Skip to main content

Accessibility as a Key Management Component of the Paralympics

Abstract

The Paralympics are undoubtedly the pinnacle sporting event for people with disability where accessibility is both a facilitator and a potential legacy of the event. Accessibility is so ubiquitous to contributing to legacy yet the operationalisation of accessibility has been so poorly understood globally that the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPWD) has placed it central to the preamble in “recognising the importance of accessibility to the physical, social, economic and cultural environment, to health and education and to information and communication” (United Nations 2006, p. np). In doing so, the CRPWD recognises accessibility as the enabler for people with disability enjoying citizenship. Similarly, accessibility at the Paralympic Games has had a history of being considered the best they could do rather than on the cutting edge of accessibility for most of its early years. The informal convergence of the Olympic and Paralympic Games from Barcelona 1992 raised significant issues for disability access in host cities (Gold and Gold 2007). Although the requirement to run the two events together only really became binding with the 2008 Beijing Games, from 1992 potential hosts with an established record of upholding disability rights and legislation had a clear advantage in the bidding process that raised the expectations that the Paralympics would be incorporated with the highest level of accessibility.

Keywords

  • International Olympic Committee
  • Universal Design
  • Accessible Path
  • Mobility Disability
  • Wheelchair User

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-43522-4_3
  • Chapter length: 44 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-137-43522-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 3.1
Fig. 3.2
Fig. 3.3
Fig. 3.4
Image 3.1
Image 3.2
Fig. 3.5
Fig. 3.6
Images 3.3 & 3.4
Fig. 3.7

Notes

  1. 1.

    For copyright purposes diagrams representing the Australian Standards have been used with notation in the text identifying any variation from the IPC Accessibility Guidelines.

References

  • Ahmed, N. (2013). Paralympics 2012 legacy: Accessible housing and disability equality or inequality? Disability & Society, 28(1), 129–133.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Alper, M., Ellcessor, E., Ellis, K., & Goggin, G. (2015). Reimagining the good life with disability: Communication, new technology, and humane connections. In H. H. Wang (Ed.), Communication and the “Good Life”, International communication association theme book series (Vol. 2, pp. 197–212). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamford, D. (2016). Lessons from London: How hosting the Paralympics can make cities more accessible. The Conversation. Retrieved from The Conversation website: https://theconversation.com/lessons-from-london-how-hosting-the-paralympics-can-make-cities-more-accessible-53044

  • Bamford, D., & Dehe, B. (2016). Service quality at the London 2012 games – A paralympics athletes survey. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 33(2), 142–159.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bartsch, A., Oliver, M. B., Nitsch, C., & Scherr, S. (2016). Inspired by the Paralympics: Effects of empathy on audience interest in para-sports and on the destigmatization of persons with disabilities. Communication Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, K. A. (1996). The Paralympic village: A barrier-free city. In Olympic villages: A hundred years of urban planning and shared experiences: International symposium on Olympic villages. Lausanna, 105–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, K. A. (1998). Fields of dreams: Today’s newest sports facilities provide accessibility that people with disabilities at one time could only with for. Sports ’n Spokes, 24(5), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, K. A., & Davies, T. D. (2001). Chapter 47 – Access to sport and entertainment. In W. F. E. Preiser & E. Ostroff (Eds.), Universal design handbook (pp. 47.41–48.41). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, D., Dickson, T. J., & Benson, A. M. (2016). Enabling volunteer legacies: A knowledge management perspective. Event Management, Accepted 6 April 2016, all.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, I. (2010). The Paralympic Games explained. Milton Park/Abingdon/Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain, I. (2016). A critical perspective on the legacy of the London 2012 Paralympic Games. Journal of the Nippon Foundation Paralympic Research, 4(2), 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, A., Silk, M., Porter, J., & Howe, P. D. (2013). Disability [sport] and discourse: Stories within the Paralympic legacy. Reflective Practice, 14(5), 632–647.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cashman, R., & Darcy, S. (Eds.). (2008). Benchmark Games: The Sydney 2000 Paralympic Games. Petersham: Walla Walla Press in conjunction with the Australian Centre for Olympic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Universal Design. (2009). Universal design principles. Retrieved 20 May, 2009, from http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/about_ud/about_ud.htm

  • Chisholm, W., & Vanderheiden, G. (1999). Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. Retrieved 22 May, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, S. (2013). A year after the Paralympics attitudes to disability need to improve. The Guardian. Retrieved from The Guardian, website: http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2013/aug/24/paralympics-sophie-christiansen-equestrian

  • Clawson, M., & Knetsch, J. L. (1966). The economics of outdoor recreation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S. (2000). The Paralympic Family Hotel – The Wentworth Hotel Access Audit. Sydney: Report to Olympic Co-ordination Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S. (2001). A games for everyone?: Planning for disability and access at the Sydney 2000 Games. Disability Studies Quarterly, 21(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S. (2003). The politics of disability and access: The Sydney 2000 Games experience. Disability & Society, 18(6), 737–757.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S. (2010). Inherent complexity: Disability, accessible tourism and accommodation information preferences. Tourism Management, 31(6), 816–826.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S. (2011). Developing sustainable approaches to accessible accommodation information provision: A foundation for strategic knowledge management. Tourism Recreation Research, 36(2), 141–157.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S. (2012a, August). (Dis)embodied air travel experiences: Disability, discrimination and the affect of a discontinuous air travel chain. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 19(e8), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S. (2012b). Disability, access, and inclusion in the event industry: A call for inclusive event research. Event Management, 16(3), 259–265.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S. (2013). Keynote address: Accessible Tourism, Accessible Hotels and the Business Case. Paper presented at the IPC Academy - Rio 2016 excellence program, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. http://eng.spbu.ru/

  • Darcy, S. (2016). Paralympic legacy – Learning from the Sydney 2000 to prepare for Tokyo 2020. Journal of the Nippon Foundation Paralympic Research, 4(1), 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S., & Appleby, L. (2011). Sydney 2000: Moving from Post-Hoc legacy to strategic vision and operational partnership. In D. Legg & K. Gilbert (Eds.), Paralympic legacies (pp. 75–98). Champaign: Common Ground Publishing LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S., & Dickson, T. (2009). A whole-of-life approach to tourism: The case for accessible tourism experiences. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 16(1), 32–44.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S., & Harris, R. (2003). Inclusive and accessible special event planning: An Australia perspective. Event Management, 8(1), 516–536.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S., & Taylor, T. (2009). Disability citizenship: An Australian human rights analysis of the cultural industries. Leisure Studies, 28(4), 419–441.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S., & Taylor, T. (2013). Managing Olympic venues. In S. Frawley & D. Adair (Eds.), Managing the Olympics (pp. 99–126). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S., Dickson, T. J., & Benson, A. M. (2014). London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games: Including volunteers with disabilities – A podium performance? Event Management, 18(4), 431–446.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, S., Frawley, S., & Adair, D. (2016). Introduction – The managerial dimensions of the Paralympic Games. In S. Darcy, S. Frawley, & D. Adair (Eds.), Managing the Paralympic Games(pp. xi, 218 pages). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. A. (2012). The Olympic Games effect: How sports marketing builds strong brands. New York: Wiley.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dept for Public Works & Pensions, & Dept of Media & Culture. (2015). The inclusive and accessible stadia report. London: Dept for Public Works & Pensions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, T. J., Darcy, S., Johns, R., & Pentifallo, C. (in press-a). Transformative service research and major sport event accessibility. The Services Industry Journal .in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickson, T. J., Misener, L., & Darcy, S. (in press-b). Enhancing destination competitiveness through disability sport event legacies: Developing an interdisciplinary typology. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 17 .Accepted 27 March 2016 2010.1108/IJCHM-2010-2015-0530

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez, T., Darcy, S., & Alén, E. (2014). Juegos olímpicos y paralímpicos en Brasil: Aprendiendo de Barcelona y Sidney Olympic and Paralympic Games in brazil: Learning from Barcelona and Sydney. RAE-Revista de Administração de Empresas Journal of Business Administration (Brazil Portuguese), 54(2), 222–230.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez, T., Darcy, S., & Alén, E. (2015). Competing for the disability tourism market – A comparative exploration of the factors of accessible tourism competitiveness in Spain and Australia. Tourism Management, 47(1), 261–272.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, M., & Legg, D. (2016). Stakeholder management. In S. Darcy, S. Frawley, & D. Adair (Eds.), Managing the Paralympic Games. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Network for Accessible Tourism. (2015). Who we are. Retrieved 15 August, 2015, from http://www.accessibletourism.org/?i=enat.en.who_we_are

  • Evans, G. (2015). Accessibility and user needs: Pedestrian mobility and urban design in the UK. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Municipal Engineer, 168(1), 32–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, K., Burns, J., & Mills, H. (2015). Public attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities after viewing Olympic or Paralympic performance. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 32(1), 19–33.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fleck, J. (2015). Inclusive Design – A lasting Paralympic Legacy? Embedding inclusive design knowledge and skills into architectural education. Charrette, 2(1), 92–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N. (2015). Paralympics 2016: How does Rio cater for disabled people? Retrieved 15 February, 2016, from http://www.bbc.com/news/disability-34171951

  • Gill, J. (2009). The 2012 challenge to help disabled and older people. Safety and Reliability, 29(3), 74–76.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital disability: The social construction of disability in new media. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J. R., & Gold, M. M. (2007). Access for all: The rise of the Paralympic Games. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health, 127(3), 9.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, J. R., & Gold, M. M. (2010). Olympic cities: City agendas, planning and the world’s games, 1896–2016. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey-Thompson, T. (2013). The Paralympic legacy is slipping away. Too many disabled people are being abandoned by the system, The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10168792/The-Paralympic-legacy-is-slipping-away.-Too-many-disabled-people-are-being-abandoned-by-the-system.html

  • Hendy, S. P. (2013). Papers the outcomes of transport planning for the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Journal of Urban Regeneration & Renewal, 7(1), 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, B. R., & Prokopowicz, S. (2007). Assessing the impact of sports mega-events in transition economies: EURO 2012 in Poland and Ukraine. International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing, 2(5-6), 496–509.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • International Olympic Committee. (2011). 2020 candidature acceptance procedure. Retrieved from http://www.olympic.org/Documents/Host_city_elections/2020_CAP.pdf

  • International Paralympic Committee. (2009a). Accessibility guide: An inclusive approach to the Olympic & Paralympic Games. Retrieved from http://www.paralympic.org/IPC/Documentation_Centre/

  • International Paralympic Committee. (2009b). Paralympic Media Awards 2009. Retrieved from http://www.paralympic.org/IPC/Awards/Paralympic_Media_Awards/Paralympic_Media_Awards_2009.html?calendar.box.year=2010&calendar.box.month=0

  • International Paralympic Committee. (2013a). Accessibility guide: An inclusive approach to the Olympic & Paralympic Games. Retrieved from http://www.paralympic.org/IPC/Documentation_Centre/

  • International Paralympic Committee. (2015a). City of Rio’s accessibility improvement plans praised by IPC President. Retrieved 12 February, 2016, from http://www.paralympics.org/news/city-rio-s-accessibility-improvement-plans-praised-ipc-president

  • International Paralympic Committee. (2015b). PyeongChang 2018 completes the ‘Accesibility Manual’. Retrieved 12 February, 2016, from http://www.paralympics.org/news/pyeongchang-2018-completes-accessibility-manual

  • International Paralympic Committee. (2015c). Tokyo 1964: Developing one of the world’s best public transport systems. Retrieved 18 August, 2015, from http://www.paralympic.org/news/tokyo-1964-developing-one-world-s-best-transport-systems#!prettyPhoto

  • International Paralympic Committee Academy. (2013). Rio 2016 excellence program – Workshop on the Accessible Tourism Market. Bonn: IPC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassens-Noor, E. (2012). Planning Olympic legacies: Transport dreams and urban realities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kung, S. P., & Taylor, P. (2014). The use of public sports facilities by the disabled in England. Sport Management Review, 17(1), 8–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Laski, J. (2009). Towards a Greener Olympics: Sustainable development and the Vancouver 2010 Athletes’ village at Southeast False Creek. Journal of Environmental Law and Practice, 20(1), 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg, D., & Gilbert, K. (Eds.). (2011). Paralympic legacies. Champaign: Commonground Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, S., & Edwards, A. (2013). A systematic review of disability awareness interventions for children and youth. Disability and Rehabilitation, 35(8), 623–646.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lipp, E. (2015). What creates access and inclusion at airports? Journal of Airport Management, 9(4), 390–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mace, R. (1985). Universal design, Barrier free environments for everyone. Los Angeles: Designers West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madon, F., & Relf, M. (2016). Practice note: Accessible accommodation sydney. Association of Consultants in Access Australia Inc. (in press to be published late 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire v Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (Internet) [2000a] (Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission No H 99/115 2000a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire v Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (Ticket book) [2000b] (Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission No H 99/115 2000b).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, M. P., & McMillen, J. D. (2014). Facility planning, design, and management of mobility assistance programs: Review and recommendations of accessible routes from super bowl XLV. Journal of Facility Planning, Design, and Management, 2(2), 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay, C., Block, M., & Park, J. Y. (2015). The impact of Paralympic School Day on student attitudes toward inclusion in physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 32(4), 331–348.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McNevin, N. (2014). London 2012 legacy: Principles, purpose, professionals and collaboration. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Civil Engineering, 167(6), 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Media Access Australia. (2015). Service providers accessibility guide: A quick reference guide for accessible communications. Sydney: Media Access Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misener, L. (2016). Paralympic games legacy. In S. Darcy, S. Frawley, & D. Adair (Eds.), Managing the Paralympic Games. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Misener, L., Darcy, S., Legg, D., & Gilbert, K. (2013). Beyond Olympic legacy: Understanding Paralympic legacy through a thematic synthesis. Journal of Sport Management, 27(4), 329–341.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Motte-Baumvol, B., & Nassi, C. D. (2012). Immobility in Rio de Janeiro, beyond poverty. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 67–76.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Naish, C., & Mason, S. (2014). London 2012 legacy: Transformation of the Olympic Park. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Civil Engineering, 167(6), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olympic Co-ordination Authority. (1999). Access guidelines (3rd ed.). Sydney: Olympic Co-ordination Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozdowski, S. (2004). Preparations for the Olympics and Paralympics and inclusion of people with disabilities: The Australian experience. Retrieved 14 February, 2016, from https://www.humanrights.gov.au/news/speeches/preparations-olympics-and-paralympics-and-inclusion-people-disabilities-australian

  • Paramio, J. L., & Buraimo, B. (2013). Promoting accessibility for fans with disabilities to European stadia and arenas. Managing the business of sport: An introduction, 367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paramio-Salcines, J. L., & Kitchin, P. J. (2013). Institutional perspectives on the implementation of disability legislation and services for Spectators with Disabilities in European professional football. Sport Management Review, 16(3), 337–348.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, N. (2012). BREEAM and the code for sustainable homes on the London 2012 Olympic park: Lessons from the Velodrome, Aquatics Centre and the Olympic and Paralympic Village. Garston: BRE Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, D., & Frawley, S. (2016). National Paralympic Committees. In S. Darcy, S. Frawley, & D. Adair (Eds.), Managing the Paralympic Games. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qantas. (2016). Australian Paralympic Committee. Retrieved 30 April, 2016, from http://www.qantas.com/travel/airlines/australian-paralympic-commitee/global/en

  • Rio 2016 Organising Committee. (2014). Rio 2016 accessibility technical guidelines. Rio 2016 Organising Committee, Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rio 2016 Organising Committee. (2015). Rio mayor launches project to improve accessibility in city ahead of 2016 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Retrieved 12 February, 2016, from http://www.rio2016.com/en/news/rio-mayor-launches-project-to-improve-accessibility-in-city-ahead-of-2016-olympic-and-paralympi

  • Rio 2016 Organising Committee for the Olympic and Paralympic Games. (2014). Rio 2016 accessibility technical guidelines: Version 3 (January 2014) Retrieved from http://www.paralympic.org/IPC/Documentation_Centre/

  • Sainsbury, T. (1997). Athletes at the Paralympic Village. In M. de Moragas, M. Llines, & B. Kidd (Eds.), Olympic Villages: One Hundred Years of Urban Planning and Shared Experiences (pp. 173–179). Lausanne: International Olympic Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sainsbury, T. (2008). Chapter 10 – The Paralympic Village. In R. Cashman & S. Darcy (Eds.), Benchmark Games: The Sydney 2000 Paralympic Games (pp. 181–200). Petersham: Walla Walla Press in conjunction with the Australian Centre for Olympic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, A. S., & Ribeiro, S. K. (2013). The use of sustainability indicators in urban passenger transport during the decision-making process: The case of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(2), 251–260.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shalala, A. (2015, 15 September 2015). Australia’s Paralympian to benefit from more comfortable flight seating for Rio games travel, ABC online. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-09-16/measures-taken-to-improve-comfort-for-australias-paralympians/6780876

  • Small, J., & Darcy, S. (2011). Chapter 5 – Understanding tourist experience through embodiment: The contribution of critical tourism and disability studies. In D. Buhalis & S. Darcy (Eds.), Accessible tourism: Concepts and issues (pp. 72–96). Bristol: Channel View Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, J., Darcy, S., & Packer, T. (2012). The embodied tourist experiences of people with vision impairment: Management implications beyond the visual gaze. Tourism Management, 33(4), 941–950.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sochi 2014 Organizing Committee. (2014). Barrier-free environment at the Sochi 2014 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Sochi: Sochi 2014 Organising Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standards Australia. (2009). AS 1428.1 Design for access and mobility – General requirements for access – New building work with amendments (4th ed.). Homebush: Standards Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, H. (2012a). Briefing: Delivering London 2012: Meeting the transport challenge. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport, 165(4), 237–239.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, H. (2012b). Delivering London 2012: Transport legacy. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Transport, 165(4), 267–275.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sydney Opera House. (2015). Access guide. Sydney: Sydney Opera House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydney Opera House. (2016). Sydney Opera House access strategic plan 2016–18. Sydney: Sydney Opera House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szwarcwald, C. L., de Andrade, C. L. T., & Bastos, F. I. (2002). Income inequality, residential poverty clustering and infant mortality: A study in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Social Science & Medicine, 55(12), 2083–2092.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. New York: http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml: United Nations General Assembly A/61/611 – 6 December 2006.

  • United Nations World Tourism Organization. (1999). Global code of ethics for Tourism. Retrieved 21 February, 2010, from http://ethics.unwto.org/en/content/global-code-ethics-tourism

  • UNWTO. (2015a). Manual on accessible tourism for all: Principles, tools and good practices – Module 1. Retrieved from http://www.e-unwto.org/doi/book/10.18111/9789284416486

    Google Scholar 

  • UNWTO. (2015b). Manual on accessible tourism for all: Principles, tools and good practices – Module 2. Retrieved from http://www.e-unwto.org/doi/abs/10.18111/9789284416509

    Google Scholar 

  • UNWTO. (2015c). Manual on accessible tourism for all: Principles, tools and good practices – Module 3. Retrieved from http://www.e-unwto.org/doi/book/10.18111/9789284416523

    Google Scholar 

  • UNWTO. (2015d). Manual on accessible tourism for all: Principles, tools and good practices – Module 4. Retrieved from http://www.e-unwto.org/doi/abs/10.18111/9789284416547

    Google Scholar 

  • UNWTO. (2015e). Manual on accessible tourism for all: Principles, tools and good practices – Module 5. Retrieved from http://www.e-unwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284416585

    Google Scholar 

  • UNWTO. (2015f). Manual on accessible tourism for all: Public-private partnerships and good practices. Retrieved from http://www.e-unwto.org/doi/pdf/10.18111/9789284416585

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horn, L., & Isola, J. A. (2014). Toward a global history of inclusive travel. Review of Disability Studies: An International Journal, 2(2), 5–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waboso, D. (2014). London 2012 legacy: Putting London underground on a new track. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Civil Engineering, 167(6), 53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, M., & Fels, D. I. (2013). Inclusive design, Audio description and diversity of theatre experiences. The Design Journal, 16(2), 219–238.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wilhite, B., Muschett, C. A., Goldenberg, L., & Trader, B. R. (1997). Promoting inclusive sport and leisure participation: Evaluation of the Paralympic Day in the Schools model. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 14(2), 131–146.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization, & World Bank. (2011). World Report on Disability, from http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report/en/index.html

  • Zuniga, K., Bunker, J., & Bevrani, K. (2013). Intraurban rail access. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2351, 38–45.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Darcy, S. (2017). Accessibility as a Key Management Component of the Paralympics. In: Darcy, S., Frawley, S., Adair, D. (eds) Managing the Paralympics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43522-4_3

Download citation