After the Turn: How the Performativity of Economics Matters

  • Ivan Boldyrev
  • Ekaterina Svetlova
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives from Social Economics book series (PSE)

Abstract

We bet notable macroeconomists, Alan Blinder and Charles Wyplosz, never heard of the ‘performativity of economics’ when they stated that ‘the main purpose of central bank talk is to help markets “think like the central bank”’ (2004, 7). It is, however, striking, that so many different aspects of what is commonly called ‘performativity’ are entangled in discussing central bank communication—a theme which is currently at the heart of macroeconomic debates. All our intuitive notions—to be explained below—are here: the context of economic governance, the inherent sociality of language, the role of explicitness, the importance of signification, and the enactment of ideas and theories. For successful performance of a central bank, successful communication is crucial. To govern, one has to use the resources of language, to create a community of those who comprehend one’s message, to make explicit one’s commitments, and, finally, in and through communication, to enact the very economic theory stating that central bank communication is essential for channeling economic agents’ expectations and eventually for the proper functioning of this institution.

References

  1. Araujo, Luis, John Finch, and Hans Kjellberg (eds.). 2010. Reconnecting Marketing to Markets: Practice-Based Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aspers, Patrik. 2015. Performing Ontology. Social Studies of Science 45(3): 449–453.Google Scholar
  3. Austin, John. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Banerjee, Abhijit and Esther Duflo. 2011. Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  5. Barad, Karen. 2003. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3): 801–831.Google Scholar
  6. Barnes, Barry. 1983. Social Life as Bootstrapped Induction. Sociology 17(4): 524–545.Google Scholar
  7. Béland, Daniel and Robert Henry Cox (eds.). 2011. Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Blinder, Alan S., and Charles Wyplosz. 2004. Central Bank Talk: Committee Structure and Communication Policy. Paper prepared for ASSA meetings, Philadelphia, January 2005.Google Scholar
  9. Bloor, David. 1997. Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Blyth, Mark. 2002. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Boldyrev, Ivan. 2012. Philosophy of Science or Science and Technology Studies? Economic Methodology and Auction Theory. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26(3): 289–307.Google Scholar
  12. Boldyrev, Ivan. 2013. Ökonomische Maschinen: Zur Performativität der Gleichgewichtstheorie. In Wirtschaftswissenschaft als Oikodizee? Diskussionen im Anschluss an Joseph Vogls Gespenst des Kapitals, edited by Hanno Pahl and Jan Sparsam, 77–90. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.Google Scholar
  13. Boldyrev, Ivan, and Carsten Herrmann-Pillath. 2013. Hegel’s Objective Spirit, Extended Mind, and the Institutional Nature of Economic Action. Mind & Society 12(2): 177–202.Google Scholar
  14. Boldyrev, Ivan, and Alexey Ushakov. 2016. Adjusting the Model to Adjust the World: Constructive Mechanisms in Postwar General Equilibrium Theory. Journal of Economic Methodology 23(1): 38–56.Google Scholar
  15. Breslau, Daniel. 2011. What Do Market Designers Do When They Design Markets? Economists as Consultants to the Redesign of Wholesale Electricity Markets in the U.S. In Social Knowledge in the Making, edited by Charles Camic, Neil Gross, and Michèle Lamont, 379–403. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Breslau, Daniel. 2013. Designing a Market-Like Entity: Economics in the Politics of Market Formation. Social Studies of Science 43(6): 829–851.Google Scholar
  17. Brisset, Nicolas. 2014. Economics is Not Always Performative: Some Limits for Performativity. Accessed October 30, 2015. https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B5o02ki-WYWWbF8yLTdBR2ZnWVE/edit?pli=1
  18. Bryant, Levi, Nick Srnicek, and Graham Harman (eds.). 2011. The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: re.press.Google Scholar
  19. Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Butler, Judith. 2010. Performative Agency. Journal of Cultural Economy 3(2): 147–161.Google Scholar
  22. Caballero, Ricardo J. 2010. Macroeconomics after the Crisis: Time to Deal with the Pretense-of-Knowledge Syndrome. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24(4): 85–102.Google Scholar
  23. Cabantous, Laure, and Jean-Pascal Gond. 2011. Rational Decision Making as a ‘Performative Praxis’: Explaining Rationality’s Éternel Retour. Organization Science 22(3): 573–586.Google Scholar
  24. Callon, Michel. 1998a. The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics. In The Laws of the Markets, edited by Michel Callon, 1–58. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Callon, Michel. 1998b. An Essay on Framing and Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology. In The Laws of the Markets, edited by Michel Callon, 244–269. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Callon, Michel. 2007a. An Essay on the Growing Contribution of Economic Markets to the Proliferation of the Social. Theory, Culture & Society 24(7–8): 139–163.Google Scholar
  27. Callon, Michel. 2007b. What Does It Mean to Say that Economics is Performative? In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 311–357. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Callon, Michel, and Fabian Muniesa. 2005. Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices. Organization Studies 26(8): 1229–1250.Google Scholar
  29. Carruthers, Bruce, and Jeong-Chul Kim. 2011. The Sociology of Finance. Annual Review of Sociology 37: 239–259.Google Scholar
  30. Carruthers, Bruce and Arthur L. Stinchcombe. 1999. The Social Structure of Liquidity: Flexibility, Markets, and States. Theory and Society 28(3): 353-382.Google Scholar
  31. Clark, Andy. 2011. Supersizing the Mind. Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. D’Adderio, Luciana. 2008. The Performativity of Routines: Theorising the Influence of Artefacts and Distributed Agencies on Routines Dynamics. Research Policy 37(5): 769–789.Google Scholar
  33. D’Adderio, Luciana, and Neil Pollock. 2014. Performing Modularity: Competing Rules, Performative Struggles and the Effect of Organizational Theories on the Organization. Organization Studies 35(12): 1813–1833.Google Scholar
  34. Davis, John B. 2013. Economics Imperialism Under the Impact of Psychology: The Case of Behavioral Development Economics. Oeconomia 3(1): 119–138.Google Scholar
  35. De Goede, Marieke. 2005. Virtue, Fortune and Faith: A Genealogy of Finance. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  36. Derrida, Jacques. 1988. Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Descola, Philippe. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Didier, Emmanuel. 2007. Do Statistics Perform the Economy? In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald Mackenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 276–310. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Dix, Guus. 2014. Governing By Carrot and Stick: A Genealogy of the Incentive. PhD dissertation, Amsterdam School for Cultural Analysis (ASCA) Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  40. Egmond, Stance van, and Ragna Zeiss. 2010. Modeling for Policy: Science-based Models as Performative Boundary Objects for Dutch Policy Making. Science Studies 23(1): 58–78.Google Scholar
  41. Esposito, Elena. 2013. The Structures of Uncertainty: Performativity and Unpredictability in Economic Operations. Economy and Society 42(1): 102–129.Google Scholar
  42. Favereau, Judith, and Nicolas Brisset. 2013. How to Do Things with Randomization? Paper presented at the 17th annual conference of the European Society for the History of Economic Thought, Kingston University, Kingston upon Thames, UK, May 16–18.Google Scholar
  43. Felin, Teppo, and Nicolai J. Foss. 2009. Performativity of Theory, Arbitrary Conventions, and Possible Worlds: A Reality Check. Organization Science 20(3): 676–678.Google Scholar
  44. Ferraro, Fabrizio, Jeffrey Pfeffer, and Robert I. Sutton. 2005. Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories Can Become Self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review 30(1): 8–24.Google Scholar
  45. Ferraro, Fabrizio, Jeffrey Pfeffer, and Robert I. Sutton. 2009. How and Why Theories Matter: A Comment on Felin and Foss (2009) Organization Science 20(3): 669–675.Google Scholar
  46. Fine, Ben. 2003. Callonistics: A Disentanglement. Economy and Society 32(3): 478–484.Google Scholar
  47. Fourcade, Marion. 2006. The Construction of a Global Profession: The Transnationalization of Economics. American Journal of Sociology 112(1): 145–195.Google Scholar
  48. Fourcade, Marion. 2009. Economists and Societies. Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Fourcade, Marion, Etienne Ollion. and Yann Algan. 2015. The Superiority of Economists. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29(1): 89–114.Google Scholar
  50. Friedman, Milton. 1970. The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13.Google Scholar
  51. Friedman, Daniel. 2010. A New Mentality for a New Economy: Performing the Homo Economicus in Argentina. Economy and Society 39(2) 271–302.Google Scholar
  52. Garcia-Parpet, Marie-France. 2007. The Social Construction of a Perfect Market: The Strawberry Auction at Fontaines-en-Sologne In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 20–53. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Ghoshal, Sumantra. 2005. Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1): 75–91.Google Scholar
  54. Ghoshal, Sumantra, and Peter Moran. 1996. Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory. The Academy of Management Review 21(1): 13–47.Google Scholar
  55. Giraudeau, Martin. 2010. Performing Physiocracy. Pierre Samuel Du Pont de Nemours and the Limits of Political Engineering. Journal of Cultural Economy 3(2): 225–242.Google Scholar
  56. Gond, Jean-Pascal, Laure Cabantous, Nancy Harding, and Mark Learmonth. 2015. What Do We Mean by Performativity in Organizational and Management Theory? The Uses and Abuses of Performativity. International Journal of Management Reviews, Published online July 7, 2015. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12074/full
  57. Guala, Francesco. 2001. Building Economic Machines: The FCC Auctions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 32(3): 453–477.Google Scholar
  58. Guala, Francesco. 2007. How to Do Things with Experimental Economics. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 128–162. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Healy, Kieran. 2015. The Performativity of Networks. European Journal of Sociology 56(2): 175–205.Google Scholar
  60. Henriksen, Lasse F. 2009. Are Financial Markets Embedded in Economics Rather than Society? A Critical Review of the Performativity Thesis. Working Paper 2009:10, Danish Institute for International Studies.Google Scholar
  61. Henriksen, Lasse F. 2013a. Performativity and the Politics of Equipping for Calculation: Constructing a Global Market for Microfinance. International Political Sociology 7(4): 406–425.Google Scholar
  62. Henriksen, Lasse F. 2013b. Economic Models as Devices of Policy Change: Policy Paradigms, Paradigm Shift, and Performativity. Regulation & Governance 7(4): 481–495.Google Scholar
  63. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten. 2010. A Neurolinguistic Approach to Performativity in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 17(3): 241–260.Google Scholar
  64. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten. 2012. Institutions, Distributed Cognition and Agency: Rule-Following as Performative Action. Journal of Economic Methodology 19(1): 21–42.Google Scholar
  65. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten. 2013. Performativity of Economic Systems: Approach and Implications for Taxonomy. Journal of Economic Methodology 20(2): 139–163.Google Scholar
  66. Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten, and Ivan Boldyrev. 2014. Hegel, Institutions, and Economics. Performing the Social. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Hirschman, Daniel, and Elisabeth Popp Berman. 2014. Do Economists Make Policies? On the Political Effects of Economics. Socio-Economic Review 12(4): 779–811.Google Scholar
  68. Hodgson, Geoffrey. 2009. The Great Crash of 2008 and the Reform of Economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 33(6): 1205–1221.Google Scholar
  69. Holm, Petter, and Kåre Nolde Nielsen. 2007. Framing Fish, Making Markets: The Construction of Individual Transferable Quotas (ITQs). In Market Devices, edited by Michel Callon, Yuval Millo, and Fabian Muniesa, 173–195. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  70. Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  71. Jacobi, Erik, James Freund, and Luis Araujo. 2015. Is There a Gap in the Market, and Is There a Market in the Gap? How Advertising Planning Performs Markets. Journal of Marketing Management 31(1–2): 37–61.Google Scholar
  72. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky (eds.) 2000. Choices, Values, and Frames. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Karpik, Lucien. 2010. Valuing the Unique: The Economics of Singularities. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Knorr Cetina, Karin. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge. An Essay on the Constructivist and Сontextual Nature of Science, Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  75. Krugman, Paul. 2009. How Did Economists Get It So Wrong? In New York Times Magazine, September 6, 2009.Google Scholar
