Advertisement

Trojan Horse or Tactic? The Case for Partnership

  • Jimmy Donaghey
Chapter

Abstract

The debates about partnership have been present in the employment relations literature for about 20 years and continue to divide scholars. While the concept has divided academic opinion greatly, with some (mainly radical scholars) arguing that partnership is merely the latest in a long series of mechanisms aimed at bringing about union incorporation into the managerial agenda, others (generally of a pluralist perspective) have argued that partnership has presented a new mechanism through which unions can operate. While the academic debate goes on, partnership approaches are a significant phenomenon, with estimates of 8–10 % of workplaces in the UK, for example, displaying the model (Bacon and Samuel 2009; Whyman and Petrescu 2014). The purpose of this chapter is primarily to evaluate the arguments for partnership from a pluralist perspective. In particular, this chapter will develop an argument, mainly using the evidence from the UK and Ireland, that partnership can be viewed as an attempt to develop social democratic–type industrial citizenship, similar to the continental “social dialogue” approach but within the constraints of the voluntarist employment relations systems of liberal economies and globalisation. The chapter then concludes by arguing that within liberal economies, legally mandated institutional supports are unlikely, but nevertheless, partnership is a worthwhile initiative in the right contextual circumstances.

Keywords

Trade Union Collective Bargaining Industrial Relation Work Council Employee Involvement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ackers, P. (2007). Collective bargaining as industrial democracy: Hugh Clegg and the political foundations of British industrial relations pluralism. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(1), 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackers, P. (2015). Trade unions as professional associations. In S. Johnstone & P. Ackers (Eds.), Finding a voice at work?: New perspectives on employment relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ackers, P., Marchington, M., Wilkinson, A., & Dundon, T. (2005). Partnership and voice, with or without trade unions: Changing UK managerial approaches to participation. In M. Stuart & M. Martinez Lucio (Eds.), Partnership and modernisation in employment relations. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  4. Ackers, P., & Payne, J. (1998). British trade unions and social partnership: Rhetoric, reality and strategy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(3), 529–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bacon, N., & Samuel, P. (2009). Partnership agreement adoption and survival in the British private and public sectors. Work, Employment and Society, 23(2), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badigannavar, V., & Kelly, J. (2011). Partnership and organizing: An empirical assessment of two contrasting approaches to union revitalization in the UK. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 32(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barry, M., & Wilkinson, A. (2015). Pro‐social or pro‐management? A critique of the conception of employee voice as a pro‐social behaviour within organizational behaviour. British Journal of Industrial Relations.Google Scholar
  8. Butler, P., Glover, L., & Tregaskis, O. (2011). ‘When the Going Gets Tough’…: Recession and the resilience of workplace partnership. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49(4), 666–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charlwood, A., & Terry, M. (2007). 21st‐century models of employee representation: Structures, processes and outcomes. Industrial Relations Journal, 38(4), 320–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clegg, H. A. (1975). Pluralism in industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 13(3), 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Danford, A., Durbin, S., Richardson, M., Stewart, P., & Tailby, S. (2014). Workplace partnership and professional workers: ‘about as useful as a chocolate teapot’? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(6), 879–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Danford, A., Richardson, M., Stewart, P., Tailby, S., & Upchurch, M. (2004). High performance work systems and workplace partnership: A case study of aerospace workers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 19(1), 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Danford, A., Richardson, M., Stewart, P., Tailby, S., & Upchurch, M. (2005). Workplace partnership and employee voice in the UK: Comparative case studies of union strategy and worker experience. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 26(4), 593–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Danford, A., Richardson, M., Stewart, P., Tailby, S., & Upchurch, M. (2008). Partnership, high performance work systems and quality of working life. New Technology, Work and Employment, 23(3), 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dietz, G., Cullen, J., & Coad, A. (2005). Can there be non-union forms of workplace partnership? Employee Relations, 27(3), 289–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dobbins, A., & Gunnigle, P. (2009). Can voluntary workplace partnership deliver sustainable mutual gains? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(3), 546–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dobbins, T. (2010). The case for ‘beneficial constraints’: Why permissive voluntarism impedes workplace cooperation in Ireland. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31(4), 497–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donaghey, J., Cullinane, N., Dundon, T., & Wilkinson, A. (2011). Reconceptualising employee silence problems and prognosis. Work, Employment and Society, 25(1), 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dundon, T., Dobbins, T., Cullinane, N., Hickland, E., & Donaghey, J. (2014). Employer occupation of regulatory space of the Employee Information and Consultation (I&C) Directive in liberal market economies. Work, Employment and Society, 28(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edwards, P., Bélanger, J., & Wright, M. (2006). The bases of compromise in the workplace: A theoretical framework. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(1), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fox, A. (1974). Beyond contract: Work, power and trust relations. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  22. Freeman, R. B., & Lazear, E. P. (1995). Works councils: Consultation, representation, and cooperation in industrial relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Glover, L., Tregaskis, O., & Butler, P. (2014). Mutual gains? The workers’ verdict: A longitudinal study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(6), 895–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Guest, D. E., & Peccei, R. (2001). Partnership at work: Mutuality and the balance of advantage. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(2), 207–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gunnigle, P. (1998). More rhetoric than reality: Enterprise level industrial relations partnerships in Ireland. Economic and social review, 28, 179–200.Google Scholar
  26. Hall, M., & Purcell, J. (2012). Consultation at work: Regulation and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In Hall and Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage, 1, (pp. 50–51).Google Scholar
  28. Heery, E. (2002). Partnership versus organising: Alternative futures for British trade unionism. Industrial Relations Journal, 33(1), 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Howell, C. (2005). Trade Unions and the State: Constructing Industrial Relations Institutions in Britain, 1890–2000 (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  30. Hyman, R. (1989). The political economy of industrial relations: Theory and practice in a cold climate. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hyman, R. (2001). Understanding European trade unionism: Between market, class and society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Hyman, R. (2004). Whose (social) partnership? In M. M. Lucio & M. Stuart (Eds.), Partnership and modernisation in employment relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Johnstone, S., Ackers, P., & Wilkinson, A. (2009). The British partnership phenomenon: A ten year review. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(3), 260–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnstone S., Wilkinson A., & Ackers P. (2011). Applying Budd’s model to partnership. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 32(2), 307–328.Google Scholar
  35. Johnstone, S. (2014). Workplace partnership. In A. Wilkinson, J. Donaghey, T. Dundon, & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), Handbook of research on employee voice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Johnstone, S. (2015). The case for partnership at work. In S. Johnstone & P. Ackers (Eds.), Finding a voice at work, new perspectives on employment relations (pp. 153–176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kaufman, B. E. (2000). The early institutionalists on industrial democracy and union democracy. Journal of Labor Research, 21(2), 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kelly, J. (1996). Union militancy and social partnership. In The new workplace and trade unionism, 3, (pp. 77–109).Google Scholar
  39. Kelly, J. (1999). Social partnership in Britain: Good for profits, bad for jobs and unions. Communist Review, 30(1), 3–10.Google Scholar
  40. Kelly, J. (2004). Social partnership agreements in Britain: Labor cooperation and compliance. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 43(1), 267–292.Google Scholar
  41. Kochan, T. A., & Osterman, P. (1994). The mutual gains enterprise: Forging a winning partnership among labor, management and government. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  42. Kochan, T. A. (1999) “How to Update Employment and Labor Policies for the 21st Century.” Perspectives on Work Vol. 3, No. 2: 12-17.Google Scholar
  43. Kochan, T. A., & Rubinstein, S. A. (2000). Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership. Organization Science, 11(4), 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Marshall, T. H. (1964). Citizenship and social democracy. Nueva York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  45. Medoff, J. L., & Freeman, R. (1984). What do unions do. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  46. Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mowbray, P. K., Wilkinson, A., & Tse, H. H. (2015). An integrative review of employee voice: identifying a common conceptualization and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(3), 382-400.Google Scholar
  48. Oxenbridge, S., & Brown, W. (2002). The two faces of partnership? An assessment of partnership and co-operative employer/trade union relationships. Employee Relations, 24(3), 262–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roche, W. K. (1997). Pay determination, the state and the politics of industrial relations. In irish industrial relations in practice, (pp. 145–226).Google Scholar
  50. Roche, W. K., & Teague, P. (2014). Successful but unappealing: Fifteen years of workplace partnership in Ireland. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(6), 781–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rogers, J., & Streeck, W. (1995). The study of works councils: Concepts and problems. In J. Rogers & W. Streeck (Eds.), Works councils: Consultation, representation, and cooperation in industrial relations (pp. 3–26). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Samuel, P., & Bacon, N. (2010). The contents of partnership agreements in Britain 1990–2007. Work, Employment and Society, 24(3), 430–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Simms, M., Holgate, J., & Heery, E. (2012). Union voices: Tactics and tensions in UK organizing. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Streeck, W. (1997). Industrial citizenship under regime competition: The case of the European works councils. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), 643–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stuart, M., & Lucio, M. M. (2002). Social partnership and the mutual gains organization: Remaking involvement and trust at the British workplace. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 23(2), 177–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Teague, P. (1995). Pay determination in the Republic of Ireland: Towards social corporatism? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 33(2), 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Teague, P. (2005). What is enterprise partnership? Organization, 12(4), 567–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Teague, P., & Donaghey, J. (2009). Why has Irish social partnership survived? British Journal of Industrial Relations, 47(1), 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Teague, P., & Donaghey, J. (2015). The life and death of Irish social partnership: Lessons for social pacts. Business History, 57(3), 418–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Terry, M. (2003a). Can partnership’ reverse the decline of British trade unions? Work, Employment and Society, 17(3), 459–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Terry, M. (2003b). Partnership and the future of trade unions in the UK. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24(4), 485–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thompson, P. (2003). Disconnected capitalism: Or why employers can’t keep their side of the bargain. Work, Employment and Society, 17(2), 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Townsend, K., Wilkinson, A., Burgess, J., & Brown, K. (2013). Has Australia’s road to workplace partnership reached a dead end? International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 29(2), 239–256.Google Scholar
  64. Upchurch, M., Richardson, M., Tailby, S., Danford, A., & Stewart, P. (2006). Employee representation and partnership in the non‐union sector: A paradox of intention? Human Resource Management Journal, 16(4), 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Webb, S., & Webb, B. (1897). Industrial democracy (Vol. 2). London: Longmans, green, and Company.Google Scholar
  67. Whyman, P. B., & Petrescu, A. I. (2014). Partnership, flexible workplace practices and the realisation of mutual gains: Evidence from the British WERS 2004 dataset. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(6), 829–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wills, J. (2004). Trade unionism and partnership in practice: Evidence from the Barclays–Unifi agreement. Industrial Relations Journal, 35(4), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wright, E. O. (2000). Working-class power, capitalist-class interests, and class compromise. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 957–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jimmy Donaghey
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial Relations Research Unit, Warwick Business SchoolUniversity of WarwickCoventryUK

Personalised recommendations