: Hutchinson, 1980.Google Scholar
  28. Hammond, Paul. (1960): n.p. Last accessed 24 June 2016.
  29. Humm, Maggie. Feminism and Film. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  30. Johnson, Barbara. The Feminist Difference: Literature, Psychoanalysis, Race, and Gender. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  31. Johnston, Claire. “Women’s Cinema as Counter-Cinema.” In Notes on Women’s Cinema, edited by Claire Johnston, 24–31. London: Society for Education in Film and Television, 1973.Google Scholar
  32. Kaplan, Ann. “Women, Film, Resistance: Changing Paradigms.” In Women Filmmakers: Refocusing, edited by Jacqueline Levitin, Judith Plessis, and Valerie Raoul. New York: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar
  33. King, John. “María Luisa Bemberg and Argentine Culture.” In An Argentine Passion: María Luisa Bemberg and Her Films, edited by John King, Sheila Whitaker, and Rosa Bosch, 1–32. London: Verso, 2000.Google Scholar
  34. Lefebvre, Henri. La Somme et le reste. Paris: La Nef de Paris, 1959.Google Scholar
  35. ———. Critique of Everyday Life, Volume II. New York: Verso, 1962.Google Scholar
  36. Lutz, Catherine. “Engendered Emotio: Gender, power, and the rhetoric of emotional control in American discourse.” In Emotions: A Social Science Reader, edited by Monica Greco and Paul Stenner, 63–71. New York: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
  37. Manning, Erin. Relationscapes: Movement, Art, Philosophy. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  38. Marsh, Leslie L. Brazilian Women’s Filmmaking: From Dictatorship to Democracy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2012.Google Scholar
  39. Martin, Deborah. The Cinema of Lucrecia Martel. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  40. ———. “Planeta ciénaga: Lucrecia Martel and Contemporary Argentine Women’s Filmmaking.” In Latin American Women Filmmakers: Production, Politics, Poetics, edited by Deborah Martin and Deborah Shaw, 241–262. London: I. B. Tauris, 2017.Google Scholar
  41. Martin, Deborah, and Deborah Shaw, eds. Latin American Women Filmmakers: Production, Politics, Poetics. London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd., 2017.Google Scholar
  42. Massumi, Brian. Parables for the Virtual Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Durham University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  43. ———. Politics of Affect. Cambridge: Polity, 2015.Google Scholar
  44. Nagib, Lúcia. Brazil on Screen: Cinema Novo, New Cinema and Utopia. London: I.B. Tauris, 2007.Google Scholar
  45. Nair, Parvati, and Julián Daniel Gutiérrez-Albilla, eds. Hispanic and Lusophone Women Filmmakers: Theory, Practice and Difference. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  46. Noë, Alva. Action in Perception. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  47. Oubiña, David. Estudio crítico sobre La ciénaga: entrevista a Lucrecia Martel. Buenos Aires: Picnic Editorial, 2007b.Google Scholar
  48. Page, Joanna. Crisis and Capitalism in Contemporary Argentine Cinema. Durham: Duke University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  49. Paulinelli, María, ed. Poéticas en el cine argentino 1995–2005. Córdoba: Comunicarte Editorial, 2005.Google Scholar
  50. Podalsky, Laura. The Politics of Affect and Emotion in Contemporary Latin American Cinema: Argentina, Brazil, Cuba, and Mexico. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
  51. Protevi, John. Political Affect: Connecting the Social and the Somatic. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  52. Rancière, Jacques. The Politics of Aesthetics. New York: Continuum, 2004.Google Scholar
  53. ———. The Intervals of Cinema. Translated by John Howe. London: Verso, 2014.Google Scholar
  54. Rangil, Viviana. Otro punto de vista: mujer y cine en Argentina. Rosario: Beatriz Viterbo, 2005.Google Scholar
  55. Rashkin, Elissa J. Women Filmmakers in Mexico: The Country of Which We Dream. Austin: University of Texas Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  56. Rich, B. R. “An/Other View of the New Latin American Cinema.” In New Latin American Cinema, Vol. 1: Theory, Practices and Transcontinental Articulations, edited by Michael T. Martin, 273–297. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  57. ———. “Preface: Performing the Impossible in Plain Sight.” In Latin American Women Filmmakers: Production, Politics, Poetics, edited by Deborah Martin and Deborah Shaw, xv–xx. London: I. B. Tauris, 2017.Google Scholar
  58. Roberts-Camps, Traci. Latin American Women Filmmakers: Social and Cultural Perspectives. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 2017.Google Scholar
  59. Rocha, Carolina. “Contemporary Argentine Cinema During Neoliberalism.” In New Trends in Argentine and Brazilian Cinema, edited by Cacilda Rêgo and Carolina Rocha, 17–34. Bristol: Intellect, 2010.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, Greg. “Moving Explosions: Metaphors of Emotion in Sergei Eisenstein’s Writings.” Quarterly Review of Film and Video 21, no. 4 (2004): 303–315.Google Scholar
  61. Sosa, Cecilia. Queering Acts of Mourning in the Aftermath of Argentina’s Dictatorship The Performances of Blood. Woodbridge: Tamesis, 2014.Google Scholar
  62. Soto, Moira. “Palabras Preliminares.” In Tránsitos de la mirada: mujeres que hacen cine, edited by Paulina Bettendorff and Agustina Pérez Rial, 9–13. Buenos Aires: Libraria, 2014.Google Scholar
  63. Stewart, Kathleen. Ordinary Affects. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  64. Tan, Ed. Emotion and the Structure of Narrative Film: Film as an Emotion Machine. New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
  65. Turner, Bryan. The Body & Society. London: Sage, 2008.Google Scholar
  66. White, Patricia. Women’s Cinema, World Cinema: Projecting Contemporary Feminisms. Durham: Duke University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  67. Žižek, Slavoj. Organs without Bodies: On Deleuze and Consequences. New York: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inela Selimović
    • 1
  1. 1.BostonUSA

Personalised recommendations