Skip to main content

Relating Pronunciation Research and Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
English Pronunciation Teaching and Research

Abstract

Although research in pronunciation is providing an increasing knowledge base for pronunciation practitioners to make informed decisions about what they do in their classrooms or other contexts of practice, there are nonetheless significant areas which need further exploration. A review of current research highlights significant findings as well as some gaps in the research literature and between research and practice that are fueling debate and controversy. Suggestions are made of promising areas for future research, including experimental interventions and classroom-based qualitative studies investigating pronunciation teaching, as well as discourse and corpus-based studies of authentic speech exploring pronunciation in context. Continuing dialogue and interaction between researchers and practitioners promotes development of an expanding body of reliable and valid research findings and practices for pronunciation learning, teaching, and assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Grabe et al. (2005) equate this to the Cambridge accent.

  2. 2.

    A mora is a segment the length of a short vowel; long vowels are two moras in length. Vowel length is phonemic in Japanese.

  3. 3.

    The latter two vowels are sometimes classified as tense vowels, especially in respect to non-standard dialects where they maybe monophthongal; but for standard varieties of NAE they are both upgliding diphthongs (see discussion in Pennington, 1996, pp. 105–118).

  4. 4.

    The Journal of Second Language Pronunciation was established in 2015 (https://benjamins.com/#catalog/journals/jslp.1.1/main).

  5. 5.

    It could be reflected that the difference between the two instructional approaches is not just one between apples and oranges—which would be an appropriate type of difference for making comparisons—but more like the difference between apple pie and orange juice—that is, too different to make any kind of meaningful comparisons.

References

  • Abercrombie, D. (1949). Teaching pronunciation. ELT Journal, 3(5), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/III.5.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D. (1986). Intonation and its parts: Melody in spoken English. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D. (1989). Intonation and its uses: Melody in grammar and discourse. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, B. (1997). Upspeak in British English. English Today, 13(3), 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400009810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. (1999). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299–2310. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206911

  • Brazil, D. (1997). The communicative value of intonation in English (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brazil, D., Coulthard, M., & Johns, C. (1980). Discourse intonation and language teaching. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (1988). Functional load and the teaching of pronunciation. TESOL Quarterly, 22(4), 593–606. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587258

  • Brown, A. (1991). Teaching pronunciation: A book of readings. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (2014). Pronunciation and phonetics: A practical guide for English language teachers. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K., & Fulcher, G. (2017). Pronunciation and intelligibility in assessing spoken fluency. In T. Isaacs & P. Trofimovich (Eds.), Second language pronunciation assessment: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 37–53). Bristol, UK and Blue Ridge Summit, PA: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catford, J. C. (1987). Phonetics and the teaching of pronunciation: A systemic description of English phonology. In J. Morley (Ed.), Current perspectives on pronunciation: Practices anchored in theory (pp. 87–100). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cauldwell, R. (2002). The functional irrhythmicality of spontaneous speech: A discourse view of speech rhythms. Apples, 2(1), 1–24. Retrieved July 30, 2017, from http://apples.jyu.fi/article_files/cauldwell_2002.pdf

  • Cauldwell, R. (2012). Cool speech, app. Retrieved July 30, 2017, from http://www.speechinaction.org/cool-speech-2/

  • Cauldwell, R. & Hewings, M. (1996). Intonation rules in ELT textbooks. English Language Teaching Journal, 50(4), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.4.327

  • Celce-Murcia, M., Brinton, D. M., & Goodwin, J. M., with Griner, B. (2010).Teaching pronunciation: A course book and reference guide (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, D. M. (2002). Discourse intonation in L2: From theory and research to practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee-Van Roey, S. (2009). Intelligibility and perceptions of English proficiency. World Englishes, 28(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2008.01567.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogo, A., & Dewey, M. (2012). Analysing English as a Lingua Franca: A corpus-driven investigation. London: Continuum/Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B., & Mees, I. (2013). Practical phonetics and phonology: A resource book for students (3rd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Couper, G. (2006). The short and long-term effects of pronunciation instruction. Prospect, 21, 46–66 Retrieved July 22, 2017, from http://www.ameprc.mq.edu.au/docs/prospect_journal/volume_21_no_1/21_1_3_Couper.pdf

  • Couper, G. (2011). What makes pronunciation teaching work? Testing for the effect of two variables: Socially constructed metalanguage and critical listening. Language Awareness, 20(3), 159–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2011.570347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couper, G. (2015). Applying theories of language and learning to teaching pronunciation. In M. Reed & J. M. Levis (Eds.), Handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 413–432). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, C. (2007). The accents of outsourcing: The meanings of “neutral” in the Indian call center industry. World Englishes, 26(3), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2007.00511.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruttenden, A. (1997/1986). Intonation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cruttenden, A. (2014). Gimson’s pronunciation of English (8th ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic systems and intonation in English. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. (1997). English as a global language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, C. (2014). Accentedness, “passing” and crossing. In J. M. Levis & A. Moyer (Eds.), Social dynamics in second language accent (pp. 145–167). Boston: DeGruyter Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11(1), 51–62. Retrieved July 22, 2017, from http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1983-29886-001

  • de Bot, K. (1983). Visual feedback of intonation I: Effectiveness and induced practice behavior. Language and Speech, 26(4), 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383098302600402

  • De Bot, K., & Mailfert, K. (1982). The teaching of intonation: Fundamental research and classroom applications. TESOL Quarterly, 16(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586564

  • Derwing, T. M. (2003). What do ESL students say about their accents? Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.59.4.547

  • Derwing, T. M., Diepenbroek, L., & Foote, J. (2012). How well do general-skills ESL textbooks address pronunciation? TESL Canada Journal, 30(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v30i1.1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 1–16. Retrieved Janurary 10, 2018, from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/studies-in-second-language-acquisition/issue/77E9B64BB6D1D3DC15A6523E69A42665

  • Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588486

  • Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (2015). Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners’ fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm041

  • Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Wiebe, G. E. (1998). Evidence in favor of a broad framework for pronunciation instruction. Language Learning, 48(3), 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047

  • Deterding, D. (2001). The measurement of rhythm: A comparison of Singapore and British English. Journal of Phonetics, 29(2), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deterding, D. (2013). Misunderstandings in English as a Lingua Franca: An analysis of ELF interactions in South-East Asia. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Csizér, K. (2002). Motivational dynamics in second language acquisition: Results of a longitudinal nationwide survey. Applied Linguistics, 23(4), 421–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/23.4.421

  • Ellis, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, H. Reinders, R. Erlam, & R. Philp (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 3–25). Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters/Channel View Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3125–3134. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.413041

  • Foote, J. A., Holtby, A. K., & Derwing, T. M. (2011). Survey of pronunciation teaching in adult ESL programs in Canada, 2010. TESL Canada Journal, 29(1), 1–22 181–196. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v29i1.1086

  • Foote, J. A., Trofimovich, P., Collins, L., & Urzúa, F. (2013). Pronunciation teaching practices in communicative second language classes. Language Learning Journal, 44(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2013.784345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friginal, E. (2007). Outsourced call centers and English in the Philippines. World Englishes, 26(3), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2007.00512.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. B. (2008). Teaching pronunciation using the prosody pyramid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved September 24, 2017, from https://www.tesol.org/docs/default-source/new-resource-library/teaching-pronunciation-using-the-prosody-pyramid.pdf?sfvrsn=0

  • Gilbert, J. B. (2012). Clear speech: Pronunciation and listening comprehension in North American English (4th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gonet, W., Szpyra-Kozłowska, J., & Święciński, R. (2010). Clashes with ashes. In E. Waniek-Klimczak (Ed.), Issues in accents of English 2: Variability and norm (pp. 213–230). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goo, J., Granena, G., Yilmaz, Y., & Novella, M. (2015). Implicit and explicit instruction in L2 learning. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 443–482). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, J., Darcy, I., & Ewert, D. (2013). Pronunciation teaching and learning: Effects of explicit phonetic instruction in the L2 classroom. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th pronunciation in second language learning and teaching conference, August 2012 (pp. 194–206). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M., & Applebaum, A. (2010). Acoustic correlates of stress in Turkish Kabardian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 40(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100309990259

  • Grabe, E., Kochanski, G., & Coleman, J. (2005). The intonation of native accent varieties of English in the British Isles: Potential for miscommunication? In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & J. Przedlacka (Eds.), English pronunciation models: A changing scene (pp. 311–337). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graddol, D. (2006). English next: Why global English may mean the end of “English as a Foreign Language”. The British Council. Retrieved September 11, 2017, from https://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/continuing-professional-development/cpd-researchers/english-next

  • Grant, L. (Ed.). (2014). Pronunciation myths: Applying second language research to classroom teaching. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Greaves, W. S. (2008). Intonation in the grammar of English. London and Oakville, CA: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, L. (2011). Accent and listening assessment: A validation study of the use of speakers with L2 accents on an academic English listening test. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A., Curnick, L., Frost, D., Kautzsch, A., Kirkova-Naskova, A., Levey, D., et al. (2015). The English pronunciation teaching in Europe survey: Factors inside and outside the classroom. In J. A. Mompean & J. Fouz-González (Eds.), Investigating English pronunciation: Trends and directions (pp. 260–292). Basingstoke, UK and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A., Frost, D., Tergujeff, E., Kautzsch, A., Murphy, D., Kirkova-Naskova, A., et al. (2012). The English pronunciation teaching in Europe survey: Selected results. Research in Language, 10, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-011-0047-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A., & Jarosz, A. (2014). Desperately seeking a communicative approach: English pronunciation in a sample of French and polish secondary school textbooks. Research in Language, 12(3), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2014-0015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hieke, A. E. (1985). A componential approach to oral fluency evaluation. Modern Language Journal, 69(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1985.tb01930.x

  • Hirst, D. J., & Di Cristo, A. (Eds.). (1998). Intonation systems: A survey of twenty languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iverson, P., & Kuhl, P. K. (1995). Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(1), 553–562. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.412280

  • Jakobson, R. (1931). Prinzipien der historischen Phonologie. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague, 4, 247–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janicka, K., Kul, M., & Weckwerth, J. (2005). Polish students’ attitudes to native English accents. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & J. Przedlacka (Eds.), English pronunciation models: A changing scene (pp. 251–292). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (2005). Implementing an international approach to English pronunciation: The role of teacher attitudes and identity. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (2012). English as a Lingua Franca from the classroom to the classroom. ELT Journal, 66(4), 486–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, O., Rubin, D., & Pickering, L. (2010). Suprasegmental measures of accentedness and judgments of language learner proficiency in oral English. The Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 554–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x

  • Kenworthy, J. (1987). Teaching English pronunciation. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, J., & Hanau, C. (2011). Pronunciation as life and death: Improving the communication skills of non-native English speaking pathologists. In B. J. Hoekje & S. M. Tipton (Eds.), English language and the medical profession: Instructing and assessing the communication skills of international physicians (pp. 261–285). Bingley, UK; Leiden and Boston: Emerald; Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, R. (2008). Intonational phonology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leather, J. (1999). Second-language speech research: An introduction. Language Learning, 49(s1), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.49.s1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 345–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levis, J. (2016). The interaction of research and pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1075/jslp.2.1.001lev

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levis, J. M. (1999). Intonation in theory and practice, revisited. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 37–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588190

  • Levis, J. M. (2005). Changing contexts and shifting paradigms in pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levis, J. M., & Cortes, V. (2008). Minimal pairs in spoken corpora: Implications for pronunciation assessment and teaching. In C. A. Chapelle, Y.-R. Chung, & J. Xu (Eds.), Towards adaptive CALL: Natural language processing for diagnostic language assessment (pp. 197–208). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levis, J. M., & Wichmann, A. (2015). English intonation—Form and meaning. In M. Reed & J. M. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 139–155). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W. (2010). The nature of linguistic norms and their relevance to multilingual development. In M. Cruz-Ferreira (Ed.), Multilingual norms (pp. 397–404). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, J., Forey, G., & Price, H. (2008). Englishes in the Philippine business processing outsourcing industry: Issues, opportunities and research. In M. L. S. Bautista & K. Bolton (Eds.), Philippine English: Linguistic and literary perspectives (pp. 157–172). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English /ɹ/ and /l/: A first report. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874–886. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1894649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Malden, MA and Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, E. L. (2006). A cross-varietal comparison of deaccenting and given information: Implications for international intelligibility and pronunciation teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 739–761. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562. https://doi.org/10.2307/330224

  • Mazlum, F. (2015). Pronunciation pedagogy in the expanding circle: Investigating Iranian teachers’ attitudes to ELF and LFC. In Proceedings of EPIP4, 4th international conference on English pronunciation: Issues & practices (pp. 97–100). Prague: Institute of Phonetics, University of Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1987). Willingness to communicate. In J. C. McCroskey & A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 129–156). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyer, A. (2007). Do language attitudes determine accent? A study of bilinguals in the USA. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 28(6), 502–518. https://doi.org/10.2167/jmmd514.0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00963.x

  • Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2006). The functional load principle in ESL pronunciation instruction: An exploratory study. System, 34(4), 520–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.09.004

  • Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Morton, S. L. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, D. (2011). An investigation of English pronunciation teaching in Ireland: ELT in Ireland presents a number of interesting issues when it comes to the question of pronunciation. English Today, 27(4), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078411000484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136

  • Nowacka, M. (2012). Questionnaire-based pronunciation studies: Italian, Spanish and Polish students’ views on their English pronunciation. Research in Language, 10(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10015-011-0048-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. D., & Arnold, G. F. (1961). Intonation of colloquial English. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paunović, T., & Savić, M. (2008). Discourse intonation – Making it work. In S. Komar & U. Mozetič (Eds.), ELOPE, V(1–2), As you write it: Issues in literature, language, and translation in the context of Europe in the 21st century (pp. 57–75). Ljubljana: Slovene Association for the Study of English and Department of English, Faculty of Arts, University of Ljubljana. https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.5.1-2.57-75. Also available at https://revije.ff.uni-lj.si/elope/article/view/3314/3007

  • Pennington, M. C. (1989). Teaching pronunciation from the top down. RELC Journal, 20(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368828902000103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, M. C. (1996). Phonology in English language teaching: An international approach. London and New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, M. C. (2002). Real language phonology: Optimality Theory meets sociolinguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6(3), 418–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, M. C., & Ellis, N. C. (2000). Cantonese speakers’ memory for English sentences with prosodic cues. Modern Language Journal, 84(3), 372–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00075

  • Pennington, M. C., Lau, L., & Sachdev, I. (2011). Diversity in adoption of linguistic features of London English by Chinese and Bangladeshi adolescents. Language Learning Journal, 39(2), 177–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2011.573686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, L. (2006). Current research on intelligibility in English as a Lingua Franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190506000110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. PhD thesis, M.I.T.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plonsky, L. (2011). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 61(4), 993–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00663.x

  • Rajadurai, J. (2007). Intelligibility studies: A consideration of empirical and ideological issues. World Englishes, 26(1), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2007.00490.x

  • Rajagopalan, K. (2010). The soft ideological underbelly of the notion of intelligibility in discussions about ‘World Englishes’. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 465–470. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq014

  • Reed, M., & Levis, J. M. (Eds.). (2015). The handbook of English pronunciation. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M., & Michaud, C. (2015). Intonation in research and practice: The importance of metacognition. In M. Reed & J. M. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation (pp. 454–470). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rindal, U. (2010). Constructing identity with L2: Pronunciation and attitudes among Norwegian learners of English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 14(2), 240–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2010.00442.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindal, U. (2013). Meaning in English: L2 attitudes, choices and pronunciation in Norway. Doctoral thesis, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, P. (1982). On the distinction between ‘stress-timed’ and ‘syllable-timed’ languages. In D. Crystal (Ed.), Linguistic controversies (pp. 73–79). London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, P. (2001). Phonetics. Oxford introductions to language study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology (4th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, P., & Gilbert, J. B. (1990). Speaking clearly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson-Revell, P. (2008). Participation and performance in international business meetings. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 338–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson-Revell, P. (2010). Can you spell that for us non-native speakers? Accommodation strategies in international business meetings. Journal of Business Communication, 47(4), 432–454. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0021943610377304

  • Rogerson-Revell, P. (2011). English phonology and pronunciation teaching. London: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson-Revell, P. (2012). Can or should we teach intonation? Speak Out! IATEFL Pronunciation SIG Newsletter, 47, 16–20. Retrieved on July 22, 2017, from https://pronsig.iatefl.org/Archive/SO%20Website%20PDFs/SO!%2047%20website.pdf

  • Rogerson-Revell, P. (2014). Pronunciation matters: Using English for international business communication. In R. van den Doel & L. Rupp (Eds.), Pronunciation matters (pp. 137–156). Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, K. (2011). Effects of FFI on L2 phonological development of / ɹ / by Japanese learners of English. Doctoral dissertation, McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, K. (2013). Reexamining effects of form-focused instruction on L2 pronunciation development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000666

  • Saito, K. (2015). Experience effects on the development of late second language learners’ oral proficiency. Language Learning, 65(3), 563–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2012). Effects of form-focused instruction and corrective feedback on L2 pronunciation development of /ɹ/ by Japanese learners of English. Language Learning, 62(2), 595–633. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Y., & Saito, K. (2016). Differential effects of instruction on the development of second language comprehensibility, word stress, rhythm, and intonation: The case of inexperienced Japanese EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816643111

  • Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2016). Second language speech production: Investigating linguistic correlates of comprehensibility and accentedness for learners at different ability levels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000502

  • Saito, K., Trofimovich, P., & Isaacs, T. (2017). Using listener judgements to investigate linguistic influences on L2 comprehensibility and accentedness: A validation and generalization study. Applied Linguistics, 38(4), 439–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardegna, V. G. (2011). Pronunciation learning strategies that improve ESL learners’ linking. In J. Levis & K. LeVelle (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd pronunciation in second language learning and teaching conference (pp. 105–121). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, M., & Lyster, R. (2012). Peer interaction and corrective feedback for accuracy and fluency development: Monitoring, practicing, and proceduralization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(4), 591–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000356

  • Scheuer, S. (2005). Why native speakers are (still) relevant. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & J. Przedlacka (Eds.), English pronunciation models: A changing scene (pp. 111–131). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, G. (2005). The Lingua Franca core and the phonetics-phonology interface. In K. Dziubalska-Kołaczyk & J. Przedlacka (Eds.), English pronunciation models: A changing scene (pp. 152–177). Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, A. (2013). English as a Lingua Franca: Ontology and ideology. ELT Journal, 67(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. E. (1976). English as an international auxiliary language. RELC Journal, 7(2), 38–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368827600700205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L., & Nelson, C. (1985). International intelligibility of English: Directions and resources. World Englishes, 4(3), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1985.tb00423.x

  • Spada, N. (1997). Form-focussed instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30(2), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012799

  • Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x

  • Strange, W., & Dittmann, S. (1984). Effects of discrimination training on the perception of /r-l/ by Japanese adults learning English. Perception & Psychophysics, 36(2), 131–145. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202673

  • Tergujeff, E. (2013). English pronunciation teaching in Finland. Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä. Retrieved September 23, 2017, from https://tinyurl.com/nd624kz. Google Scholar

  • Tomalin, B. (2010). India rising: The need for two way training. In G. Forey & J. Lockwood (Eds.), Globalization, communication and the workplace (pp. 172–189). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R. I. (2011). Computer assisted pronunciation training: Targeting second language vowels: Perception improves pronunciation. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 744–765. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.3.744-765

  • Thomson, R. I. (2012). English accent coach. Retrieved July 30, 2017, from https://www.englishaccentcoach.com/

  • Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). The effectiveness of L2 pronunciation instruction: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underhill, A. (2012). Proprioception and physicality: The physicality of pronunciation & proprioception. Retrieved September 24, 2017, from http://www.adrianunderhill.com/2012/08/28/proprioception-and-pronunciation/

  • Walker, R. (1999). Proclaimed and perceived wants and needs among Spanish teachers of English. Speak Out! Newsletter of the IATEFL Pronunciation Special Interest Group, 24, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. (2010). Teaching the pronunciation of English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R., & Zoghbor, W. (2015). The pronunciation of English as a Lingua Franca. In M. Reed & J. M. Levis (Eds.), The handbook of English pronunciation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. (2006). English intonation: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennerstrom, A. K. (2001). The music of everyday speech: Prosody and discourse analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wichmann, A. (2000). Intonation in text and discourse. Harlow, UK: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. W. S. (2012). Training the perception and production of English /e/ and /æ/ of Cantonese ESL Learners: A comparison of low vs. high variability phonetic training. In Proceedings of the 14th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology (SST 2012), Sydney, Australia (pp. 37–40).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yau, J. N. W. (2010). Call centre discourse: Graduation in relation to voice quality and attitudinal profile. In G. Forey & J. Lockwood (Eds.), Globalization, communication and the workplace (pp. 107–124). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoghbor, W. S. (2011). Teaching the pronunciation of English as a Lingua Franca: Reducing skepticism and increasing practicality. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(8), 285–288. Retrieved September 22, 2017, from http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol._1_No._8;_July_2011/35.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pennington, M.C., Rogerson-Revell, P. (2019). Relating Pronunciation Research and Practice. In: English Pronunciation Teaching and Research. Research and Practice in Applied Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47677-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47677-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-4235-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47677-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics