Skip to main content

The Traverse, Equilibrium Analysis, and Post-Keynesian Economics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Post-Keynesian Essays from Down Under Volume IV: Essays on Theory

Abstract

The traverse refers to the movement of the economy outside equilibrium. It requires a consideration of how an economy may achieve equilibrium and how it may navigate toward a new one if conditions change. Analysis of these themes, from the classical economists onward, leads to the conclusion that it is difficult to envisage any useful role for equilibrium theory in the absence of some evidence that there are forces in the economy that propel it to equilibrium, without influencing the position to which the economy is gravitating toward. Complicating factors, emphasized in the post-Keynesian literature, include the existence of path dependency, hysteresis, cumulative causation, and the evolutionary nature of economic change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bain, J. 1956. Barriers to New Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blecker, R. A. 2013 “Long-Run Growth in Open Economies: Export-led Cumulative Causation or a Balance-of-payments Constraint?” In The Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics, Volume 1: Theory and Origins, eds. G. C. Harcourt and Peter Kriesler, 390–414. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. 1993a. “Hysteresis and Post Keynesian Economics.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 15: 305–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R. 1993b. “On the Foundations of Hysteresis in Economic Systems.” Economics and Philosophy 9: 53–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. 1993. “The Elephant and the Butterfly: or Hysteresis and Post Keynesian Economics.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 15: 309–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eltis, W. 1985. “Ricardo on Machinery and Technological Unemployment.” In The Legacy of Ricardo, ed. G. Caravale, 257–84. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F. M. 1983. Disequilibrium Foundations of Equilibrium Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forstater, M., and M. Murray. 2009. “Circular and Cumulative Causation in the Classics: Anticipations, Family Resemblances, and the Influence on Post Keynesian Economics.” In The Foundations of Non-equilibrium Economics: The Principle of Circular and Cumulative Causation, ed. S. Berger, 154–71. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandolfo, G. 1971. Mathematical Methods and Models in Economic Dynamics. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrke, C., and H. Hagemann. 1996. “Efficient Traverses and Bottlenecks: A Structural Approach.” In Production and Economic Dynamics, ed. M. Landesmann and R. Scazzieri, 140–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, R. M. 1982. Essays in Economic Dynamics. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, F. 1966. “Equilibrium Dynamics with Heterogeneous Capital Goods.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 633–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halevi, J. 1992. “Accumulation and Structural Disequilibrium.” In Beyond the Steady State: A Revival of Growth Theory, ed. J. Halevi, D. Laibman, and E. Nell, 264–88. Houndmills: Macmillan Academic and Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halevi, J., and P. Kriesler. 1991. “Kalecki, Classical Economics and the Surplus Approach.” Review of Political Economy 3: 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halevi, J., and P. Kriesler. 1992. “An Introduction to the Traverse in Economic Theory.” In Beyond the Steady State: A Revival of Growth Theory, ed. J. Halevi, D. Laibman, and E. Nell, 225–34. Houndmills: Macmillan Academic and Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. L., and C. J. Hitch. 1939. “Price Theory and Business Behaviour.” Oxford Economic Papers 2: 12–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, G. C. 1995. “Markets, Madness and a Middle Way.” In Harcourt, Capitalism, Socialism and Post-Keynesianism, 9–24. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, G. C. 2001. 50 Years a Keynesian and Other Essays. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, G. C. 2006. The Structure of Post-Keynesian Economics: The Core Contributions of the Pioneers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, G. C. 2008. “The Contributions of Tom Asimakopulos to Post Keynesian Economics.” In Keynes and Macroeconomics after 70 Years, ed. L. W. Wray and M. Forstater, 64–79. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, N. 2012. Equilibrium and Evolution: Alfred Marshall and the Marshallians. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, N. 2013. Alfred Marshall and Modern Economics: Equilibrium Theory and Evolutionary Economics. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J., and M. Lavoie. 1997. “The Hicksian Traverse as a Process of Reproportioning: Some Structural Dynamics.” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 8: 157–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. 1939. Value and Capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John 1965. Capital and Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John 1973. Capital and Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John 1979. Causality in Economics. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John 1980–81. “IS-LM: An Explanation.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 3: 19–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John 1985. Methods of Dynamic Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1938) 1960. “Stability and Full Employment.” In Kaldor, Essays on Economic Stability and Growth, 103–19. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. 1966. Causes of the Slow Rate of Economic Growth of the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. 1970. “The Case for Regional Policies.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 18: 337–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. 1972. “The Irrelevance of Equilibrium Economics.” Economic Journal 82: 1237–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. 1975. “What Is Wrong with Economic Theory?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 89 (3): 347–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. 1985. Economics without Equilibrium. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. 1996. Causes of Growth and Stagnation in the World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, M. 1939. Essays in the Theory of Economic Fluctuations. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, M. (1954) 1991. The Theory of Economic Dynamic. London: Allen and Unwin. Reprinted in Collected Works of Michał Kalecki, ed. J. Osiatyński, vol. 2, Capitalism: Economic Dynamics, 207–338. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalecki, M. (1968) 1991. “Trend and the Business Cycle.” In Collected Works of Michał Kalecki, ed. J. Osiatyński, vol. 2, Capitalism: Economic Dynamics, 435–50. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzner, D. W. 1993. “Some Notes on the Role of History and the Definition of Hysteresis and Related Concepts in Economic Analysis.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 15: 323–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, P., and R. Scazzieri. 2013 “Structural Economic Dynamics and the Cambridge Tradition”. In The Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics, Volume 1: Theory and Origins, eds. G. C. Harcourt and Peter Kriesler, 257–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. (1930) 1971. A Treatise on Money. Vol. 1: The Pure Theory of Money. Reprinted as vol. 5 of The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, ed. D. Moggridge. London: Macmillan for the Royal Economic Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirman, A. 2006. “Demand Theory and General Equilibrium: From Explanation to Introspection, a Journey down the Wrong Road.” History of Political Economy 38 (supplement): 246–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesler, P. 1999. “Harcourt, Hicks and Lowe: Incompatible Bedfellows?” In Keynes, Post-Keynesianism and Political Economy: Essays in Honour of Geoff Harcourt, ed. C. Sardoni and P. Kriesler, 400–417. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesler, P., and J. Nevile. 2012. “Dynamic Keynesian Economics: Cycling Forward with Harrod and Kalecki.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 36: 405–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, O. 1967. “The Computer and the Market.” In Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth: Essays Presented to Maurice Dobb, ed. C. H. Feinstein, 158–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, M. 1996. “Traverse, Hysteresis, and Normal Rates of Capacity Utilization in Kaleckian Models of Growth and Distribution.” Review of Radical Political Economics 28: 113–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, M., and P. Ramirez-Gaston. 1997. “Traverse in a Two-Sector Kaleckian Model of Growth with Target-Return Pricing.” Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 65 (2): 145–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, A. 1952. “A Structural Model of Production.” Social Research 19: 135–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, A. 1955. “Structural Analysis of Real Capital Formation.” In Capital Formation and Economic Growth, ed. A. Moses, 581–634. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, A. 1976. The Path of Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. 1980. “Methods and Problems in Business Cycle Theory.” Journal of Money, Banking and Credit 21: 696–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. 1983. Studies in Business-Cycle Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A. [1890] 1920. Principles of Economics. 8th edition. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Means, G. C. 1939. The Structure of the American Economy. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, J. S. 2007b. “Alfred Marshall’s Mecca: Reconciling the Theories of Value and Development.” Economic Record 83: S1–S22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F. 1959. “New Developments on the Oligopoly Front.” Journal of Political Economy 66: 215–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. 1965. Economic Theory and Underdeveloped Regions. London: University Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. 1968. Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naqvi, K. A. 1963. “Machine-Tools and Machines: A Physical Interpretation of the Marginal Rate of Saving.” Indian Economic Review 6: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nell, E. J. 1998. The General Theory of Transformational Growth: Keynes after Sraffa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R., and S. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hara, P. 2009. “The Principle of Circular and Cumulative Causation: Myrdal, Kaldor and Contemporary Heterodox Political Economy.” In The Foundations of Non-Equilibrium Economics: The Principle of Circular and Cumulative Causation, ed. S. Berger, 91–105. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. L. 1981. Structural Change and Economic Growth: A Theoretical Essay on the Dynamics of the Wealth of Nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. L. 1993. Structural Economic Dynamics: A Theory of the Economic Consequences of Human Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raj, K. N., and A. K. Sen. 1961. “Alternative Patterns of Growth under Conditions of Stagnant Export Earnings.” Oxford Economic Papers 13: 43–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, D. [1817] 1951. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Vol. 1: Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Ed. P. Sraffa with the collaboration of M. H. Dobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, S. A. T. 2006. “The Sonnenschein-Mantel-Debreu Results after Thirty Years.” History of Political Economy 38:228–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. [1953] 1975. “Imperfect Competition Revisited.” Economic Journal 63:579–93. Reprinted in Collected Economic Papers, 2nd edition, vol. 2: 222–38. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. [1974] 1979. “History versus equilibrium.” In Robinson, Collected Economic Papers, 2nd edition, vol. 5: 48–68. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. [1973] 1979. “What Has Become of the Keynesian Revolution?” In Robinson, Collected Economic Papers, 2nd edition, vol. 5: 168–77. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, J. B., Jr. 2002. “Complex Dynamics and Post Keynesian Economics.” In The Economics of Demand-Led Growth, ed. M. Setterfield, 74–98. Cheltanham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser, J. Barkley, Jr. 2013. “A Personal View of Post-Keynesian Elements in the Development of Economic Complexity Theory and Its Application to Policy” In The Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics, Volume 2: Critiques and Methodology, eds. G. C. Harcourt and Peter Kriesler, 198–201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. 1988. “Mathematical Vindication of Ricardo on Machinery.” Journal of Political Economy 96(2): 274–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardoni, C. 1981. “Multi-sectoral Models of Balanced Growth and the Marxian Schemes of Expanded Reproduction.” Australian Economic Papers 20:383–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackle, G. L. S. 1982. “Sir John Hicks’ ‘IS-LM an Explanation’: A Comment.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 4(3): 435–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1962) 1970. “Interest, Investment and Growth.” Rewritten in Growth Economics, ed. A. K. Sen, 219–32. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setterfield, M. 1997. “History versus Equilibrium and the Theory of Economic Growth.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 21:365–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setterfield, M. 2002. “A Model of Kaldorian Traverse: Cumulative Causation, Structural Change and Evolutionary Hysteresis.” In The Economics of Demand-Led Growth, ed. M. Setterfield, 215–33. Cheltanham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Setterfield, M. 2013. “Endogenous Growth: A Kaldorian Approach”. In The Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics, Volume 1: Theory and Origins, eds. G. C. Harcourt and Peter Kriesler, 231–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow R. M. 1984. “Mr Hicks and the Classics.” Oxford Economic Papers, n.s, 36 (Supplement: Economic Theory and Hicksian Themes): 13–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities: Prelude to a Critique of Economic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweezy, P. 1942. The Theory of Capitalist Development: Principles of Marxian Political Economy. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylos Labini, P. 1962. Oligopoly and Technical Progress. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirlwall, A. P. 1983. “A Plain Man’s Guide to Kaldor’s Growth Laws.” Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 5(3): 345–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toner, P. 1999. Main Currents in Cumulative Causation: The Dynamics of Growth and Development. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. B. 1898. “Why Is Economics Not an Evolutionary Science?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 12:373–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velupillai, K. V. 2013. “Post-Keynesian Precepts for Nonlinear, Endogenous, Nonstochastic, Business Cycle Theories”. In The Oxford Handbook of Post-Keynesian Economics, Volume 1: Theory and Origins, eds. G. C. Harcourt and Peter Kriesler, 415–442. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. A. 1928. “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress.” Economic Journal 38:527–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Joseph Halevi, G. C. Harcourt, Peter Kriesler and J. W. Nevile

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halevi, J., Hart, N., Kriesler, P. (2016). The Traverse, Equilibrium Analysis, and Post-Keynesian Economics. In: Post-Keynesian Essays from Down Under Volume IV: Essays on Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47529-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47529-9_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47528-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47529-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics