Skip to main content

Invisible Labour? Tensions and Ambiguities of Modifying the ‘Private’ Body: The Case of Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aesthetic Labour

Part of the book series: Dynamics of Virtual Work ((DVW))

Abstract

The ‘designer vagina’ is a relatively new phenomenon, becoming part of public discourse only in the late 1990s. Although female genital surgery has a history longer than 150 years, modification has not usually been for aesthetic reasons (Green 2005). Nowadays, cosmetic surgeons promising ‘designer vaginas’ offer to modify all parts of women’s genitals, often to render them more attractive: the labia minora are minimised and made symmetrical (labiaplasty), the clitoral hood is made less prominent (clitoral hood reduction), the labia majora are plumped to make them look more ‘youthful’, and liposuction is available for a ‘fat’ mons pubis (Michala et al. 2012). Normal genital variation among women has been pathologised by describing visible labia minora as ‘hypertrophic’ (Miklos and Moore 2008). Simone Weil Davis (2002) quotes a cosmetic surgeon as telling her that ‘the ideal look for labia minora was not only minimal and not extended but also symmetrical, homogenously pink and not wavy’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These interviews are part of a research project, Elucidating the Increasing Demand for Genital Cosmetic Surgery among Girls and Women in Australia (2014–2017), funded by the Australian Research Council and partners Jean Hailes for Women’s Health, Monash Health, Women’s Health Victoria, Family Planning Victoria, and the Australian Federation of Medical Women. The four components are in-depth interviews with women; semi-structured interviews with medical practitioners and beauty therapists; a national online survey; and analysis of social media.

  2. 2.

    We do not have space to map this context here and point the reader to the work of Gill and Scharff 2011; Scharff 2012; Evans and Riley 2015; and Dobson 2015 for fuller discussions of postfeminism and neoliberalism in feminist cultural studies.

References

  • Banet-Weiser, S., & Portwood Stacer, L. (2006). ‘I Just Want to Be Me Again!’: Beauty Pageants, Reality Television and Post-Feminism. Feminist Theory, 7(2), 255–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartky, S. L. (1988). Foucault, Femininity, and the Modernization of Patriarchal Power. In I. Diamond & L. Quinby (Eds.), Feminism & Foucault: Reflections on Resistance (pp. 61–86). Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, V. (2003). Flesh Wounds: The Culture of Cosmetic Surgery. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, S. (2009). Twenty Years in the Twilight Zone. In C. Heyes & M. Jones (Eds.), Cosmetic Surgery: A Feminist Primer (pp. 21–33). Surrey, England: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell, R., Morland, C., & Garden, A. S. (2007). Expectations and Experience of Labial Reduction: A Qualitative Study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 114(12), 1493–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. (2005). In Search of (Better) Sexual Pleasure: Female Genital ‘Cosmetic’ Surgery. Sexualities, 8(4), 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. (2009). The Women Are Doing It for Themselves’: The Rhetoric of Choice and Agency Around Female Genital ‘Cosmetic Surgery. Australian Feminist Studies, 24(60), 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. (2010). Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery: A Critical Review of Current Knowledge and Contemporary Debates. Journal of Women’s Health, 19(7), 1393–1407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1995). Reshaping the Female Body: The Dilemma of Cosmetic Surgery. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. W. (2002). Loose Lips Sink Ships. Feminist Studies, 28(1), 7–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. S. (2015). Postfeminist Digital Cultures: Femininity, Social Media, and Self-Representation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A. (2008). Making the Cut: How Cosmetic Surgery Is Transforming Our Lives. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A., & Riley, S. (2015). Technologies of Sexiness: Sex, Identity, and Consumer Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, M. (2010). Body, Image and Affect in Consumer Culture. Body & Society, 16(1), 193–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, S. (2003). Cosmetic Surgery, Gender and Culture. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R. (2007). Critical Respect: The Difficulties and Dilemmas of Agency and ‘Choice’ for Feminism. A Reply to Duits and van Zoonen. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 14(1), 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R., & Scharff, C. (Eds.). (2011). New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism, and Subjectivity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilman, S. (1999). Making the Body Beautiful. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, F. J. (2005). From Clitoridectomies to ‘Designer Vaginas’: The Medical Construction of Heteronormative Female Bodies and Sexuality Through Female Genital Cutting. Sexualities, Evolution & Gender, 7(2), 153–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Dobson, A. S. (2015). Theorizing Agency in Post-Girlpower Times. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 29(2), 145–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illouz, E. (2007). Cold Intimacies: The Making of Emotional Capitalism. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2008). Skintight: An Anatomy of Cosmetic Surgery. Oxford, New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, L. M., Michala, L., & Creighton, S. M. (2010). Labial Surgery for Well Women: A Review of the Literature. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 117(1), 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, L. M., Taghinejadi, N., & Creighton, S. M. (2012). An Analysis of the Content and Clinical Implications of Online Advertisements for Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery. BMJ Open, 2(6), online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markey, C. N., & Markey, P. M. (2010). A Correlational and Experimental Examination of Reality Television Viewing and Interest in Cosmetic Surgery. Body Image, 7(2), 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2009). The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medicare Benefits Schedule. (2012). Item Numbers 35533 and 35569. www.medicareaustralia.gov.au

  • Michala, L., Liao, L. M., & Creighton, S. M. (2012). Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery: How Can Clinicians Act in Women’s Best Interests? The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 14(3), 203–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklos, J. R., & Moore, R. D. (2008). Labiaplasty of the Labia Minora: Patients’ Indications for Pursuing Surgery. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 5(6), 1492–1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northrop, J. M. (2012). Reflecting on Cosmetic Surgery: Body Image, Shame and Narcissism. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, C. (2012). Repudiating Feminism: Young Women in a Neoliberal World. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (2014). Values Beyond Value? Is Anything Beyond the Logic of Capital? The British Journal of Sociology, 65(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperry, S., Thompson, J. K., Sarwer, D. B., & Cash, T. F. (2009). Cosmetic Surgery Reality V Viewership: Relations with Cosmetic Surgery Attitudes, Body Image, and Disordered eating. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 62(1), 7–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C., Maher, J. M., & Fraser, S. (2014). Vanity: 21st Century Selves. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. J. (2012). Buying and Selling Breasts: Cosmetic Surgery, Beauty Treatments and Risk. The Sociological Review, 60(4), 635–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H., & Melody, J. (2001). Growing up Girl: Psychosocial Explorations of Gender and Class. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, N. (1991). The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty are Used Against Women. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dobson, A.S., McDonald, K., Kirkman, M., Souter, K., Fisher, J. (2017). Invisible Labour? Tensions and Ambiguities of Modifying the ‘Private’ Body: The Case of Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery. In: Elias, A., Gill, R., Scharff, C. (eds) Aesthetic Labour. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47765-1_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics