Advertisement

Labour–Management Partnership in the USA: Islands of Success in a Hostile Context

  • Adrienne E. Eaton
  • Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld
  • Saul A. Rubinstein
Chapter
  • 647 Downloads

Abstract

The current context for labor–management partnerships in the USA is unfriendly in almost all ways. Union density, at 11.1 % overall and 6.6 % in the private sector, is at a modern low (US BLS 2015). With few exceptions, there is no significant encouragement of partnerships from either the federal or the state governments. There is no organization or forum that regularly brings together leaders of the labor and business communities for social dialogue about economic or other policies. And many of the “best examples” of partnerships in the last couple of decades have not been sustained. There are still “islands” of success, but they function in spite of the system rather than because of it.

Keywords

Collective Bargaining Management Committee Management Relation Employee Involvement Public Sector Union 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgment

Portions of this chapter draw on text developed by a team of scholars for an amicus brief that included all three co-authors of this chapter. We have primarily utilised text developed by one of the three co-authors that was not in the final brief due to space limitations. We express our appreciation to the full group, which is as follows: Paul Adler, James Brudney, Margaret Carr, Willard Carr, Marion Crain, Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld, Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt, Adrienne E. Eaton, Matthew W. Finkin, Catherine Fisk, Sanford M. Jacoby, Thomas A. Kochan, Wilma Liebman, Martin H. Malin, Robert B. McKersie, Saul A. Rubinstein, and Katherine Stone.

References

  1. Adler, P. S. (1995). ‘Democratic Taylorism’: The Toyota production system at NUMMI. In S. Babson (Ed.), Lean work: Empowerment and exploitation in the global auto industry (pp. 207–219). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brock, J., & Lipsky, D. B. (Eds.). (2003). Going public: The role of Labour-Management Relations in delivering quality government services. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Chansler, P. A., Swamidass, P. M., & Cammann, C. (2003). Self-managing work teams: An empirical study of group cohesiveness in “Natural Work Groups” at a Harley-Davidson Motor Company plant. Small Group Research, 34, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Commission on the Future of Worker–Management Relations (1994a). Fact Finding Report. Washington: US Department of Labour.Google Scholar
  5. Commission on the Future of Worker–Management Relations (1994b). Report and Recommendations. Washington: US Department of Labour, December 1994. Available at http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1004&context=key_workplace.
  6. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J. (1988). Tracing a transformation in industrial relations: A case study of Xerox and ACTWU (pp. 1–27). Washington: US Department of Labour.Google Scholar
  7. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J., Brooks, D., & Mulloy, M. (2015). Inside the Ford-UAW transformation: Pivotal events in valuing work and delivering results. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J., & Kochan, T. (2004). Taking stock: Collective bargaining at the turn of the century. Industrial & Labour Relations Review, 58(1), 3–26.Google Scholar
  9. Dilts, D. A. (1993). Labour-management cooperation in the public sector. Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector, 22(4), 305–311.Google Scholar
  10. Douglas, P. (1921). Shop committees: Substitute for or supplement to trade unions? Journal of Political Economy, 29, 89–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eaton, A. E. (1995). Educating for AT&T, CWA and IBEW's workplace of the future. Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association (pp. 383390). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  12. Eaton, A. E. (1994). Factors contributing to the survival of participative programs in unionized settings. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 47(3), 371–389.Google Scholar
  13. Eaton, A. E. (1997). The new American workplace: Big deal or too little, too late? In B. Nissen (Ed.), Unions and workplace reorganization (pp. 57–77). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Eaton, A. E., & Rubinstein, S. A. (2006). Tracking local unions involved in managerial decision-making. Labour Studies Journal, 31(2), 1–30.Google Scholar
  15. Eaton, A. E., & Voos, P. (1994). Productivity enhancing innovations in work organization, compensation, and employee participation in the union versus non-union sectors. Advances in Industrial and Labour Relations, 6(6), 63–109.Google Scholar
  16. Eaton, S., Rubinstein, S., & McKersie, R. (2004). Building and sustaining labour-management partnerships: Recent experiences in the U. S. Advances in Industrial and Labour Relations, 13, 139–159.Google Scholar
  17. Gittell, J. H. (2003). The Southwest Airlines Way: Using the power of relationships to achieve high performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Golden, C. S., & Parker, V. (1949). Causes of industrial peace under collective bargaining. New York: Harper and Bros.Google Scholar
  19. Golden, C. S., & Ruttenberg, H. (1942). Dynamics of industrial democracy. New York: Harper and Bros.Google Scholar
  20. Gray, G. R., Myers, D. W., & Myers, P. S. (1999). Cooperative provisions in labour agreements: A new paradigm. Monthly Labour Review, 122(1), 2945.Google Scholar
  21. Gudza, H. P. (1984). Industrial democracy: Made in the USA. Monthly Labour Review, 107, 27.Google Scholar
  22. Hecksher, C., & Schurman, S. (1997). Can labour-management cooperation deliver jobs and justice? Industrial Relations, 28(4), 323–330.Google Scholar
  23. Jacoby, S. M. (1983). Union-management cooperation in the United States: Lessons from the 1920s. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 37(1), 18–33.Google Scholar
  24. Johansson, E. (2014).Improving government through labour-management collaboration and employee ingenuity. Washington: Jobs With Justice Education Fund. http://www.jwj.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/140122publicpartnershipreport.pdf.
  25. Kaufman, B. E., & Taras, D. G. (2000). Nonunion employee representation: History, contemporary practice, and policy. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  26. Kochan, T., Eaton, A. E., McKersie, R. B., & Adler, P. S. (2013). Healing together: The labour-management partnership at Kaiser Permanente. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kochan, T., Adler, P. S., McKersie, R., Eaton A. E., & Phyllis Segal and Paul Gerhart (2008). The potential and precariousness of partnership: The case of the Kaiser Permanente labour management partnership. Industrial Relations, 47(1), 3665.Google Scholar
  28. Kochan, T., Bluestone, B., & Peace N. (2015). Massachusetts education partnership: Results and research from the first two years. Massachusetts Education Partnership.Google Scholar
  29. Lafer, G. (2013). The legislative attack on American wages and labour standards, 201112, Report of the Economic Policy Institute, October, 31, 2013. http://www.epi.org/publication/attack-on-american-labour-standards/.
  30. Lazonick, W. (2009). Sustainable prosperity in the new economy?: Business organization and high-tech employment in the United States. Kalamazoo: WE Upjohn Institute.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leone, R. D., & Eleey, M. F. (1983). The origins and operations of area labour-management committees. Monthly Labour Review, 106, 37–41. http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1983/05/rpt3full.pdf.
  32. Levine, D., Adler, P. S., & Goldoftas, B. (1995). NUMMI: A case study. In D. Levine (Ed.), Reinventing the workplace: How business and employees can both win (pp. 10–35). Brookings Institution: Washington.Google Scholar
  33. Levine, D., & Tyson, L. (1990). Participation, productivity, and the firm’s environment. In A. Blinder (Ed.), Paying for productivity: A look at evidence. Washington: Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  34. Mangum, G. L., & McNabb, R. S. (1997). The rise, fall, and replacement of industry wide bargaining in the basic steel industry. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  35. Nadworny, M. J. (1955). Scientific management and the unions, 1900–1932: A historical analysis. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Nissen, B. (1997). Unions and workplace reorganization. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Preuss, G., & Frost, A. (2003). The rise and decline of labour-management cooperation: Lessons from health care in the Twin Cities. California Management Review, 45(2), 85–106.Google Scholar
  38. Reid, P. C. (1990). Well made in America: Lessons from Harley-Davidson on being the best. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  39. Rubinstein, S. A. (2000). The impact of co-management on quality performance: The case of the Saturn Corporation. Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 53(2), 197–218.Google Scholar
  40. Rubinstein, S. A. (2001). The local union revisited: New voices from the front lines. Industrial Relations, 40(3), 405–35.Google Scholar
  41. Rubinstein S. A., & McCarthy, J. E. (2011). Reforming public school systems through sustained union-management collaboration, Center for American Progress. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  42. Rubinstein, S. A., & Kochan, T. (2001). Learning from Saturn: Possibilities for corporate governance and employee relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rubinstein, S. A., & McCarthy, J. E. (2012). Public school reform through union-management collaboration. Advances in Industrial and Labour Relations, 20, 1–50.Google Scholar
  44. Rubinstein S.A. (2003). Partnerships of steel - Forging high involvement work systems in the US steel industry: A view from the local unions. Advances in industrial and labour relations (Vol. 12).Google Scholar
  45. Rubinstein, S. A., & McCarthy, J. E. (2014). Teachers unions and management partnerships: How working together improves student achievement,. Center for American Progress. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  46. Sheahan, M. (1997). Participating in union-management initiatives to build the union. In B. Nissen (Ed.), Unions and workplace reorganization (pp. 110–129). Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Slichter, S., Healy, J. J., & Livernash, E. R. (1960). The impact of collective bargaining on management. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  48. US BLS (2015). Economic news release: Union members summary. January 23. http://www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nr0.htm.
  49. US Department of Labour (1996). Working together for public service, Report of the US Secretary of Labour’s Task Force on Excellence in State and Local Government Through Labour-Management Cooperation.Google Scholar
  50. Voos, P. B., & Cheng, T. Y. (1989). What do managers mean by cooperative labour relations? Labour Studies Journal, 14(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
  51. Walton, R., Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J., & McKersie, R. (1994). Strategic negotiations: A theory of change in labour-management relations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  52. Weil, D. (1999). Are mandated health and safety committees supplement for or substitutes to labour unions? Industrial and Labour Relations Review, 52(3), 339–360.Google Scholar
  53. Weil, D. (2014). The fissured workplace: Why work became so bad for so many and what can be done to improve it. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrienne E. Eaton
    • 1
  • Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld
    • 2
  • Saul A. Rubinstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Labour Studies and Employment RelationsRutgers State UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Heller School for Social Policy and ManagementBrandeis UniversityWalthamUSA

Personalised recommendations