Skip to main content

Posthumous Landscapes and the Earth-Archive: Archaeology, Ethics and Birthplace

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Framing the Holocaust in Polish Aftermath Cinema

Part of the book series: Palgrave Film Studies and Philosophy ((PFSP))

  • 173 Accesses

Abstract

The close analysis of Paweł Łoziński’s documentary Birthplace in this chapter is informed by the work of Levinas and Deleuze, and their deployment in film-philosophy. The chapter draws on the Deleuzian notion of stratigraphic images to consider how Henryk Grynberg’s difficult homecoming to a frequently hostile rural landscape is layered with spoken recollections and narratives, creating distinct though interrelated strata that the film sifts through. The film’s actual process of excavating human remains from unmarked ‘non-sites’ (Sendyka) materialises this archaeological metaphor. Levinas’s writing on our ethical obligation to the stranger/neighbour, emanating from the face or visage, is drawn on to consider how Birthplace evokes and performs multiple encounters between human subjects within the film and between the film and the viewer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Critics have often used the vocabulary of archaeology and exhumation when discussing the film. Łysak (2016, 284), for example, calls the film an ‘archaeological investigation’ , while Litka terms it an ‘exhumation of memory’ (2011, 883). He connects this to the driving force behind Grynberg’s own writing, which he considers to be akin to a kind of ‘exhumation’ of Holocaust victims and a preservation of their material traces (2011, 884). Prager (2015, 64) describes the film as mediated through an ‘excavator’s gaze ’.

  2. 2.

    In this layering I follow a number of film theorists who have considered Levinasian thought alongside that of Deleuze and Guattari, including Cooper (2006, 28). Girgus (2010) argues that Deleuze ‘advances elements that can help in applying Levinasian theory to film’, particularly as he postulates ‘the importance of a discordant temporal order for new ethical discourse’, and imagines a cinema able to free ‘the imagination from closed boundaries of thought’ (2010, 223). Girgus associates the disjunctions of the Deleuzian time-image with a Levinasian ‘diachronic time’ ‘beyond ordinary linear time’ (2010, 56). See also Harvey (2017), who entwines Levinasian and Deleuzian approaches to the face .

  3. 3.

    Łysak gives as examples the release of Long Night/Długa Noc (Janusz Nasfeter, Poland, 1967), which had been shelved under state socialism, and the production of Just Beyond This Forest/Jeszcze Tylko Ten Las (Jan Łomnicki, Poland, 1991).

  4. 4.

    For a history and analysis of Shoah’s reception in Poland, see Kwieciński (2012).

  5. 5.

    For Molisak (2019, 49) Grynberg as a writer can also be defined as a ‘medium’, as he positions himself as a subject speaking on behalf of those who perished in the Holocaust , including his own family and friends. She describes his oeuvre as ‘mediumistic’.

  6. 6.

    Łysak calls the film an ‘investigative documentary’ (2016, 153). See also Prager , who compares Grynberg to a ‘dogged detective’ ‘in the mode of Lanzmann ’ (2015, 64). Given what we know about the film’s production it might be more accurate to think of Łoziński in this role, though he himself is never visible or audible in the film (he might also, considering the comments he has made about Shoah , object to the comparison).

  7. 7.

    This citation is taken from Grynberg’s book Dziedzictwo (variously interpreted as Inheritance or Legacy), published in the year following the release of Birthplace (1993a). It is made up of a series of monologues by, and dialogues with, the villagers interviewed during filming. The work includes scraps of conversation that didn’t make it into the finished film, a section containing Grynberg’s recollections (some of which were used in the film’s voice-overs) and his further reflections on the filming process.

  8. 8.

    See also Cinquegrani (2018), who has eloquently pursued the idea of the journey, as literal and figurative, in Birthplace.

  9. 9.

    See Grynberg (1993b, 17).

  10. 10.

    Russell is here referring to the look of an owl towards the camera in Bill Viola’s I Do Not Know What It Is I Am Like (1986).

  11. 11.

    In his critique of Russell’s analysis, for example, Burt notes that ‘there is no presumption here that the look of an animal might be an active one’, and there is a slippage between the notion that we do not have access to the animal’s thinking, and the idea that the animal has no ‘thinking’ at all (Burt 2002, 41–42).

  12. 12.

    For Eaglestone, the image of bread in Levinas’s writing more specifically references the concentration camp , where to give one’s own ration to another, when one is at the point of starvation, is literally to give yourself to them (2004, 258).

  13. 13.

    Spargo notes how the figures of the stranger and the neighbor change throughout Levinas’s body of work. After ‘Enigma and Phenomenon’ the neighbour for Levinas comes to signify not so much a relation of familiarity but of proximity, not of knowledge but of responsibility even towards those whom one does not know (Spargo 2006, 212).

  14. 14.

    As Waterson writes, testimonial narration is a performative act that is partly produced through relationships between interviewer, testifier, and actual or imagined audience (Waterson 2007, 51).

  15. 15.

    This statement reminds us that Jewish shops before WWII were sometimes boycotted in villages, and both Jewish shopkeepers and the non-Jewish people who shopped there were sometimes attacked by nationalist Poles.

  16. 16.

    Other statements by the villagers are openly hostile, however. For example, one man opines that Jewish people were stupid for circumcising their sons and comes close to blaming them for their fate during the Holocaust .

  17. 17.

    In Guzmán’s film, the searchers are women who routinely comb the Atacama Desert for the remains of those ‘disappeared’ by the Pinochet regime in the 1970s and 1980s. Guzmán’s approach to history is admittedly more expansive than Łoziński’s; the film reaches back to the origins of life on Earth . See Martin-Jones (2019, especially 91–118) for an extended analysis of the earth as a planetary archive .

  18. 18.

    In this I am also following Saxton’s example. Saxton locates Shoah’s ethics not in Lanzmann’s relationship to his interviewees but in the relationship between the film and its viewers (2010, 101). For an important account of the ethics of the relationship between filmmaker and subject (including in Shoah ), see Piotrowska (2014, 132–145).

  19. 19.

    See also Harvey (2017) who pursues a similar argument in relation to Paul Thomas Anderson’s 2012 film The Master (USA).

  20. 20.

    Once again, I take inspiration from Saxton’s writing on Shoah (2010, 103).

  21. 21.

    There were, however, traces of human activity below the surface of this site; as Grynberg describes, an excavation of the dugout revealed fragments of pottery, wood, and metal (1993a, 88). This dig is not shown in the film.

  22. 22.

    Curiously, Prager argues that ‘this ill-defined space both is and is not a cemetery; bones remain there’ (2015, 66). It should be noted that the villagers state that there are no human remains under this surface. Grynberg also writes that no human remains were found during the excavation of the site, though he describes the dugout as the ‘grave of my mother’s entire family’ (1993a, 90).

  23. 23.

    For Mąka-Malatyńska , the milk bottle recalls Zofia Nałkowska’s short story ‘Kobieta Przy Torze Kolejowym’/‘By the Railway Track’ from the collection Medaliony/Medallions (1946), and Andrzej Brzozowski’s film adaptation, Przy Torze Kolejowym/By the Railway Track (Poland, 1963). These works revolve around a heavily injured Jewish woman who has escaped from a rail transport heading to a camp . The local Polish villagers do not help her, though they leave her a cup of milk. She is eventually shot by a Polish policeman after pleading for death .

  24. 24.

    Abram was reburied in Warsaw’s Powązki Cemetery, but this is not shown in the film.

  25. 25.

    Commenting on Levinas’s writing on suffering, particularly in relation to the Holocaust , Cohen describes how suffering denotes the ‘meaningless painfulness of pain’ which is ‘intrinsically excessive, unwanted, not to be accommodated’ (2009, 274). There are parallels here with Brinkema’s writing on how grief highlights the ‘peculiar painfulness’ of pain (2014, 70). I will return to Brinkema’s work on grief in Chap. 5.

  26. 26.

    ‘Peace and Proximity’ comments on the state of Europe after two world wars, genocide and imperial exploitation. Aptly for this chapter, the events of Vassili Grossman’s Life and Fate take place during WWII and the Holocaust , and describes what Levinas has called a ‘completely dehumanized’ society (1999, 106). Grossman visited Treblinka with Red Army troops after the camp’s liberation in 1944 and described its operations. He accompanied members of the Polish-Soviet Commission for Investigation of German Crimes, who recommended the preservation of the camp’s documents and analysis of its mass graves (Gross with Grudzińska-Gross 2012, 20). This report went largely unheeded and the camp fell into neglect. It was in part this lack of safeguarding that provided the conditions for some Polish citizens (and Soviet soldiers) to sift through the human remains searching for gold. What has been termed a ‘Gold Rush’ at Treblinka has been described by, amongst others , Gross and Grudzińska-Gross (2012) and Rusiniak (2008), though these accounts are disputed (see Chap. 2).

  27. 27.

    See in particular Cooper’s analysis of the ending of La Promesse (Belgium/France, 1996), in which the young protagonist Igor confesses to the refugee Assita that his own father was responsible for the death of her husband. This confession is delivered to her back as she faces away from Igor, who is also filmed with his back to the camera. This image of ‘staggered backs’ ‘enables the filmic rendering of the Levinasian ethical encounter’ (2007, 72).

References

  • Aaron, Michele. 2014. Death and the Moving Image: Ideology, Iconography, and I. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, Theodor W. 2005. Minima Moralia: Reflections From Damaged Life. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, Sarah. 2000. Strange Encounters: Embodied Others in Post-Coloniality. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelard, Gaston. 1994. The Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielas, Katarzyna. 1993. Miejsce dochodzenia. Gazeta Wyborcza, 21 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkema, Eugenie. 2014. The Forms of the Affects. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brzozowski, Andrzej. 1963. Przy Torze Kolejowym/By the Railway Track. Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Jonathan. 2002. Animals in Film. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2006. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chantner, Tina. 2001. Time, Death and the Feminine: Levinas with Heidegger. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinquegrani, Maurizio. 2018. Journey to Poland: Documentary Landscapes of the Holocaust. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cobel-Tokarska, Marta. 2018. Desert Island, Burrow, Grave: Wartime Hiding Places of Jews in Occupied Poland. Trans. Katarzyna Błachnio-Sitkiewicz. Berlin: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Richard A. 2009. Ethics, Exegesis and Philosophy: Interpretation After Levinas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Sarah. 2006. Selfless Cinema? Ethics and French Documentary. London: LEGENDA Modern Humanities Research Association and Maney Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Mortal Ethics: Reading Levinas with the Dardenne Brothers. Film-Philosophy 11 (2): 66–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Critchley, Simon. 2002. Introduction. In The Cambridge Companion to Levinas, ed. Simon Critchley and Robert Bernasconi, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dardenne, Luc, and Jean-Pierre Dardenne. 1996. La Promesse. Belgium/France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1995. Cinema 2: The Time Image. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doane, Mary-Ann. 2003. The Close-up: Scale and Detail in the Cinema. Differences 14 (3): 88–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downing, Lisa, and Libby Saxton. 2010. Film and Ethics: Foreclosed Encounters. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabinski, John E. 2011. Levinas and the Postcolonial: Race, Nation, Other. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaglestone, Robert. 2004. The Holocaust and the Postmodern. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Girgus, Sam B. 2010. Levinas and the Cinema of Redemption: Time, Ethics and the Feminine. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glowacka, Dorota. 2012. Disappearing Traces: Holocaust Testimonials, Ethics and Aesthetics. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Jan T., with Irena Grudzińska-Gross. 2012. Golden Harvest: Events at the Periphery of the Holocaust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grynberg, Henryk. 1993a. Dziedzictwo. London: Aneks.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993b. The Jewish War and The Victory. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán, Patricio. 2010. Nostalgia for the Light. France/Germany/Chile/Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, Seán. 2009. Emmanuel Levinas. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, James. 2017. The Unknowable Soldier: Ethical Erasure in The Master’s Facial Close-Ups. In Disappearing War: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Cinema and Erasure in the Post-9/11 World, ed. Christina Hellmich and Lisa Purse, 92–110. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insdorf, Annette. 2003. Indelible Shadows: Films of the Holocaust. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenaan, Hagi. 2013. The Ethics of Visuality: Levinas and the Contemporary Gaze. London and New York: I. B. Tauris.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kobielska, Maria, and Aleksandra Szczepan. 2019. “Testimoniality”: A Lexicon of Witnesses of Non-sites of Memory. Unpublished conference draft. Research Centre for Memory Cultures, Faculty of Polish Studies, Jagiellonian University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Gertrud, and Miriam Hansen. 1987. Béla Balázs: The Physiognomy of Things. New German Critique 40: 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kracauer, Siegfried. 1997. Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwieciński, Bartosz. 2012. Obrazy i Klisze. Między Biegunami Wizualnej Pamięci Zagłady. Kraków: Universitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzmann, Claude. 1985. Shoah. France/UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, Emmanuel. 1996. Enigma and Phenomenon. In Emmanuel Levinas: Basic Philosophical Writings, ed. Adriaan T. Peperzak, Simon Critchley, and Robert Bernasconi, 65–78. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Alterity and Transcendence. Trans. Michael B. Smith. London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litka, Piotr. 2011. Odzyskiwanie Pamięci. Miejsce urodzenia Pawła Łozińskiego i Sąsiedzi Agnieszki Arnold. In Pamięć Shoah: Kulturowe Reprezentacje i Praktyki Upamiętnienia, ed. Tomasz Majewski and Anna Zeidler-Janiszewska, 2nd ed., 883–890. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Officyna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łomnicki, Jan. 1991. Jeszcze Tylko Ten Las/Just Beyond This Forest. Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łoziński, Paweł. 1991. Journey. Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Birthplace/Miejsce Urodzenia. Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Łysak, Tomasz. 2016. Od Kroniki do Filmu Posttraumatycznego—Filmy Dokumentalne o Zagładzie. Warsaw: Instytut Badań Literackich PAN Wydawnictwo.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Wydobyć skrywane historie. Pleograf. Kwartalnik Akademii Polskiego Filmu, 3. Accessed 16 April 2020. http://akademiapolskiegofilmu.pl/pl/historia-polskiego-filmu/artykuly/wydobyc-skrywane-historie-z-pawlem-lozinskim-o-miejscu-urodzenia-rozmawia-tomasz-lysak/603.

  • Mąka-Malatyńska, Katarzyna. 2012. Widok z Tej Strony: Przedstawienia Holocaustu w Polskim Filmie. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Laura U. 2000. The Skin of the Film. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Jones, David. 2013. Archival Landscapes and a Non-anthropocentric “Universe Memory”. Third Text 27 (6): 707–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019. Cinema Against Doublethink: Ethical Encounters with the Lost Pasts of World History. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensch, James R. 2003. Ethics and Selfhood: Alterity and the Phenomenology of Obligation. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molisak, Alina. 2019. On Behalf of the Dead: Mediumistic Writing on the Holocaust in Polish Literature. In The Spectral Turn: Jewish Ghosts in the Polish Post-Holocaust Imaginaire, ed. Zuzanna Dziuban, 49–64. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nałkowska, Zofia. 1946. Medaliony/Medallions. Warsaw: Czytelnik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasfeter, Janusz. 1967. Długa Noc/Long Night. Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlikowski, Paweł. 2013. Ida. Poland/Denmark/France/UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, Anat. 2011. Creaturely Poetics: Animality and Vulnerability in Literature and Film. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowska, Agnieszka. 2014. Psychoanalysis and Ethics in Documentary Film. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prager, Brad. 2015. The Act of Digging: Archaeology, Photography and Forensics in Birthplace and Holocaust by Bullets. In Holocaust Cinema in the Twenty-First Century: Memory, Images and the Ethics of Representation, ed. Oleksandr Kobrynskyy and Gerd Bayer, 59–75. New York and Chichester: Wallflower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renov, Michael. 2004. The Subject of Documentary. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodowick, D.N. 1997. Gilles Deleuze’s Time Machine. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rusiniak, Martyna. 2008. Obóz zagłady Treblinka II w pamięci społecznej (1943–1989). Warsaw: Neriton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, Libby. 2007. Fragile Faces: Levinas and Lanzmann. Film-Philosophy 11 (2): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Haunted Images: Film, Ethics, Testimony and the Holocaust. London and New York: Wallflower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sendyka, Roma. 2013. Pryzma—zrozumieć nie-miejsce pamięci (non-lieu de mémoire). Teksty Drugie 1 (2): 323–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnerbrink, Robert. 2016. Cinematic Ethics: Exploring Ethical Experience Through Film. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spargo, R. Clifton. 2006. Vigilant Memory: Emmanuel Levinas, the Holocaust, and the Unjust Death. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigg, Dylan. 2012. The Memory of Place: A Phenomenology of the Uncanny. Athens: University of Ohio Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viola, Bill. 1986. I Do Not Know What It Is I Am Like. USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg, Malin. 2008. Documentary Time: Film and Phenomenology. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterson, Roxana. 2007. Trajectories of Memory: Documentary Film and the Transmission of Testimony. History and Anthropology 18 (1): 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, John. 2009. Landscape, Absence and the Geographies of Love. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 34: 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Żukowski, Tomasz. 2018a. Wielki Retusz: Jak Zapomnieliśmy, że Polacy Zabijali Żydów. Warsaw: Wielka Litera.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zylinska, Joanna. 2005. The Ethics of Cultural Studies. London and New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Who Is My Neighbour? Ethics Under Duress. In Imaginary Neighbours: Mediating Polish-Jewish Relations after the Holocaust, ed. Dorota Glowacka and Joanna Zylinska, 275–300. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matilda Mroz .

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mroz, M. (2020). Posthumous Landscapes and the Earth-Archive: Archaeology, Ethics and Birthplace. In: Framing the Holocaust in Polish Aftermath Cinema. Palgrave Film Studies and Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-46166-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics