Skip to main content

Lethal Innovation: The Nexus of Criminology, War, and Malevolent Creativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and War
  • 1092 Accesses

Abstract

Whether viewed as a characteristic of the individual, a quality of an artefact, a way of arriving at a solution, or as a feature of the organisational environment, creativity embodies positive problem-solving. However, there is a growing recognition that the same personal qualities that facilitate creativity—for example, motivation, courage, risk-taking—can also serve negative ends. These outcomes may be not merely accidental but may involve deliberate intent to do harm. War, criminology, and creativity intersect when studying aspects of the person, the cognitive processes, the product, and the organisational climate that simultaneously facilitate outcomes in all three domains. What is malevolent creativity in the context of war and crime? What facilitates or hinders it? How can it be understood and controlled?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AIC. (2008). Counting the costs of crime in Australia: A 2005 update (Research and public policy series, Vol. 91). Canberra: AIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, N. C. (1987). Creativity and mental illness: Prevalence rates in writers and their first degree relatives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1288–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, B. K., & Thompson, J. L. (2004). Entrepreneurs: Talent, temperament, technique. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (1997). Creativity: A bundle of paradoxes. Gifted and Talented International, 12(1), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J. (2010). The dark side of creativity. In D. H. Cropley, A. J. Cropley, J. C. Kaufman, & M. A. Runco (Eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 1–14). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H. (2014). Engineering, ethics and creativity: N’er the twain shall meet? In S. Moran, D. H. Cropley, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The ethics of creativity (pp. 152–169). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H. (2015). Creativity in engineering: Novel solutions to complex problems. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Faces of the muse: How people think, work and act creatively in diverse domains (pp. 169–185). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J., & Cropley, D. H. (2008). Resolving the paradoxes of creativity: An extended phase model. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 355–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, A. J., & Cropley, D. H. (2009). Fostering creativity: A diagnostic approach for education and organizations. Cresskill: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2013). Creativity and crime: A psychological approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2015). The psychology of innovation in organizations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 105–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., White, A. E., & Chiera, B. A. (2014). Layperson perceptions of malevolent creativity: The good, the bad, and the ambiguous. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dacey, J. S., & Lennon, K. (1998). Understanding creativity: The interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors (Vol. 8). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P., & Tilley, N. (2000). Going equipped. British Journal of Criminology, 40(3), 376–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, M. H. (1997). Bureaucracy and the mafia: An alternative view. In P. J. Rayan & G. E. Rush (Eds.), Understanding organised crime in global perspective: A reader. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 211–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2002). I bask in dreams of suicide: Mental illness, poetry, and women. Review of General Psychology, 6(3), 271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, M. (2007). From Pablo to Osama: Trafficking and terrorist networks, government bureaucracies, and competitive adaptation. University Park: Penn State Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipper, D. A., Green, D. J., & Prorak, A. (2010). The relationship among spontaneity, impulsivity, and creativity. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 5(1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity. Buffalo: Creative Education Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 211–228). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McMullan, W. E. (1978). Creative individuals: Paradoxical personages. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 265–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D. (2012). Handbook of organizational creativity. London: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puccio, G. J., & Cabra, J. F. (2010). Organizational creativity: A systems approach. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 145–173). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (2010). Creativity research: A historical view. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 3–19). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, M. P. (1989). The Eureka process: A structure for the creative experience in science and engineering. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 286–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2009). Understanding entrepreneurial behaviour in organized criminals. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 3(3), 256–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. J., Albright, L. E., & Glennon, J. R. (1961). The prediction of research competence and creativity from personal history. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45(1), 59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 36, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Duyne, P. C. (1999). Mobsters are human too. In D. Canter & L. Alison (Eds.), Offender profiling series: Profiling in policy and practice (Vol. 2). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, S. E., & Piquero, A. R. (2011). Organizational justice and police misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(4), 332–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cropley, D.H. (2016). Lethal Innovation: The Nexus of Criminology, War, and Malevolent Creativity. In: McGarry, R., Walklate, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and War. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43170-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43170-7_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-43169-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43170-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics