Advertisement

The Impact of National Context on Age Diversity and Age Management: The Case of the UK and Hong Kong

  • Matt Flynn
  • Heike Simone Schröder
  • Alfred C. M. Chan
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores how governments are responding to ageing demographics using two case studies: the UK and Hong Kong. Both economies are facing dual challenges: addressing chronic skills shortages which necessitate longer working lives and closing the gap in pension savings as citizens need to prepare for longer periods of old age. We will explore how governments in these contrasting economies are using both the levers of the welfare state and employment law to shape employment and savings patterns. Although the timing may differ, the two governments are following similar tracks of placing the onus for both extended working life and savings on individuals while not significantly intervening in firms’ business and Human Resource (HR) processes. The most significant difference between the two governments’ responses to ageing demographics lies in how they have been tackling workplace ageism since the beginning of the millennium. While the Hong Kong government focused its efforts on encouraging voluntary good practice by businesses, in the UK, regulations are now in place to curtail both workplace age discrimination and mandatory retirement. However, the latter interventions are directly in response to the European Union (EU)’s Lisbon Protocol, which directed member states to take action to raise participation rates of people aged 55–64.

Keywords

Pension Scheme Occupational Pension Mandatory Retirement Define Contribution Define Benefit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aaron, H. (2013). Pensions in Asia/Pacific. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  2. Alexandre, S. (2004). The Madrid international plan of action on ageing: From conception to implementation. Ageing and Society, 24, 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almond, P., Edwards, T., Colling, T., Ferner, A., Gunnigle, P., Muller-Camen, M., et al. (2005). Unraveling home and host country effects: An investigation of the HR policies of an American multinational in four European countries. Industrial Relations Journal, 44, 276–306.Google Scholar
  4. Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. The Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Fink, G. (2010). Implications of population ageing for economic growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 26, 583–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloom, D. E., Chatterji, S., Kowal, P., Lloyd-Sherlock, P., Mckee, M., Rechel, B., et al. (2015). Macroeconomic implications of population ageing and selected policy responses. The Lancet, 385, 649–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blossfeld, H.-P., Buchholz, S., & Hofäcker, D. (Eds.) (2006). Globalization, uncertainty and late careers in society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Boehm, S., Schröder, H., & Kunze, F. (2013). Comparative age management: Theoretical perspectives and practical implications. In J. Field, R. J. Burke, & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of aging, work and society (pp. 211–238). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowen, D. E., Galang, C., & Pillai, R. (2002). The role of human resource management: An exploratory study of cross-country variance. Human Resource Management, 41, 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buchholz, S., Hofäcker, D., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (2006). Globalization, accelerating economic change and late careers – A theoretical framework. In H.-P. Blossfeld, S. Buchholz, & D. Hofäcker (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and late careers in society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Carnegie Trust (1996). The third age: The continuing challenge. Dunfermline: Carnegie United Kingdom Trust.Google Scholar
  12. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society, the information age: Economy, society and culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. CBI (2003). CBI response to equality and diversity: Age matters. London: CBI.Google Scholar
  14. Census and Statistics Department (2011). Hong Kong population projections 2012–2041. Hong Kong: HKGSAR.Google Scholar
  15. Chan, C.-K. (1998). Welfare policies and the construction of welfare relations in a residual welfare state: The case of Hong Kong. Social Policy & Administration, 32, 278–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chand, M., & Tung, R. (2014). The aging of the world’s population and its effects on global business. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28, 409–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chiu, W. C. K., Chan, A. W., Snape, E., & Redman, T. (2001). Age stereotypes and discriminatory attitudes towards older workers: An East-West comparison. Human Relations, 54, 629–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Civil Service Bureau. (2013). Retirement [Online]. 2013.Google Scholar
  19. Connell, J., & Stanton, P. (2014). Skills and the role of HRM: Towards a research agenda for the Asia Pacific region. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 52, 4–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cremer, H., & Pestieau, P. (2003). Social insurance competition between Bismarck and Beveridge. Journal of Urban Economics, 54, 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dacin, M. T., Goodstein, J., & Scott, W. R. (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doling, J., Finer, C. J., & Maltby, T. (2005). Ageing matters: European policy lessons from the East. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  23. DTI (2005). Employment equality (age) regulations 2006. London: DTI.Google Scholar
  24. DWP (2010). A sustainable state pension: When the state pension age will increase to 66. London: DWP.Google Scholar
  25. DWP (2013a). Employing older workers: An employers guide to today’s multi-generational workforce. London: DWP.Google Scholar
  26. DWP (2013b). The single-tier pension: A simpler foundation for saving. London: DWP.Google Scholar
  27. Ebbinghaus, B. (2006). Reforming early retirement in Europe, Japan and the USA. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. EOC (2014). Public consultation on the review of discrimination laws. Hong Kong: HKEOC.Google Scholar
  29. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Flynn, M. (2010). The United Kingdom government’s ‘business case’ approach to the regulation of retirement. Ageing and Society, 30, 421–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Flynn, M. (2014). Representing an ageing workforce: Challenges and opportunities for Britain’s unions. London: TUC.Google Scholar
  32. Flynn, M., & McNair, S. (2011). Managing age: A guide to good employment practice (2nd ed.). London: CIPD.Google Scholar
  33. Flynn, M., Upchurch, M., Muller-Camen, M., & Schröder, H. (2013). Trade union responses to ageing workforces in the UK and Germany. Human Relations, 66, 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Flynn, M., Schröder, H., Higo, M., & Yamada, A. (2014). Government as institutional entrepreneur: Extending working life in the UK and Japan. Journal of Social Policy, 43, 535–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Forth, J. S. L., Grant, C., & Sullivan, S. (2014). Employers’ pension provision survey 2013. London: DWP.Google Scholar
  36. Francis, C., & Anise, M. S. W. (2013). Older workers’ successful aging and intention to stay. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28, 645–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The foundation of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hall, R., & Wailes, N. (2009). International and comparative human resource management. In A. Wilkinson, N. Bacon, T. Redman, & S. Snell (Eds.), The Sage handbook of human resource management. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Harper, S. (2014). Economic and social implications of aging societies. Science, 346, 587–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. HK Labour Department (2006). Practical guidelines for employers on eliminating age discrimination in employment. Hong Kong: HKLD.Google Scholar
  41. HK Labour Department (2012). Self-employment: Special topic report number 60. Hong Kong: HKGSAR.Google Scholar
  42. HKGCC (2013). 2014–15 Policy address cum budget submission. Hong Kong: HKGCC.Google Scholar
  43. Hock, H., & Weil, D. (2012). On the dynamics of the age structure, dependency, and consumption. Journal of Population Economics, 25, 1019–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hofäcker, D., & Pollnerová, S. (2006). Late careers and career exits. An international comparison of trends and institutional background patterns. In H.-P. Blossfeld, S. Buchholz, & D. Hofäcker (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and late careers in society. London: Routeledge.Google Scholar
  45. Hofäcker, D., Schröder, H., Li, Y., & Flynn, M. (2016). Trends and determinants of work-retirement transitions under changing institutional conditions: Germany, England and Japan compared. Journal of Social Policy, 45, 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holliday, I. (2000). Productivist welfare capitalism: Social policy in East Asia. Political Studies, 48, 706–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. ILO. (2009). International symposium to discuss responses to the demographic challenges in the workplace. http://www.ilo.org/global/About_the_ILO/Media_and_public_information/I-News/lang--en/WCMS_105139/index.htm. Geneva: ILO.
  48. Kok, H. (2004). Facing the challenge: The Lisbon strategy for growth and employment. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  49. Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: A critique and new direction. Academy of Management Review, 33, 994–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kulik, C. T., Ryan, S., Harper, S., & George, G. (2014). Aging populations and management. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 929–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kunze, F., Boehm, S. A., & Bruch, H. (2011). Age diversity, age discrimination climate and performance consequences – A cross organizational study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 264–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lain, D. (2012). Working past 65 in the UK and the USA: Segregation into ‘Lopaq’ occupations? Work, Employment and Society, 26, 78-94.Google Scholar
  53. Lee, K., To, B., & Yu, K. (2014). The new paradox of thrift: Financialisation, retirement protection, and income polarisation in Hong Kong. China Perspectives, 1, 15–24.Google Scholar
  54. Lisenkova, K., Mérette, M., & Wright, R. (2013). Population ageing and the labour market: Modelling size and age-specific effects. Economic Modelling, 35, 981–989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Loretto, W., & White, P. (2006). Employers´ attitudes, practices and policies towards older workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 16, 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mayer, M., & Whittington, R. (2004). Economics, politics and nations: Resistance to the multidivisional form in France, Germany and the United Kingdom, 1983–1993. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 1057–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McGaughey, S. L., & De Cieri, H. (1999). Reassessment of convergence and divergence dynamics: Implications for international HRM. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10, 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McNair, S., & Flynn, M. (2012). Managing a healthy ageing workforce: A business imperative. Glasgow: HWL.Google Scholar
  59. Metcalf, H., & Meadows, P. (2010). Second survey of employers policies, practices and preferences relating to age, 2010. London: DWP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Midtsundstad, T. I. (2011). Inclusive workplaces and older employees: An analysis of companies’ investment in retaining senior workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 1277–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Muller-Camen, M., Croucher, R., Flynn, M., & Schröder, H. (2011). National institutions and employers’ age management practices in Britain and Germany: ‘Path dependence’ and option exploration. Human Relations, 64, 507–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Naegele, G., & Walker, A. (2006). A guide to good practice in age management. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Working and Living Conditions.Google Scholar
  63. OECD (2009). Pensions at a glance: Special edition Asia/Pacific. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  64. Pension Commission (2010). Independent public service pension commission: Interim report. London: IPSPC.Google Scholar
  65. Raemdonck, I., Beausaert, S., Fröhlich, D., Kochoian, N., & Meurant, C. (2015). Aging workers’ learning and employability. In P. M. Bal, D. T. A. M. Kooij, & D. M. Rousseau (Eds.), Aging workers and the employee-employer relationship. Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  66. Schröder, H., Hofäcker, D., & Muller-Camen, M. (2009). HRM and the employment of older workers: Germany and Britain compared. International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, 9, 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Schröder, H., Muller-Camen, M., & Flynn, M. (2014). The management of an ageing workforce: Organisational policies in Germany and Britain. Human Resource Management Journal, 24, 394–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Taylor, P., & Walker, A. (1998). Policies and practices towards older workers: A framework for comparative research. Human Resource Management Journal, 8, 61–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Taylor, P., Brooke, L., & Di Biase, T. (2010). European employer policies concerning career management and learning from a life-span perspective. In G. Naegele (Ed.), Soziale Lebenslaufspolitik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
  70. UKCES (2011). Working futures: 2010–2011. London: UKCES.Google Scholar
  71. UN (2013). World population ageing 2013. New York: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations publication.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Walker, A., & Maltby, T. (2012). Active ageing: A strategic policy solution to demographic ageing in the European Union. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21, S117–S130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Whitley, R. D. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 70, 77–140.Google Scholar
  75. Witt, M. A., & Redding, G. (2013). Asian business systems: Institutional comparison, clusters and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems theory. Socio-Economic Review, 11, 265–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. World Bank (1994). Averting the old age crisis. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matt Flynn
    • 1
  • Heike Simone Schröder
    • 2
  • Alfred C. M. Chan
    • 3
  1. 1.Newcastle UniversityNewcastleUK
  2. 2.Queen’s UniversityBelfastUK
  3. 3.Lingnan UniversityHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations