Skip to main content

Shared Spaces and Services

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter examines the ‘separate but equal’ thesis which contends that segregation in a post-conflict society such as Northern Ireland is acceptable as long as there is equality and respect between the two main communities. In fact, far from creating an equal society, the peace process has not improved the quality of life of those most impacted by the violence, which is most acutely experienced at interface areas where the two communities live ‘cheek by jowl’. The failure of existing government policies which had been aimed at highly segregated and marginalised communities encouraged Atlantic Philanthropies to fund a micro-initiative in an interface area of West Belfast (Suffolk and Lenadoon). The pilot project became the foundation for a partnership with government entitled Contested Space/Interface Programme. This chapter traces how Atlantic Philanthropies used what was learned from this programme to inform the wider public narrative in the shape of the government’s flagship policy document, Together: Building a United Community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The 2014 Northern Ireland Life and Times survey sample size was 1210 respondents aged 18 or over selected using systematic random sampling from the Postcode Address File (PAF) and the data were collected between September and December 2014.

  2. 2.

    The Northern Ireland Multiple Deprivation Measure (2010) provides information on seven types or ‘domains’ of deprivation and an overall multiple deprivation measure comprising a weighted combination of the seven domains as follows: Income Deprivation 25 %; Employment Deprivation 25 %; Health Deprivation and Disability 15 %; Education Skills and Training Deprivation 15 %; Proximity to Services 10 %; Living Environment 5 %; and, Crime and Disorder 5 %.

  3. 3.

    The Northern Ireland Housing Executive launched the Shared Neighbourhood Programme in August 2008 as a three-year pilot programme. The programme provided grants to enable community organisations to celebrate diversity and bring together people from all backgrounds who live in these areas.

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfast Interface Project. (2005). A policy agenda for the interface. Belfast: Belfast Interface Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfast Interface Project. (2012). http://www.belfastinterfaceproject.org/

  • Boal, F. (1969). Territoriality in the Shankill-Falls divide in Belfast. Irish Geography, 6(1), 30–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, S., & Knox, C. (2014). Evaluation of the contested spaces/interface programme. Belfast: Atlantic Philanthropies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Community Relations Council. (2009). Towards sustainable security: Interface barriers and the legacy of segregation in Belfast. Belfast: Community Relations Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte Consulting. (2007). Research into the financial cost of the Northern Ireland divide. Belfast: Deloitte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Social Development. (2003). People and place: A strategy for neighbourhood renewal. Belfast: DSD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Social Development. (2011). People and place: A strategy for neighbourhood renewal—mid-term review. Belfast: DSD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Justice. (2012). Building safer, shared and confident communities: A community safety strategy for Northern Ireland 2012–2017. Belfast: DoJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gormley-Heenan, C., Byrne, J., & Robinson, G. (2013). The Berlin walls of Belfast. British Politics, 8(3), 357–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (2007). Building bridges at the grassroots: The experience of Suffolk–Lenadoon Interface Group. Newtownabbey: Island Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insight Consulting. (2006). Suffolk community plan. Belfast: Suffolk Community Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Fund for Ireland. (2015b). Annual report and accounts, 2014. Belfast: IFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarman, N. (2006). Working at the interface: Good practice in reducing tension and violence. Belfast: Institute for Conflict Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarman, N. (2008). Security and segregation: Interface barriers in Belfast. Shared Space, 6, 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, C. (2011). Cohesion sharing and integration in Northern Ireland. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(3), 548–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, C. (2015b). Northern Ireland: Where is the Peace Dividend?. Policy & Politics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557314X14042296270069

  • Knox, C., & McWilliams, S. (2015). Evaluation of the contested spaces/interface programme. Belfast: Atlantic Philanthropies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenadoon Community Forum. (2003). The development of Lenadoon area and the community forum 1992–2002. Belfast: Lenadoon Community Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, D. (2008, February). A better future: Interfaces and the good relations panel. Interface Issue 9, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtagh, B. (2002). The politics of territory. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P. (2014). Northern Ireland peace monitoring report (Number 3). Belfast: Community Relations Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northern Ireland Executive. (2011a). Programme for government 2011–2015: Building a better future. Belfast: Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northern Ireland Life and Times Survey. (2014). http://www.ark.ac.uk/nilt/

  • O’Halloran, C., & McIntyre, G. (1999). Addressing conflict in two interface areas. Belfast: Belfast Interface Project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister. (2003). A shared future: A consultation paper on improving relations in Northern Ireland. Belfast: OFMDFM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister. (2005). A shared future: Policy and strategic framework for good relations in Northern Ireland. OFMDFM: Belfast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister. (2013a). Together: Building a united community. Belfast: Office of the First Minister and Deputy First Minister.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M., & Doherty, P. (1996). Ethnic residential segregation in Belfast. Coleraine: University of Ulster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirlow, P., & Murtagh, B. (2006). Belfast: Segregation, violence and the city. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth, I., & Lloyd, C. (2013). Moving apart or moving together? Shared Spaces, 16, 57–70. Belfast: Community Relations Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Agreement: Agreement reached in Multi-Party Negotiations. (1998). Agreement reached between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knox, C., Quirk, P. (2016). Shared Spaces and Services. In: Public Policy, Philanthropy and Peacebuilding in Northern Ireland. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46269-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics