Abstract
Whether viewed as a characteristic of the individual, a quality of an artefact, a way of arriving at a solution, or as a feature of the organisational environment, creativity embodies positive problem-solving. However, there is a growing recognition that the same personal qualities that facilitate creativity—for example, motivation, courage, risk-taking—can also serve negative ends. These outcomes may be not merely accidental but may involve deliberate intent to do harm. War, criminology, and creativity intersect when studying aspects of the person, the cognitive processes, the product, and the organisational climate that simultaneously facilitate outcomes in all three domains. What is malevolent creativity in the context of war and crime? What facilitates or hinders it? How can it be understood and controlled?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
AIC. (2008). Counting the costs of crime in Australia: A 2005 update (Research and public policy series, Vol. 91). Canberra: AIC.
Andreasen, N. C. (1987). Creativity and mental illness: Prevalence rates in writers and their first degree relatives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 1288–1292.
Baumol, W. J. (1996). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 3–22.
Bolton, B. K., & Thompson, J. L. (2004). Entrepreneurs: Talent, temperament, technique. Oxford: Routledge.
Cropley, A. J. (1997). Creativity: A bundle of paradoxes. Gifted and Talented International, 12(1), 8–14.
Cropley, A. J. (2010). The dark side of creativity. In D. H. Cropley, A. J. Cropley, J. C. Kaufman, & M. A. Runco (Eds.), The dark side of creativity (pp. 1–14). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cropley, D. H. (2014). Engineering, ethics and creativity: N’er the twain shall meet? In S. Moran, D. H. Cropley, & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The ethics of creativity (pp. 152–169). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Cropley, D. H. (2015). Creativity in engineering: Novel solutions to complex problems. San Diego: Academic.
Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2005). Engineering creativity: A systems concept of functional creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Faces of the muse: How people think, work and act creatively in diverse domains (pp. 169–185). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cropley, A. J., & Cropley, D. H. (2008). Resolving the paradoxes of creativity: An extended phase model. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 355–373.
Cropley, A. J., & Cropley, D. H. (2009). Fostering creativity: A diagnostic approach for education and organizations. Cresskill: Hampton Press.
Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2013). Creativity and crime: A psychological approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cropley, D. H., & Cropley, A. J. (2015). The psychology of innovation in organizations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 105–115.
Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., White, A. E., & Chiera, B. A. (2014). Layperson perceptions of malevolent creativity: The good, the bad, and the ambiguous. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 1–20.
Dacey, J. S., & Lennon, K. (1998). Understanding creativity: The interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors (Vol. 8). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ekblom, P., & Tilley, N. (2000). Going equipped. British Journal of Criminology, 40(3), 376–398.
Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105–123.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.
Haller, M. H. (1997). Bureaucracy and the mafia: An alternative view. In P. J. Rayan & G. E. Rush (Eds.), Understanding organised crime in global perspective: A reader. London: Sage.
James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12(3), 211–226.
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2002). I bask in dreams of suicide: Mental illness, poetry, and women. Review of General Psychology, 6(3), 271.
Kenney, M. (2007). From Pablo to Osama: Trafficking and terrorist networks, government bureaucracies, and competitive adaptation. University Park: Penn State Press.
Kipper, D. A., Green, D. J., & Prorak, A. (2010). The relationship among spontaneity, impulsivity, and creativity. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 5(1), 39–53.
MacKinnon, D. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity. Buffalo: Creative Education Foundation.
Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 211–228). New York: Plenum.
McMullan, W. E. (1978). Creative individuals: Paradoxical personages. Journal of Creative Behavior, 10, 265–275.
Mumford, M. D. (2012). Handbook of organizational creativity. London: Academic.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563.
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83–96.
Puccio, G. J., & Cabra, J. F. (2010). Organizational creativity: A systems approach. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 145–173). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.
Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (2010). Creativity research: A historical view. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 3–19). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Shaw, M. P. (1989). The Eureka process: A structure for the creative experience in science and engineering. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 286–298.
Smith, R. (2009). Understanding entrepreneurial behaviour in organized criminals. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 3(3), 256–268.
Smith, W. J., Albright, L. E., & Glennon, J. R. (1961). The prediction of research competence and creativity from personal history. Journal of Applied Psychology, 45(1), 59.
Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and culture. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 36, 311–322.
van Duyne, P. C. (1999). Mobsters are human too. In D. Canter & L. Alison (Eds.), Offender profiling series: Profiling in policy and practice (Vol. 2). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Wolfe, S. E., & Piquero, A. R. (2011). Organizational justice and police misconduct. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(4), 332–353.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cropley, D.H. (2016). Lethal Innovation: The Nexus of Criminology, War, and Malevolent Creativity. In: McGarry, R., Walklate, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Criminology and War. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43170-7_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-43170-7_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-43169-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-43170-7
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)