  76. La Berge, Leigh C. 2016. How to Make Money with Words: Finance, Performativity, Language. Journal of Cultural Economy 9(1): 43–62. Google Scholar
  77. Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Law, John. 2008. Actor-Network Theory and Material Semiotics. In The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory, edited by Bryan S. Turner, 3rd ed., 141–158. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  79. Law, John, and John Urry. 2004. Enacting the Social. Economy and Society 33(3): 390–410.Google Scholar
  80. Licoppe, Christian. 2010. The ‘Performative Turn’ in Science and Technology Studies. Journal of Cultural Economy 3(2): 181–188.Google Scholar
  81. MacKenzie, Donald. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  82. MacKenzie, Donald. 2010. Models as Coordination Devices. In Débordements, edited by Madeleine Akrich, Yannick Barthe, and Fabian Muniesa, 299–302. Paris: Presses de Mines.Google Scholar
  83. MacKenzie, Donald, and Yuval Millo. 2003. Constructing a Market, Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Exchange. American Journal of Sociology 109(1): 107–145.Google Scholar
  84. MacKenzie, Donald, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu (eds.). 2007. Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  85. MacKenzie, Donald, and Taylor Spears. 2014a. ‘The Formula that Killed Wall Street’: The Gaussian Copula and Modelling Practices in Investment Banking. Social Studies of Science 44(3): 393–417.Google Scholar
  86. MacKenzie, Donald, and Taylor Spears. 2014b. ‘A Device for Being Able to Book P&L’: The Organizational Embedding of the Gaussian Copula. Social Studies of Science 44(3): 418–440.Google Scholar
  87. Mäki, Uskali. 2013. Performativity: Saving Austin from MacKenzie. In Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science, The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings, edited by Vassilios Karakostas and Dennis Dieks, 443–453. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  88. Marglin, Stephen. 2008. The Dismal Science: How Thinking Like an Economist Undermines Community. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Mason, Katy, Hans Kjellberg, and Johan Hagberg. 2015.Exploring the Performativity of Marketing: Theories, Practices and Devices. Journal of Marketing Management. 31(1–2):1–15.Google Scholar
  90. McCloskey, Deirdre N. 2010. Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can’t Explain the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  91. McFall, Liz. 2011. A ‘Good, Average Man’: Calculation and the Limits of Statistics in Enrolling Insurance Customers. Sociological Review 59(4): 662–684.Google Scholar
  92. McFall, Liz, and Jose Ossandón. 2014. What’s New in the ‘New, New Economic Sociology’ and Should Organisation Studies Care? In Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory and Organization Studies: Contemporary Currents, edited by Paul S. Adler, Paul du Gay, Glenn Morgan, and Michael Reed, 510–533. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Miller, Daniel. 2002. Turning Callon the Right Way Up. Economy and Society 31(2): 218–233.Google Scholar
  94. Miller, Peter, and Ted O’Leary. 2007. Mediating Instruments and Making Markets: Capital Budgeting, Science and the Economy. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(5): 638–653.Google Scholar
  95. Millo, Yuval, and Donald MacKenzie. 2009. The Usefulness of Inaccurate Models: Towards an Understanding of the Emergence of Financial Risk Management. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32(7–8): 701–734.Google Scholar
  96. Mirowski, Philip and Edward Nik-Khan. 2013. Private Intellectuals and Public Perplexity: The Economics Profession and the Economic Crisis.History of Political Economy 45 (Annual Supplement): 279-311.Google Scholar
  97. Mirowski, Philip. 2015. Review of The Economics of Economists: Institutional Setting, Individual Incentives, and Future Prospects, Edited by Alessandro Lanteri and Jack Vromen. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 8(1): 105–109.Google Scholar
  98. Mirowski, Philip, and Edward Nik-Khah. 2007. Markets Made Flesh: Performativity, and a Problem in Science Studies, Augmented with Consideration of the FCC Auctions. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 190–224. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Mirowski, Philip, and Edward Nik-Khah. 2008. Command Performance: Exploring What STS Thinks It Takes to Build a Market. In Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies, edited by Trevor Pinch and Richard Swedberg, 89–128. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  100. Mokyr, Joel. 2003. The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Muniesa, Fabian. 2014. The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  102. Myerson, Roger B. 2009. Fundamental Theory of Institutions: A Lecture in Honor of Leo Hurwicz. Review of Economic Design 13(1): 59–75.Google Scholar
