Advertisement

Quality Assurance in Asian Higher Education: Challenges and Prospects

  • Angela Yung Chi Hou
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter will focus on the development of Asian quality assurance (QA) system in the massification era of higher education and while first analyzing the characteristics of QA agencies in major Asian countries. The major challenges faced by most QA agencies, including internationalization, autonomy, and accountability will be discussed as well. Two quality initiatives, mutual recognition of QA agencies’ decisions and Asia Pacific Quality Register (APQR) by Asian Pacific Quality Network (APQN) will be presented at the end of the chapter.

Keywords

High Education Institution Asian Nation Quality Assurance System External Quality Assurance External Review 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Asia-Pacific Quality Network (APQN). 2010. Chiba principles. Asia-Pacific Quality Network. http://www.apqn.org/. Accessed 1 Oct 2010.
  2. ———. 2012a. Official website. Asia-Pacific Quality Network. http://www.apqn.org/. Accessed 1 Oct 2012.
  3. ———. 2012b. Peer review of quality assurance agencies. Asia-Pacific Quality Network. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  4. ———. 2014. Discussion paper on Asia Pacific quality register (APQR). Asia-Pacific Quality Network. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  5. Blackmur, D. 2008. A critical analysis of the INQAAHE guidelines of good practice for higher education quality assurance agencies. Higher Education 56(6): 723–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, R. 2013. Mutuality meets the market: Analyzing changes in the control of quality assurance in United Kingdom higher education 1992–2012. Higher Education Quarterly 67(4): 420–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calderon, A. 2012. Massification continues to transform higher education. University World News 2(237). http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20120831155341147. Accessed 7 Jun 2014.
  8. Costes, N. et al. 2012. First external evaluations of quality assurance agencies—Lessons learned. European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED512349. Accessed 15 Dec 2010.
  9. Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). 2006. Recognition of accrediting organizations policy and procedures. Washington, DC: CHEA.Google Scholar
  10. Deem, R., K.H. Mok, and L. Lucas. 2008. Transforming higher education in whose image? Exploring the concept of the ‘world-class’ university in Europe and Asia. Higher Education Policy 21(3): 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dill, D.D. 2011. Governing quality. In Handbook on globalization and higher education, eds. R. King, S. Marginson, and R. Naidoo. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  12. Eaton, J. 2011. US accreditation: Meeting the challenges of accountability and student achievement. Evaluation in Higher Education 5(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
  13. Ewell, P. 2008. US accreditation and the future of quality assurance. Washington, DC: CHEA.Google Scholar
  14. Hawkins, D., et al. 2006. Delegation and agency in international organization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henard, F. 2010. Learning our lesson: Review of quality teaching in higher education. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  16. Hou, A.Y.C. 2014. Quality in cross-border higher education and challenges for the internationalization of national quality assurance agencies in the Asia-Pacific Region –Taiwan experience. Studies in Higher Education 39(6): 163–152.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2015. Is the Asian quality assurance system for higher education going glonacal?: Assessing the impact of three types of program accreditation on Taiwanese universities. Studies in Higher Education 40(1): 83–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hou, A.Y.C., M. Ince, S. Tasi, and C.L. Chiang. 2015. Quality assurance of quality assurance agencies from an Asian perspective: Regulation, autonomy and accountability. Asian Pacific Educational Review 16(1): 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education (INQAAHE). 2009. Guidelines of good practice in quality assurance. International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education. http://www.inqaahe.org/main/professional-development/guidelines-of-good-practice-51. Accessed 1 Dec 2009.
  20. ———. 2013a. Quality glossary. International Network for Quality Assurance Agencies in Higher Education. http://www.apqn.org/.
  21. ———. 2013b. GGP aligned agencies. International Network for Quality assurance Agencies in Higher Education. http://www.apqn.org/. Accessed 26 Jan 2013.
  22. Knight, J. 2005. The international race for accreditation. International Higher Education 40. https://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/research_sites/cihe/pdf/IHEpdfs/ihe40.pdf.
  23. Marcos, S. 2012. Learning from each other-using benchmarking to develop Internal quality assurance. European Association for Quality assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). In Internal quality assurance benchmarking, 13–16. Helsinki: ENQA.Google Scholar
  24. Marginson, S. 2007. The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision. Higher Education 53(3): 307–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marginson, S., S. Kaur, and E. Sawir. 2011. Global, local, national in the Asia-Pacific. In Higher education in the Asia-Pacific, eds. S. Marginson, S. Kaur, and E. Sawir, 3–34. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Martin, M., and A. Stella. 2007. External quality assurance in higher education: Making choices. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  27. National Institution for Academic Degrees and University Evaluation (NIAD-UE). 2007. Glossary of quality assurance in Japanese higher education. Tokyo: NIAD-UE.Google Scholar
  28. Neubauer, D.E. 2011. The International Trend in Quality Assurance of Higher Education-Implication of mutual recognition on quality assurance outcomes. Taipei: HEEACT –MQA workshop.Google Scholar
  29. Stella, A. 2010. The Chiba principles: A survey analysis on the developments in the APQN membership. Shanghai: Asia-Pacific Quality Network.Google Scholar
  30. Szanto, T. 2010. Background and purposes of external reviews of quality assurance agencies: ENQA membership, national purposes. In European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA), First external evaluations of quality assurance agencies-lessons learned, 7–13. Helsinki: ENQA.Google Scholar
  31. Van der Wende, M., and D.F. Westerheijden. 2001. International aspects of quality assurance with a special focus on European higher education. Quality in Higher Education 7(3): 233–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vroeijenstijn, T. 2008. Internal and external quality assurance—Why are they two sides of the same coin?. http://www.eahep.org/web/images/Bangkok/28_panel_ton.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2012.
  33. WASC. 2008. Handbook of accreditation 2008. Alameda: WASC.Google Scholar
  34. Woodhouse, D. 2004. The quality of quality assurance agencies. Quality in Higher Education 10(2): 77–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Woodhouse, D. 2006. The role of quality assurance agencies in higher education in the 21st century. http://www.apqn.org/events/past/details/presentations/?id=103. Accessed 24 Aug 2016.
  36. ———. 2010. Internationalization of quality assurance: The role played by the networks. http://www.auqa.edu.au/files/presentations/internationalisation_of_qa___the_role_played_by_the_networks.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2011.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela Yung Chi Hou
    • 1
  1. 1.Graduate Center of Educational Leadership and DevelopmentFu Jen Catholic UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations