Abstract
In this chapter, I explore the role of aesthetic labour in academic research through an auto-ethnographic account of aesthetic labour when preparing for and conducting elite interviews. During my PhD, at the suggestion of my supervisor and my sponsor organisation, I worked with a presence coach or ‘image consultant’, who helped me prepare for interviewing elites. I had been recruited to conduct research that addressed the poor representation of women on corporate boards, but I was told that my appearance was ‘not professional enough’, and that to do the PhD I needed to ‘look good and sound right’ (Warhurst and Nickson 2001, p. 2). In this chapter I show how expectations about ‘acceptable’ professional appearance are embodied; how they went from being something ascribed onto my body to something my body had to do (Crossley 1995). As a young, female, feminist academic preparing for interviews in professional environments, my aesthetic labour also reflected social expectations about (acceptable) femininity, the female body, professionalism and what it means to be a good researcher. This highlights how the body can be a site where conflicting discourses play out, and how the boundary between aesthetics and the self can become blurred.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Birch, M., & Miller, T. (2000). Inviting Intimacy: The Interview as Therapeutic Opportunity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(3), 189–202.
Black, P. (2004). The Beauty Industry: Gender, Culture, Pleasure. London: Routledge.
Carroll, K. (2013). Infertile? The Emotional Labour of Sensitive and Feminist Research Methodologies. Qualitative Research, 13(5), 546–561.
Collier, R. (1998). ‘Nutty Professors’, ‘Men in Suits’ and ‘New Entrepreneurs’: Corporeality, Subjectivity and Change in the Law School and Legal Practice. Social and Legal Studies, 7(1), 27–53.
Conti, J. A., & O’Neil, M. (2007). Studying Power: Qualitative Methods and the Global Elite. Qualitative Research, 7(1), 63–82.
Crossley, N. (1995). Merleau-Ponty, the Elusive Body and Carnal Sociology. Body and Society, 1(1), 43–63.
Dean, D. (2005). Recruiting a Self: Women Performers and Aesthetic Labour. Work, Employment and Society, 19(4), 761–774.
Dickson-Swift, V., James, E., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2009). Researching Sensitive Topics: Qualitative Research as Emotion Work. Qualitative Research, 9(1), 61–79.
Ellis, C. (1998). ‘I Hate My Voice!’: Coming to Terms with Minor Bodily Stigmas. The Sociological Quarterly, 39(4), 517–537.
Entwistle, J. (1997). ‘Power Dressing’ and the Construction of the Career Woman. In M. Nava, A. Blake, I. MacRury, & B. Richards (Eds.), Buy This Book: Studies in Advertising and Consumption. London: Routledge.
Entwistle, J. (2000a). The Fashioned Body: Fashion Dress and Modern Society. Cambridge: Polity.
Entwistle, J. (2000b). Fashion and the Fleshy Body: Dress as Embodied Practice. Fashion Theory, 4(3), 323–348.
Entwistle, J., & Wissinger, E. (2006). Keeping up Appearances: Aesthetic Labour in the Fashion Modelling Industries of London and New York. The Sociological Review, 54(4), 774–794.
Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003). Working at a Cynical Distance: Implications for Power, Subjectivity and Resistance. Organization, 10(1), 157–179.
Freeman, C. (1993). Designing Women: Corporate Discipline and Barbados’s Off-Shore Pink-Collar Sector. Cultural Anthropology, 8(2), 169–186.
Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166.
Gill, R. (2009). Breaking the Silence: The Hidden Injuries of Neo-Liberal Academia. Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections, pp. 228–244.
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Reading: Penguin.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hewlett, S. A. (2014). Executive Presence: The Missing Link Between Merit and Success. New York: Harper Collins.
Hollander, A. (1994). Sex and Suits: The Evolution of Modern Dress. Brinkworth: Claridge Press.
Holmes, M. (2010). The Emotionalization of Reflexivity. Sociology, 44(1), 139–154.
Hochschild, A. (1983). The Managed Heart. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.
Kelan, E. (2013). The Becoming of Business Bodies: Gender, Appearance, and Leadership Development. Management Learning, 44(1), 45–61.
Masciave, C. (2014). Executive Presence for Women 1: The Five Facets Approach to Get the Job You Deserve. Eden Image Coaching Series, 1.
Mason, J. (2011). Qualitative Researching. London: Sage.
Mavin, S., & Grandy, G. (2014). Bodies, Appearance, Abjection: Women Elite Leaders’ Intra-Gender Experiences. 74th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management 2014, 1–5 August 2014, Philadelphia, USA.
McRobbie, A. (2004). Notes on ‘What Not to Wear’ and Post-Feminist Symbolic Violence. The Sociological Review, 52(2), 97–109.
Mears, A. (2014). Aesthetic Labor for the Sociologies of Work, Gender, and Beauty. Sociology Compass, 8(12), 1330–1343.
Mears, A., & Finlay, W. (2005). Not Just a Paper Doll: How Models Manage Bodily Capital and Why They Perform Emotional Labor. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34(3), 317–343.
Nath, V. (2011). Aesthetic and Emotional Labour Through Stigma: National Identity Management and Racial Abuse in Offshored Indian Call Centres. Work, Employment and Society, 25(4), 709–725.
Nickson, D., Warhurst, C., Witz, A., & Cullen, A. (2001). The Importance of Being Aesthetic: Work, Employment and Service Organization. In A. Sturdy, I. Grugulis, & H. Willmott (Eds.), Customer Service: Empowerment and Entrapment. London: Palgrave.
Reay, D. (2004). Cultural Capitalists and Academic Habitus: Classed and Gendered Labour in UK Higher Education. Women’s Studies International Forum, 27, 31–39.
Sheane, S. (2012). Putting on a Good Face: An Examination of the Emotional and Aesthetic Roots of Presentational Labour. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 33(1), 145–158.
Shilling, C. (1993). The Body and Social Theory. London: Sage.
Sinclair, A. (2011). Leading with Body. In E. Jeanes, D. Knights, & P. Martin (Eds.), Handbook of Gender, Work and Organization (pp. 117–130). London: John Wiley and Sons.
Sinding, C., & Aronson, J. (2003). Exposing Failures, Unsettling Accommodations: Tensions in Interview Practice. Qualitative Research, 3(1), 95–117.
Spry, T. (2001). Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 706–732.
Tyler, M., & Abbott, P. (1998). Chocs Away: Weight Watching in the Contemporary Airline Industry. Sociology, 32(3), 433–450.
Warhurst, C., & Nickson, D. (2001). Looking Good and Sounding Right: Style Counselling and the Aesthetics of the New Economy. London: Industrial Society.
Warhurst, C., & Nickson, D. (2007). Employee Experience of Aesthetic Labour in Retail and Hospitality. Work, Employment & Society, 21(1), 103–120.
Warhurst, C., Nickson, D., Witz, A., & Cullen, A. (2001). Aesthetic Labour in Interactive Service Work: Some Case Study Evidence from the ‘New’ Glasgow. Service Industries Journal, 20(3), 1–18.
Witz, A., Warhurst, C., & Nickson, D. (2003). The Labour of Aesthetics and the Aesthetics of Organization. Organization, 10(1), 33–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brown, S. (2017). PhD Barbie Gets a Makeover! Aesthetic Labour in Academia. In: Elias, A., Gill, R., Scharff, C. (eds) Aesthetic Labour. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47765-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47765-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47764-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47765-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)