Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary International Political Economy pp 103–117Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Domestic Politics and the Societal Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Handbooks in IPE ((PHIPE))

Abstract

Theories of domestic politics focus on ideational expectations, material interests, and regulatory institutions to explain governmental preference formation. While the possible relevancy of the international power, transnationalism, and regimes is not disputed, domestic politics theories argue that domestic actors and structures influence governmental preferences prior to international circumstances. The societal approach to International Political Economy (IPE) develops previous domestic politics theories further, especially by conceptualising the conditions under which either value-based ideas or material interests prevail in shaping governmental preferences and under which domestic institutions matter. This chapter discusses central domestic politics theories, presents the innovations of the societal approach, and exemplifies its explanatory power in a case study on the controversies between emerging and developed countries on global economic governance in the Group of 20 (G20).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cynamon, Barry Z. and Steven M. Fazzari. 2010. The End of the Consumer Age. Working Paper Washington University, St. Louis. http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~ec448sf/Cyn_Fazz_Cons.pdf

  • Deutscher Industrie-und Handelskammertag (DIHK). 2010. “Das Spiel mit Wechselkursen birgt Gefahren”, Interview with DIHK President Hans Heinrich Driftmann in Manager Magazin 13 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federaçao das Industrias do Estado de São Paulo (FIESP). 2011. Diretor da Fiesp defende rodada da moeda no G20 papa evitar maior deterioração do cambio. Press release, São Paulo 14 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioretos, Orfeo. 2001. The Domestic Sources of Multilateral Preferences: Varieties of Capitalism in the European Community. In Varieties of Capitalism, ed. Peter A. Hall and David Soskice, 213–244. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Capitalist Diversity and the International Regulation of Hedge Funds. Review of International Political Economy 17 (4): 696–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, Jeffry, and Ronald Rogowski. 1996. The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview. In Internationalization and Domestic Politics, ed. Robert O. Keohane and Helen V. Milner, 25–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geithner, Timothy. 2009. US Treasury Secretary Quoted in The Economist. “The G20: Talking-Shop on Thames” 12 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010a. Letter of the US Treasury Secretary. “Timothy Geithner’s Letter to G20 Finance Leaders.” The Guardian, 22 October. http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/oct/22/g20-timothy-geithner-letter

  • ———. 2010b. Treasury Secretary Geithner’s Testimony on China. Wall Street Journal, 16 September. http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/09/16/treasury-secretary-geithners- testimony-on-china

  • Goldstein, Judith, and Robert O. Keohane, eds. 1993. Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A. 1997. The Role of Interests, Institutions, and Ideas in the Comparative Political Economy of the Industrialized Nations. In Comparative Politics. Rationality, Culture, and Structure, ed. Mark Lichbach and Alan Zuckerman, 174–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice. 2001. An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantages, ed. Peter A. Hall and David Soskice, 1–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hartwich, Hans-Hermann. 1998. Die Europäisierung des deutschen Wirtschaftssystems. Alte Fundamente, neue Realitäten, Zukunftsperspektiven. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organisation (ILO). 2010. G20 Statistical Update: Brazil’s Response to the Crisis. Geneva. http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/jobcrisis/download/g20_brazil_countrybrief.pdf

  • Katzenstein, Peter J. 1978. Introduction. Domestic and International Forces and Strategies of Foreign Economic Policy. In Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced Industrial States, ed. Peter J. Katzenstein, 3–22. WI: Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavareda, Antonio. 2009. Crise e Opiniao Publica. Percepcoes sobre o Enfrentamento da Crise no Brasil. Presentation at Fundacao Getulio Vargas, “Impacto da Crise na Gestao Governamental”. São Paulo. http://www.fgv.br/fgvprojetos/Arq/controle_arq/122.pdf

  • Milner, Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51 (4): 513–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nölke, Andreas, Tobias ten Brink, Simone Claar, and Christian May. 2015. Domestic Structures, Foreign Economic Policies and Global Economic Order: Implications from the Rise of Large Emerging Economies. European Journal of International Relations 21 (3): 538–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2010. Household Saving Rates – OECD Economic Outlook No. 88. Paris. doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/2074384X-2010-table7.

  • Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: e Logic of Two Level Games. International Organization 42 (3): 427–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, Raghuram G. 2010. Rebalancing the Global Economy. New Perspectives Quarterly 27 (4): 7–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, James N., ed. 1967. Domestic Sources of Foreign Policy. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseff, Dilma. 2011. Brazil will Fight Back against the Currency Manipulators. Financial Times, 21 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäuble, Wolfgang. 2010. Quoted in The Economist, “The Ghost at the Feast” 12 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirm, Stefan A. 2002. Globalization and the New Regionalism. Global Markets, Domestic Politics, and Regional Cooperation. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Ideas and Interests in Global Financial Governance. Comparing German and US Preference Formation. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (3): 501–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Leaders in Need of Followers. Emerging Powers in Global Governance. European Journal of International Relations 16 (2): 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Global Politics are Domestic Politics. A Societal Approach to Divergence in the G20. Review of International Studies 39 (3): 685–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Domestic Ideas, Institutions, or Interests? Explaining Governmental Preferences Towards Global Economic Governance. International Political Science Review 37 (1): 66–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrück, Peer. 2009. German Finance Minister Quoted in Handelsblatt, 16 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Chamber of Commerce. 2011. International Trade and Investment: Policy Accomplishments for 2011, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Values Survey (WVS). 2006a. Values Survey Databank, V152 Democracy: Governments Tax the Rich and Subsidize the Poor. www.wvsevsdb.com

  • ———. 2006b. Values Survey Databank, V118 Government Responsibility. www.wvsevsdb.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ruhr University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Stefan A. Schirm

Authors
  1. Stefan A. Schirm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

    Timothy M. Shaw

  2. Bavarian School of Public Policy, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany

    Laura C. Mahrenbach

  3. Centre for African Studies, University of Mumbai, Mumbai, India

    Renu Modi

  4. School of Government and International Relations, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia

    Xu Yi-chong

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schirm, S.A. (2019). Domestic Politics and the Societal Approach. In: Shaw, T.M., Mahrenbach, L.C., Modi, R., Yi-chong, X. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary International Political Economy. Palgrave Handbooks in IPE. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-45443-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation