Skip to main content

The Carbon Economy: A Brave New World?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business Value and Sustainability
  • 1415 Accesses

Abstract

Many regions throughout the world have adopted some form of carbon market mechanism, such as carbon trading (cap and trade) or taxes. As the outcome of the Copenhagen accord, the European Commission has set the new carbon emission target at 30% by 2020, up from 20%. In the United States the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recognizes the issues of ‘climate change-related risks’, and asks companies to disclose ‘material climate risks’. Even in large carbon emitting countries that have not signed or are opting out of the Kyoto accord, administrative areas are adopting market-based incentives to reduce carbon emissions from various industries. In December 2011, Canada opted out of the Kyoto protocol; however, in 2008, the Canadian province of British Columbia implemented a carbon tax, starting from $10 per tonne of carbon dioxide, then increasing gradually to the current price of $30 per tonne. It has been very effective in tackling the root cause of carbon pollution—the burning of fossil fuels. Since the tax came into effect, fuel use in British Columbia has dropped by 16 per cent while in the rest of Canada, it has risen by 3 per cent. A recent survey by Statistics Canada shows that within just six years of implementation, British Columbia’s policy has been an environmental and economic success. In 2012, the province of Quebec (Canada) announced that it had joined California’s existing carbon trading scheme by imposing a cap on energy intensive industries’ greenhouse gas emissions (e.g., mining, cement, utility and manufacturing industries).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Copenhagen Accord (also known as the Copenhagen Agreement) is a document that delegates at the 15th session of the Conference of Parties (COP 15) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change agreed to ‘take note of’ at the final plenary on December 18, 2009.

    On one hand the United States, and on the other, in a united position as the BASIC countries (China, India, South Africa, and Brazil), are not legally bound by the Accord, which does not commit countries to agree to a binding successor to the Kyoto Protocol, whose round ended in 2012.

  2. 2.

    Beaty, R., Lipsey, R. and Elgie, S. (2014) ‘The shocking truth about B.C.’s carbon tax: It works’. July 9, The Globe and Mail, http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/the-insidious-truth-about-bcs-carbon-tax-it-works/article19512237/

  3. 3.

    Hughes, N. (2013) Apple’s iPad now in use in all American Airlines cockpits, June 24 Apple insider, http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/06/24/apples-ipad-now-in-use-in-all-american-airlines-cockpits

  4. 4.

    In December 1997, the Kyoto Protocol produced a binding reduction target of greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) with countries in Annex I of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).

  5. 5.

    As of May 1 2014, ratification by 144 parties is needed for the Doha amendment to the Kyoto Protocol to enter into force.

  6. 6.

    See more details http://www.un-redd.org/aboutredd/tabid/102614/default.aspx.

  7. 7.

    Delphi Automotive, Walt Disney Company, ConAgra Foods, Wal-Mart Stores, Apache Corporation, BP, Chevron Corporation, ConocoPhillips, Devon Energy Corporation, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Hess Corporation, Royal Dutch Shell, Total, Wells Fargo & Company, Cummings, Delta Airlines, General Electric, Google, Jabil Circuit, Microsoft Corporation, E.I. Du Pont (Source: Carbon Disclosure Project 2013).

  8. 8.

    See the details at www.climatechange.gov.au/climate-change/greenhouses-gas-measurement-and-reporting/company-emissions-measurement.

  9. 9.

    Corporate Average Fuel Economy

  10. 10.

    Daimler sold part of its shares in joint venture to Ford in 2007.

  11. 11.

    Source: Detroit Free Press on February 12 2015, http://www.freep.com/story/money/cars/general-motors/2015/02/12/gm-chevrolet-bolt-detroit-built-orion-township/23285851.

  12. 12.

    Source: Bloomberg ‘Worst Thai floods in 50 years hit Apple, Toyota supply chain’, October 21 2011, available at http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2011-10-20/worst-thai-floods-in-50-years-hit-apple-toyota-supply-chains (accessed 10 May 2014).

  13. 13.

    Source: The Guardian, February 15 2012, available at http://www.theguardian.com/business/2012/feb/14/lloyds-thailand-flooding-2bn-dollars (accessed 20 October 2014).

  14. 14.

    Cyclone devastates Australia’s banana crop, Sydney Morning Herald, March 20, 2006.

  15. 15.

    See http://corporate.walmart.com/global-responsibility/environmental-sustainability

  16. 16.

    As of 2011 existing ECAs include the Baltic Sea (SOx, adopted 1997; enforced 2005) and the North Sea (SOx, 2005/2006 adopted July 2005; enforced 2006), the North American ECA, including most of US and Canadian coast (NOx & SOx, 2010/2012) and the US Caribbean ECA, including Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands (NOx & SOx, 2011/2014).

  17. 17.

    Air Pollution and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, International Maritime Organization (IMO), 2014.

  18. 18.

    Global warming opens Arctic to LNG shipping lanes, The Australian, 11 July 2014.

  19. 19.

    http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/read/nissan-green-charge-networks-turn-second-life-ev-batteries-into-grid-storag. On 15 June 2015, Nissan launches Green Charge Networks to turn ‘second-life’ EV batteries into Grid Storage Business.

  20. 20.

    http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/csr/news/2002/02.html, Sony Europe GmbH, a subsidiary of Sony Corporation, on February 18, 2002 issued a press statement on its program of temporarily halting shipments to retail of some Sony models in Europe. Please see below the text of the Sony Europe statement made on this subject.

  21. 21.

    WEEE directive is designed to control electronic products waste while RoHS is about restrictions of six hazardous materials (lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, phlobrominated biphenyls (PBBs) and polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBED) in certain types of electronic equipment including mobile phone handsets (Lee and Kim 2011).

References

  • Bowen, F. E., Cousins, P. D., Lamming, R. C., & Faruk, A. C. (2001). Horses for courses: Explaining the gap between the theory and practice of green supply. Greener Management International, 35, 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R., & Easton, L. (2011). Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(1), 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C., & Rogers, D. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foerstl, K., Reuter, C., Hartmann, E., & Blome, C. (2010). Managing supplier sustainability risks in a dynamically changing environment: Sustainable supplier management in the chemical industry. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 16(2), 118–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujii, H., Iwata, K., Kaneko, S., & Managi, S. (2013). Corporate environmental and economic performance of Japanese manufacturing firms: Empirical study for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(3), 187–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, N. L., Brown, S., Hagen, S. C., Saatchi, S. S., Petrova, S., Salas, W., Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., & Lotsch, A. (2012). Baseline map of carbon emissions from deforestation in tropical regions. Science, 336, 1573–1576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J. (2005). Climate change strategy: The business logic behind voluntary greenhouse gas reductions. California Management Review, 47(3), 21–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K., & Wong, C. (2012). Green logistics management and performance: Some empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing exporters. Omega, 40(3), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-H. (2011). Integrating carbon footprint in supply chain management: The case of Hyundai Motor Company (HMC) in the automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(11), 1216–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-H. (2012). Carbon accounting for supply chain management in the automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-H., & Kim, J.-W. (2009). Current status of CSR in the realm of supply management: The case of the Korean electronics industry. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 14(2), 138–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-H., & Kim, J.-W. (2011). Integrating suppliers into green product innovation development: An empirical case study in the semiconductor industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(8), 527–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-H., & Min, B. (2014). Globalization and carbon constrained global economy: A fad or a trend? Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, 15(2), 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-H., Min, B., & Yook, K. (2015). The impacts of carbon (CO2) emissions and environmental research and development (R&D) investment on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L., Padmanabhan, V., & Whang, S. (1997). The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management Review, 38(3), 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, W., & Crowston, G. (1994). The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys, 26(1), 87–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D., Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Behrens, W., III. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M., Santos, V., & Seuring, S. (2009). The contribution of environmental and social standards towards ensuring legitimacy in supply chain governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(4), 509–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani, K., & Kokubu, K. (2012). Why does the reduction of Greenhouse Gas Emissions enhance firm value? The case of Japanese manufacturing firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(8), 495–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). OECD environmental outlook to 2050: The consequences of inaction. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pagell, M., Wu, Z., & Murthy, N. (2007). The supply chain implications of recycling. Business Horizons, 50(2), 133–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmigiani, A., Klassen, R., & Russo, M. (2011). Efficiency meets accountability: Performance implications of supply chain configuration, control, and capabilities. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 212–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S., Sarkis, J., Müller, M., & Rao, P. (2008). Sustainability and supply chain management – an introduction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 1545–1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharfman, M. P., Shaft, T. M., & Anex, R. P. (2009). The road to cooperative supply-chain environmental management: trust and uncertainty among pro-active firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simatupang, T., Wright, A., & Sridharan, R. (2002). The knowledge of coordination for supply chain integration. Business Process Management, 8(3), 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2012). The future we want: Outcome document adopted at Rio +20. http://www.un.org/en/sustainablefuture. 15 Mar 2014.

  • Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. (2008). Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 299–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinhofer, G., & Busch, T. (2012). Corporate strategies for managing climate risks. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinhofer, G., & Hoffmann, V. (2010). Mitigating climate change – How do corporate strategies differ? Business Strategy and the Environment, 19, 77–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2014). State and trends of carbon pricing. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zander, M., & Anderson, J. (2008). Breaking up mobile: Implications for firm strategy. Info, 10(4), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendices

Key Terms and Glossary

Carbon trading (cap and trade) :

A government imposed ceiling (cap) on the amount of allowed greenhouse gas emissions, combined with a system which allows a firm to sell (trade) its emission reductions to another firm whose emissions exceed the allowed cap.

Climate Change Costs and Risks :

As a result of climate change, extreme weather events such as droughts, storms and flooding are occurring more and more frequently The cost and the risk associated with these events varies, but the main point is that there will be economic, social and environmental effects as a direct and indirect result of climate change. These affect businesses, partners and supply chains.

Collaboration in the supply network :

Collaboration in the supply network means that companies leverage each other on an operational basis so that together they perform better than they did separately. Collaboration in the supply network creates a synergistic business environment in which the sum of the parts is greater than the whole. A strategic collection of mutually complementary competencies and capabilities through collaboration, forming an integrated supply network, is highly competitive against other supply networks.

Coordination in the supply network :

Since the central challenge of supply management is coordinating the actions of different organizational members in the supply network, coordination acts as a means of developing the capabilities of partner organizations and promoting shared goals and strategies to achieve mutual benefit.

Restrictions on hazardous substances (RoHS) :

Under the RoHS 1 (2002/95/EC) Directive and the RoHS 2 (2011/65/EU) Directive, RoHS were required to be enforced, and became law in each member state on 1 July 2006. This directive restricts (with exceptions) the use of six hazardous materials—lead (Pb), mercury (Hg), cadmium (Cd), hexavalent chromium (Cr6+), polybrominated biphenyls (PBB), polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE)—in the manufacture of various types of electronic and electrical equipment. This directive is closely linked with the WEEE Directive (see below), and is part of a legislative initiative to attempt to solve the problem of huge amounts of toxic waste.

Sustainability collaboration :

In order to reduce negative environmental and social footprints, companies collaborate by creating mutual benefit as well as business sustainability value. Sustainability collaboration requires a shift from stand-alone competition to network rivalry in order to achieve business sustainability through the supply network.

The Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) Directive :

Under the European Community (EC) Directive 2012/19/EU the WEEE Directive set targets for collection, recycling and recovery for all types of electrical goods, with a minimum rate of 4 kilograms per head of population per annum recovered for recycling by 2009. This target was revised in 2012. The overall aim is that by 2016 the EU will be recycling at least 85% of electrical and electronics waste equipment.

List of Companies

American Airlines

Apple

China Shipping Development

CMA CGM

General Motors

Honda Motors

LG Electronics

Maersk

Mitsui OSK Lines

MSC

Nissan Motors

Samsung Electronics

Sony Electronics

Sumitomo Corporation

Tesla

Toyota Motors

Unifeeder

United Parcel Service (UPS)

Volkswagen

Walmart

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, KH., Vachon, S. (2016). The Carbon Economy: A Brave New World?. In: Business Value and Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43576-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics