Abstract
In many industrialised economies, young people are staying away from traditional technical education and careers in their droves. They appear to engage more readily with creative work, with its image of autonomy, personal responsibility, and self-expression. Using secondary data from youth and educational research, plus primary data from Spanish case studies of technical education, Müller explores the drivers of this disengagement from engineering and engagement with creative work. Media consumption, obstacles to labour market entry, and growing individualism drive young people into constant self-presentation and self-management in their work, political, and consumption roles. Europe’s future engineers may be lost to creative occupations, with much less secure employment prospects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adkins, L. (2008). From retroactivation to futurity: The end of the sexual contract. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 16(3), 182–201.
Ainley, P., & Bailey, B. (1997). The business of learning: Staff and student experiences of further education in the 1990s. Herndon, VA: Cassell.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., et al. (2010). ‘Doing’ science versus ‘being’ a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639.
Archer, L., DeWitt, J., & Willis, B. (2014). Adolescent boys’ science aspirations: Masculinity, capital, and power. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 1–30.
Arvidsson, A., Malossi, G., & Naro, S. (2010). Passionate work? Labour conditions in the Milan Fashion Industry. Journal for Cultural Research, 14(3), 295–309.
Ashton, D., Maguire, M. J., & Spilsbury, M. (1990). Restructuring the labour market: The implications for youth. Houndmills Basingstoke Hampshire: Macmillan.
Baker, J. (2010). Great expectations and post-feminist accountability: Young women living up to the ‘successful girls’ discourse. Gender and Education, 22(1), 1–15.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London and New York: Sage Publications, Ltd.
Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: SAGE Publications.
Becker, F. S. (2010). Why don’t young people want to become engineers? Rational reasons for disappointing decisions. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 349–366.
Bennett, W. (2008). Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Brannen, J., Lewis, S., & Nilsen, A. (Eds.) (2002). Young Europeans, work and family. London: Routledge.
Careers Research and Advisory Centre (2008). Do undergraduates want a career in IT? A study of the attitudes of current UK undergraduates in relation to careers and work in the IT sector. Cambridge: Careers Research and Advisory Centre.
Chouliaraki, L. (2013). The ironic spectator: Solidarity in the age of post-humanitarianism. Cambridge Malden MA: Polity Press.
Cockburn, C. (1985). Machinery of dominance: Women, men, and technical know-how. London, Dover N.H.: Pluto Press.
Cockburn, C. (1999). Caught in the wheels: The high cost of being a female cog in the male machinery of engineering. In D. A. MacKenzie & J. Wajcman (Eds.), The social shaping of technology, Buckingham [England] (pp. 126–133). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Cohoon, J. M., & Aspray, W. (2006). Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DeWitt, J., Archer, L., & Osborne, J. (2014). Science-related aspirations across the primary–secondary divide: Evidence from two surveys in England. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1609–1629.
Eccles, J. S., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). Influences of parents’ education on their children’s educational attainments: The role of parent and child perceptions. London Review of Education, 3(3), 191–204.
European Round Table of Industrialists (2009). Mathematics, science and technology education report. Brussels: European Round Table of Industrialists.
Evans, K., & Furlong, A. (1997). Metaphors of youth transitions: Niches, pathways, trajectories or navigations. In J. M. Bynner, L. Chisholm, & A. Furlong (Eds.), Youth, citizenship and social change in a European context. Aldershot: Ashgate Pub Ltd.
Faulkner, W. (2000). The power and the pleasure? A research agenda for ‘making gender stick’ to engineers. Science, Technology & Human Values, 25(1), 87–119.
Fleming, P., & Sturdy, A. J. (2009). Just be yourself—Towards neo-normative control in organisations. Employee Relations, 31, 6.
Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (2007). Young people and social change new perspectives. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gill, R. (2002). Cool, creative and egalitarian?: Exploring gender in project-based new media work in Europe. Information, Communication and Society, 5(1), 70–89.
Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008). In the social factory?: Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 1–30.
Girard, B. (2009). The Google way how one company is revolutionizing management as we know it. San Francisco: No Starch Press.
Harris, A. (2004). Jamming girl culture: Young women and consumer citizenship. In A. Harris (Ed.), All about the girl: Culture, power, and identity (pp. 163–172). Londdon and New York: Routledge.
Harris, A., Wyn, J., & Younes, S. (2010). Beyond apathetic or activist youth: ‘Ordinary’ young people and contemporary forms of participation. Young, 18(1), 9–32.
Hesmondhalgh, D., & Baker S. (2011). Creative labour: media work in three cultural industries. London & New York: Routledge.
Holmegaard, H. T., Madsen, L. M., & Ulriksen, L. (2012). To choose or not to choose science: Constructions of desirable identities among young people considering a STEM higher education programme. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 186–215.
Howe, N., & Strauss, B. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Books.
Jenkins, E. W., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: Students’ attitudes towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science & Technological Education, 23(1), 41–57.
Kücklich, J. (2005). Precarious playbour: Modders and the digital games industry. The Fiberculture Journal (5).
McKinlay, A., & Smith, C. (2009). Creative labour: working in the creative industries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Miles, S. (1998). Consumerism: As a way of life. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Miles, S. (2000). Youth lifestyles in a changing world. Buckingham [England], Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Morgan, G., Wood, J., & Nelligan, P. (2013). Beyond the vocational fragments: Creative work, precarious labour and the idea of ‘Flexploitation’. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 24(3), 397–415.
Müller, J. (2011). Gendering the Millennials. Analyzing staff responses to new student profiles in Spanish ICT higher education. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(2), 424–444.
Ng, E. S. W., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. T. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the Millennial generation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 281–292.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008). Encouraging student interest in science and technology studies. Paris: OECD.
Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467.
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: A critical reflection. A report to the Nuffield Foundation. London: Nuffield Foundation.
Osgerby, B. (1998). Youth in Britain since 1945. Oxford UK; Malden MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Poschke, M. (2013). ‘Entrepreneurs out of necessity’: A snapshot. Applied Economics Letters, 20(7), 658–663.
Pultz, S., & Mørch, S. (2015). Unemployed by choice: Young creative people and the balancing of responsibilities through strategic self-management. Journal of Youth Studies, 18, 1–20.
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Raffe, D. (2003). Pathways linking education and work: A review of concepts, research, and policy debates. Journal of Youth Studies, 6(1), 3–19.
Riley, S., More, Y., & Griffin, C. (2010). The ‘pleasure citizen’: Analyzing partying as a form of social and political participation. Young, 18(1), 33–54.
Roberts, S. (2010). Misrepresenting ‘choice biographies’?: A reply to Woodman. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(1), 137–149.
Røed, K., & Skogstrøm, J. F. (2014). Job loss and entrepreneurship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 76(5), 727–744.
Sáinz, M., & López-Sáez, M. (2010). Gender differences in computer attitudes and the choice of technology-related occupations in a sample of secondary students in Spain. Computers & Education, 54(2), 578–587.
Singh, K., Allen, K. R., Scheckler, R., et al. (2007). Women in computer-related majors: A critical synthesis of research and theory from 1994 to 2005. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 500–533.
Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2005). How do learners in different cultures relate to science and technology? Results and perspectives from the project ROSE. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1–17.
Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled–and more miserable than ever before. New York: Free Press.
Twenge, J. M., & Kasser, T. (2013). Generational changes in materialism and work centrality, 1976-2007: Associations with temporal changes in societal insecurity and materialistic role modeling. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(7), 883–897.
Twenge, J. M., Campbell, S. M., Hoffman, B. J., et al. (2010). Generational differences in work values: Leisure and extrinsic values increasing, social and intrinsic values decreasing. Journal of Management, 36(5), 1117–1142.
Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Woodman, D. (2010). Class, individualisation and tracing processes of inequality in a changing world: A reply to Steven Roberts. Journal of Youth Studies, 13(6), 737–746.
Ziehe, T., & Baines, R. (1994). From living standard to life style. Young, 2(2), 2–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Müller, J. (2016). Engineering Lifestyles: Career Choices in Late Modernity. In: Webster, J., Randle, K. (eds) Virtual Workers and the Global Labour Market. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47919-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47919-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47918-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47919-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)