Skip to main content

The Future Is Monstrous?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 444 Accesses

Abstract

Jacques Derrida (1995) argues that a future that is not monstrous would not be a future but a predictable tomorrow; all real innovations have something scary or ‘monstrous’ about them. Futurology is a dangerous business for various reasons. This final chapter claims to do no more than highlight some issues foundations may face in the coming decades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anheier, H.K., and D. Leat. 2002. From charity to creativity: Philanthropic foundations in the 21st century. London: COMEDIA in association with the Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.J. 2008. New philanthropy, new networks, and new governance in education. Political Studies 56(4): 747–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., W. Bonss, and C. Lau. 2003. The theory of reflexive modernization: Problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture and Society 20(2): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brest, P. 2012. A decade of outcome-oriented philanthropy. Stanford Social Innovation Review 10: 2. http://www.ssireview.org/pdf/Spring_2012_A_Decade_of_Outcome-Oriented_Philanthropy.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brilliant, E. 2000. Private charity and public inquiry: A history of the Filer and Peterson commissions. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, P. 2014. Beyond formulas and easy answers. Alliance 19(1): 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. 1995. Points-interviews 1974–1994. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fosdick, R. 1958. Chronicle of a generation. New York: Harper and Bros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frumkin, P. 1999. Private foundations as public institutions. In Philanthropic foundations: New scholarship, new possibilities, ed. E.C. Lagemann, 69–99. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. 1998. The rise of governance and the risks of failure: The case of economic development. International Social Science Journal 50(155): 29–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karl, B.D. 1999. Going for broke: The historian’s commitment. E.C. Lagemann (ed.) op.cit., pp. 287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, B.D., and A.W. Karl. 1999. Foundations and the government: A tale of conflict and consensus. In Philanthropy and the nonprofit sector in a changing America, ed. C.T. Clotfelter and T. Ehrlich, 52–71. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravero, K. 2014. Quoted in achieving social change: What role for grant making? Alliance 19(1): 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaMarche, G. 2009. The ‘public option’ for philanthropy: Foundations and government in the Obama era. http://64.34.162.109/news/news/the_public_option_for_philanthropy_foundations. 14 Sept.

  • LaMarche, G. 2010. Reclaiming the moral life of philanthropy. http://atlanticphilanthropies.org/learning/speech-recaliming-m

  • Marinetto, M. 2003. Governing beyond the centre: A critique of the Anglo-governance school. Policy Studies 51(3): 592–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavity, J.H., and P. Ylvisaker. 1977. Private philanthropy and public affairs. In The commission on private philanthropy and public needs, research papers part 1, vol. 2, 795–836. Washington, DC: Department of Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naim, M. 2013. The end of power. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odendahl, T. 2005. Comments in a panel discussion. The costs of caution: Advocacy, public policy, and America’s foundations, April 21. http://www.cpnl.georgetown.edu

  • Patrizzi, P., E.H. Thompson, J. Cottmay, and T. Beer. 2013. Eyes wide open: Learning as strategy under conditions of complexity and uncertainty. The Foundation Review 5(3): 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, A. 2015. New opportunities, bigger barriers: How to open space for philanthropy. Alliance 20(3): 38–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. 2005. A failure of philanthropy. Stanford Social Innovation Review (Winter): 26–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenman, M. 2005. Grant makers must focus on government’s role. Chronicle of Philanthropy, March 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B. 2015. Time for a new foundation for philanthropy. Alliance 20(2): 52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skloot, E. 2001. Slot machines, boat-building and the future of philanthropy, inaugural address to the Waldemar A. Nielsen issue in philanthropy series. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, October 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.A. 2002. Foundations and public policy making: A historical perspective. R-P 11, May, www.usc.edu/philanthropy

  • Stevens, B.A., and L.D. Brown. 1997. Expertise meets politics: Efforts to work with states. In To improve health care 1997: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation anthology, ed. S.L. Isaacs and J.R. Knickman. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veenhoven, R. 2012. Happiness: Also known as “life satisfaction” and “subjective well-being”. In Handbook of social indicators and quality of life research, ed. K.C. Land, A.C. Michalos, and M.J. Sirgy, 63–77. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ylvisaker, P. 1999. Small can be effective. In Conscience and community: The legacy of Paul Ylvisaker, ed. V. Esposito. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leat, D. (2016). The Future Is Monstrous?. In: Philanthropic Foundations, Public Good and Public Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48289-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics