Skip to main content

The Creativity of Culture and the Culture of Creativity Research: The Promise of Integrative Transdisciplinarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture ((PASCC))

Abstract

Social and cultural changes brought about by the digital revolution have led to changes in the discourse and practices of creativity, such as an increasing focus on collaborative and everyday creativity. These developments may reflect the deeper changes of a shift from modernity to a new networked era, whose outlines and implications are not yet clear. We argue that in order to contextualize, understand, and articulate, the relationship between social and cultural changes, and the interconectedness between technological, cultural, economic, and social as well as psychological factors, researchers cannot be limited to the perspective of a single discipline. A transdisciplinary approach, rooted in the epistemology of complexity, can be used to address the challenge of integrating material from diverse sources and multiple dimensions, from the cognitive to the social. Trandisciplinary scholarship of integration is viewed as complementary to more specialized, disciplinary research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Augsburg, T. (2014). Becoming transdisciplinary: The emergence of the transdisciplinary individual. World Futures, 70(3–4), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barabasi, A. (2003). Linked. How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life. New York: Plume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1953a). Complexity-simplicity as a personality dimension. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48(2), 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1953b). An ego-strength scale which predicts response to psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 17(5), 327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1963). The needs for order and for disorder as motives in creative activity. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 153–160). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1968). Creativity and personal freedom. New York: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1969). Creative person and creative process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1972). Towards and ecology of consciousness. Inquiry, 15, 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1979). The shaping of personality: Conflict, choice, and growth. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, F. (1995). No rootless flower: Towards an ecology of creativity. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M. C. (2001). Composing a life. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (2002). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battersby, C. (1989). Gender and genius: Towards a feminist aesthetics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid life. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times. Living in an age of uncertainty. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2008). The art of life. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, H. (1975). Creative evolution. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, D. (2004). On creativity (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgo, D. (2006). Sync or swarm: Improvising music in a complex age. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, D. (2001). Bobos in paradise: The new upper class and how they got there. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. (2014). The myth of the strong leader: Political leadership in the modern age. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L., Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L., & Meng, X. (2013). Little emperors: Behavioral impacts of China’s one-child policy. Science, 339(6122), 953–957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1996). The web of life. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, E. S. (2000). Imagining: A phenomenological study. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2009). The rise of the network society (New Edition) (The information age: Economy, society and culture, Vol. 1). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casti, J. L. (1994). Complexification: Explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catmull, E. (2008). How Pixar fosters collective creativity. Harvard business review, 86(9), 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceruti, M. (2015). La fine dell’onniscienza. [The end of omniscience]. Roma: Studium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Connected: The surprising power of our social networks and how they shape our lives (1st ed.). New York: Little, Brown and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. (2013). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citron, M. J. (1993). Gender and the musical canon. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (1989). The cosmic blueprint. New discoveries in nature’s creative ability to order the Universe. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, R. (1954). Philosophical writings. London: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolling, I., & Hark, S. (2000). She who speaks shadow speaks truth: Transdisciplinarity in women’s and gender studies. Signs, 25(4), 1195–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dortier, J.-F. (2015). L’innovation: un nouveau mythe de la création? [Innovation: A new creation myth?]. Les grandes dossier de Sciences Humaines, 38, 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisler, R., & Montuori, A. (2007). Creativity, society, and the hidden subtext of gender: A new contextualized approach. World Futures. The Journal General Evolution, 63(7), 479–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A. (2013). Reinvention. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, M. (2004). Creativity: Where the divine and the human meet. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1993). Seven creators of the modern era. In J. Brockman (Ed.), Creativity (pp. 28–47). New York: Touchstone Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., & Davis, K. (2013). The app generation: How today’s youth navigate identity, intimacy, and imagination in a digital World. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, B. (2008). How to fix capitalism. Time Magazine, 31, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauntlett, D. (2011). Making is connecting. The social meaning of creativity, from DIY and knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 439–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2010). Paradigms in the study of creativity: Introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28, 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014a). Distributed creativity: Thinking outside the box of the creative individual. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2014b). Theory and context/theory in context: Towards an expanded view of the creativity field. Creativity. Theories—Research—Applications, 1(2), 268–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, E., & Weber, K. (2008). Generation we: How millennial youth are taking over America and changing our world forever. Emeryville: Pachatusan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, R. (1990). Creativity in women: Inner and outer views over time. In M. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemetsberger, A., & Reinhardt, C. (2008). Consumers’ changing roles—From creative communities to entrepreneurial tribes. European Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 345–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, B.A. (2015). Creative behavior, motivation, environment and culture: The building of a systems model. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 49, 3, pp. 194–21010.1002/jocb.97

    Google Scholar 

  • Heskett, J. (2005). Design: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holton, G. (1988). Thematic origins of scientific thought. Kepler to Einstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymowitz, K. S. (2011). Manning up: How the rise of women has turned men into boys. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Boston: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. T. (2011). The tribes of burning man: How an experimental city in the desert is shaping the new American counterculture. San Francisco: CCC Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, S. A. (1995). At home in the universe. The search for the laws of self-organization and complexity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, G. D. (2004). In the beginning…creativity. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, R. (1988). The wake of imagination: Towards a postmodern culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keen, A. (2008). The cult of the amateur: How blogs, MySpace, YouTube, and the rest of today’s user-generated media are destroying our economy, our culture, and our values. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V., Hemetsberger, A., & Schau, H. J. (2008). The wisdom of consumer crowds collective innovation in the age of networked marketing. Journal of Macromarketing, 28(4), 339–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeter, C. (2009). We-think: Mass innovation, not mass production (2nd ed.). London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C., & Miller, P. (2004). The Pro-Am revolution: How enthusiasts are changing our society and economy. Retrieved from http://www.demos.co.uk/publications/proameconomy/

  • Lombardo, T. (2006a). Contemporary futurist thought: Science fiction, future studies, and theories and visions of the future in the last century. Bloomington: AuthorHouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, T. (2006b). The evolution of future consciousness. The nature and historical development of the human capacity to think about the future. Bloomington: AuthorHouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, A., & Kinser, C. (2012). Connected generation. Perspectives from tomorrow’s leaders in a digital world. Insights from the 2012 IBM Global Student Study: IBM Institute for Business Value.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruyama, M. (1963). The second cybernetics. Deviation-amplifying mutual causal processes. American Scientist, 51(June), 164–179, 250–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCracken, G. (2008). Transformations: Identity construction in contemporary culture. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, S., & Volckmann, R. (2011). Transversity: Transdisciplinary approaches in higher education. Tucson: Integral Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mele, N. (2013). The end of big: How the Internet makes David the new Goliath. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A. (1992). Creativity, chaos, and self-renewal in human systems. World Futures: Journal of General Evolution, 35(4), 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A. (1996). Frank Barron’s ecological vision. In A. Montuori (Ed.), Unusual associates. A festschrift for Frank Barron (pp. 148–163). Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A. (2003). The complexity of improvisation and the improvisation of complexity. Social science, art, and creativity. Human Relations, 56(2), 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A. (2005a). Gregory Bateson and the challenge of transdisciplinarity. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 12(1–2), 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A. (2005b). How to make enemies and influence people. Anatomy of totalitarian thinking. Futures, 37, 18–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A. (2010). Research and the research degree: Transdisciplinarity and creative inquiry. In M. Maldonato & R. Pietrobon (Eds.), Research on scientific research. A transdisciplinary study (pp. 110–135). Brighton/Portland: Sussex Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A. (2011). Beyond postnormal times: The future of creativity and the creativity of the future. Futures: The Journal of Policy, Planning and Future Studies, 43(2), 221–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A. (2014). Complexity and transdisciplinarity: Reflections on theory and practice. In A. Montuori (Ed.), Journeys in complexity: Autobiographical accounts by leading systems and complexity thinkers (pp. 200–230). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A., & Conti, I. (1993). From power to partnership. Creating the future of love, work, and community. San Francisco: Harper San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A., & Donnelly, G. (2013a). Creative Inquiry and scholarship: Applications and implications in a doctoral degree. World Futures, 69(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A., & Donnelly, G. (2013b). Creativity at the opening of the 21st century. Creative Nursing, 19(2), 58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A., & Fahim, U. (2004). Cross-cultural encounter as an opportunity for personal growth. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 44(2), 243–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (1995). Deconstructing the lone genius myth: Towards a contextual view of creativity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 35(3), 69–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (1996). Context and creativity: Beyond social determinism and the isolated genius. A Rejoinder to Hale. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 36(2), 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (1999). Introduction. In A. Montuori & R. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity (Vol. 1). Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montuori, A., Combs, A., & Richards, R. (2003). Creativity, consciousness, and the direction for human development. In D. Loye (Ed.), The great adventure: Toward a fully human theory of evolution. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2007). Restricted complexity, general complexity. In C. Gershenson, D. Aerts, & B. Edmonds (Eds.), Worldviews, science, and us: Philosophy and complexity. New York: World Scientific Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2008a). La méthode: Coffret en 2 volumes. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2008b). On complexity. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2008c). The reform of thought, transdisciplinarity, and the reform of the university. In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity. Theory and practice (pp. 23–32). Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2014). Complex thinking for a complex world—About reductionism, disjunction and systemism. Systema, 2(1), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations, 1(2), 145–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolescu, B. (2008a). In vivo and In vitro knowledge-methodology of transdisciplinarity. In B. Nicolescu (Ed.), Transdisciplinarity. Theory and practice (pp. 1–21). Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolescu, B. (Ed.) (2008b). Transdisciplinarity. Theory and practice. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvy, J. (1977). Many dimensional man. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvy, J. (1992). Beyond individualism and collectivism. In J. Ogilvy (Ed.), Revisioning philosophy (pp. 217–233). Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogilvy, J. (2002). Creating better futures. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachucki, M. A., Lena, J. C., & Tepper, S. J. (2010). Creativity narratives among college students: Sociability and everyday creativity. Sociological Quarterly, 51, 122–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peat, F. D. (2002). From certainty to uncertainty. In The story of science and ideas in the 20th century. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peat, F. D., & Bohm, D. (1987). Science, order, and creativity. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K., & Miller, D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrobon, R., Shah, J., & Maldonato, M. (2010). Scientific innovation, innovation architects, and interdisciplinary ecologies: A theoretical model. In M. Maldonato & R. Pietrobon (Eds.), Research on scientific research. A transdisciplinary study. Brighton: Sussex Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope, R. (2005). Creativity. Theory, history, practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purser, R., & Montuori, A. (Eds.) (1999). Social creativity (Vol. 2). Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (2007a). Everyday creativity: Our hidden potential. In M. Runco & R. Richards (Eds.), Everyday creativity and new views of human nature (pp. 25–54). Westport: Ablex/Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (Ed.) (2007b). Everyday creativity and new views of human nature: Psychological, social, and spiritual perspectives. New York: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (2001). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. London: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosin, H. (2012). The end of men: And the rise of women. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. (2004). Creativity. Annual review of psychology, 55, 657–687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. (2015). A commentary of the social perspective on creativity. Creativity. Theories—Research—Applications, 2(1), 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M., & Richards, R. (Eds.) (1997). Eminent creativity, everyday creativity, and health. Westport: Ablex/Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardar, Z. (2010). Welcome to postnormal times. Futures, 42(5), 435–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sardar, Z. (2015). Postnormal times revisited. Futures, 67, 26–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1999). The creative society: Genius vis-a-vis the Zeitgeist. In A. Montuori & R. Purser (Eds.), Social creativity (Vol. 1, pp. 237–264). Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (2009). The fourth turning. New York: Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile. Things that gain from disorder. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2003). The moment of complexity. Emerging network culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2009, April 26). End of the university as we know it. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/27/opinion/27taylor.html?_r=3&smid=fb-share&pagewanted=print

  • Taylor, P. (2014). The next America. Boomers, Millennials, and the looming generational showdown. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave (1st ed.). New York: Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generationme: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled—and more miserable than ever before. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bertalanffy, L. (1976). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: George Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Foerster, H. (1983). Observing systems. Salinas: Intersystems Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. W. (2015). One the usefulness of “value” in the definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27(2), 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. H., & Drew, M. R. (2012). Pendulum: How past generations shape our present and predict our future. New York: Vanguard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, T. (1976). The me decade and the third great awakening. New York Magazine, 23, 6–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagalo, N., & Branco, P. (2015). Creativity in the digital age. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, E. (1995). The rigid, the fuzzy, and the flexible: Notes on the mental sculpting of academic identity. Social Research, 62(4), 1093–1106.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alfonso Montuori .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Montuori, A., Donnelly, G. (2016). The Creativity of Culture and the Culture of Creativity Research: The Promise of Integrative Transdisciplinarity. In: Glăveanu, V. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Creativity and Culture Research. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46344-9_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics