Skip to main content

Hospital Planning in a Competitive Arena: Sustaining or Suspending Market Forces?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter examines the growing tensions between hospital funding and governance systems in Germany and attempts to understand why individual states promote or curb market competition within the health care sector in response. After briefly reviewing governance reform trends across the country, the author explores the advent of New Public Management (NPM)- and post-NPM-inspired models in the states of Hessen, Sachsen-Anhalt, and Brandenburg using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in order to determine which forces push governments away or toward market competition in hospital planning. The findings reveal that economic concerns at both the state and individual hospital levels largely drive desires for reform, but that the diffusion of oft-unchallenged ideas and internationally imported norms regarding efficient and cost-effective management practices in health care are critical to the elevation of market-friendly instruments to fill governance voids. As a result, while state influence persists across cases, governments’ focus is moving away from direct intervention and toward the definition of goals and standards that hospitals must meet by means of heightened market and quasi-market competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In North-Rhine Westphalia, for example, the most populated state in Germany and at the same time the state with the highest hospital density, the first hospital plan was implemented in 1971, which was substantially revised in 1979. In the following 20 years, however, no new plan was released. It was not before 2001, when Birgit Fischer, the then state health minister, developed a substantial new hospital plan. But even then, the reforms of hospital planning were mainly a reaction to the paradigm shift of federal hospital policy. It was the introduction of the new DRG-remuneration system, which put hospital planning at the state level on the political agenda. In this paper, the most recent hospital plan from 2013 is at the centre of the discussion (Ministerium für Gesundheit, Emanzipation, Alter und Pflege des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, 2015).

  2. 2.

    The population of a defined area is multiplied by its hospitalization rate per 1,000 inhabitants (inpatient cases divided by its population), its average length of stay (ALOS) and 100. This multiplication is then divided by the multiplication of 1,000 × 365 × bed utilization rate.

  3. 3.

    In terms of the number of units; the share of public provision is still higher with regard to the number of beds.

References

  • Altenstetter, C. (1973). Planning for health facilities in the United States and in west Germany. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 51(1), 41–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg-Schlosser, D. & Cronqvist, L. (2011). Aktuelle Methoden der Vergleichenden Politikwissenschaft: Einführung in konfigurationelle (QCA) und makro-quantitative Verfahren. Stuttgart, Germany: UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bode, I., Lange, J., & Märker, M. (2013). Qualitätsagenda im Krankenhauswesen. Eine diffuse Agenda und reichlich Ambivalenz. Sozialer Fortschritt, 62(12), 293–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckenberger, E., Klaue, S., & Schwintowski, H.-P. (Eds.) (2006). Krankenhausmärkte zwischen Regulierung und Wettbewerb. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, T. (1987). Max Webers theory of concept formation: History, laws, and ideal types. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrkjeflot, H., Neby, S., Vrangbæk, K., & Mattei, P. (2012). Accountable public hospitals? A comparison of Denmark. Madrid, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacace, M. & Frisina, L. (2010). Beyond path dependency: Explaining health care system change. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 35(4), 449–454. doi:10.1215/03616878-2010-012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronqvist, L. (2007). TOSMANA-Tool for Small-N Analysis, Version 1.3. Retrieved from http://www.tosmana.net/tosmana_manual1_3beta.pdf.

  • Deutsche Krankenhausgesellschaft (DKG). (2012). Bestandsaufnahme zur Krankenhausplanung und Investitionsfinanzierung in den Bundesländern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döhler, M. & Manow, P. (1997). Strukturbildung von Politikfeldern—Das Beispiel bundesdeutscher Gesundheitspolitik seit den 50er Jahren. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1996). Welfare states in transition: National adaptations in global economies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ettelt, S., Ellen, N., Sarah, T., & Nicholas, M. (2008). Capacity planning in health care a review of the international experience. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies., 10(1), 112–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P. C. (2011). Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlinger, T. & Schmucker, R. (2009). A long farewell to the Bismarck system: Incremental change in the German health insurance system. German Policy Studies, 5(1), 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosfield, A. G. (1997). Who is holding whom accountable for quality? Health Affairs, 16(3), 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. H. (1991). The profit motive and patient care: The changing accountability of doctors and hospitals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, C. (2002). New public management reforms of the Danish and Swedish welfare states: The role of different social democratic responses. Governance, 15(2), 271–294. doi:10.1111/1468-0491.00188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassenteufel, P., Smyrl, M., Genieys, W., & Moreno-Fuentes, F. J. (2010). Programmatic actors and the transformation of European health care states. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 35(4), 517–538. doi:10.1215/03616878-2010-015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häusermann, S. (2010). Solidarity with whom? Why organised labour is losing ground in continental pension politics. European Journal of Political Research, 49(2), 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häusermann, S., Picot, G., & Geering, D. (2013). Review article: Rethinking party politics and the welfare state—Recent advances in the literature. British Journal of Political Science, 43(1), 241–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1995). The ‘new public Management’ in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(2–3), 93–109. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(93)E0001-W.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klenk, T. & Reiter, R. (2012). Öffentliche Daseinsvorsorge, privat organisiert? Ein deutsch-französischer Vergleich der Bereitstellung der Krankenhausinfrastruktur. ZSR, 58(4), 401–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, W. (1983). The democratic class struggle. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J.-E. (2009). State management. An enquiry into models of public administration and management. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mätzke, M. (2010). The organization of health policy functions in the German federal government. Social Policy & Administration, 44(2), 120–141. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2009.00704.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerium für Gesundheit, Emanzipation, Alter und Pflege des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. (2015). Krankenhausplan NRW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosebach, K. (2009). Commercializing German hospital care? Effects of new public management and managed care under neoliberal conditions. German Policy Studies, 5(1), 65–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordrhein-Westfahlen, L. (2007). Gesetzentwurf der Landesregierung Krankenhausgestaltungsgesetz des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (KHGG NRW). 14. Wahlperiode Drucksache 14/3958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perschke-Hartmann, C. (1994). Die doppelte Reform: Gesundheitspolitik von Blüm zu Seehofer. Reihe Gesellschaftspolitik und Staatstätigkeit, Bd. 3. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Geert, B. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis (2nd ed.). Oxford, MA: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0621/2004556488-d.html.

  • Quaas, M. (2014). Krankenhausplan als Qualitätssicherungsinstrument? Rechtliche Vorgaben und Grenzen. Gesundheitsrecht, 13(3), 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations (4th ed. ). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidegeld, E. (1996). Staatliche Sozialpolitik in Deutschland: Historische Entwicklung und theoretische Analyse von den Ursprüngen bis 1918. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rihoux, B. (2006). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods: Recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research. International Sociology, 21(5), 679–706. doi:10.1177/0268580906067836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rihoux, B. (2009). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques: Recent advances and challenges. In S. Pickel, D. Jahn, H.-J. Lauth, & G. Pickel (Eds.), Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft Neue Entwicklungen und Anwendungen (pp. 365–385). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage GmbH.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rihoux, B. & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (Applied social research methods series (vol. 51, ). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schlesinger, M., Mitchell, S., & Gray, B. H. (2004). Public expectations of nonprofit and for-profit ownership in American medicine: Clarifications and implications. Health Affairs, 23(6), 181–191. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.23.6.181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, A., Cacace, M., Götze, R., & Rothgang, H. (2010). Explaining health care system change: Problem pressure and the emergence of ‘Hybrid’ health care systems. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 35(4), 455–486. doi:10.1215/03616878-2010-013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, C. Q. & Wagemann, C. (2012). Set-theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. In Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. (2010). Das Gesundheitssystem in Deutschland: eine Einführung in Struktur und Funktionsweise. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. & Kathleen, T. (2006). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & T. Kathleen (Eds.), Beyond continuity, institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1991). Die Objektivität sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis. In Schriften zur Wissenschaftslehre. Stuttgart, Germany: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1997). In E. A. Shils, H. A. Finch, R. J. Antonio, & A. Sica (Eds.), The methodology of the social sciences. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiemeyer, J. (1984). Krankenhausfinanzierung und Krankenhausplanung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berlin, Germany: Duncker&Humbolt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, H. L. (1974). The welfare state and equality: Structural and ideological roots of public expenditures. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanja Klenk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klenk, T. (2016). Hospital Planning in a Competitive Arena: Sustaining or Suspending Market Forces?. In: Mattei, P. (eds) Public Accountability and Health Care Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47299-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics