Abstract
This chapter sums up the findings and limitations of the study. It then makes recommendations for further research into editorial peer review in terms of both research approach and further issues that could be usefully investigated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bazerman, C. (1980). A relationship between reading and writing: The conversational model. College English, 41, 656–661.
Belcher, D. D. (2007). Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 1–22.
Belcher, D. D., Barron Serrano, F. J., & Yang, H. S. (2016). English for professional and academic purposes. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 502–514). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Brown, D. E. (2015). Interdisciplinary research: Pathway to meaningful publications. In J. Liebowitz (Ed.), A guide to publishing for academics. Inside the publish or perish phenomenon (pp. 93–108). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Bush, T. (2016). Understanding the peer-review process: Reject, revise, resubmit. In C. Sugrue & S. Mertkan (Eds.), Publishing in the academic world: Passion, purpose and possible futures (pp. 90–99). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Carnell, E., MacDonald, J., McCallum, B., & Scott, M. (2008). Passion and politics: Academics reflect on writing for publication. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
Curry, M. J. (2016). More than language: Graduate student writing as “disciplinary becoming”. In S. Simpson, N. A. Caplan, M. Cox, & T. Phillips (Eds.), Supporting graduate student writers: Research, curriculum, & program design (pp. 78–96). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Curry, M. J., & Lillis, T. (2013). A scholar’s guide to getting published in English: Critical choices and practical strategies. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Englander, K. (2009). Transformation of the identities of nonnative English-speaking scientists as a consequence of the social construction of revision. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 8, 35–53.
Feak, C. B., & Swales, J. M. (2009). Telling a research story: Writing the literature review. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Feak, C. B., & Swales, J. M. (2011). Writing introductions across genres. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Freedman, A. (1999). Beyond the text: Towards understanding the teaching and learning of genres. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 764–768.
Frow, J. (2015). Genre (2nd ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Gordon, S. R. (2015). The editor is often a coach. In J. Liebowitz (Ed.), A guide to publishing for academics. Inside the publish or perish phenomenon (pp. 127–140). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.). (2014), The discourse reader (3rd ed., pp. 62–72). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Habibie, P. (2015). An investigation into writing for scholarly publication by novice scholars: Practices of Canadian Anglophone doctoral students. Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Ontario, Canada.
Habibie, P. (2016). Writing for scholarly publication in a Canadian higher education context: A case study. In C. Badenhorst & C. Guerin (Eds.), Research literacies and writing pedagogies for masters and doctoral writers (pp. 51–67). Leiden: Brill.
Hames, I. (2007). Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals: Guidelines for good practice. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Hammond, M., & Wellington, J. (2013). Research methods: The key concepts. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2015). Academic publishing: Issues in the challenges in the construction of knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (2016b). Methods and methodologies in second language writing research. System, 59, 116–125.
Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, N. F. (2011). Publishing from your PhD. Negotiating a crowded jungle. Farnham, UK: Gower.
Leki, I. (2003). Tangled webs: Complexities of professional writing. In C. P. Casanave & S. Vandrick (Eds.), Writing for scholarly publication: Behind the scenes in language education (pp. 103–112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Li, G. (2012). Getting published and doing research. In R. Kubota & Y. Sun (Eds.), Demystifying career paths after graduate school (pp. 151–162). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Liebowitz, J. (Ed.). (2015). A guide to publishing for academics: Inside the publish or perish phenomenon. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lillis, T. M. (2008). Ethnography as method, methodology, and “deep theorizing”. Closing the gap between text and context in academic writing research. Written Communication, 25, 353–388.
Lillis, T. M. (2013). The sociolinguistics of writing. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic writing in a global context: The politics and practices of publishing in English. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Lillis, T. M., & Curry, M. J. (2015). The politics of English, language and uptake. The case of international academic journal article reviews. AILA Review, 28, 127–150.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Marsden, J. R. (2015). How could my paper have gotten rejected? In J. Liebowitz (Ed.), A guide to publishing for academics. Inside the publish or perish phenomenon (pp. 67–78). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Mertkan, S. (2016). From a doctoral dissertation to journal articles. In C. Sugrue & S. Mertkan (Eds.), Publishing in the academic world: Passion, purpose and possible futures (pp. 136–149). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Mills, S. (2002). Rethinking politeness, impoliteness and gender identity. In L. Litosseliti & J. Sunderland (Eds.), Gender identity and discourse analysis (pp. 69–89). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mills, S. (2008). Language and sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moran-Ellis, J., Alexander, V. D., Cronin, A., Dickinson, M., Fielding, J., Sleney, J., et al. (2006). Triangulation and integration: Processes, claims and implications. Qualitative Research, 6, 45–59.
O’Leary, D. E. (2015). Models of editing and editorial boards. In J. Liebowitz (Ed.), A guide to publishing for academics. Inside the publish or perish phenomenon (pp. 109–126). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Paltridge, B. (2016). Data selection as an ethical issue: Dealing with outliers in telling a research story. In P. De Costa (Ed.), Ethics in applied linguistics research. Language researcher narratives (pp. 38–50). New York: Routledge.
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2016). Getting published in academic journals: Navigating the publication process. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., & Tardy, C. M. (2016). Ethnographic perspectives on academic writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rocco, T. S. (2011). Reasons to write, writing opportunities, and other considerations. In T. S. Rocco & T. Hatcher (Eds.), The handbook of scholarly writing and publishing (pp. 3–12). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Samraj, B. (2016b). Research articles. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for academic purposes (pp. 403–415). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Sarker, S. (2015). Publishing in leading journals: An overview for aspirant authors early in their career. In J. Liebowitz (Ed.), A guide to publishing for academics. Inside the publish or perish phenomenon (pp. 191–202). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Starfield, S. (2004). ‘Why does this feel empowering?’ Thesis writing, concordancing, and the corporatizing university. In B. Norton Peirce & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical pedagogies and language learning (pp. 138–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, S., & Feiz, P. (2014). Discourse analysis. Putting our worlds into words. New York: Routledge.
Swales, J. M. (2016). Prof. Swales on genre & English for academic purposes. Retrieved September 16, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W--C4AzvwiU
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2000). English in today’s research world. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2009). Abstracts and the writing of abstracts. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2011). Navigating academia: Writing support genres. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Wensley, A. K. P. (2015). Lost in translation and other challenges of new and international researchers seeking publication. In J. Liebowitz (Ed.), A guide to publishing for academics. Inside the publish or perish phenomenon (pp. 179–190). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Wingate, U. (2015). Academic literacy and student diversity. The case for inclusive practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Woodside, A. G. (2015). Grabbing readers: How to focus your paper’s title and contents on its major theoretical contribution rather than the local context of the study. In J. Liebowitz (Ed.), A guide to publishing for academics. Inside the publish or perish phenomenon (pp. 15–24). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paltridge, B. (2017). Conclusions. In: The Discourse of Peer Review. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48736-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48736-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-48735-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48736-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)