Abstract
Of all the topics that contemporary Criminology deals with, arguably, the gang is the most researched. Moreover, gangs are considered in a variety of places, such as policing studies, youth work and migration: they are inescapable, being blamed, at various times, for all manner of things from murder and rape to drug dealing and people trafficking. Others still see gangs as a form of resistance, a social movement and helpful ad hoc socialiser of young people (Brotherton 2007). The extent of gangs is perennially disputed in the literature. There are those who see gangs everywhere and others who see the phenomenon as far more restricted. It both rests on whether scholars use a fat or a thin version of the gang in their work (Hallsworth and Young 2008). The phenomenon of gangs itself is hardly helped by there being no agreed working typology. Moreover, as I noted previously “… the polluting influence of funding from the police and a range of government agencies has meant that criminologists have had little incentive to be unduly critical of the basic ontological settlement around gangs” (Amatrudo 2015a, b, 105). There is also the phenomenon of the fetishisation and sexualisation of young, virile male bodies, often black, by, usually, white, middle-class observers, inside and outside of the academy. Many academics and policy makers are all too willing to sensationalise the lives of young people and fit them neatly into a category; the gang as an object to stare at, to study and assess (Panfil 2014; Mayeda et al. 2001). Many scholars are all too willing to go along with the script. This issue of seeing gangs everywhere is a huge concern. At a time of falling crime rates the gang seems to be given greater and greater attention. The issue of joint criminal enterprise is intertwined with the issue of gangs, leading Squires to write of “voodoo criminal liability” concerning the over-criminalisation of young black men in our urban centres with their accompanying over-prosecution and over-incarceration rates (Squires 2016). We must never forget that Stan Cohen’s Folk Devils and Moral Panics was about gangs, mods and rockers. Cohen’s view was that the media’s focus upon mods and rockers made them seem a far bigger problem than they were. So, it has been with a succession of groups over the years since Cohen’s book appeared. It is worth citing, in full, Cohen’s analysis in a passage from the start of the book, which is seminal:
“Societies appear to be subject, every now and then, to periods of moral panic. A condition episode, person or group of persons emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests; its nature is presented in a stylized and stereotypical fashion by the mass media; the moral barricades are manned by editors, bishops, politicians and other right-thinking people; socially accredited experts pronounce their diagnoses and solutions; ways of coping are evolved or (more often) resorted to; the condition then disappears, submerges or deteriorates and becomes more visible. Sometimes the object of the panic is quite novel and at other times it is something which has been in existence long enough, but suddenly appears in the limelight. Sometimes the panic passes over and is forgotten except in folklore and collective memory; at other times, it has more serious and long-lasting repercussions and might produce such changes as those in legal and social policy or even in the way the society conceives itself. One of the most recurrent types of moral panic in Britain since the war has been associated with the emergence of various forms of youth culture (originally almost exclusively working class, but often recently middle class or student based) whose behaviour is deviant or delinquent” (Cohen 1973, 9).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Amatrudo, A. (2015a). Unheimlichkeit: Alienated and Integrated Identities and Criminal Existence(s). Law, Jurisprudence, Governance and Existential Indeterminacy: Onati Socio-Legal Series, 5(3), 969–981.
Amatrudo, A. (2015b). Individuals and Groups of Individuals Breaking Laws. In D. Crewe & R. Lippens (Eds.), What is Criminology About? (pp. 105–122). Abingdon: Routledge.
Amatrudo, A., & Blake, L. (2015). Human Rights and the Criminal Justice System. London: Routledge.
Arrigo, B., & Williams, C. (2009). Existentialism and the Criminology of the Shadow. In R. Lippens & D. Crewe (Eds.), Existentialist Criminology (pp. 222–245). London: Routledge.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck, U. (1998). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
Becker, H. (1963). Outsiders. New York: Free Press.
Becker, H. (1974). Labelling Theory Reconsidered. In P. Rock & M. McIntosh (Eds.), Deviance and Social Control. London: Tavistock Press.
Bowling, B., & Phillips, C. (2007). Disproportionate and Discriminatory: Reviewing the Evidence on Police Stop and Search. Modern Law Review, 70(6), 936–961.
Brotherton, D. (2007). Beyond Social Reproduction: Bringing Resistance Back Into the Theory of Gangs. Theoretical Criminology, 12(1), 55–77.
Brotherton, D. (2015). Youth Street Gangs: A Critical Appraisal. London: Routledge.
Cloward, R., & Ohlin, L. (1960). Delinquency and Opportunity: A Theory of Delinquent Gangs. New York: Free Press.
Cohen, S. (1971). Images of Deviance. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Cohen, S. (1973). Folk Devils and Moral Panics. St Albans: Paladin Press.
Cohen, S. (1985). Visons of Social Control: Crime, Punishment and Classification. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cohen, S., & Young, J. (1973). The Manufacture of News: Deviance, Social Problems and the Mass Media. London: Constable.
Cotte, S., & Hayward, K. (2011). The Terrorist (E)Motives: The Existential Attractions of Terrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, 34(12), 963–986.
Crewe, D. (2013). Becoming Criminal: The Socio-Cultural Origins of Law, Transgression and Deviance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Crewe, D. (2016). Gang: Culture, Eidos and Process. The Politics and Jurisprudence of Group Offending: Onati Socio-Legal Series, 6(4), 999–1015.
Fromm, E. (1941). Escape From Freedom. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
Grant, J. (2014). Riots in the UK: Morality, Social Imaginaries and Conditions of Possibility. New Political Science, 36(3), 311–329.
Hall, S., et al. (1978). Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.
Hallsworth, S. (2013). The Gang and Beyond: Interpreting Violent Street Worlds. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hallsworth, S., & Young, T. (2008). Gang Talk and Gang Talkers. Crime, Media and Culture, 4(2), 175–195.
Hardie-Bick, J. (2016). Escaping the Self: Identity, Group Identification and Violence. The Politics and Jurisprudence of Group Offending: Onati Socio-Legal Series, 6(4), 1032–1052.
Hayward, K., & Yar, M. (2006). The ‘Chav’ Phenomenon: Consumption, Media and the Construction of a New Underclass. Crime, Media and Culture, 2(1), 9–28.
Hinton, E. (2016). From the War on Poverty to the War on Crime: The Making of Mass Incarceration in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
von Hirsch, A. (1990). The Politics of Just Deserts. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 397(32), 407–409.
von Hirsch, A. (1996). Censure and Sanctions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hogg, M. (2007). Uncertainty-Identity Theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), 69–126.
Hogg, M. (2014). From Uncertainty to Extremism: Social Categorization and Identity Processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 338–342.
Ilan, J. (2015). Understanding Street Culture: Poverty, Crime, Youth and Cool. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Jacques, S., & Wright, R. (2015). Code of the Suburb: Inside the World of Young Middle-Class Drug Dealing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Katz, J., & Jackson-Jacobs, C. (2004). The Criminologist’s Gang. In C. Sumner (Ed.), Blackwell Companion to Criminology (pp. 91–124). Oxford: Blackwell.
Klein, M., & Maxon, C. (2006). Street Gang Patterns and Policies. Oxford: OUP.
Lemert, E. (1951). Social Pathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lippens, R., & Crewe, D. (2009). Existentialist Criminology. London: Routledge.
Mayeda, D., Chesney-Lind, M., & Koo, J. (2001). Talking Story with Hawaii’s Youth: Confronting Violent and Sexualized Perceptions of Ethnicity and Gender. Youth and Society, 33(1), 99–128.
Oddson, G., & Bernburg, J. (2017). Opportunity Beliefs and Class Differences in Subjective Status Injustice During the Great Icelandic Recession. Acta Sociologica. Published Online First: July 2017.
Panfil, V. (2014). Better Left Unsaid? The Role of Agency in Queer Criminological Research. Critical Criminology, 22(1), 99–111.
Reiner, R. (2016). Crime. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Sen, A. (2006). Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. New York: Norton.
Squires, P. (2016). Voodoo Liability: Joint Enterprise Prosecution as an Aspect of Intensified Criminalisation. The Politics and Jurisprudence of Group Offending: Onati Socio-Legal Series, 6(4), 937–956.
Sumner, C. (1994). The Sociology of Deviance: An Obituary. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Young, J. (2007). The Vertigo of Late Modernity. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Amatrudo, A. (2018). The Gang in Criminological Literature. In: Criminal Actions and Social Situations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45731-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45731-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-45730-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-45731-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)