Skip to main content

PhD Barbie Gets a Makeover! Aesthetic Labour in Academia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aesthetic Labour

Part of the book series: Dynamics of Virtual Work ((DVW))

Abstract

In this chapter, I explore the role of aesthetic labour in academic research through an auto-ethnographic account of aesthetic labour when preparing for and conducting elite interviews. During my PhD, at the suggestion of my supervisor and my sponsor organisation, I worked with a presence coach or ‘image consultant’, who helped me prepare for interviewing elites. I had been recruited to conduct research that addressed the poor representation of women on corporate boards, but I was told that my appearance was ‘not professional enough’, and that to do the PhD I needed to ‘look good and sound right’ (Warhurst and Nickson 2001, p. 2). In this chapter I show how expectations about ‘acceptable’ professional appearance are embodied; how they went from being something ascribed onto my body to something my body had to do (Crossley 1995). As a young, female, feminist academic preparing for interviews in professional environments, my aesthetic labour also reflected social expectations about (acceptable) femininity, the female body, professionalism and what it means to be a good researcher. This highlights how the body can be a site where conflicting discourses play out, and how the boundary between aesthetics and the self can become blurred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, M., & Miller, T. (2000). Inviting Intimacy: The Interview as Therapeutic Opportunity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3(3), 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. (2004). The Beauty Industry: Gender, Culture, Pleasure. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, K. (2013). Infertile? The Emotional Labour of Sensitive and Feminist Research Methodologies. Qualitative Research, 13(5), 546–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R. (1998). ‘Nutty Professors’, ‘Men in Suits’ and ‘New Entrepreneurs’: Corporeality, Subjectivity and Change in the Law School and Legal Practice. Social and Legal Studies, 7(1), 27–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conti, J. A., & O’Neil, M. (2007). Studying Power: Qualitative Methods and the Global Elite. Qualitative Research, 7(1), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. (1995). Merleau-Ponty, the Elusive Body and Carnal Sociology. Body and Society, 1(1), 43–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D. (2005). Recruiting a Self: Women Performers and Aesthetic Labour. Work, Employment and Society, 19(4), 761–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickson-Swift, V., James, E., Kippen, S., & Liamputtong, P. (2009). Researching Sensitive Topics: Qualitative Research as Emotion Work. Qualitative Research, 9(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C. (1998). ‘I Hate My Voice!’: Coming to Terms with Minor Bodily Stigmas. The Sociological Quarterly, 39(4), 517–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, J. (1997). ‘Power Dressing’ and the Construction of the Career Woman. In M. Nava, A. Blake, I. MacRury, & B. Richards (Eds.), Buy This Book: Studies in Advertising and Consumption. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, J. (2000a). The Fashioned Body: Fashion Dress and Modern Society. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, J. (2000b). Fashion and the Fleshy Body: Dress as Embodied Practice. Fashion Theory, 4(3), 323–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, J., & Wissinger, E. (2006). Keeping up Appearances: Aesthetic Labour in the Fashion Modelling Industries of London and New York. The Sociological Review, 54(4), 774–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. (2003). Working at a Cynical Distance: Implications for Power, Subjectivity and Resistance. Organization, 10(1), 157–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1993). Designing Women: Corporate Discipline and Barbados’s Off-Shore Pink-Collar Sector. Cultural Anthropology, 8(2), 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2007). Postfeminist Media Culture: Elements of a Sensibility. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(2), 147–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2009). Breaking the Silence: The Hidden Injuries of Neo-Liberal Academia. Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections, pp. 228–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Reading: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, S. A. (2014). Executive Presence: The Missing Link Between Merit and Success. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, A. (1994). Sex and Suits: The Evolution of Modern Dress. Brinkworth: Claridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, M. (2010). The Emotionalization of Reflexivity. Sociology, 44(1), 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1983). The Managed Heart. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelan, E. (2013). The Becoming of Business Bodies: Gender, Appearance, and Leadership Development. Management Learning, 44(1), 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masciave, C. (2014). Executive Presence for Women 1: The Five Facets Approach to Get the Job You Deserve. Eden Image Coaching Series, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2011). Qualitative Researching. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavin, S., & Grandy, G. (2014). Bodies, Appearance, Abjection: Women Elite Leaders’ Intra-Gender Experiences. 74th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management 2014, 1–5 August 2014, Philadelphia, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2004). Notes on ‘What Not to Wear’ and Post-Feminist Symbolic Violence. The Sociological Review, 52(2), 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mears, A. (2014). Aesthetic Labor for the Sociologies of Work, Gender, and Beauty. Sociology Compass, 8(12), 1330–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, A., & Finlay, W. (2005). Not Just a Paper Doll: How Models Manage Bodily Capital and Why They Perform Emotional Labor. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 34(3), 317–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath, V. (2011). Aesthetic and Emotional Labour Through Stigma: National Identity Management and Racial Abuse in Offshored Indian Call Centres. Work, Employment and Society, 25(4), 709–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickson, D., Warhurst, C., Witz, A., & Cullen, A. (2001). The Importance of Being Aesthetic: Work, Employment and Service Organization. In A. Sturdy, I. Grugulis, & H. Willmott (Eds.), Customer Service: Empowerment and Entrapment. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D. (2004). Cultural Capitalists and Academic Habitus: Classed and Gendered Labour in UK Higher Education. Women’s Studies International Forum, 27, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheane, S. (2012). Putting on a Good Face: An Examination of the Emotional and Aesthetic Roots of Presentational Labour. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 33(1), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shilling, C. (1993). The Body and Social Theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (2011). Leading with Body. In E. Jeanes, D. Knights, & P. Martin (Eds.), Handbook of Gender, Work and Organization (pp. 117–130). London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinding, C., & Aronson, J. (2003). Exposing Failures, Unsettling Accommodations: Tensions in Interview Practice. Qualitative Research, 3(1), 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spry, T. (2001). Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 706–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, M., & Abbott, P. (1998). Chocs Away: Weight Watching in the Contemporary Airline Industry. Sociology, 32(3), 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warhurst, C., & Nickson, D. (2001). Looking Good and Sounding Right: Style Counselling and the Aesthetics of the New Economy. London: Industrial Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warhurst, C., & Nickson, D. (2007). Employee Experience of Aesthetic Labour in Retail and Hospitality. Work, Employment & Society, 21(1), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warhurst, C., Nickson, D., Witz, A., & Cullen, A. (2001). Aesthetic Labour in Interactive Service Work: Some Case Study Evidence from the ‘New’ Glasgow. Service Industries Journal, 20(3), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witz, A., Warhurst, C., & Nickson, D. (2003). The Labour of Aesthetics and the Aesthetics of Organization. Organization, 10(1), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, S. (2017). PhD Barbie Gets a Makeover! Aesthetic Labour in Academia. In: Elias, A., Gill, R., Scharff, C. (eds) Aesthetic Labour. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47765-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics