Skip to main content

Creativity and Applied Linguistics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity and English Language Teaching
  • 1602 Accesses

Abstract

After discussing whether TESOL is an art or a science, the chapter examines two ways in which creativity manifests itself in the field of applied linguistics (AL). There are examples directly linking AL and creativity. And there are cases where work has creatively shaped the domain of AL itself. In the first type we consider the work of Carter on the creativity of ‘common talk’ and Tannen on conversational creativity. Cook and Crystal’s work on language play is also reviewed. We also look at some recent collections centred on creativity. In the second type we refer to work which has opened up new areas for AL: corpus studies, socio-linguistics and the spread of English, teacher research, motivation and materials development. There have been many new ideas and new areas for research. The question remains, how influential have these been on practice?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allwright, D. (2003). Exploratory practice: Re-thinking practitioner research in language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 113–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom: An introduction to classroom research for language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, N. (2016). Humour and language play. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 129–142). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellos, D. (2012). Is that a fish in your ear? London: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boden, M. A. (1998). The creative mind. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, P. (Ed.). (1995). Materials writer’s guide. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (2013). Transitional practice: Global English and cosmopolitan relations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R., & McCarthy, M. (2006). Cambridge grammar of English. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, G. (2000). Language play, language learning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, G. (2010). Translation in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covington, M. (1988). The will to learn: A guide for motivating young people. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. (1998). Language play. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The Gr8 Db8. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford, UK: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dam, L. (1995). Learner autonomy 3: From theory to practice. Dublin, Ireland: Authentik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Murphey, T. (2003). Group dynamics in the classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Schmidt, R. (Eds.). (2003). Motivation and second language acquisition. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edge, J., & Richards, K. (1993). Teachers develop teachers research: Papers on classroom research and teacher development. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, T. (2014). Promoting reflection in second language learning: A framework for professionals. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graddol, D. (2006). English next. London: British Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, K. (2016). Creativity in the curriculum. In R. H. Jones & J. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 165–179). Abingdon, VA: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield, J. (1992). Classroom dynamics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield, J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2013). Motivated learning. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo-Downing, L. (2016). Metaphor and metonymy. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 107–128). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, A. (2005). The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, K. (1989). Impro. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, K. (1999). Impro for storytellers. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. H. (2016a). Creativity and discourse analysis. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 61–77). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. H. (2016b). Creativity and language. In R. H. Jones & J. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 16–31). Abingdon, VA: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. H. (Ed.). (2016c). Routledge handbook of language and creativity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. H., & Richards, J. (Eds.). (2016). Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice. Abingdon, VA: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordanous, J. (2016). Language and music. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 302–321). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (2010). The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, A. (2010). The Routledge handbook of world Englishes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2016). Language, creativity and remix culture. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 398–414). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maley, A. (2016). More research is needed – A mantra too far? Humanising Language Teaching, 18(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maybin, J. (2016). Everyday language creativity. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 25–39). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, T. (1998). The English languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1995). Spoken grammar: What is it and how can we teach it? ELT Journal, 49(3), 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, S. L. (2002). Teaching English as an international language: Rethinking goals and perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medgyes, P. (1998). The non-native teacher. Ismaning, Germany: Hueber Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medgyes, P. (2002). Laughing matters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1998). The form of reading: Empirical studies of literariness. Poetics, 25(6), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, F. (2005). Designing authenticity into language learning materials. Bristol, UK: Intellect Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munat, J. (2016). Lexical creativity. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 92–106). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D. (2000). The great debate: TESOL is a science, not an art. The Journal of the Imagination in Language Learning, 5, 8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ollerhead, S., & Burns, A. (2016). Creativity as resistance: Implications for language teaching and teacher education. In R. H. Jones & J. Richards (Eds.), Creativity in language teaching: Perspectives from research and practice (pp. 227–240). Abingdon, VA: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opie, I., & Opie, P. (1959). The language and lore of schoolchildren. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, M. C. (2016). Creativity in composition. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 483–467). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postman, N., & Weingartner, C. (1976). Teaching as a subversive activity. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poynton, R. (2013). Do improvise – Less push. More pause. Better results. A new approach to work (and life). London: The Do Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rampton, M. B. H. (1990). Displacing the ‘native speaker’: Expertise, affiliation, and inheritance. ELT Journal, 44(2), 97–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. (2016). Creativity and translation. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 278–289). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubdy, R., & Saraceni, M. (2006). English in the world: Global rules, global roles. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1984). On doing ‘being ordinary’. In G. Jefferson (Ed.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analysis (pp. 71–82). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, K. (2016). Creativity and dialogue: The improvisational nature of conversational interaction. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 78–91). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1986). The routine as achievement. Human Studies, 9(2–3), 111–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidlhofer, B. (2011). Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (1987). Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. (1988). Collins COBUILD English dictionary. London: Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes, P. D. (2005). Creativity from constraints: The psychology of breakthrough. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swann, J., & Maybin, J. (2007). Introduction: Language creativity in everyday contexts. Applied Linguistics, 28(4), 491–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tin, T. B. (2016). Creativity in second-language learning. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 433–451). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (1988). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing materials for language teaching. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veale, T. (2016). Computational approaches to language and creativity. In R. H. Jones (Ed.), Routledge handbook of language and creativity (pp. 353–366). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wajnryb, R. (1996). Death, taxes and jeopardy: Systematic omissions in EFL texts, or life was never meant to be an adjacency pair. Paper presented at the 9th Educational Conference, Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan Maley .

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maley, A., Kiss, T. (2018). Creativity and Applied Linguistics. In: Creativity and English Language Teaching. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46729-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46729-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-46728-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-46729-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics