Skip to main content

Planning for Inclusionary Housing in New and Renewing Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 3001 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces and extends the current state of knowledge on approaches to planning for inclusionary housing, outlining a range of mandatory and voluntary mechanisms suited to different development and housing market contexts. These mechanisms range from planning system incentives through to mandatory requirements for dedicated affordable housing within planning laws through to voluntary and negotiated agreements. The chapter updates previous research by the authors and draws on the recent cases contained within the book to provide guidance on matching mechanisms to particular types of markets (high value, renewing, stable and failing) and development contexts (inner ring/transit orientation/redevelopment areas; new release greenfield; regional or rural). It also outlines the range of policy settings, resources and delivery systems needed to support inclusionary housing strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Addison, C., Zhang, S. M., & Coomes, B. (2013). Smart growth and housing affordability: A review of regulatory mechanisms and planning practices. Journal of Planning Literature, 28(3), 215–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aurand, A. (2014). Florida’s planning requirements and affordability for low-income households. Housing Studies, 29(5), 677–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, K (2004). Review of housing supply: Delivering stability: Securing our future housing needs. Final Report & Recommendations. London: H M Treasury/TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, M. (2006). Housing Affordability and the Economy: a review of labour market impacts and policy issues. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley, G. (2012). Affordability, poverty and housing need: Triangulating measures and standards. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27(2), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunick, N. J. (2004). Inclusionary housing: Proven success in large cities. Zoning Practice, 10(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, D. (2010). Relocatable homes: Medieval tenure in the 21st century? Urban Policy and Research, 28(3), 277–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calavita, N., Mallach, A., & Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. (2010). Inclusionary housing in international perspective: Affordable housing, social inclusion, and land value recapture. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clingermayer, J. C. (2004). Heresthetics and happenstance: Intentional and unintentional exclusionary impacts of the zoning decision-making process. Urban Studies, 41(2), 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, S. M. (2006). Anti-snob land use laws, suburban exclusion, and housing opportunity. Journal of Urban Affairs, 28(3), 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crook, A. D. H., & Whitehead, C. (Eds.) (2000). The achievement of affordable housing policies through the planning system. Restructuring Housing Systems: From Social to Affordable Housing? York: York Publishing Services

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment, Community and Local Government. (2014). Minister Kelly announces major reforms of the planning process. Dublin: Department of Environment, Community and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Housing and Community Development. (2014). DHCD chapter 40B subsidized housing inventory. Boston: Department of Housing and Community Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2005). Why not in our community? Removing barriers to affordable housing, an update to the report of the advisory commission on regulatory barriers to affordable housing. Washington: Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischel, W. A. (2004). An economic history of zoning and a cure for its exclusionary effects. Urban Studies, 41(2), 317–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallent, N. (2009). Affordable housing in ‘village England’: Towards a more systematic approach. Planning Practice & Research, 24(2), 263–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurran, N. (2008). Affordable housing: A dilemma for metropolitan planning? Urban Policy and Research, 26(1), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurran, N. (2011). Australian urban land use planning: Principles, systems and practice. Sydney: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurran, N., Milligan, V., Baker, D., Bugg, L. B., & Christensen, S. (2008). New Directions in planning for affordable housing: Australian and international evidence and implications. AHURI Final Report Series. Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, R. (2013). After the downturn: New challenges and opportunities for inclusionary housing. Washington, DC: Center for Housing Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Coombes, M., & Wong, C. (2010). Geography of housing market areas: Final report. Research Report to DCLG. London: DCLG. http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/housing/geographyhousingmarket

  • Knaap, G. J., Meck, S., Moore, T., & Parker, R. (2007). Do we know regulatory barriers when we see them? An exploration using zoning and development indicators. Housing Policy Debate, 18(4), 711–749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landis, J. D. (2006). Growth management revisited - Efficacy, price effects, and displacement. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4), 411–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, P. G. (2005). Can state review of local planning increase housing production? Housing Policy Debate, 16(2), 173–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, V., Phibbs, P., Fagan, K., & Gurran, N. (2004). A practical framework for expanding affordable housing services in Australia: learning from experience. Melbourne: Austrlian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milligan, V., Gurran, N., Lawson, J., Phibbs, P., & Phillips, R. (2009). Innovation in affordable housing in Australia: Bringing Policy and practice for not-for profit housing organisations together. AHURI Final Report Series, 134, Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, N., & Burgess, G. (2014). Inclusionary housing policy in England: The impact of the downturn on the delivery of affordable housing through Section 106. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(3), 423–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nenno, M. K. (1991). State and local governments: New initiatives in low-income housing preservation. Housing Policy Debate, 2(2), 467–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York State Attorney General. (2014). Airbnb in the City. New York: Attorney General, New York State.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, M. (2004). Economics, planning, and housing. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satsangi, M., Gallent, N., & Bevan, M. (2010). The rural housing question: Communities and planning in Britain’s countrysides. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. A. (2003). Planning, policy and polarisation in Vancouver’s downtown eastside. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 94(4), 496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & Allmendinger, P. (2003). Land-use planning and the housing market: A comparative review of the UK and the USA. Urban Studies, 40(5–6), 953–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, C. M. E. (2007). Planning policies and affordable housing: England as a successful case study? Housing Studies, 22(1), 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. (2000). Inclusionary zoning and affordable housing in Sydney. Routledge, 18, 291–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, R. J., & Barton, S. E. (2014). The underpinnings of inclusionary housing in California: current practice and emerging market and legal challenges. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 29(3) 403–422.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gurran, N., Bramley, G. (2017). Planning for Inclusionary Housing in New and Renewing Communities. In: Urban Planning and the Housing Market. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46403-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics