Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Interface Between Trade and Technology Policies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Agricultural Trade, Policy Reforms, and Global Food Security

Abstract

Concerns that products containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs) may be unsafe as food or animal feed, or may harm the environment, have led European countries to procrastinate on approving their production or use despite no evidence of their harm. This policy stance, which has discouraged many developing countries from adopting too, is unfortunate because modeling results show that GM crops offer welfare gains that could alleviate poverty and food insecurity directly, substantially, and relatively rapidly in countries willing to allow adoption of this new biotechnology. The stakes in this issue are very high because the prospective gains from this new technology will increase as climate change proceeds and requires adaptation by farmers to warming and to increased weather volatility and higher costs of irrigation water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alston, J.M., M.C. Marra, P.G. Pardey, and T.J. Wyatt. 2000. A Meta Analysis of Rates of Return to Agricultural R&D: Ex Pede Herculum? IFPRI Research Report 113. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., and L.A. Jackson. 2005. Some Implications of GM Food Technology Policies for Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies 14(3): 385–410, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., C.P. Nielsen, and S. Robinson. 2002. Estimating the Economic Effects of GMOs: The Importance of Policy Choices and Preferences, Ch. 20. In Economic and Social Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology, ed. R.E. Evenson, V. Santaniello, and D. Zilberman. London: CAB International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., L.A. Jackson, and C.P. Nielsen. 2005. GM Rice Adoption: Implications for Welfare and Poverty Alleviation. Journal of Economic Integration 20(4): 771–788, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K., E. Valenzuela, and L.A. Jackson. 2008b. Recent and Prospective Adoption of Genetically Modified Cotton: A Global CGE Analysis of Economic Impacts. Economic Development and Cultural Change 56(2): 265–296, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, B.A. 2015. Extensive and Intensive Agricultural Supply Response. Annual Review of Resource Economics 7(1): 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, G., S. Sexton, and D. Zilberman. 2014. Agricultural Biotechnology: The Promise and Prospects of Genetically Modified Crops. Journal of Economic Perspectives 28(1): 99–120, Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, S. 2014. Empire of Cotton: A Global History. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beddow, J.M., and P.G. Pardey. 2015. Moving Matters: The Effect of Location on Crop Production. Journal of Economic History 75(1): 219–249, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouis, H.E. 2002. Plant Breeding: A New Tool to Fight Micronutrient Malnutrition. Journal of Nutrition 132: 491S–494S.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. The Potential of Genetically Modified Food Crops to Improve Human Nutrition in Developing Countries. Journal of Development Studies 43(1): 79–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C.A., and G.P. Gruere. 2006. International Approval and Labeling Regulations of Genetically Modified Food in Major Trading Countries, Ch. 21. In Economics of Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnologies, ed. R.E. Just, J.M. Alston, and D. Zilberman. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, A., D. Doan, D. Newhouse, M.C. Nguyen, H. Uematsu, and J.P. Azevedo 2016. Who Are the Poor in the Developing World? Policy Research Working Paper 7844, World Bank, Washington DC, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., and M. Ravallion. 2010. The Developing World is Poorer Than We Thought, But No Less Successful in the Fight Against Poverty. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125(4): 1577–1625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. 1997. Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • EASAC (European Academies Science Advisory Council). 2013. Planting the Future: Opportunities and Challenges for Using Crop Genetic Improvement Technologies for Sustainable Agriculture. EASAC Policy Report 21. Halle: EASAC Secretariat, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenson, R.E., and D. Gollin. 2003. Assessing the Impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science 300: 758–762, May 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedoroff, N. 2004. Mendel in the Kitchen: A Scientist’s View of Genetically Modified Foods. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuglie, K.O., S.L. Wang, and V.E. Ball (ed). 2012. Productivity Growth in Agriculture: An International Perspective. London: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, G.D., and D. Zilberman. 2004. Explaining Europe’s Resistance to Agricultural Biotechnology. ARE Update 7(5): 5–7, May/June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, G.D., G. Hochman, and D. Zilberman. 2009. The Political Economy of Agricultural Biotechnology Policies. AgBioForum 12: 34–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. 1958. Research Costs and Social Returns: Hybrid Corn and Related Technologies. Journal of Political Economy 66(5): 419–431, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruère, G., and D. Sengupta. 2009. GM-free Private Standards and their Effects on Biosafety Decision-Making in Developing Countries. Food Policy 34(5): 399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T. (ed). 1997. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, F., C.E. Pray, Y. Lu, J. Huang, C. Fan, and R. Hu. 2004. Genetically Modified Cotton and Farmers’ Health in China. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 10: 307–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons. 2015. Advanced Genetic Techniques for Crop Improvement: Regulation, Risk and Precaution. Fifth Report of Session 2014–15, Science and Technology Committee, House of Commons, UK Parliament, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., R. Hu, H. van Meijl, and F. van Tongeren. 2004. Biotechnology Boosts to Crop Productivity in China: Trade and Welfare Implications. Journal of Development Economics 75(1): 27–54, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. 2015. 20th Anniversary of Global Commercialization of Biotech Crops (1996 to 2015)and Biotech Crop Highlights in 2015. Brief 51, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D.K. 2003. GM Science Review: First Report. Prepared by the GM Science Review Panel under the chairmanship of Sir David King for the UK Government, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klümper, W., and M. Qaim. 2014. A Meta-Analysis of the Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops. PLoS ONE 9(11): e111629, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marra, M., P. Pardey, and J. Alston. 2002. The Payoffs to Agricultural Biotechnology: An Assessment of the Evidence. AgBioForum 5(2): 43–50. Downloadable at http://www.agbioforum.org/v5n2/v5n2a02-marra.pdf

  • Nielsen, C.P., and K. Anderson. 2001. Global Market Effects of European Responses to Genetically Modified Organisms. Weltwertschaftliches Archiv 137(2): 320–346, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, A.L., and P.W. Rhode. 2002. The Red Queen and the Hard Reds: Productivity Growth in American Wheat, 1800-1940. Journal of Economic History 62(4): 929–966, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Adapting North American Wheat Production to Climatic Challenges, 1839–2009. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(2): 480–485, 11 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paarlberg, R.L. 2003. The Politics of Precaution: Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Starved for Science: How Biotechnology is Being Kept Out of Africa. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardey, P.G., J.M. Alston, and C. Chan-Kang. 2013. Public Agricultural R&D over the Past Half Century: An Emerging New World Order. Agricultural Economics 44(s1): 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardey, P.G., C. Chan-Kang, S.P. Dehmer and J.M. Beddow. 2016b. Agricultural R&D is on the Move. Nature 537: 301–303, 15 September (and online supplement at go.nature.com/2cfvkij).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinstrup-Andersen, P., and E. Schioler. 2000. Seeds of Contention: World Hunger and the Global Controversy Over GM Crops. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pray, C.E., and A. Naseem. 2007. Supplying Crop Biotechnology to the Poor: Opportunities and Constraints. Journal of Development Studies 43(1): 192–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qaim, M. 2016. Genetically Modified Crops and Agricultural Development. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Qaim, M., and D. Zilberman. 2003. Yield Effects of Genetically Modified Crops in Developing Countries. Science 299: 900–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant, M.W., R.E. Evenson, S. Msangi, and T.B. Sulser. 2014. Agricultural Productivity and Child Mortality: The Impact of the Green Revolution. World Food Policy 1(1): 94–116, Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, C.F., B. Senauer, P. Pardey, and M. Rosegrant. 2003. Ending Hunger in Our Lifetime: Food Security and Globalization. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, V.W. 2004. Controversy About Agricultural Technology Lessons from the Green Revolution. International Journal of Biotechnology 6(1): 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santana, R., and L.A. Jackson. 2012. Identifying Non-Tariff barriers: Evolution of Multilateral Instruments and Evidence from the Disputes (1948−2011). World Trade Review 11(3): 462–478, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A.J., H.P.S. Sachdev, and M. Qaim. 2008. Genetic Engineering for the Poor: Golden Rice and Public Health in India. World Development 36(1): 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, S., A. Matysek, and A. Dolling. 2002. Modelling Possible Impacts of GM Crops on Australian Trade. Staff Research Paper, Productivity Commission, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen, J.F.M., and T. Vandemoortele. 2012. Trade and the Political Economy of Standards. World Trade Review 11(3): 390–400, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinnen, J.F.M., A. Vandeplas, and T. Vandemoortele. 2016. Quality Standards and International Development. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Meijl, H., and F. van Tongeren. 2004. International Diffusion of Gains from Biotechnology and the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy. Agricultural Economics 31(2): 307–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, R.M. 2002. Breeding Strategies for Biofortified Staple Plant Foods to Reduce Micronutrient Malnutrition Globally. Journal of Nutrition 132: 495S–499S.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO. 2005. Modern Food Biotechnology, Human Health and Development: An Evidence-based Study. Geneva: World Health Organization, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilberman, D., H. Ameden, and M. Qaim. 2007. The Impact of Agricultural Biotechnology on Yields, Risks, and Biodiversity in Low-Income Countries. Journal of Development Studies 43: 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, R., and M. Qaim. 2004. Potential Health Benefits of Golden Rice: A Philippines Case Study. Food Policy 29(2): 147–168, April.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    Kym Anderson

  2. Arndt-Corden Department of Economics, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Kym Anderson

Authors
  1. Kym Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, K. (2016). The Interface Between Trade and Technology Policies. In: Agricultural Trade, Policy Reforms, and Global Food Security. Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46925-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46925-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47168-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46925-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation