Regionalization of Higher Education in Asia: Functional, Organizational, and Political Approaches

  • Jane Knight


In the last ten years, the speed and intensity with which intra-regional-level collaborations have expanded has been remarkable. The growth of regionalization is happening in all sectors, including higher education, and in all regions of the world, particularly Asia. The purpose of this chapter is to propose a conceptual framework and Functional, Organizational and Political Approaches (FOPA) model for analyzing the evolving phenomenon of the regionalization of higher education. The term regionalization of higher education has been chosen over the concepts of regionalism or regional integration to denote the significance of the “ization” or “process.” Regionalization is defined “as the process of building closer collaboration and alignment among higher education among education actors and systems in a designated area or framework, commonly called a region.” Regionalization of higher education is seen as a complementary process to internationalization.

Three main approaches to the higher education regionalization process are proposed in the FOPA model: a functional approach which focuses on alignment of national policies and programs, and the development of regional frameworks; an organizational approach which refers to the myriad of actors engaged at national, regional, sub-regional, and international levels; and a political approach which speaks to the political will and financial support necessary to promote and support the regionalization process. These approaches are inter-related and simultaneously active, albeit at different levels of intensity. Examples from Asian are provided to illustrate and apply the three approaches and show the recent surge in Asian higher education regionalization. Key issues such as rationales, governance, benefits and risks, unintended consequences, language, engagement for all, and innovation are raised to stimulate further reflection and exploration on the complex process of higher education regionalization.


High Education Conceptual Mapping Regional Integration High Education System Regional Identity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aphijanyathan, R. 2010. A research report on East Asian internationalization of higher education: A key to regional integration. Program report 24. Bangkok: Regional Centre for Higher Education and Development, South East Ministers of Education Organization.Google Scholar
  2. Hettne, B.2005. Beyond the new regionalism. New Political Economy 10(4): 543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Johnston, A. 2010. Obstacles to governance in East Asia: The case of security communities. In Security cooperation and regional integration in Asia conference proceedings. Global Institute for Asian Regional Integration. Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan, 78–92.Google Scholar
  4. Knight, J.2008. Higher education in turmoil: The changing world of internationalization. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2012. A conceptual framework for the regionalization of higher education Asia. In In Higher education regionalization in Asia Pacific: Implications for governance, citizenship, and university transformation, eds. J.N. Hawkins, K.H. Mok, and D.E. Neubauer. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2013. Towards African higher education regionalization and harmonization: Functional, organizational, and political approaches. In The development of higher education in Africa: Prospects and challenges, International perspectives on education and society series, eds. A. Wiseman and C. Wolhuter. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Kuroda, K., and D. Passarelli, eds.2009. Higher education and Asian regional integration symposium Report. Tokyo: Global Institute for Asian Regional Integration, Waseda University.Google Scholar
  8. Kuroda, K., Y. Takako, and K. Kang. 2011. “Cross-border higher education for regional integration: Analysis of the JICA-RI survey on leading universities in East Asia.” JICA- Research Institution working paper. Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  9. RIHED.2008. Harmonization of higher education- lessons learned from the Bologna process (Lecture series #1). Bangkok: Regional Centre for Higher Education Development, South East Asia Ministers of Education.Google Scholar
  10. Stubbs, R.2008. The ASEAN alternative? Ideas, institutions, and the challenge to ‘global’ governance. The Pacific Review 21(4): 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Terada, T.2003. Constructing an ‘East Asian’ concept and growing regional identity: From EAEC to ASEAN +3. The Pacific Review 16(2): 251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Vayrynen, R.2003. Regionalism: Old and new. International Studies Review 5(1): 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Yavaprabhas, S. 2009. Experiences of Asian higher education frameworks and their implication for the future.” GIARI working paper 2008-E.19. Tokyo: Waseda University.Google Scholar
  14. ———. 2010. Regional harmonization of higher education in ASEAN. Paper presented at the 2010 Global Higher Education Forum, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jane Knight
    • 1
  1. 1.Ontario Institute for Studies in EducationUniversity of TorontoONCanada

Personalised recommendations