Skip to main content

Enhancing Global Cooperation in Social Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Future Directions in Social Development

Abstract

The chapter explores the main processes supported by international agencies and non-governmental actors to advance global social development cooperation. It examines the main strategies, initiatives, actors, and mechanisms employed, as well as the main challenges and shortcomings. Particular attention is paid to the increasing importance of emerging aid actors from the South, and their potential role for shaping global social development cooperation. Despite unprecedented exchanges, which generated a global conversation on social development, whether ultimately they will lead to new models of global cooperation and drive real change are yet to be seen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alesina, A., & Dollar, D. (2000). Who gives foreign aid to whom and why? Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 33–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekerman, W., & Pasek, J. (2001). Justice, posterity and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., Abbott, K., Andresen, S., Bäckstrand, K., Bernstein, S., Betsill, M. M., et al. (2012). Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving earth system governance. Science, 335(6074), 1306–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdsall, N., & Fukuyama, F. (2011). The post-Washington consensus: Development after the crisis(Working paper no. 244). Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRICS. (2013). Joint Statistical Publication 2013. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), Federal State Statistics Service of Russian Federation (ROSSTAT), Central Statistics Office of India, National Bureau of Statistics of China (NBS), Statistics South Africa (SSA). Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRICS Academic Forum. (2013). Report of the Fifth BRICS Academic Forum, March 10–13th Durban, South Africa. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from http://www.brics5.co.za/assets/Report-of-the-Fifth-BRICS-Academic-Forum-10-13-March-2013-Durban-South-Africa.pdf

  • BRICS Health Ministers. (2011). Beijing Declaration. July 11th, Beijing, China. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from http://www.brics5.co.za/about-brics/sectorial-declaration/health-ministers-meeting/beijing-declaration/

  • Busan Partnership Agreement. (2011). Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, Fourth High Level Form on Aid Effectiveness. Busan, Republic of Korea, November 29th–December 1st. Retrieved April 15, 2015, from http://www.aideffectiveness.org/busanhlf4/images/stories/hlf4/OUTCOME_DOCUMENT_-_FINAL_EN.pdf

  • Chan, L.-H. (2011). China engages global health governance. Responsible stakeholder or system-transformer? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. (2004). Building a global partnership for development? In R. Black, & H. White. (Eds.), Targeting development. Critical perspectives on the MDGs. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dani, A., & de Haan, A. (Eds.). (2008). Inclusive states. Social policy and structural inequalities. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, B. (2007). Global social policy and governance. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, B. (2013). Global social policy in the making. Foundations of the social protection floor. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, B., Macovei, M. C., Van Langenhove, L., & Yeates, N. (Eds.). (2010). World-regional social policy and global governance. New research and policy agendas in Africa, Asia, Europe and Latin America. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwerth, K., & Pattberg, P. (2006). Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance, 12, 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly, W. R. (2006). The white man’s burden: Why the west’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • FOCAC. (2012). The fifth Ministerial Conference of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation Beijing Action Plan (2013–2015). Beijing: Forum on China-Africa Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation, GPEDC. (2013). About the Global Partnership. Retrieved April 15, 2015, from http://effectivecooperation.org/

  • Gough, I., & Wood, G. (with Barrientos, A., Bevan, P., Davis, P., & Room, G.) (2004). Insecurity and welfare regimes in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A., & Midgley, J. (2004). Social policy for development. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISSA. (2013). Social security coverage extension in the BRICS. In A comparative study on the extension for coverage in Brazil, the Russian Federation, India, China and South Africa. Geneva: International Social Security Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaasch, A., & Martens, K. (2015). Agency and actors in global social governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, I. (2013). The rise of the global south: Implications for the provisioning of global public goods. In K. Malik & M. Kugler (Eds.), Human progress and the rising south (pp. 301–336). New York: UNDP Human Development Report Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharas, H. (2011). Coming together: How a new global partnership on Development cooperation was forged at the Busan High Level Forum on Aid effectiveness (ARI). Madrid: Real Institute Elcano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kharas, H. (2012). The global partnership for effective development cooperation. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, J., & Martens, K. (2015). NGOs and actors in global social governance. In Kaasch, A., & Martens, K. (Eds.), Agency an actors in global social governance (pp. 175–194). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, J. (1997). Social welfare in global context. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, J. (2014). Social development: Theory and practice. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mkandawire, T. (Ed.). (2004). Social policy in a developing context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morais de Sá e Silva, M. (2005, February). South-South cooperation, policy transfer and best-practice reasoning: The transfer of the solidarity in literacy program from Brazil to Mozambique (Institute of Social Studies, Working Paper Series, no. 406). The Hague: Institute of Social Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morais de Sá e Silva, M. (2010). How did we get there? The pathways of South-South cooperation. In South-South cooperation. The same old game or a new paradigm? (pp. 3–4). Poverty in Focus no. 20, Poverty Practice, Bureau for Development Policy. Brasilia: International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. C., & Keohane, R. O. (2014, March). Contested multilateralism. The Review of International Organizations, 9(1), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, D. (2009). Dead aid: Why aid is not working and why there is another way for Africa. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2013). The social entrepreneurship-social policy nexus in developing countries. In R. Surender & R. Walker (Eds.), Social policy in a developing world. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014). Development co-operation report 2014. Mobilising resources for sustainable development. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Aid statistics. Retrieved April 10, 2015, from http://stats.oecd.org

  • Ohno, I. (2013). An overview: Diversity and complementarity in development efforts. In K. Ohno, & I. Ohno (Eds.), Eastern and western ideas for African growth. Diversity and complementarity in development aid (pp. xx). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulo, S., & Reisen, H. (2010). Eastern donors and Western soft law: Towards a DAC donor peer review of China and India? Development Policy Review, 28(5), 535–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poku, N. K., & Whitman, J. (2011). The millennium development goals and development after 2015. Third World Quarterly, 32(1), 181–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanahuja, J. A. (2010). Post-liberal regionalism: S-S cooperation in Latin America and the Caribbean. In South-South cooperation. The same old game or a new paradigm? (pp. 17–19). Poverty in Focus no. 20, Poverty Practice, Bureau for Development Policy. Brasilia: International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth, United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Severino, J. M., & Ray, O. (2009, March). The end of ODA: Death and rebirth of a global public policy. (Working paper, no. 167). Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T. M., Grant, J. A., & Cornelissen, S. (Eds.). (2012). The Ashgate research companion to regionalisms. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuenkel, O. (2013). Institutionalizing South-South cooperation: Towards a new paradigm? Background research paper submitted to the High Level Panel on the Post-2015 Development Agenda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, A. (2012). Where will the world’s poor live? An update on global poverty and the new bottom billion (Working paper no. 305). Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surender, R., & Urbina-Ferretjans, M. (2013). South-South cooperation: A new paradigm for global social policy? In R. Surender & R. Walker (Eds.), Social policy in a developing world (pp. 237–257). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Surender, R., & Urbina-Ferretjans, M. (2015). New kids on the block? The implications of the BRICS alliance for global social governance. In A. Kaasch, & K. Martens (Eds.), Agency and actors in global social governance (pp.130–152). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surender, R., & Walker, R. (Eds.). (2013). Social policy in a developing world. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., & Bosma, N. (2011). Global entrepreneurship monitor. Report on social entrepreneurship. London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Reality of Aid (2010). South-South cooperation: A challenge to the aid system? Retrieved April 15, 2015, from http://www.realityofaid.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/ROA-SSDC-Special-ReportEnglish.pdf

  • Thompson, D. (2005). China’s soft power in Africa: From the “Beijing Consensus” to health diplomacy. China Brief, 5(21). Washington, DC: The Jamestown Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2013). The rise of the south: Human progress in a diverse world. Human Development Report 2013. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2011). Report on the development of China-Africa educational cooperation. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2013). A new global partnership: Eradicate poverty and transform economics through sustainable development. The report of the High-level panel of eminent persons on the post-2015 development agenda. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2014). Corporate sustainability in the world economy. United Nations Global Compact. UN Global Compact Office. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 20130 Agenda for Sustainable Development (70/1). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. (2000). Governance, good governance and global governance: Conceptual and actual challenges. Third World Quarterly, 21(5), 795–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, L., & Fraser, A. (2009). Introduction: Aid and sovereignty. In Whitfield, L. (Ed.), The politics of aid. African strategies for dealing with donors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N. (2011). Rethinking aid coordination. In H. Kharas, K. Makino, & W. Jung (Eds.), Catalyzing development. A new vision for aid. Washington, DC: The Brooking Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woods, N., Betts, A., Prantl, J., & Sridhar, D. (2013). Transforming global governance for the 21st century. In K. Malik & M. Kugler (Eds.), Human progress and the rising south (pp. 336–370). New York: UNDP Human Development Report Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2008). Aid architecture. In An overview of the main trends in official development assistance flows. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates, N. (1999). Social politics and policy in an era of globalization: Critical reflections. Social Policy and Administration, 33(4), 372–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeates, N. (Ed.). (2005). “Globalization” and social policy in a development context. Regional responses, Social policy and development (Paper no. 18). Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates, N. (Ed.). (2008a). Understanding global social policy. Bristol: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates, N. (2008b). Global inequality, poverty and wealth. In T. Ridge, & S. Wright (Eds.), Understanding inequality, poverty and wealth. Policies and prospects (pp. xx). Bristol: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, F., & Smith, K. (2011). More actors, more money, more ideas for international development co-operation. Journal of International Development, 23, 722–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Urbina-Ferretjans, M., Surender, R. (2017). Enhancing Global Cooperation in Social Development. In: Midgley, J., Pawar, M. (eds) Future Directions in Social Development. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44598-8_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics