Skip to main content

Abstract

Investment Decision Analysis using NPV has become the primary method of investment evaluation. This chapter contributes to the existing literature by: (1) simulating and proving new biases and errors inherent in the NPV-MIRR model; (2) developing the necessary and sufficient conditions for monotonic NPV (“well behaved” NPV); (3) developing the necessary and sufficient conditions for the anomalous behavior of NPV; (4) explaining the conditions under which discount rates can be negative (less than zero); (5) developing the conditions under which negative discount rates are justified; (6) proving that the power rule and the inverse function rule in differential calculus, are both wrong. NPV, modified-IRR (MIRR) and related approaches are deeply flawed and are very sensitive to the time horizon, the signs of the periodic cash flows, and discount rates that exceed 100% or are below −100%. The NPV-MIRR model does not accommodate the differences between compounded interest rates and simple interest rates and does not account for Real Options, Regret, or Rejoice in decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Altshuler, D., & Magni, C. A. (2012). Why IRR is not the rate of return on your investment: Introducing the AIRR to the real estate community. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 18(2), 219–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1825544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aven, T., & Flage, R. (2009). Use of decision criteria based on expected values to support decision-making in a production assurance and safety setting. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94, 1491–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, P., & Robison, L. (2014). Technical note: Economic rates of return and investment analysis. The Engineering Economist, 59(3), 231–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bas, E. (2013). A robust approach to the decision rules of NPV and IRR for simple projects. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219(9), 5901–5908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Horin, M., & Kroll, Y. (2012). The limited relevance of the multiple IRRs. The Engineering Economist, 57(2), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biondi, Y. (2006). The double emergence of the modified internal rate of return: The neglected financial work of Duvillard (1755–1832) in a comparative perspective. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 13(3), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaset Kastro, A., & Kulakov, N. (2016). Definition of the concepts of conventional and non-conventional projects. Business Informatics, 2(36), 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgonovo, E., & Percocao, M. (2012). A note on the sensitivity analysis of the internal rate of return. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 526–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, L. (2003). Discounting expected values with parameter uncertainty. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9, 505–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Califf, R. M., Rasiel, E. B., & Schulman, K. A. (2008). Considerations of net present value in policy making regarding diagnostic and therapeutic technologies. American Heart Journal, 156(5), 879–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Reyck, B., Degraeve, Z., & Vandenborre, R. (2008). Project options valuation with net present value and decision tree analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 184, 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1995, May–June). The options approach to capital investment. Harvard Business Review, 73, 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domingo, C. J. (2001). Anomalies in net present value calculations? Economics Letters, 72, 127–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doraszelski, U. (2001). The net present value method versus the option value of waiting: A note on Farzin, Huisman and Kort (1998). Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 25, 1109–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dybvig, P. (1983). Duality, interest rates, and the theory of present value. Journal of Economic Theory, 30(1), 98–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendaal, W. (1998). Estimating NPV variability for deterministic models. European Journal of Operational Research, 107, 202–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley, G., & Goldberg, S. (1995). Net present value techniques and their effects on new product research. Industrial Marketing Management, 24, 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., Edlin, R., Kharroubi, S., et al. (2012). Expected net present value of sample information: From burden to investment. Medical Decision Making, 32, E11–E21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanafizadeh, P., & Vahideh, L. (2011). Robust net present value. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 54(1–2), 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handforth, F. (2004). Duration and convexity of mortgages in the context of real estate investment analysis. Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 10(3), 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazen, G. B. (2003). A new perspective on multiple internal rates of return. The Engineering Economist, 48(1), 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulakov, N., & Blaset Kastro, A. (2015). Evaluation of nonconventional projects: GIRR and GERR vs MIRR. The Engineering Economist, 60(3), 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulakova, A. N., & Kulakov, N. J. (2013). Evaluation of non-conventional projects. The Engineering Economist, 58(2), 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leyman, P., & Vanhoucke, M. (2016). Payment models and net present value optimization for resource-constrained project scheduling. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 91, 139–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., Rettenmaier, A. J., & Saving, T. (2004). Present value criterion: The case of differing borrowing and lending rates. Economics Letters, 84, 427–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, J. R. (1988). The IRR, NPV and the fallacy of the reinvestment rate assumption. The Engineering Economist, 33(4), 303–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magni, C. (2002). Investment decisions in the theory of finance: Some antinomies and inconsistencies. European Journal of Operations Research, 137, 202–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magni, C. A. (2005). On decomposing net final values: EVA, SVA and shadow project. Theory and Decision, 59(1), 51–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magni, C. A. (2007). Project valuation and investment decisions: CAPM versus arbitrage. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 3(1), 137–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magni, C. (2009a). Splitting up value: A critical review of residual income theories. European Journal of Operational Research, 198, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magni, C. A. (2009b). Investment decisions, NPV and bounded rationality. Quantitative Finance, 9(8), 967–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magni, C. (2010). CAPM and capital budgeting: Present/future, equilibrium/disequilibrium, decision/valuation. IUP Journal of Financial Economics, 8(1/2), 7–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magni, C. A. (2011). Addendum to “average internal rate of return and investment decisions: A new perspective”. The Engineering Economist, 56(2), 140–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magni, C. A. (2013). The Internal-Rate-of-Return approach and the AIRR paradigm: A refutation and a corroboration. The Engineering Economist, 58(2), 73–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magni, C. (2015). Aggregate Return On Investment for investments under uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magni, C. (2016). Capital depreciation and the underdetermination of rate of return: A unifying perspective. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 67, 54–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, C., Edlin, R., & Hall, P. (2013). Navigating time and uncertainty in health technology appraisal: Would a map help? PharmacoEconomics, 31(9), 731–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellichamp, D. (2013). New discounted cash flow method: Estimating plant profitability at the conceptual design level while compensating for business risk/uncertainty. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 48(10), 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlo, P. (2016). Consequences of the absence of monotonicity of the NPV function to the assessment of effectiveness of investment projects. Engineering Economics, 27(1), 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naim, M. (2006). The impact of the net present value on the assessment of the dynamic performance of e-commerce enabled supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 104, 382–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, E., & Beruvides, M. (2015). Multiple internal rate of return revisited: Frequency of occurrences. The Engineering Economist, 60(1), 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nwogugu, M. (2010). On regret theory, and anomalies in polynomials and net-present-value decisions. www.ssrn.com. September 10, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1925458.

  • Nwogugu, M. (2012). Risk in the global real estate market. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oehmke, J. F. (2000). Anomalies in net present value calculations. Economics Letters, 67, 349–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, M. (2010). A resolution to the NPV–IRR debate? The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 50, 234–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padberg, M., & Wilczak, M. J. (1999). Optimal project selection when borrowing and lending rates differ. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 29, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padilla, E., Jadotteb, E., & Pasqula, J. (2013). Technical note: Equivalence of different profitability criteria with the net present value. International Journal of Production Economics, 142(1), 205–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressacco, F., Magni, C., & Stucchi, P. (2014). A quasi-IRR for a project without IRR. Frontiers in Finance & Economics, 11(2), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Promislow, D. S., & Spring, D. (1996). Postulate for an internal rate of return for an investment project. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 26, 335–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, E. J., & Varberg, D. (1987). Calculus with analytic geometry (5th ed.). Prentice Hall, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remer, D., & Nieto, A. (1995). A compendium and comparison of 25 project evaluation techniques. Part 2: Ration, payback, and accounting methods. International Journal of Production Economics, 42(2), 101–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robison, L. J., & Barry, P. J. (1996). Present value models and investment analysis. Northport: The Academic Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocabert, J., Tarrio, J., & Perez, M. (2005). Anomalies in net present value calculations. A solution. Revista de Economía Pública, 173(2), 47–60. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6835918.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S., Spatt, C., & Dybvig, P. (1980). Present values and internal rates of return. Journal of Economic Theory, 23, 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, A., & Rickard, J. (1982). Uniqueness of non-negative internal rate of return. Journal of the Institute of Actuaries, 109, 435–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saak, A., & Hennesey, D. (2001). Well behaved cashflows. Economic Letters, 73, 81–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1975). Minimal conditions for monotonicity of capital values. Journal of Economic Theory, 11, 340–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, K., Tang, T., & Tso, P. (2000). Optimal investment sequence. Economic Theory, 15(1), 215–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simerska, C. (2008). Remarks on the economic criterion-the internal rate of return. In: J. Chleboun, P. Přikryl, K. Segeth, & T. Vejchodský (Eds.): Programs and algorithms of numerical mathematics, Proceedings of seminar, Dolní Maxov, June 1–6, 2008 (pp. 170–176). Prague: Institute of Mathematics of the Czech Academy of Science. http://dml.cz/bitstream/handle/10338.dmlcz/702871/PANM_14-2008-1_24.pdf.

  • Simerska, C. (2008). Remarks on the economic criterion-the Internal rate of return. Programs and Algorithms of Numerical Mathematics, 14, 170–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R., & Williams, A. (1978). The principles of practical cost-benefit analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigeorgis. (1996). Real options. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trippi, R. (1989). A discount rate adjustment for calculation of net present values and internal rates of returns on investments whose lives are uncertain. Journal of Economics and Business, 41, 143–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trusheim, M. R., Burgess, B., Hu, S. X., et al. (2011). Quantifying factors for the success of stratified medicine. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 10(11), 817–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsao, C. (2012). Fuzzy net present values for capital investments in an uncertain environment. Computers & Operations Research, 39(8), 1885–1892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassallo, J. (2010). The role of the discount rate in tendering highway concessions under the LPVR approach. Transportation Research Part A, 44, 806–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walthe, H. (2010). Anomalies in inter-temporal choice, time-dependent uncertainty and expected utility—A common approach. Journal of Economic Psychology, 31(1), 114–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, T. (2014). On the (non-)equivalence of IRR and NPV. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 52, 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nwogugu, M.C.I. (2016). On Algebraic Anomalies in Polynomials and Net Present Value Decisions. In: Anomalies in Net Present Value, Returns and Polynomials, and Regret Theory in Decision-Making . Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44698-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44698-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-44697-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-44698-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics