Skip to main content

How Leadership Works

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Interdisciplinary Discourse

Abstract

This chapter, the final analytical chapter in the book, explores the dynamics of leadership and the different forms it can take in research project meetings. It addresses the ways in which leadership activities and processes such as decision-making, negotiating and reaching consensus are discursively constructed by team members, and how different forms of leadership are instantiated through research interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antonakis, J., Cianciolo, A. T., & Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Leadership: Past, present, and future. In J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 3–15). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asmus, B., & Svennevig, J. (2009). Meeting talk: An introduction. Journal of Business Communication, 46(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. (2007). Leadership of academics in research. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 35(4), 449–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (2008). The Bass handbook of leadership (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. (2010). The language of female leadership. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N., Crawford, M., & Cartwright, M. (2003). Effective educational leadership. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennis, W. (1996). The leader as storyteller. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 154–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R. (2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2008). Tensions in higher education leadership: Towards a multi-level model of leadership practice. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 358–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: Rhetoric and reality. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 37(2), 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S., & Schnurr, S. (2014). Exploring distributed leadership: Solving disagreements and negotiating consensus in a ‘leaderless’ team. Discourse Studies, 16(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, J. (2006). A conversation analytical approach to business communication. Journal of Business Communication, 43(3), 202–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, J. (2012). A discursive approach to leadership: Doing assessments and managing organizational meanings. Journal of Business Communication, 49, 148–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, J. (2015). Leaders as ventriloquists: Leader identity and influencing the communicative construction of the organisation. Leadership, Online. doi: 10.1177/1742715015584695

  • Day, D. V., Gronn, P., & Salas, E. (2004). Leadership capacity in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 857–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drath, W. H., McCauley, C. D., Palus, C. J., Van Velsor, E., O’Connor, P. M. G., & McGuire, J. B. (2008). Direction, alignment, commitment: Toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 635–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensley, M. D., Hmieleski, K. M., & Pearce, C. L. (2006). The importance of vertical and shared leadership within new venture top management teams: Implications for the performance of startups. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 217–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairhurst, G. T. (2007). Discursive leadership: In conversation with leadership psychology. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairhurst, G. T. (2009). Considering context in discursive leadership research. Human Relations, 62(11), 1607–1633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, T. L., & Mumford, M. D. (2009). The effects of conflicting information on creative thought: a source of performance improvements or decrements? Creativity Research Journal, 21(2–3): 265–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich, T. L., Griffith, J. A., & Mumford, M. D. (2016). Collective leadership behaviors: Evaluating the leader, team network, and problem situation characteristics that influence their use. The Leadership Quarterly 27(2), 312–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. D. (2010). Dispersed leadership: Exploring the impact of antecedent forms of power using a communicative framework. Management Communication Quarterly, 24, 260–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2008). Enhancing transdisciplinary research through collaborative leadership. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, S124–S132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2010). Hybrid configurations of leadership. In A. Bryman, D. Collinson, K. Grint, B. Jackson, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), Sage handbook of leadership (pp. 435–452). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1969). Management of organizational behaviour. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J., Marra, M., & Vine, B. (2011). Leadership, discourse, and ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J. (1971). A path–goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2006). Successful school leadership: What it is and how it influences pupil learning. Nottingham: DfES Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailhot, C., Gagon, S., Langley, A., & Louis-Felix, B. (2016). Distributed leadership across people and objects in a collaborative research project. Leadership, 12(1), 53–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, A., Smith, B. R., Dixon, A. L., & Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 232–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middlehurst, R., Goreham, H., & Woodfield, S. (2009). Why research leadership in higher education: Exploring contributions from the UK’s leadership foundation in higher education. Leadership, 5, 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumby, D. (2001). Power and politics. In F. Jablin & L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 585–623). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, M. (2009). Interpretive management in business meetings. Understanding managers’ interactional strategies through conversation analysis. Journal of Business Communication, 46, 23–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northouse, P. G. (2004). Leadership: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, C. L., & Sims Jr., H. P. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics, 6, 172–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rost, J. (1991). Leadership for the twenty-first century. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnurr, S., & Chan, A. (2011). Exploring another side of co-leadership: Negotiating professional identities through face-work in disagreements. Language in Society, 40(2), 187–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svennevig, J. (2008). Exploring leadership conversations. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 529–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourish, D. (2007). Communication, discourse and leadership. Human Relations, 60(11), 1727–1740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 654–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., Kwon, W., & Clark, I. (2011). Getting people on board: Discursive leadership for consensus building in team meetings. Discourse and Society, 22(5), 592–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yammarino, F. J., Salas, E., Serban, A., Shirreffs, K., & Shuffler, M. L. (2012). Collectivistic leadership approaches: Putting the “we” in leadership science and practice. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5, 382–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Choi, S., Richards, K. (2017). How Leadership Works. In: Interdisciplinary Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47040-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47040-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47039-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47040-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics