Performativity Matters: Economic Description as a Moral Problem

  • Philip Roscoe
Part of the Perspectives from Social Economics book series (PSE)


If performativity theory simply repeats that economists design markets, much of its radicalism is lost. Instead, researchers must consider the mechanisms by which economisation transforms social arrangements. This chapter develops the argument that economic description constitutes aspects of the social as economic. Following Austin and Butler, I argue that such description has a performative force, and is therefore politically and ethically charged. I suggest that an understanding of economic description as performative explain show economics can at once constitute and claim authority over an object. The chapter explores how economic description transforms social relations. It connects performativity theory to existing critiques of economic relations, and suggests that performativity research can develop ethically rich narratives without losing theoretical or empirical rigour. Finally, it urges performativity research to rediscover its radicalism in its ability to unseat the ‘meta physical presumptions’ of economics.


  1. Austin, John. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, Gary S. 1973. A Theory of Marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy 81(4): 813–846.Google Scholar
  3. Binmore, Ken, and Paul Klemperer. 2002. The Biggest Auction Ever: The Sale of the British 3G Telecom Licences. The Economic Journal 112(478): C74–C96.Google Scholar
  4. Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Starr. 1999. Sorting Things Out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, Judith. 2010. Performative Agency. Journal of Cultural Economy 3(2): 147–161.Google Scholar
  7. Çalışkan, Koray, and Michel Callon. 2009. Economization, Part 1: Shifting Attention from the Economy Towards Processes of Economization. Economy and Society 38(3): 369–398.Google Scholar
  8. Callon, Michel. 1998. The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics. In The Laws of the Markets, edited by Michel Callon, 1–58. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Callon, Michel. 2007. An Essay on the Growing Contribution of Economic Markets to the Proliferation of the Social. Theory, Culture & Society 24(7–8): 139–163.Google Scholar
  10. Callon, Michel. 2010. Performativity, Misfires and Politics. Journal of Cultural Economy 3(2): 163–169.Google Scholar
  11. Cochoy, Franck. 2015. Myriam’s ‘Adverteasing’: On the Performative Power of Marketing Promises. Journal of Marketing Management 31(1–2): 123–140.Google Scholar
  12. Cochoy, Franck, Martin Giraudeau, and Liz McFall. 2010. Performativity, Economics and Politics. Journal of Cultural Economy 3(2): 139–146.Google Scholar
  13. Dussauge, Isabelle, Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, Francis Lee, and Steve Woolgar. 2015. On the Omnipresence, Diversity, and Elusiveness of Values in the Life Sciences and Medicine. In Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine, edited by Isabelle Dussauge, Claes-Frederik Helgesson, and Francis Lee, 1–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Esposito, Elena. 2012. The Structures of Uncertainty: Performativity and Unpredictability in Economic Operations. Economy and Society 42(1): 102–129.Google Scholar
  15. Fourcade, Marion. 2011. Cents and Sensibility: Economic Valuation and the Nature of ‘Nature’. American Journal of Sociology 116(6): 1721–1777.Google Scholar
  16. Frankel, Christian, Jose Ossandon, and Trine Pallesen. 2015. Markets for Collective Concerns. Paper presented at the EGOS Colloquium, Athens, Greece, July 2–4.Google Scholar
  17. Gottlieb, Lori. 2006. How Do I Love Thee? The Atlantic Monthly. Accessed November 1, 2015.
  18. Hitsch, Günter J., Ali Hortaçsu, and Dan Ariely. 2010. Matching and Sorting in Online Dating. The American Economic Review 100(1): 130–163.Google Scholar
  19. Holm, Petter, and Kåre Nolde Nielsen. 2007. Framing Fish, Making Markets: The Construction of Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs). In Market Devices, edited by Michel Callon, Yuval Millo, and Fabian Muniesa, 173–195. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Hühn, Matthias. 2014. You Reap What You Sow: How MBA Programs Undermine Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 121(4): 527–541.Google Scholar
  21. Jeacle, Ingrid. 2003. Accounting and the Construction of the Standard Body. Accounting, Organizations and Society 28(4): 357–377.Google Scholar
  22. Karl, Alissa G. 2013. ‘Bank Talk’: Performativity and Financial Markets. Journal of Cultural Economy 6(1): 63–77.Google Scholar
  23. Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Latour, Bruno. 2007. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (New Edition), Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Latour, Bruno. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Latour, Bruno, and Couze Venn. 2002. Morality and Technology: The End of the Means. Theory, Culture & Society 19(5–6): 247–260.Google Scholar
  27. Law, John, and John Urry. 2004. Enacting the Social. Economy and Society 33(3): 390–410.Google Scholar
  28. MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  29. MacKenzie, Donald. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. MacKenzie, Donald 2007. Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 54–86. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mäki, Uskali. 2013. Performativity: Saving Austin from MacKenzie. In Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science, The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings, edited by Vassilios Karakostas and Dennis Dieks, 443–453. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Mendelsohn, Robert, Thomas Sterner, U. Martin Persson, and John P. Weyant. 2008. Comments on Simon Dietz and Nicholas Stern’s Why Economic Analysis Supports Strong Action on Climate Change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2(2): 309–313.Google Scholar
  33. Mirowski, Philip, and Edward Nik-Khah. 2007. Markets Made Flesh: Performativity, and a Problem in Science Studies, Augmented with Consideration of the FCC Auctions. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 190–224. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Muniesa, Fabian. 2014. The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Polanyi, Karl. [1944] 2001. The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pollock, Neil, and Luciana D’Adderio. 2012. Give Me a Two-by-Two Matrix and I will Create the Market: Rankings, Graphic Visualisations and Sociomateriality. Accounting, Organizations and Society 37(8): 565–586.Google Scholar
  37. Roscoe, Philip. 2013. On the Possibility of Organ Markets and the Performativity of Economics. Journal of Cultural Economy 6(4): 386–401.Google Scholar
  38. Roscoe, Philip. 2014. I Spend Therefore I Am. London: Penguin Viking.Google Scholar
  39. Roscoe, Philip. 2015. A Moral Economy of Transplantation: Competing Regimes of Value in the Allocation of Transplant Organs. In Value Practices in the Life Sciences and Medicine, edited by Isabelle Dussauge, Claes-Fredrik Helgesson, and Francis Lee. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Roscoe, Philip, and Shiona Chillas. 2014. The State of Affairs: Critical Performativity and the Online Dating Industry. Organization 21(6): 797–820.Google Scholar
  41. Roth, Alvin E., Tayfun Sönmez, and M. Utku Ünver. 2005. A Kidney Exchange Clearing House in New England. American Economic Review 95(2): 376–380.Google Scholar
  42. Sandel, Michael. 2012. What Money Can’t Buy. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  43. Schinkel, Willem. 2007. Sociological Discourse of the Relational: The Cases of Bourdieu & Latour. The Sociological Review 55(4): 707–729.Google Scholar
  44. Spanier, Graham B. 1976. Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family 38(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
  45. Stern, Nicholas. 2007. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Svetlova, Ekaterina. 2012. On the Performative Power of Financial Models. Economy and Society 41(3): 418–434.Google Scholar
  47. Tong, Alison, Kirsten Howard, Stephen Jan, Alan Cass, John M. Rose, Steven Chadban, Richard D. Allen, and Jonathan C. Craig. 2010. Community Preferences for the Allocation of Solid Organs for Transplantation: A Systematic Review. Transplantation 89(7): 796–805.Google Scholar
  48. Townley, Barbara. 2008. Reason’s Neglect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Turner, Adair. 2012. Economics After the Crisis: Objectives and Means. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  50. Ubel, Peter, and George Loewenstein. 1996. Distributing Scarce Livers: The Moral Reasoning of the General Public. Social Science and Medicine 42(7): 1049–1055.Google Scholar
  51. Walsh, Adrian. 2001. Are Market Norms and Intrinsic Valuation Mutually Exclusive? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79(4): 525–543.Google Scholar
  52. Webb, Amy. 2013. Hacking the Hyperlinked Heart. The Wall Street Journal, January 14.

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Roscoe
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversity of St AndrewsScotlandUK

Personalised recommendations