  103. Nik-Khah, Edward. 2008. A Tale of Two Auctions. Journal of Institutional Economics 4(1): 73–97.Google Scholar
  104. Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  105. Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Pinch, Trevor, and Richard Swedberg (eds.). 2008. Living in a Material World, Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  107. Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Porter, Theodore M. 2008. Locating the Domain of Calculation. Journal of Cultural Economy 1(1): 39–50.Google Scholar
  109. Preda, Alex. 2009. Information, Knowledge, and Economic Life: An Introduction to the Sociology of Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  110. Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg. 1997. Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Roberts, John M. 2012. Poststructuralism Against Poststructuralism: Actor-Network Theory, Organizations and Economic Markets. European Journal of Social Theory 15(1): 35–53.Google Scholar
  112. Rodrik, Dani. 2014. When Ideas Trump Interests: Preferences, Worldviews, and Policy Innovations. Journal of Economic Perspectives 28(1): 189–208.Google Scholar
  113. Sætnan, Ann Rudinow, Heidi Mork Lomell, and Svein Hammer (eds.). 2010. The Mutual Construction of Statistics and Society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  114. Santos, Ana C., and João Rodrigues. 2009. Economics as Social Engineering? Questioning the Performativity Thesis. Cambridge Journal of Economics 33(5): 985–1000.Google Scholar
  115. Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  116. Searle, John R. 2005. What is an Institution? Journal of Institutional Economics 1(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
  117. Sparsam, Jan. 2015. Die zwei Soziologien des Marktes. Konstitutionstheoretische Defizite der neueren Wirtschaftssoziologie. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie 2(2): 255–284.Google Scholar
  118. Spears, Taylor C. 2014. Engineering Value, Engineering Risk: What Derivatives Quants Know and What Their Models Do. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  119. Svetlova, Ekaterina. 2012. On the Performative Power of Financial Models. Economy and Society 41(3): 418–434.Google Scholar
  120. Svetlova, Ekaterina. 2014. Modeling Beyond Application: Epistemic and Non-epistemic Values in Modern Science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28(1): 79–98.Google Scholar
  121. Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge. Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  122. Vollmer, Hendrik, Andrea Mennicken, and Alex Preda. 2009. Tracking the Numbers: Across Accounting and Finance, Organizations and Markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society 34(5): 619–637.Google Scholar
  123. Vosselman, Ed. 2014. The ‘Performativity Thesis’ and Its Critics: Towards a Relational Ontology of Management Accounting. Accounting and Business Research 44(2): 181–203.Google Scholar
  124. White, Mark D. 2013. The Manipulation of Choice: Ethics and Libertarian Paternalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  125. Whittle, Andrea, and André Spicer. 2008. Is Actor Network Theory Critique? Organization Studies 29(4): 611–629.Google Scholar
  126. Woolgar, Steve, and Javier Lezaun. 2013. The Wrong Bin Bag: A Turn to Ontology in Science and Technology Studies? Social Studies of Science 43(3): 321–340.Google Scholar
  127. Woolgar, Steve, and Javier Lezaun (eds.). 2013. Special Issue: A Turn to Ontology in Science and Technology Studies? Social Studies of Science 43(3): 321–462.Google Scholar
  128. Zuckerman, Ezra W. 2012. Market Efficiency: A Sociological Perspective. In Oxford Handbook of the Sociology of Finance, edited by Karin Knorr-Cetina and Alex Preda, 223–249. Oxford: Oxford University press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Boldyrev
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ekaterina Svetlova
    • 3
  1. 1.Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Witten Institute for Institutional ChangeUniversity of Witten/HerdeckeWittenGermany
  3. 3.School of ManagementUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations