Capital and Growth: Its Relevance as a Critique of Neo-Classical and Classical Economic Theories

  • Joseph Halevi


This chapter argues that Hicks’s Capital and Growth, and its rewritten version Methods of Dynamic Economics, constitute a critique of both Neo-classical and Classical economics. The critique of the Neo-classical side is explicit: it appears in the series of explanations concerning the necessity to abandon the Temporary Equilibrium method of Value and Capital. Furthermore, the way in which Hicks argues against the assumption of a given aggregate saving ratio takes him straight into the Kaldor-Pasinetti Cambridge Equation. Having jettisoned both the Temporary Equilibrium and the Harrod type Fixprice methods, Hicks ends up with Sraffa type prices of production. By inserting those prices into the saving equation he obtains a model where any change in the natural growth rate implies a change in the distribution of income à la Kaldor with the underlying prices being determined à la Sraffa.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bhaduri, Amit (1975). ‘On the Analogy Between the Quantity and the Price Traverse’, Oxford Economic Papers, 27(3): 455–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Findlay, Ronald (1963). ‘The Robinsonian Model of Accumulation’, Economica, 30(117): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Foley, Duncan and Sidrauski, Miguel (1971). Monetary and Fiscal Policy in a Growing Economy (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  4. Garegnani, Pierangelo (1970). ‘Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution’, Review-of-Economic-Studies; 37(3): 407–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garegnani, Pierangelo (1976). ‘On a Change in the Notion of Equilibrium in Recent Work on Value and Distribution’, in Brown, Murray; Sato, Kazuo; Zarembka, Paul (eds.), Essays in Modern Capital Theory (Amsterdam and New York: North Holland).Google Scholar
  6. Halevi, Joseph (1992). ‘Accumulation and Structural Disequilibrium’, in Halevi, Joseph., Laibman, David., Nell, Edward, (eds.), Beyond the Steady State (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harcourt, Geoffrey C. (1963). ‘A Critique of Mr. Kaldor’s Model of Income Distribution and Growth’, Australian Economic Papers, 1(1): 20–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harcourt, Geoffrey C. (1975). ‘Decline and Rise: The Revival of (Classical) Political Economy’, Economic-Record, 51(135): 339–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hicks, John R. (1939). Value and Capital (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  10. Hicks, John R. (1965). Capital and Growth (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  11. Hicks, John (1969). A Theory of Economic History (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  12. Hicks, John R. (1973). Capital and Time (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  13. Hicks, John R. (1975). ‘Revival of Political Economy: The Old and the New’, Economic-Record, 51(135): 365–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hicks, John (1985). Methods of Dynamic Economics (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
  15. Hicks, John R. (1990). ‘Ricardo and Sraffa’, in Bharadwaj Krishna and Schefold Bertram (eds.), Essays On Piero Sraffa. Critical Perspectives on the Revival of Classical Theory (London, Boston, Sydney, Wellington: Unwyn Hyman).Google Scholar
  16. Pasinetti, Luigi L. (1966). ‘Changes in the Rate of Profit and Switches of Techniques’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80: 554–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pasinetti, Luigi L. (1977). Lectures in the Theory of Production (New York: Columbia University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Robinson, Joan (1956). The Accumulation of Capital (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  19. Spaventa-Luigi. (1970). ‘Rate of Profit, Rate of Growth, and Capital Intensity in a Simple Production Model’, Oxford-Economic-Papers; 22(2): 129–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Joseph Halevi, G. C. Harcourt, Peter Kriesler and J. W. Nevile 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joseph Halevi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations