Abstract
Bruno Latour, according to Andrew Barry, has been ‘extraordinarily influential across the social sciences in Britain’. Latour’s ‘actor-network theory’ has, however, only been influential in literary and cultural studies comparatively recently. This moment has coincided with and been reinforced by the turn to objects, and Latour’s own turn to metaphysical and philosophical questions. The author tracks and disputes with this turn to Latour by analysing his work as operating by posing matter against materialism. Constant throughout Latour’s work is a suspicion of Marxism and of any ‘reductive’ materialism that would, according to Latour, privilege one dominant form of matter. In place of this Latour calls for an ‘irreduction’, which would treat ‘matter’, and ‘objects’, as matters of concern that resist stabilization. Literary studies has extended this point to dispute suspicious readings, which seek some ‘hidden’ explanation, in favour of description and the tracking of ‘objects’. This conforms to the general turn of the humanities towards the historical, conceived of as a site of material density, friction, and resistance. The author argues that while this vision may be attractive it occludes the problem raised by Marxian ‘materialism’ concerning the forms of ‘real abstraction’. These are forms of value, incarnated in the commodity-form, that cut across both matter and abstraction. For Marx the commodity is a ‘sensuous super-sensuous thing’ (innlich-übersinnlich), combining materiality and abstraction. This ‘occult character’ of the commodity is occluded in Latour’s turn to matter, or the recent turn to objects, even when unpacked as a series of relations or a mode of gathering. The desire for the concrete, in the form of matter, in fact composes what Alberto Toscano calls a ‘warm abstraction’, which misses the force of abstraction. This problem is explored through the analysis and reading of Gordon Lish’s novel Peru (Lish, G. (1986). Peru. Champaign: Dalkey Archive Press, 2013). The novel interweaves forms of abstraction and materiality, working between the repetitions of language and the experience of violence, while also engaging with the question of value in literary and economic terms. This intervention troubles the Latourian tendency to reduce abstraction onto a level field of multiple objects, while also suggesting that ‘materialism’ is not simply confined to ‘matter’ or ‘objects’. The result would be a reworked consideration of materialism against matter, which would contest Latour’s ‘matter against materialism’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
Balibar, Étienne. The Philosophy of Marx. Trans. Chris Turner. London/New York: Verso, 2007.
Barry, Andrew. ‘Networks’. Radical Philosophy 165 (2011): 35–40.
Bennett, Jane. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press, 2010.
Brouillette, Sarah. ‘UNESCO and the Book in the Developing World’. Representations 127.1 (2014): 33–54.
Connolly, William E. A World of Becoming. Durham: Duke University Press, 2011.
Derrida, Jacques. Specters of Marx. Trans. Peggy Kamuf. London/New York: Routledge, 1994.
Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 1996.
Felski, Rita. ‘“Context Stinks!”’ New Literary History 42.4 (2011a): 573–91.
Felski, Rita. ‘Suspicious Minds’. Poetics Today 32.2 (2011b): 215–34.
Hamacher, Werner. ‘Lingua Amissa: The Messianism of Commodity-Language and Derrida’s Specters of Marx’. Ghostly Demarcations: A Symposium on Jacques Derrida’s Specters of Marx. Ed. Michael Sprinker. London/New York: Verso, 2008. 168–212.
Harman, Graham. Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne: re.press, 2009.
Harman, Graham. ‘The Well-Wrought Broken Hammer: Object-Oriented Literary Criticism’. New Literary History 43 (2012): 183–203.
Heinrich, Michael. An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Marx’s Capital. Trans. Alexander Locascio. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2012.
Latour, Bruno. The Pasteurization of France. Trans. Alan Sheridan and John Law. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press, 1988.
Latour, Bruno. ‘Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern’. Critical Inquiry 30 (2004): 225–48.
Latour, Bruno. Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Latour, Bruno. An Inquiry Into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2013.
Lish, Gordon. Peru. Champaign: Dalkey Archive Press, 2013 (1986).
Love, Heather. ‘Close but not Deep: Literary Ethics and the Descriptive Turn’. New Literary History 41 (2010): 371–91.
Lupton, Christina. ‘Theorizing Surfaces and Depths: Gaskell’s Cranford’. Criticism 50.2 (2008): 235–54.
Lupton, Christina. ‘Giving Power to the Medium: Recovering the 1750s’. The Eighteenth Century 52.3 (2011): 289–302.
Lutz, Garry. ‘The Sentence is a Lonely Place’. The Believer. January 2009. http://www.believermag.com/issues/200901/?read=article_lutz. Date accessed: 26 August 2014.
McGurl, Mark. The Program Era: Postwar Fiction and the Rise of Creative Writing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.
Marx, Karl. Grundrisse. Trans. Martin Nicolaus. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1973.
Marx, Karl. Early Writings. Intro. Lucio Colletti. Trans. Rodney Livingstone and Gregory Benton. Harmondsworth: Penguin in association with New Left Review, 1975.
Marx, Karl. Capital. Vol. 1. Intro. Ernest Mandel. Trans. Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin, 1990.
Marx, Karl. Capital. Vol. 3. Intro. Ernest Mandel. Trans. David Fernbach. London: Penguin, 1992.
Noys, Benjamin. The Persistence of the Negative: A Critique of Contemporary Continental Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010.
Schmidgen, Henning. ‘The Materiality of Things? Bruno Latour, Charles Péguy and the History of Science’. History of the Human Sciences 26.1 (2013): 3–28.
Sohn-Rethel, Alfred. Intellectual and Manual Labour: A Critique of Epistemology. London: Macmillan, 1978.
Toscano, Alberto. ‘The Culture of Abstraction’. Theory, Culture & Society 25.4 (2008): 57–75.
White, Hylton. ‘Materiality, Form, and Context: Marx contra Latour’. Victorian Studies 55.4 (2013): 667–82.
Winters, David. ‘Truth, Force, Composition’. 3AM Magazine. 7 April 2013. http://www.3ammagazine.com/3am/truth-force-composition/. Date accessed: 6 December 2013.
Žižek, Slavoj. The Sublime Object of Ideology. London/New York: Verso, 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Noys, B. (2016). Matter Against Materialism: Bruno Latour and the Turn to Objects. In: Middeke, M., Reinfandt, C. (eds) Theory Matters. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47428-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47428-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47427-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47428-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)