Performative Mechanisms

  • Carsten Herrmann-Pillath
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives from Social Economics book series (PSE)

Abstract

Performativity is grounded in a particular kind of social mechanisms that involve semiotic causation. I combine three different literatures: on performativity, on constitutive explanations in the social sciences, and on Peircian semiotics into a conceptual and methodological framework that can deal with the ubiquitous phenomena of contextualization and framing in experimental and behavioural economics. In the semiotic model, incentivesal ways operate via two channels of causation, the efficient-causal one and the semiotic one, with the latter operating via the cognitive system. For example, in social preferences, incentives efficient-causally impact on neuronal mechanisms that generate actions and on the cognitive processing of in-group/out-group boundaries. I present the example of corporate governance and managerial incentive systems as a case in point, arguing that these are performative mechanisms, as reflected in observations of historical and cultural embeddedness. This results in the impossibility of formulating universal regularities along the lines of the ‘legal origin’ literature.

References

  1. Amir, On, Daniel Ariely, and Ziv Carmon. 2008. The Dissociation between Monetary Assessment and Predicted Utility. Marketing Science 27(6): 1055–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aoki, Masahiko. 1988. Information, Incentives, and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aoki, Masahiko. 2010. Corporations in Evolving Diversity: Cognition, Governance, and Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aunger, Robert. 2002. The Electric Meme: A New Theory of How We Think. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bebchuk, Lucian, and Jesse Fried. 2004. Pay Without Performance: The Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Beugelsdijk, Sjoerd, and Robbert Maseland. 2010. Culture in Economics: History, Methodological Reflections, and Contemporary Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bhaskar, Roy. 1989. The Possibility of Naturalism. A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  8. Bowles, Samuel, and Sandra Polanía-Reyes. 2012. Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements? Journal of Economic Literature 50(2): 368–425.Google Scholar
  9. Bowles, Samuel, Jung-Kyoo Choi, and Astrid Hopfensitz. 2003. The Co-evolution of Individual Behaviors and Social Institutions. Journal of Theoretical Biology 223: 135–147.Google Scholar
  10. Callon, Michel. 2007. An Essay on the Growing Contribution of Economic Markets to the Proliferation of the Social. Theory, Culture & Society 24(7–8): 139–163.Google Scholar
  11. Callon, Michel, Yuval Millo, and Fabian Muniesa (eds.). 2007. Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Camerer, Colin. 2003. Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Camerer, Colin, George Loewenstein, and Drazen Prelec. 2005. Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 43(1): 9–64.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, Xiao-Ping, S. Arzu Wasti, and Harry C. Triandis. 2007. When Does Group Norm or Group Identity Predict Cooperation in a Public Goods Dilemma? The Moderating Effects of Idiocentrism and Allocentrism. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 31(2): 259–276.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, Andy. 2011. Supersizing the Mind. Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Craver, Carl F. 2007. Explaining the Brain. Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of the Neurosciences. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Deci, Edward L., Richard Koestner, and Richard M. Ryan. 1999. A Meta-analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. Psychological Bulletin 125(6): 627–668.Google Scholar
  18. Demeulenaere, Pierre (ed.). 2011. Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Djankov, Simeon, Edward Glaeser, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer. 2003. The New Comparative Economics. Journal of Comparative Economics 31(4): 595–619.Google Scholar
  20. El-Hani, Charbel Niño, Joao Queiroz, and Claus Emmeche. 2006. A Semiotic Analysis of the Genetic Information System. Semiotica 160(1–4): 1–68.Google Scholar
  21. Elster, Jon. 1989. Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Erlei, Mathias, and Wiebke Roß. 2014. Bounded Rationality as an Essential Component of the Holdup Problem. Working Paper, Clausthal University.Google Scholar
  23. Falk, Armin, and Michael Kosfeld. 2006. The Hidden Costs of Control. American Economic Review 96(5): 1611–1630.Google Scholar
  24. Fehr, Ernst, Michael Powell, and Tom Wilkening. 2014. Handing Out Guns at a Knife Fight: Behavioral Limitations of Subgame-Perfect Implementation. Working Paper 171, University of Zurich.Google Scholar
  25. Frey, Bruno S. 1997. Not Just for the Money. An Economic Theory of Personal Motivation. Brookfield: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  26. Ghoshal, Sumantra. 2005. Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1): 75–91.Google Scholar
  27. Guala, Francesco. 2007. How to Do Things with Experimental Economics. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 128–162. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Harrison, Glenn W. 2008. Neuroeconomics: A Critical Reconsideration. Economics & Philosophy 24(3): 303–344.Google Scholar
  29. Hart, Oliver. 2009. Hold-Up, Asset Ownership, and Reference Points. Quarterly Journal of Economics 124(1): 267–300.Google Scholar
  30. Hausman, Daniel. 1992. The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hausman, Daniel. 2013. Philosophy of Economics. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2013 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. Accessed November 1, 2015. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2013/entries/economics/
  32. Hedström, Peter, and Petri Ylikoski. 2010. Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 36: 49–67.Google Scholar
  33. Henrich, Joseph, Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Ernst Fehr, Herbert Gintis, Richard McElreath, Michael Alvard, et al. 2005. ‘Economic Man’ in Cross-cultural Perspective: Behavioural Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(6): 795–855.Google Scholar
  34. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten. 2010. A Neurolinguistic Approach to Performativity in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 17(3): 241–260.Google Scholar
  35. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten. 2012a. Institutions, Distributed Cognition and Agency: Rule-Following as Performative Action. Journal of Economic Methodology 19(1): 21–42.Google Scholar
  36. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten. 2012b. Towards an Externalist Neuroeconomics: Dual Selves, Signs, and Choice. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology and Economics 5(1): 38–61.Google Scholar
  37. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten. 2013. Performativity of Economic Systems: Approach and Implications for Taxonomy. Journal of Economic Methodology 20(2): 139–163.Google Scholar
  38. James Jr., Harvey S. 2005. Why Did You Do That? An Economic Explanation of the Effect of Extrinsic Compensation on Intrinsic Motivation and Performance. Journal of Economic Psychology 26(4): 549–566.Google Scholar
  39. Joutsenvirta, Maria. 2013. Executive Pay and Legitimacy: Changing Discursive Battles Over the Morality of Excessive Manager Compensation. Journal of Business Ethics 116(3): 459–477.Google Scholar
  40. Kirman, Alan, and Miriam Teschl. 2010. Selfish or Selfless? The Role of Empathy in Economics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 365: 303–317.Google Scholar
  41. Kranton, Rachel E. 1996. Reciprocal Exchange: A Self-Sustaining System. American Economic Review 86(4): 830–851.Google Scholar
  42. Krippner, G. 2005. The Financialization of the American Economy. Socio-Economic Review 3(2): 173–208.Google Scholar
  43. La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silvanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny. 1997. Legal Determinants of External Finance. Journal of Finance 52(3): 1131–1150.Google Scholar
  44. La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny. 1998. Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy 106(6): 1113–1155.Google Scholar
  45. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford et al.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Little, Daniel. 1992. Understanding Peasant China. Case Studies in the Philosophy of Social Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Lycan, William G. 1999. Philosophy of Language. An Introductory Text. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. MacKenzie, Donald. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. MacKenzie, Donald. 2007. Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 54–86. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Maskin, Eric. 2002. On Indescribable Contingencies and Incomplete Contracts. European Economic Review 46(4–5): 725–733.Google Scholar
  51. Maskin, Eric, and Jean Tirole. 1999. Unforeseen Contingencies and Incomplete Contracts. Review of Economic Studies 66(1): 83–114.Google Scholar
  52. Merton, Robert K. 1948. The Self Fulfilling Prophecy. Antioch Review 8(2): 193–210.Google Scholar
  53. Milgrom, Paul, and John Roberts. 1990. The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy, and Organization. American Economic Review 80(3): 511–528.Google Scholar
  54. Muniesa, Fabian, and Michel Callon. 2007. Economic Experiments and the Construction of Markets. In Do Economists Make Markets?: On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 163–189. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Papineau, David. 2009. The Causal Closure of the Physical and Naturalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind, edited by Ansgar Beckermann, Brian P. McLaughlin, and Sven Walter, 53–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Pinch, Trevor, and Richard Swedberg (eds.). 2008. Living in a Material World, Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. Reutlinger, Alexander, Gerhard Schurz, and Andreas Hüttemann. 2015. “Ceteris Paribus Laws”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/ceteris-paribus/
  58. Roberts, John. 2004. The Modern Firm. Organizational Design for Performance and Growth. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Salthe, Stanley N. 2009. The System of Interpretance: Naturalizing Meaning as Finality. Biosemiotics 1(3): 285–294.Google Scholar
  60. Schmid, Michael. 2011. The Logic of Mechanistic Explanations in the Social Sciences. In Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms, edited by Pierre Demeulenaere, 136–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Searle, John R. 1995. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  62. Searle, J.R. 2010. Making the Social World. The Structure of Human Civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Short, Thomas L. 2007. Peirce’s Theory of Signs. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Siems, Mathias M., and Simon Deakin. 2010. Comparative Law and Finance: Past, Present, and Future Research. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 166(1): 120–140.Google Scholar
  65. Singer, Tania and Claus Lamm. 2009. The Social Neuroscience of Empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1156: 81–96.Google Scholar
  66. Sliwka, Dirk. 2007. Trust as a Signal of a Social Norm and the Hidden Costs of Incentive Schemes. American Economic Review 97(3): 999–1012.Google Scholar
  67. Triandis, Harry C. 1995. Individualism & Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  68. Tuomela, Raimo. 2007. The Philosophy of Sociality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vohs, Kathleen D., Nicole L. Mead, and Miranda R. Goode. 2006. The Psychological Consequences of Money. Science 314(5802): 1154–1156.Google Scholar
  70. Vromen, Jack. 2011. Routines as Multilevel Mechanisms. Journal of Institutional Economics 7(2): 175–196.Google Scholar
  71. Yamagishi, Toshio. 2012. Micro–Macro Dynamics of the Cultural Construction of Reality. A Niche Construction Approach to Culture. In Advances in Culture and Psychology: Volume 1, edited by Michele J. Gelfand, Chi-yue Chiu and Ying-yi Hong, 251–308. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Yang, Qing, Xiaochang Wu, Xinyue Zhou, Nicole L. Mead, Kathleen D. Vohs, and Roy F. Baumeister. 2012. Diverging Effects of Clean Versus Dirty Money on Attitudes, Values, and Interpersonal Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 104(3): 473–489.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carsten Herrmann-Pillath
    • 1
  1. 1.Witten/Herdecke UniversityWittenGermany

Personalised recommendations