Skip to main content

Developing Positive Employment Relations: International Experiences of Labour–Management Partnership

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developing Positive Employment Relations

Abstract

Ideas of employee participation and voice have a long history as part of the search for good employment relations and have also attracted extensive interest among human resource management (HRM) and industrial relations researchers. In practice, participation can refer to a wide range of approaches and techniques, ranging from, on the one end, direct employee involvement initiatives such as profit-sharing, quality circles and communication techniques to giving workers ownership and control of organisations on the other (Wilkinson et al. 2010, 2014a). In between these two extremes is the pluralist idea of representative participation, where the central assumption is that differences of interest will inevitably arise in organisations and that effective employee representation is important in attempting to reconcile different interests (Johnstone and Ackers 2015). Historically, collective employee representation would normally be provided by independent trade unions through collective bargaining and joint regulation of the employment relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackers, P. (2002). Reframing employment relations: The case for neo‐pluralism. Industrial Relations Journal, 33(1), 2–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackers, P. (2014). Rethinking the employment relationship: A neo-pluralist critique of British industrial relations orthodoxy. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(18), 2608–2625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ackers, P., & Payne, J. (1998). British trade unions and social partnership: Rhetoric, reality and strategy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9(3), 529–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, E., & Batt, R. (1994). The new American workplace: Transforming work systems in the United States. New York: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackers, P., Marchington, M., Wilkinson, A., and Dundon. T. (2005) ‘Partnership andVoice, with or without Trade Unions’. In Stuart, M. and Martı´nez-Lucio, M. (eds),Partnership and Modernisation in Employment Relations, pp. 20–39. London:Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamber, G., Hoffer Gittell, J., Kochan, T., & Von Nordenflycht, A. (2009). Up in the air: How airlines can improve performance by engaging employees. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamber, G. Lansbury, R. Wailes, N and Wright, C. (2016) International and Comparative Employment Relations: Globalisation, Regulation and Change, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger, J., & Edwards, P. (2007). The conditions promoting compromise in the workplace. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(4), 713–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, P., & Haynes, P. (1997). Strategy and trade union effectiveness in a neo‐liberal environment. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 35(4), 567–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, B., & Gold, M. (2000). Social partnership and economic performance: The case of Europe. Cheltehnam: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cathcart, A. (2014). Paradoxes of participation: Non-union workplace partnership in John Lewis. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(6), 762–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colling, T. and Terry, M. (eds) (2010) Industrial Relations: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danford, A., Durbin, S., Richardson, M., Stewart, P., & Tailby, S. (2014). Workplace partnership and professional workers: ‘about as useful as a chocolate teapot’? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(6), 879–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, T. (2010). The case for ‘beneficial constraints’: Why permissive voluntarism impedes workplace cooperation in Ireland. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31(4), 497–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferner, A and Hyman, R (eds), Industrial Relations in the New Europe, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, A. (1964). Fawley productivity agreements. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. (1966). Industrial relations and industrial sociology, Research Paper 3, Royal Commission on Trade Unions and Employers Associations, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R., & Medoff, J. (1984). What do unions do? New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, G. (2008). Labour unionism in financial services. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, L., Tregaskis, O., & Butler, P. (2014). Mutual gains? The workers’ verdict: A longitudinal study. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(6), 895–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gold, M., & Artus, I. (2015). Employee participation in Germany: Tension and challenges. In S. Johnstone & P. Ackers (Eds.), Finding a voice at work: New perspective on employment relations (pp. 193–215). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gollan, P., Kaufman, B., Taras, D., & Wilkinson, A. (2014). Voice and involvement at work: Experience with non-union representation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D. E., & Peccei, R. (2001). Partnership at work: Mutuality and the balance of advantage. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(2), 207–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heery, E. (2002) ‘Partnership versus Organising: Alternative Futures for British Trade Unionism’. Industrial Relations Journal, 33(1), 20–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heery, E. (2015). British industrial relations pluralism in the era of neoliberalism. Journal of Industrial Relations, doi:10.1177/0022185615598190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, B. T. (2004). What do unions do for economic performance? Journal of Labour Research, 25(3), 415–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R 2005 Whose (Social) Partnership in M. Stuart and M Martinez-Lucio (Eds) Partnership and Modernisation in Employment Relations, London, Routledge, 251-265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R., & Gumbrell-McCormick, R. (2010). Works councils: The European model of industrial democracy. In A. Wilkinson, P. Gollan, M. Marchington, & D. Lewin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of participation in organizations (pp. 286–314). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, S. (2015). The case for partnership at work. In S. Johnstone & P. Ackers (Eds.), Finding a voice at work, new perspectives on employment relations (pp. 153–176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, S., & Ackers, P. (2015). Finding a voice at work, new perspectives on employment relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, S., Ackers, P., & Wilkinson, A. (2009). The British partnership phenomenon: A ten year review. Human Resource Management Journal, 19(3), 260–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, S., Ackers, P., & Wilkinson, A. (2010). Better than nothing? Is non-union partnership a contradiction in terms? Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(2), 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, S., Wilkinson, A., and Ackers, P. (2011) ‘Applying Budd’s Model to Partnership’. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 32(2), 307–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, S. and Wilkinson, A. (2014) Employee voice in a dotcom: the rise and demise of the Employee Forum at WebBank in Gollan, P Kaufman, B Taras, D and Wilkinson, A (Eds) Voice and Involvement at Work: Experience with Non-Union Employee Representation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T. A., Katz, H., and McKersie, R. (1986) The Transformation of American Industrial Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (1996). Union militancy and social partnership. In P. Ackers, C. Smith, & P. Smith (Eds.), The new workplace and trade unionism (pp. 79–109). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (2004). Social partnership agreements in Britain: Labour cooperation and compliance. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 43(1), 267–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, T., & Osterman, P. (1994). The mutual gains enterprise: Forging a winning partnership among labour, management and government. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil, J., Haworth, N., & Rasmussen, E. (2011). Addressing the productivity challenge? Government-sponsored partnership programs in Australia and New Zealand. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(18), 3813–3829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J., 1981. Good industrial relations: theory and practice. Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell, J., & Sisson, K. (1983). Strategies and practice in the management of industrial relations. In G. S. Bain (Ed.), Industrial relations in Britain. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, W. K., & Teague, P. (2014). Successful but unappealing: Fifteen years of workplace partnership in Ireland. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(6), 781–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, P. J. (2014). Financial service partnerships: Labor management dynamics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, P., & Bacon, N. (2010). The contents of partnership agreements in Britain 1990–2007. Work, Employment and Society, 24(3), 430–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simms, M 2015 Union organising as an alternative to partnership. Or what to do when employers can’t keep their side of the bargain in Johnstone, S and Ackers, P (Eds) Finding a Voice at Work? New Perspectives on Employment Relations, Oxford University Press, 127-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, G. (1998). Comparative international industrial relations. In K. Whitfield & G. Strauss (Eds.), Researching the world of work: Strategies and methods in studying industrial relations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, M. and Martınez-Lucio, M. (eds), Partnership and Modernisation in Employment Relations, pp. 20–39. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Teague, P., Donaghey, J. (2015). The life and death of Irish social partnership: Lessons for social pacts. Business History, (ahead-of-print), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, M. (2003) ‘Can “Partnership” Reverse the Decline of British Trade Unions?’ Work, Employment and Society, 17(3), 459–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (2003). Disconnected capitalism: Or why employers can’t keep their side of the bargain. Work, Employment and Society, 17(2), 359–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upchurch, M., Danford, A., Tailby, S., and Richardson, M. (2008) The Realities of Partnership at Work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, A., Kochan, T. A., & Wood, S. J. (2002). Editors’ introduction. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 40(3), 373–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, J. (2014). Trade union membership retention in Europe: The challenge of difficult times. European Journal of Industrial Relations. doi:10.1177/0959680114538708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyman, P. B. and Petrescu, A. I. (2014) ‘Partnership, Flexible Workplace Practices and the Realisation of Mutual Gains: Evidence from the British WERS 2004 Dataset’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, A., Donaghey, J., Dundon, T., & Freeman, R (Eds.). (2014a). The handbook of research on employee voice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, A., Dundon, T., Donaghey, J., & Townsend, K. (2014b). Partnership, collaboration and mutual gains: evaluating context, interests and legitimacy. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(6), 737–747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, A., Gollan, P., Marchington, M., & Lewin, D. (Eds.). (2010). The Oxford handbook of participation in organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, A., Wood, G., & Deeg R. (Eds.). (2014c). The Oxford handbook of employment relations: comparative employment systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, A., & Wood, G. (2011). Institutions and employment relations - The state of the art. Industrial Relations, 51 (S1), 2012, 373–388.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnstone, S., Wilkinson, A. (2016). Developing Positive Employment Relations: International Experiences of Labour–Management Partnership. In: Johnstone, S., Wilkinson, A. (eds) Developing Positive Employment Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-42772-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics