The IS–LMization of the General Theory and the Construction of Hydraulic Governability in Postwar Keynesian Macroeconomics

  • Hanno Pahl
  • Jan Sparsam
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives from Social Economics book series (PSE)

Abstract

The text contributes to the largely uncharted terrain of performativity and macroeconomics. What are the gains and limitations of the performativity perspective when the field of interest is not a single market or trading technique, but a vast, complex and occasionally diffuse field, consisting of various macroeconomic forces as well as competing political players? First, we analyze how the complex and multilayered narratives of Keynes’s General Theory were transformed into the epochal IS–LM model and how this mathematically formalized and visually appealing tool served as an organizing cognitive landscape for the emerging field of (Keynesian) macroeconomics. In an ensuing case study, we reconstruct key aspects of the diffusion of this ‘IS-LMised’ version of Keynes’s General Theory into policy circles in West Germany in the 1960s.

References

  1. Akerlof, George A., and Robert J. Shiller. 2009. Animal Spirits. How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Backhouse, Roger E. 1997. The Rhetoric and Methodology of Modern Macroeconomics. In Reflections on the Development of Modern Macroeconomics, edited by Brian Snowdon and Howard R. Vane, 31–54. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  3. Backhouse, Roger, and Mauro Boianovsky. 2013. Transforming Modern Macroeconomics. Exploring Disequilibrium Microfoundations, 1956–2003. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boldyrev, Ivan 2013. Ökonomische Maschinen: Zur Performativität der Gleichgewichtstheorie. In Wirtschaftswissenschaft als Oikodizee? Diskussionen im Anschluss an Joseph Vogls Das Gespenst des Kapitals, edited by Hanno Pahl and Jan Sparsam, 77–90. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  5. Booth, Alan. 1983. The ‘Keynesian Revolution’ in Economic Policy-Making. The Economic History Review, New Series 36(1): 103–123.Google Scholar
  6. Bordo, Michael D., and Anna J. Schwartz. 2003. IS-LM and Monetarism (NBER Working Paper Series, 9713). http://www.nber.org/papers/w9713.pdf.
  7. Bos, Frits. 2007. Use, Misuse and Proper Use of National Accounts Statistics. National Accounts Occasional Paper, NA-096.Google Scholar
  8. Boumans, Marcel. 2005. How Economists Model the World into Numbers. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Braun, Benjamin. 2014. Why Models Matter: The Making and Unmaking of Governability in Macroeconomic Discourse. Journal of Critical Globalisation Studies 7: 48–79.Google Scholar
  10. Çalışkan, Koray, and Michel Callon. 2009. Economization, Part 1: Shifting Attention from the Economy Towards Processes of Economization. Economy and Society 38(3): 369–398.Google Scholar
  11. Callon, Michel. 1998. The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics. In The Laws of the Markets, edited by Michel Callon, 1–58. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Callon, Michel. 2007. What Does It Mean to Say that Economics is Performative? In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 311–357. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Clower, Robert W. 1965. The Keynesian Counter-Revolution: A Theoretical Appraisal. In The Theory of Interest Rates. Proceedings of a Conference Held by the International Economic Association, edited by Frank H. Hahn and Frank Brechling, 103–125. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Clower, Robert W., and Axel Leijonhufvud. 1975. The Coordination of Economic Activities: A Keynesian Perspective. American Economic Review 65(2): 182–188.Google Scholar
  15. Coddington, Alan. 1976. Keynesian Economics. The Search for First Principles. Journal of Economic Literature 14: 1258–1273.Google Scholar
  16. Colander, David C., Richard P.F. Holt, and John B. Rosser. 2004. The Changing Face of Economics. Conversations with Cutting Edge Economists. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  17. De Grauwe, Paul. 2010. Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Macroeconomics. CESifo Economic Studies 56(4): 465–497.Google Scholar
  18. De Vroey, Michel, and Pierre Malgrange. 2011. The History of Macroeconomics from Keynes’s General Theory to the Present. Institut de Recherches Economiqueset Sociales de l’Universitecatholique de Louvain Discussion Paper, 2011-28. Accessed November 2, 2015. http://sites.uclouvain.be/econ/DP/IRES/2011028.pdf.
  19. DeLong, J. Bradford. 1997. America’s Peacetime Inflation: The 1970s. In Reducing Inflation. Motivation and Strategy, edited by Christina Romer and David Romer, 247–280. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Dillard, Dudley. 1985. The Influence of Keynesian Thought on German Economic Policy. In The Policy Consequences of John Maynard Keynes, edited by Harold L. Wattel, 116–127. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  21. Düppe, Till. 2012. Arrow and Debreu De-Homogenized. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 34(4): 491–514.Google Scholar
  22. Eicker-Wolf, Kai. 2003. Vom Hydraulischen Keynesianismus Zur Radikalen Politischen Ökonomie (RPÖ). Keynesianische Wirtschaftspolitische Konzeptionen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Nach dem Scheitern der Globalsteuerung. Metropolis: Marburg.Google Scholar
  23. Feiwel, George R. 1987. Oral History II: An Interview with Gerard Debreu. In Arrow and the Ascent of Modern Economic Theory, edited by George R. Feiwel, 243–257. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fine, Ben. 2005. From Actor-Network Theory to Political Economy. Capitalism Nature Socialism 16(4): 91–108.Google Scholar
  25. Fleming, Marcus J. 1962. Domestic Financial Policies Under Fixed and Under Floating Exchange Rates. IMF Staff Papers, 9.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  27. Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and Societies. Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gordon, Robert J. 1990. What is New-Keynesian Economics? Journal of Economic Literature 28(3): 1115–1171.Google Scholar
  30. Hagemann, Harald. 2009. Zur frühen Rezeption der General Theory durch deutschsprachige Wirtschaftswissenschaftler. In Aus gesamtwirtschaftlicher Sicht. Festschrift für Jürgen Kromphardt, edited by Harald Hagemann, Gustav Horn, and Hans-Jürgen Krupp, 71–104. Marburg: Metropolis.Google Scholar
  31. Hall, Peter A. 1989. The Political Power of Economic Ideas, Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Heilemann, Ullrich. 1981. Zur Prognoseleistung ökonometrischer Konjunkturmodelle für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  33. Heise, Arne. 2007. Karl Schillers ‘verspäteter Keynesianismus’. Zur politischen Ökonomie des Stabilitäts- und Wachstumsgesetzes von 1967. Berliner Debatte Initial 18(6): 92–105.Google Scholar
  34. Henriksen, Lasse F. 2013. Economic Models as Devices of Policy Change: Policy Paradigms, Paradigm Shift, and Performativity. Regulation & Governance 7(4): 481–495.Google Scholar
  35. Hetzel, Robert L. 2013. The Monetarist-Keynesian Debate and the Phillips Curve: Lessons from the Great Inflation. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly 99(2): 83–116.Google Scholar
  36. Hicks, John R. 1937. Mr. Keynes and the Classics: A Suggested Interpretation. Econometrica 5(2): 147–159.Google Scholar
  37. Hicks, John R. 1980. ‘IS-LM’: An Explanation. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 3(2): 139–154.Google Scholar
  38. Hoover, Kevin D. 1988. The New Classical Macroeconomics. A Sceptical Inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  39. Howitt, Peter. 2002. A Dictionary Article on Axel Leijonhufvud’s On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes: A Study in Monetary Theory. (Draft of an article to be translated into French and published in the Dictionnaire des grandesœuvreséconomiques, edited by Xavier Greffe, Jérôme Lallement, and Michel deVroey, to be published by Éditions Dalloz). http://www.econ.brown.edu/fac/Peter_Howitt/publication/Dalloz.pdf
  40. Humphrey, Thomas M. 1985. The Evolution and Policy Implications of Phillips Curve Analysis. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Review. Accessed November1, 2015. https://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/economic_review/1985/pdf/er71020.pdf
  41. Kaboub, Fadhel. 2010. IS-LM Model. In 21st Century Economics. A Reference Handbook, edited by Rhona C. Free, 341–347. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Keynes, John M. 1920. The Economic Consequences of the Peace. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Howe.Google Scholar
  43. Keynes, John M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Klein, Lawrence R. 1966. The Keynesian Revolution. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Klein, Lawrence R., and Arthur Goldberger. 1955. An Econometric Model of the United States, 1929–1952. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  46. Kriesler, Peter, and John Nevile. 2002. IS-LM and Macroeconomics after Keynes. In Money, Macroeconomics and Keynes. Essays in Honour of Victoria Chick, Volume 1, edited by Philip Arestis, Meghnad Desai, and Sheila Dow, 103–114. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Laidler, David E. 1999. Fabricating the Keynesian Revolution, Studies of the Inter-war Literature on Money, the Cycle, and Unemployment. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Latour, Bruno. 1986. Visualization and Cognition: Thinking with Eyes and Hands. Knowledge and Society: Studies in the Sociology of Culture Past and Present 6: 1–40.Google Scholar
  49. Leijonhufvud, Axel. 1968. On Keynesian Economics and the Economics of Keynes. A Study in Monetary Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Lucas, Robert E., and Thomas J. Sargent. 1997. After Keynesian macroeconomics. In A Macroeconomics Reader, edited by Brian Snowdon and Howard R. Vane, 270–294. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. MacKenzie, Donald. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  52. MacKenzie, D. 2007. Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, 54–86. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Mäki, Uskali. 2013. Performativity: Saving Austin from MacKenzie. In Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science, The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings, edited by Vassilios Karakostas and Dennis Dieks, 443–453. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Mariano, Roberto S. 2008. Klein, Lawrence R. (born 1920). In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume, 2nd ed. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  55. Mehrling, Perry. 1998. The Money Muddle: The Transformation of American Monetary Thought, 1920–1970. History of Political Economy 30(Suppl.): 293–396.Google Scholar
  56. Mehrling, Perry. 2006. The Evolution of Macroeconomics: The Origins of Post Walrasian Macroeconomics. In Beyond Microfoundation: Post Walrasian Macroeconomics, edited by David C. Colander, 71–86. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Michaelis, Jochen. 2013. Und Dann Werfen Wir den Computer An—Anmerkungen Zur Methodik der DSGE-Modelle. MAGKS Joint Discussion Paper Series in Economics, 23-2013. Accessed November 1, 2015. http://www.uni-marburg.de/fb02/makro/forschung/magkspapers/23-2013_michaelis.pdf
  58. Miller, Daniel. 2002. Turning Callon the Right Way Up. Economy and Society 31(2): 218–233.Google Scholar
  59. Minsky, Hyman P. 1975. John Maynard Keynes. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Mirowski, Philip, and Edward Nik-Khah. 2008. Command Performance: Exploring What STS Thinks It Takes to Build a Market. In Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies, edited by Trevor Pinch and Richard Swedberg, 89–128. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  61. Mirowski, Philip. 2013. “Facebook Teaches You How To Be a Neoliberal Agent.” An interview with Philip Mirowski (by Tomas Undurraga). https://estudiosdelaeconomia.wordpress.com/2013/07/22/facebook-teaches-you-how-to-be-a-neoliberal-agent-an-interview-with-philip-mirowski/.
  62. Modigliani, Franco. 1944. Liquidity Preference and the Theory of Interest and Money. Econometrica 12(1): 45–88.Google Scholar
  63. Morgan, Mary S., and Malcolm Rutherford. 1998. From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Mundell, Robert A. 1963. Capital Mobility and Stabilization Policy under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 29(4): 475–485.Google Scholar
  65. Nik-Khah, Edward. 2006. What the FCC Auctions Can Tell Us About the Performativity Thesis. Economic Sociology European Electronic Newsletter 7(2): 15–21.Google Scholar
  66. Nützenadel, Alexander. 2005. Stunde der Ökonomen. Wissenschaft, Politik und Expertenkultur in der Bundesrepublik 1949–1974. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  67. Pernecky, Mark. 1992. The Keynesian Revolution from a Philosophy of Science Perspective: Revolutionary or Evolutionary? Methodus June: 126–134.Google Scholar
  68. Phillips, Alban William Housego. 1958. The Relationship between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wages in the United Kingdom 1861–1957. Economica 25(100): 283–299.Google Scholar
  69. Richter, Rudolf. 1998. Zur Entwicklung der Makroökonomik in den vergangenen 50 Jahren (1947 – 1997). RWI-Mitteilungen. 49 (1/2): 1–37.Google Scholar
  70. Richter, Rudolf. 1999. Deutsche Geldpolitik 1948–1998. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  71. Robinson, Joan. 1975. What has Become of the Keynesian Revolution? In Essays on John Maynard Keynes, edited by Milo Keynes, 123–131. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. 1967. Sondergutachten März 1967: Zur Konjunkturlage im Frühjahr 1967. http://econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/75392/1/749940727.pdf
  73. Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. 1968. Sondergutachten vom Juli 1968. dem Herrn Bundeskanzler am 3. Juli 1968 mündlich vorgetragen. http://www.sachverstaendigenrat-wirtschaft.de/fileadmin/dateiablage/download/sondergutachten/sg7-1968.pdf
  74. Samuelson, Paul A., and Robert M. Solow. 1960. Analytical Aspects of Anti-Inflation Policy. The American Economic Review 50(2): 177–194.Google Scholar
  75. Santos, Ana C., and João Rodrigues. 2009. Economics as Social Engineering? Questioning the Performativity Thesis. Cambridge Journal of Economics 33(5): 985–1000.Google Scholar
  76. Schneider, Erich. 1959. Fortschritte der ökonomischen Theorie in unserer Zeit. Ekonomisk Tidskrift 61 (4): 201–212.Google Scholar
  77. Sievert, Olaf. 2003. Vom Keynesianismus zur Angebotspolitik. In Vierzig Jahre Sachverständigenrat 1963–2003, edited by Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, 34–46. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Google Scholar
  78. Slater, Don. 2002. From Calculation to Alienation: Disentangling Economic Abstractions. Economy and Society 31(2): 234–249.Google Scholar
  79. Snowdon, Brian, and Howard R. Vane. 2005. Modern Macroeconomics. Its Origins, Development and Current State. Cheltenham, UK; Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  80. Solow, Robert M. 1965. Economic Growth and Residential Housing. In. Readings in Financial Institutions, edited by Marshall E. Ketchum und Leon T. Kendall, 142–164. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  81. Solow, Robert M. 1984. Mr. Hicks and the Classics. Oxford Economic Papers 36(2): 13–25.Google Scholar
  82. Speich, Daniel. 2011. The Use of Global Abstractions: National Income Accounting in the Period of Imperial Decline. Journal of Global History 6(1): 7–28.Google Scholar
  83. Takami, Norikazu. 2014. Models and Mathematics: How Pigou Came to Adopt the IS-LM-Model Reasoning. Journal of the History of Economic Thought 36(2): 169–186.Google Scholar
  84. Tesfatsion, Leigh. 2006. Agent-Based Computational Modeling and Macroeconomics. In Post Walrasian Macroeconomics. Beyond the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium Model, edited by David C. Colander, 175–202. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Tily, Geoff. 2010. Keynes Betrayed. The General Theory, the Rate of Interest and ‘Keynesian Economics’. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  86. Tomlinson, Jim. 1981. Why Was There Never a ‘Keynesian Revolution’ in Economic Policy? Economy and Society 10(1): 72–87.Google Scholar
  87. Turgeon, Lynn. 1996. Bastard Keynesianism. The Evolution of Economic Thinking and Policymaking Since World War II. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  88. Vercelli, Alessandro. 1999. The Evolution of IS-LM Models: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Presuppositions. Working Paper UniversitàdegliStudi di Siena, 246. http://www.econ-pol.unisi.it/quaderni/246.pdf
  89. Vroey, Michel de, and Hoover, Kevin D. 2004. Introduction: Seven Decades of the IS-LM Model. History of Political Economy 36 (Annual Supplement): 1–11.Google Scholar
  90. Vroey, Michel de, and Pierre Malgrange. 2010. From the Keynesian Revolution to the Klein-Goldberger Model: Klein and the Dynamization of Keynesian Theory (Institut de Recherches Économiques et Sociales de l’Université catholique de Louvain Discussion Paper, 2010-19). http://sites.uclouvain.be/econ/DP/IRES/2010019.pdf.
  91. Walker, Donald A. (ed.). 2006. William Jaffe’s Essays on Walras. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Wansleben, Leon. 2013. Cultures of Expertise in Global Currency Markets. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  93. Wattel, Harold L. 1985. The Policy Consequences of John Maynard Keynes. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  94. Woolgar, Steve. 1993. Science. The Very Idea. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  95. Yonay, Yuval P. 1998. The Struggle Over the Soul of Economics. Institutionalist and Neoclassical Economists in America between the Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Young, Warren. 1987. Interpreting Mr Keynes: The IS-LM Enigma. Oxford: Polity-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanno Pahl
    • 1
  • Jan Sparsam
    • 1
  1. 1.Sociology DepartmentUniversity of MunichMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations