Skip to main content

Accountability and Shared Measurement in Health Care: Examples from Israel

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Public Accountability and Health Care Governance

Abstract

Governance structure and the way services are being delivered are changing. As a result, the nature of accountability and measurement are changing as well. In this study, we examine these changes in measurement and accountability and use the Israeli health system as a useful illustration. In particular we focus on the development of horizontal accountability and shared measurement practices. We demonstrate that the shift from more vertical to more horizontal accountability is creating opportunities for and giving rise to more shared measurement across organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We focus on outcomes, but it could also relate to characteristics of the population, inputs and outputs.

  2. 2.

    The Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute is Israel’s leading center for applied research on social policy and services. MJB is an independent, non-profit partnership between the American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee and the Government of Israel. The three authors of this paper are MJB employees.

  3. 3.

    It is probably not coincidental that, while the research center is not dependent on cooperation from either the government or the health plans to be able to field the consumer surveys, both of these groups—as well as other key players in the health system—are involved, through the steering committee, as true partners and stakeholders in the effort.

Bibliography

  • Agranoff, R. & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almog, Y. & Habib, J. (2013a). Shared measurement of outcomes in the social sector: Literature review and conceptual development. Jerusalem, Israel: Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute (RR-646-13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Almog, Y., & Habib, J. 2013b.The role of shared measurement in collaborations and its effective implementation: What have we learned thus far? Lecture presented at the conference Collaboration among Government, Market, and Society: Forging Partnerships and Encouraging Competition, Shanghai, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behn, R. D. (2010). Collaborating for performance: Or can there exist such a thing as collaborationstat? International Public Management Journal, 13(4), 429–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg-Warman, A., Rosen, B., & Sicron, M. (2005). Use of data from the Witkowsky report on the financial activities of the health plans in decision making in the health system. Jerusalem, Israel: Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute RR-463-05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovens, M. (2005). Public accountability. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 182–208). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammli-Greenberg, S., Gross, R., Yair, Y., & Akiva, E. (2011). Public opinion on the level of service and performance of the healthcare system in 2009 and in comparison with previous years. Jerusalem, Israel: Myers-JDC-Brookdale Institute RR-587-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busi, M. & Bititci, U. S. (2006). Collaborative performance management: Present gaps and future research. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 55(1/2), 7–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole‐of‐government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. 2015. Performance and accountability—A theoretical discussion and an empirical assessment. Public Organization Review, 15:207–225. doi:10.1007/s11115–013-0267-2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, M. (2002). The end of the line? Accountable governance in the age of networks, partnerships, and joined‐up services. Governance, 15(1), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. & Sabin, J. (1998). The ethics of accountability in managed care reform. Health Affairs (Project Hope), 17(5), 50–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, P. & Klein, R. (1987). Accountability: Five public services. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, E. J. & Emanuel, L. L. (1996). What is accountability in health care? Annals of Internal Medicine, 124(2), 229–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkkilä, T. (2007). Governance and accountability—A shift in conceptualisation. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, R. (2004). A consumer-based tool for evaluating the quality of health services in the Israeli health care system following reform. Health Policy, 68(2), 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanleybrown, F., Kania, J., & Kramer, M. 2012 Channeling change: Making collective impact work. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved February, 2012, from http://www.ssireview.org/blog/entry/channeling_change_making_collective_impact_work#bio-footer

  • Hodges, R. (2012). Joined‐up government and the challenges to accounting and accountability researchers. Financial Accountability and Management, 28(1), 26–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, D. H., Shmueli, A., Ben-Yehuda, A., Paltiel, O., Calderon, R., Cohen, A. D., et al. (2012). Community healthcare in Israel: Quality indicators 2007–2009. Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 1, 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kania, J. & Kramer, M. (2011). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, M., Parkhurst, M., & Vaidyanathan, L. (2009). Breakthroughs in shared measurement and social impact. Boston: FSG Social Impact Advisors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lægreid, P. & Mattei, P. (2013). Introduction: Reforming the welfare state and the implications for accountability in a comparative perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(2), 197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch-Cerullo, K. & Cooney, K. (2011). Moving from outputs to outcomes: A review of the evolution of performance measurement in the human service nonprofit sector. Administration in Social Work, 35(4), 364–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattei, P., Mitra, M., Vrangbæk, K., Neby, S., & Byrkjeflot, H. (2013). Reshaping public accountability: Hospital reforms in Germany, Norway and Denmark. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(2), 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, M. & Agranoff, R. (2011). The limitations of public management networks. Public Administration, 89(2), 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michels, A. & Meijer, A. (2008). Safeguarding public accountability in horizontal government. Public Management Review, 10(2), 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, D. P., Fernandez, S., Kim, S., LeRoux, K. M., Piotrowski, S. J., Wright, B. E., et al. (2011). Performance regimes amidst governance complexity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(suppl 1), i141–i155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ní Ógáin, E., Svistak, M., & De Las Casas, L. (2013). Inspiring impact: Blueprint for shared measurement: Developing, designing and implementing shared approaches to impact measurement. London: NPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, G. (1999). Horizontal accountability in new democracies. In A. Schedler, L. J. Diamond, & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), The self restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies (pp. 29–52). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2013. Health at a glance 2013: OECD indicators. OECD. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health_glance-2013-en

  • Page, S. (2004). Measuring accountability for results in interagency collaboratives. Public Administration Review, 64(5), 591–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-new public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G. & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, S. (2001). Managing government-third sector collaboration: Accountability, ambiguity, and politics. International Journal of Public Administration, 24(11), 1161–1188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romzek, B. S. (2011). The tangled web of accountability in contracting networks: The case of welfare reform. In M. J. Dubnick & G. H. Frederickson (Eds.), Accountable governance: Promises and problems (pp. 22–41). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romzek, B. S. & Dubnick, M. J. (1998). Accountability. In J. M. Shafritz (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration (pp. A–C). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romzek, B. S., LeRoux, K., & Blackmar, J. M. (2012). A preliminary theory of informal accountability among network organizational actors. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 442–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B. & Lessoff, S. (2012). Introduction to the country essays. In B. Rosen, A. Israeli, & S. M. Shortell (Eds.), Accountability and responsibility in health care: Issues in addressing an emerging global challenge (p. 115). Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B. & Samuel, H. (2009). Israel health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 11(2), 1–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B., Israeli, A., & Shortell, S. M. (2012). Accountability and responsibility in health care: Issues in addressing an emerging global challenge. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B., Pawlson, L. G., Nissenholtz, R., Benbassat, J., Porath, A., Chassin, M. R., et al. (2011). What the United States could learn from Israel about improving the quality of health care. Health Affairs, 30(4), 764–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, B., Porath, A., Pawlson, L. G., Chassin, M. R., & Benbassat, J. (2010). Adherence to standards of care by health maintenance organizations in Israel and the USA. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 23(1), 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Riverside County, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C. & Walsh, P. (2004). Collaboration of public sector agencies: Reporting and accountability challenges. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(7), 621–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanfilippo, L. & Chambers, T. (2007). Banking on outcomes for the third sector: Useful? Possible? Feasible? London, England: New Economics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schillemans, T. (2008). Accountability in the shadow of hierarchy: The horizontal accountability of agencies. Public Organization Review, 8(2), 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schillemans, T. (2011). Does horizontal accountability work? Evaluating potential remedies for the accountability deficit of agencies. Administration & Society, 43(4), 387–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schillemans, T. & Bovens, M. (2011). The challenge of multiple accountability: Does redundancy lead to overload? In M. J. Dubnick & H. G. Frederickson (Eds.), Accountable governance: Problems and promises (pp. 3–21). Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinaiko, A. D., Eastman, D., & Rosenthal, M. B. (2012). How report cards on physicians, physician groups, and hospitals can have greater impact on consumer choices. Health Affairs, 31(3), 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuohy, C. H. (2012). Agency, contract, and governance: Shifting shapes of accountabilily in the health care arena. In B. Rosen, A. Israeli, & S. M. Shortell (Eds.), Accountability and responsibility in health care: Issues in addressing an emerging global challenge (p. 91). Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, E. K., Farley, C., & Polin, M. (2012). Using data in multi-agency collaborations: Guiding performance to ensure accountability and improve programs. New York: Public/Private Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitaker, G. P., Altman-Sauer, L., & Henderson, M. (2004). Mutual accountability between governments and nonprofits moving beyond “Surveillance” to “Service”. The American Review of Public Administration, 34(2), 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yehonatan Almog .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Almog, Y., Rosen, B., Habib, J. (2016). Accountability and Shared Measurement in Health Care: Examples from Israel. In: Mattei, P. (eds) Public Accountability and Health Care Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47299-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics