Skip to main content

Constructing the Narrative Subject

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1751 Accesses

Abstract

The various narrative conceptualizations of the subject critically examined in this chapter are formulated—implicitly or explicitly—in response to the debate concerning the ‘idea of a substantial self, including the sense that there is a creative force within’, which is generally characterized as the question defining the difference between the postmodern and modern view of the subject (Simon 1999: 57). It is therefore instructive to sketch briefly the broader context of philosophical and psychological discussion regarding the category of the subject in which specifically narrative formulations of the subject have emerged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Badiou, A. 1991. On a Finally Objectless Subject. In Who Comes After the subject? ed. E. Cadava, P. Connor, and J.-L. Nancy, 24–33. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. 2005. Liquid Life. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D. 2009. Sounding Postmodernism. Sydney: Australian Music Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. 2001. Foucauldian Influences in Narrative Therapy: An Approach for Schools. Journal of Education Enquiry 2(2): 72–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, C. 2002. Postmodernism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 2008. Interview to Fina Birulés, “Gender is extramoral” In Barcelona Metropolis. Summer, June – September 2008. http://www.egs.edu/faculty/judith-butler/articles/gender-is-extramoral/; viewed 10 March 2015.

  • Colebrook, C. 1997. Foucault and New Historicism in Literary Studies. In Foucault: The Legacy, ed. C. O’Farell, 57–63. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, P. 1990. Why is the Self Empty? American Psychologist 45(5): 599–611.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, G., T. Schirato, and J. Webb. 2000. Understanding Foucault. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. 1991. A Philosophical Concept. In Who Comes After the Subject? ed. E. Cadava, P. Connor, and J.-L. Nancy, 94–95. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. 1991. “Eating Well”, or the Calculation of the Subject. An Interview with Jacques Derrida. In Who Comes After the Subject? ed. E. Cadava, P. Connor, and J.-L. Nancy, 96–119. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A. 2005. Concepts of the Self. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1970. The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences, 386–7. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1984. What is Enlightenment? In The Foucault Reader, ed. P. Rabinov, 32–50. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1991. The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault’s Thought, edited by P. Rabinow. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1998. The History of Sexuality, Vol.1, The Will to Knowledge. Trans. R. Hurley. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 2005. The Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language. Trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Routlege.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. 1979. From the native point of view: On the nature of anthropological understanding. In Interpretive social science, ed. P. Rabinov and W.M. Sullivan, 225–242. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K.J. 1991. The Saturated Self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. 1992. Towards a postmodern psychology. In Psychology and postmodernism, ed. S. Kvale. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilfoyle, M. 2012. Towards a Grounding of the Agentive Subject in Narrative Therapy. Theory & Psychology 5: 626–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutting, G. 2011. “Michel Foucault.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011 Edition), edited by E.N. Zalta. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/foucault/; viewed 3 January 2012.

  • Habermas, T., and S. Bluck. 2000. Getting a Life: The Emergence of the Life Story in Adolescence. Psychological Bulletin 126: 748–769.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H.J.M. 2001b. The Dialogical Self: Towards a Theory of Personal and Cultural Positioning. Culture & Psychology 7(3): 243–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H.J.M. 2001c. Conceptions of Self and Identity: Towards a Dialogical View. International Journal of Education and Religion II 1: 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H.J.M., and A. Hermans-Konopka. 2010. Dialogical Self Theory: Positioning and Counter-Positioning in a Globalizing Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H.J.M., and H. Kempen. 1993. The Dialogical Self: Meaning as Movement. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein, J.A., and J.F. Gubrium. 2000. The Self We Live By: Narrative Identity in a Postmodern World. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. 1991. Philosophy and Awakening. In Who Comes After the subject? ed. E. Cadava, P. Connor, and J.-L. Nancy, 206–217. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R.J. 1993. The Protean Self. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., and J. Barresi. 2006. The Rise and Fall of Soul and Self. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D.P. 1985. Power, Intimacy, and the Life Story: Personological Inquiries into Identity. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D.P. 1993. The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. New York: William Morrow & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D.P. 1996. Personality, Modernity, and the Storied Self: A Contemporary Framework for Studying Persons. Psychological Inquiry 7(4): 295–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D.P. 2006a. The Problem of Narrative Coherence. Journal of Constructivist Psychology 19(2006): 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D.P. 2006c. The Redemptive Self. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D.P., and J.L. Pals. 2006. A New Big Five: Fundamental Principles for an Integrative Science of Personality. American Psychologist 61(3): 204–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, J.-L. 1991. Introduction. In Who Comes After the Subject? ed. E. Cadava, P. Connor, and J.-L. Nancy. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, R.A. 2000. Narrative Disruptions in the Construction of the Self’. In Construction of Disorder: Meaning-making Frameworks for Psychotherapy, ed. R.A. Neimeyer and J.D. Raskin, 207–242. Washingtom, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer, R.A., and J.D. Raskin. 2000. On Practicing Postmodern Therapy in Modern Times. In Constructions of Disorder: Meaning-making Frameworks for Psychotherapy, ed. R.A. Neimeyer and J.D. Raskin, 3–14. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, Donald E. 2004. Chapter 3: Narrative therapy and postmodernism. In The handbook of narrative and psychotherapy: Practice, theory and research, ed. Lynne E. Angus and John McLeod, 53–68. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putman, F.W. 1989. Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Personality Disorder. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raggat, P.T.F. 2006. Multiplicity and Conflict in the Dialogical Self: A Life Narrative Approach. In Identity and Story: Creating Self in Narrative, ed. D.P. McAdams, R. Josselson, and A. Lieblich, 15–37. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. 1998. Inventing our Selves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J. 2005. Power/Knowledge. In The Cambridge Companion to Foucault, ed. G. Gutting. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, E.E. 1985. The Decentralisation of Identity. American Psychologist 40(11): 1203–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. 1999. Good news from Ghent: the suppression of the self in modern literary theory. The Critical Review 37: 29–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B., and A. Sparkes. 2006. Narrative Inquiry in Psychology: Exploring the Tensions Within. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, F. 2005. The Narrative Self. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 35: 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M. 2007. Maps of Narrative Practice. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., and D. Epston. 1990. Narrative Means to Therapeutic Ends. New York/London: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D. 1990. The Quantum Self. New York: Quill/William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vassilieva, J. (2016). Constructing the Narrative Subject. In: Narrative Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49195-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics