Advertisement

The Grand Crusade

  • David Cowan
Chapter
  • 508 Downloads
Part of the Great Thinkers in Economics book series (GTE)

Abstract

Austrian economist Friedrich Hayek opened his 1936 essay “The Mythology of Capital,” referring to “Professor Knight’s crusade against the concept of the period of investment” (Hayek 1936, p. 199). What Knight was crusading about has been named in different ways, in terms of length of the production process, roundaboutness, period of waiting, period of investment, period of maturing, and others. It may be overstating the case to say this was a crusade, though it fits with the theological terminology so often applied to Knight, but it was certainly true that in the 1930s one of Knight’s core interests was capital theory and his writings on capital and interest theory were to span two decades. Like so much of his thinking, during this period Knight never offered a systematic theory; rather he developed his views through a series of journal articles, essays and book reviews, starting in 1916, with the bulk published from 1931 onwards. It was, as Emmett so neatly states, “a string of conversations with other theorists” (Emmett 2009, p. 78). As a result, trying to explain his theory is a process of picking one’s way through a series of essays and opponents’ responses to present a unified view, rather than explaining a coherent theory presented by Knight himself. This picking one’s way means encountering repetition and restatement of ideas in different ways, a fraught exercise that can easily give rise to debate with the other attempts to piece together his theory. If this is a problem for his critics, it certainly wasn’t for Knight, who was fully aware of the criticism, as he noted in a letter to Hayek:

Keywords

Interest Rate Production Period Fixed Capital Price Theory Consumption Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Knight, Frank Hyneman. 1931. Professor Fisher’s interest theory: A case in point. Journal of Political Economy 39: 176.Google Scholar
  2. Knight, Frank Hyneman. 1932a. Interest. In Encyclopedia of the social sciences, vol. 8. New York: Macmillan. Reprinted in The ethics of competition (1935).Google Scholar
  3. Knight, Frank Hyneman. 1932b. The case for communism: From the standpoint of an ex-liberal. In Research in the history of economic thought and methodology, ed. Warren J. Samuels. Archival supplement 2(1991): 57–108. JAI Press: Stamford, Conn USA.Google Scholar
  4. Knight, Frank Hyneman. 1933a. The economic organization. Chicago: University of Chicago. Published as The economic organization. New York: A.M. Kelley, 1951.Google Scholar
  5. Knight, Frank Hyneman. 1933b. Capitalistic production, time and the rate of return. In Essays in honor of Gustav Cassel, 327–342. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  6. Knight, Frank Hyneman. 1934. Capital, time, and the interest rate. Economica 1: 257–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Knight, Frank Hyneman. 1935a. The ethics of competition and other essays. New York: Harper & Bros. The ethics of competition. Originally published in Quarterly Journal of Economics 37(August, 1923): 579–624.Google Scholar
  8. Knight, Frank Hyneman. 1935c. Comment (on Professor Knight and the period of production, by F. Machlup). Journal of Political Economy 43: 625–627.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

  1. Bohm-Bawerk, Eugen von. 1891. The positive theory of capital. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Buechner, M.N. 1976. Frank Knight on capital as the only factor of production. Journal of Economic Issues 10(3): 598–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, Avi J. 2006 The Kaldor/Knight Controversy: Is Capital A Distinct and Quantifiable Factor of Production? European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 13(1): 141–161.Google Scholar
  4. Emmett, Ross B. 2009. Frank Knight and the Chicago School in American economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Hayek, F.A. 1931. Prices and production. London: Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Hayek, F.A. 1936a. The mythology of capital. Quarterly Journal of Economics 50: 199–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayek, F.A. 1941. The pure theory of capital. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Hicks, John R. 1939. Value and capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hicks, John R. 1965. Capital and growth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hicks, John R. 1973. Capital and time. A neo-Austrian theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hicks, John R. 1976. Some questions of time in economics. In Evolution, welfare and time in economics, Festschrift in honor of Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, ed. A.M. Tang et al. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  12. Jevons, William Stanley. 1871. Theory of political economy. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  13. Machlup, Fritz. 1935. Professor Knight and the “period of production”. Journal of Political Economy 43(5): 577–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Solow, Robert M. 1974. Review. The Economic Journal 84(333): 189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wicksell, Knut. 1901. Lectures on political economy, vol. 1. Trans. E. Classen. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Cowan
    • 1
  1. 1.Boston CollegeBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations