Advertisement

After Massification and Response to Internationalization: Quality Assurance of Higher Education in Taiwan and Hong Kong

  • Ka Ho Mok
  • Sheng-Ju Chan
Chapter

Abstract

This article is to explore the changing landscape of quality assurance (QA) regimes in Taiwan and Hong Kong, with particular reference to see how the implementation of QA exercises has affected university governance. This article focuses on three aspects of examination. The first is the changing roles of various actors including governments, QA agencies and higher education institutions (HEIs) in QA. The second dimension is to examine to what degree that HEIs have been “monitored” or “intruded” when QA is becoming more frequent. Finally, how the evaluation report or result is used also act as an important indicator for understanding who retain dominant power among different actors. Both notions of decentralization and recentralization are used to compare the different emerging trends in Taiwan and Hong Kong. Opposite developmental direction can be found in these two societies.

Keywords

High Education Quality Assurance High Education System High Education Sector Research Assessment Exercise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Braun, D., and F.X. Merrien. 1999. Towards a new model of governance for universities?: A comparative view. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  2. Bray, M. 1999. Control of education: Issues and tensions in centralization and decentralization. In Towards a new model of governance for universities?: A comparative view, eds. D. Braun and F.X. Merrien. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  3. Cerny, P.G. 1996. Globalization and other stories: The search for a new paradigm for international relations. International Journal 51(4): 617–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan, Y. 2010. Higher education evaluation system in the four Chinese societies: Taiwan, Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Macao. Taipei City: Higher Education Publication. (Written in Chinese).Google Scholar
  5. Chan, S.J. 2013. Massification of higher education in Taiwan and its implications: Shifting pressure from admission to employment. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of Hong Kong Educational Research Association 2012–2013. Managing International Connectivity and Diversity: Experiences of Asian World Cities, Hong Kong Institute of Education, February 22, 2013.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, D.H. 2008. Different aspects of higher education in Taiwan. Taipei City: Win Join. (Written in Chinese).Google Scholar
  7. Davidson-Harden, A., and D. Schugurensky. 2009. Neoliberalism and education in Latin America: Entrenched problems, emerging alternatives. In The developing world and state education, eds. D. Hill and E. Rosskam, 13–33. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Faulks, K. 2000. Political sociology: A critical introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Harvey, D. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler Series B. Human Geography 71(1): 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hawkins, J., K.H. Mok, and D.E. Neubauer. 2014. Higher education massification in the Asia Pacific. Paper presented at the 2014 Senior Seminar of The Many Faces of Asia Pacific Higher Education in the Era of Massification, Hong Kong Institute of Education, October 17–19, 2014.Google Scholar
  11. Higher Education Evaluation & Accreditation Council of Taiwan (HEEACT). 2013. Mission statement. Available online at: http://www.heeact.edu.tw/ct.asp?xItem=1091&CtNode=445&mp=4. Accessed 12 Oct 2014.
  12. Hoggett, P. 1991. A new management in the public sector? Policy & Politics 19(4): 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lo, W.Y.W. 2010. Educational decentralization and its implications for governance: Explaining the differences in the four Asian newly industrialized economies. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 40(1): 63–78.Google Scholar
  14. Massen, P., and F. Vught. 1994. Alternative models of governmental steering in higher education: An analysis of steering models and policy-instruments in five countries. In Comparative policy studies in higher education, eds. L. Goedegebuure and F. Vught. Lemma: Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies.Google Scholar
  15. Massy, W.F. 1997. Teaching and learning quality process review: The Hong Kong program. Quality in Higher Education 3(3): 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Massy, W.F. and N.J. French. 1997. Teaching and learning quality process review: A review of the Hong Kong program. Paper presented at the Biannual Conference of International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education, South Africa, May.Google Scholar
  17. Mok, K.H. 1997. Privatization or marketization: Educational development in Post-Mao China. International Review of Education 43(5–6): 547–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 1999. Education and the market place in Hong Kong and Mainland China. Higher Education 37(2): 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ———. 2000. Impact of globalization: A study of quality assurance systems of higher education in Hong Kong and Singapore. Comparative Education Review 44(2): 148–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 2003. Globalization and higher education restructuring in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China. Higher Education Research and Development 22(2): 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ———. 2005. The quest for world class university: Quality assurance and internationalization benchmarking in Hong Kong. Quality Assurance in Education 13(4): 277–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 2011. When neoliberalism colonizes higher education in Asia: Bringing the ‘Public’ back to the contemporary university. In Knowledge matters: The public mission of the research university, ed. D. Rhoten, 195–230. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  23. ———. 2013. The quest for entrepreneurial universities in East Asia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. ———. 2014. Enhancing quality of higher education for world-class status. Chinese Education and Society 47(1): 44–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mok, K.H., and D.K.K. Chan. 2002. Globalization and education: The quest for quality education in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mok, K.H., K.M. Yu, and Y.W. Ku. 2013. After massification: The quest for entrepreneurial universities and technological advancement in Taiwan. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 35(3): 264–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neave, G. 2001. The changing frontiers of autonomy and accountability. Higher Education Policy 14(1): 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ntsohe, I., and M. Letseka. 2010. Quality assurance and global competitiveness in higher education. In Higher education, policy, and the global competition phenomenon., eds. L.M. Portnoi, V.D. Rust, and S.S. Bagley, 29–41. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Rondinelli, D.A. 1990. Decentralization, territorial power and the state: A critical response. Development and Change 21(3): 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosa, M.J., and A. Amaral. 2007. A self-assessment of higher education institutions from the perspective of the EFQM excellence model. In Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation., eds. Don F. Westerheijden, B. Stensaker, and M.J. Rosa, 181–207. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenau, J.N. 1992. Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Slaughter, S., and L.L. Leslie. 1997. Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university, ERIC. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press..Google Scholar
  33. Slaughter, S., and G. Rhoades. 2004. Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Tatto, M.T. 1999. Education Reform and state power in Mexico: The paradoxes of decentralization. Comparative Education Review 43(3): 251–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. TLQPR Review Team. 1999. A campaign for quality: Hong Kong teaching and learning quality process review. TLQPR review Team. Available online at: www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/publication/prog/tlqpr/tlq_fr_r.htm. Accessed 16 Jun 2011.
  36. University Grants Committee (UGC). 2007. Mission statement. University Grants Committee. Available online at: www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/qac/about/mission/mission.htm. Accessed 16 Jun 2011.
  37. ———. 2010. Aspirations for the higher education system in Hong Kong—Report of the University Grants Committee. University Grants Committee. Available online at: www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/publication/report/her2010/her2010.htm. Accessed 16 Jun 2011.
  38. ———. 2011. UGC annual report 2010–11. University Grants Committee. Available online at: www.ugc.edu.hk/eng/ugc/publication/report/AnnualRpt_2010-11.htm. Accessed 21 Jun 2011.
  39. Whitty, G. 1997. Marketization, the state, and the re-formation of the teaching profession. In Education, culture, and economy., eds. A.H. Halsey et al., 299–310. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Wu, C.S. 2010. Current issues in higher education evaluation. Taipei City: Higher Education Publication. (Written in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ka Ho Mok
    • 1
  • Sheng-Ju Chan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Social PolicyLingnan UniversityHong KongChina
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of Education and Center for TeachingNational Chung Cheng UniversityChiayiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations