Skip to main content

Outside the State: The Shadow Economy and Shadow Economy Labour Force

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of International Development

Abstract

This chapter focusses on the shadow economy and on work in the shadow. The most influential factors on the shadow economy are tax policies and state regulation. The size of the shadow economy was decreasing over 1999–2007 from 34 % to 31.2 % for 161 countries (unweighted average). Furthermore, economic opportunities, taxes and regulations, the general situation on the labour market, and unemployment are crucial for an understanding of the dynamics of the shadow labour force. Opposite to the decrease of the shadow economy (value-added figures), the shadow economy labour force increased for most countries over the period 1999–2007.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This paper focusses on the size and development of the shadow economy for uniform countries and not for specific regions. Recently, first studies have been undertaken to measure the size of the shadow economy as well as the ‘grey’ or ‘shadow’ labour force for urban regions or states (e.g. California). See, for example, Marcelli et al. (1999), Marcelli (2004), Chen (2004), Williams and Windebank (1998, 2001a, b), Flaming et al. (2005), Alderslade et al. (2006), Brück et al. (2006). Herwartz et al. (2009) and Tafenau et al. (2010) estimate the size of the shadow economy of 234 EU-NUTS regions for the year 2004 demonstrating a considerable regional variation in the size of the shadow economy.

  2. 2.

    This definition is taken from Dell’Anno (2003), Dell’Anno and Schneider (2004) and Feige (1989); see also Thomas (1999), Fleming et al. (2000) or Feld and Larsen (2005: 25).

  3. 3.

    This indirect approach is based on the assumption that cash is used to make transactions within the shadow economy. By using this method, one econometrically estimates a currency demand function including independent variables like tax burden, regulation and so on, which ‘drive’ the shadow economy. This equation is used to make simulations of the amount of money that would be necessary to generate the official GDP. This amount is then compared with the actual money demand and the difference is treated as an indicator for the development of the shadow economy. On this basis, the calculated difference is multiplied by the velocity of money of the official economy and one gets a value-added figure for the shadow economy. See footnote 11 for references discussing critically this method.

References

  • Alderslade J., J. Talmage, and Y. Freeman. 2006. Measuring the informal economy: One neighborhood at a time. Discussion Paper, The brooking institution metropolitan policy program, Washington D.C., Sept 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J., B. Erard, and J. Feinstein. 1998. Tax compliance. Journal of Economic Literature 36(4): 818–860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharyya, D.K. 1999. On the economic rationale of estimating the hidden economy. Economic Journal 109(3): 348–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, C. 2010. A meta analysis of incentive effects in tax compliance experiments. In Developing alternative frameworks explaining tax compliance, ed. J. Alm, J. Martinez-Vazquez, and Benno Torgler, 97–112. London: Routledge Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. 2005a. The Canadian underground economy: An examination of giles and tedds. Canadian Tax Journal 53(4): 367–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch, T. 2005b. Estimating the underground economy using MIMIC models. Working Paper, Canberra, Australia. http://econwpa.wustl.edu/eps/em/papers/0507/0507003.pdf

  • Brueck, T., J.B. Haisten-DeNew, and K.F. Zimmermann. 2006. Creating low-skilled jobs by subsidizing market contracted household work. Applied Economics 38(4): 899–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehn, A., A. Karmann, and F. Schneider. 2009. Shadow economy and do-it-yourself activities: The German case. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 165(4): 701–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmes, J. 2002. Informal sector, poverty and gender: A review of the empirical evidence. Paper prepared on behalf of Wiego (Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing). Washington and Paris: OECD and World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmes, J. 2007. Informal sector poverty and gender, a review of empirical evidence. Paper prepared on behalf of Wiego (Women in Formal Employment Globalizing and Organizing). Washington and Paris: OECD and World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmes, J. 2008. Informal sector poverty and gender, a review of empirical evidence. Paper prepared on behalf of Wiego (Women in Formal Employment Globalizing and Organizing). Washington and Paris: OECD and World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. 2004. Rethinking the informal economy: Linkages with the formal economy and the formal regulatory environment. Paper presented a the EGDI-WIDR Conference Unleashing Human Potential: Linking the Informal and Formal Sectors, Helsinki, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, L.A., and M. Salahdine (eds.). 1991. The silent revolution – The informal sector in five Asian and near Eastern Countries. San Francisco: An International Center for Economic Growth Publication (ICS Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallago, B. 1990. The irregular economy: The ‘underground economy’ and the “black labor market”. UK: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Grazia, R. 1983. Le travail clandistin: Situation dans les pays industrialisés à économie de marché. Genève: Bit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Anno, R. 2003. Estimating the shadow economy in Italy: A structural equation approach. Working Paper 2003–7, Department of Economics, University of Aarhus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Anno, R., and F. Schneider. 2004. The shadow economy of Italy and other OECD countries: What do we know? Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice 21: 223–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Anno, R., and F. Schneider. 2009. A complex approach to estimate shadow economy: The structural equation modelling. In Coping with the complexity of economics, ed. M. Faggnini and T. Looks, 110–130. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, H. 1999. Controversy, on the hidden economy, editorial introduction. Economic Journal 456(3): 335–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enste, D., and F. Schneider. 2006. Umfang und Entwicklung der Schattenwirtschaft in 145 Ländern. In Jahrbuch Schattenwirtschaft 2006/07. Zum Spannungsfeld von Poltik und Ökonomie, ed. F. Schneider and D. Enste, 55–80. Berlin: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2007. Stepping up the fight against undeclared work. COM 628 final. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feige, E.L. (ed.). 1989. The underground economies. Tax evasion and information distortion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feige, E.L. 1994. The underground economy and the currency enigma. Supplement to Public Finance/ Finances Publiques 49: 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L.P., and B.S. Frey. 2007. Tax compliance as the result of a psychological tax contract: The role of incentives and responsive regulation. Law and Policy 29(1): 102–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L.P., and C. Larsen. 2005. Black activities in Germany in 2001 and 2004: A comparison based on survey data, study No. 12. Copenhagen: The Rockwool Foundation Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L.P., and C. Larsen. 2008. “Black” activities low in Germany in 2006. News from the Rockwool Foundation Research Unit, Mar 2008, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L.P., and C. Larsen. 2009. Undeclared work in Germany 2001–2007 – Impact of deterrence, tax policy, and social norms: An analysis based on survey data. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, L.P., and F. Schneider. 2010. Survey on the shadow economy and undeclared earnings in OECD countries. German Economic Review 11(2): 109–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flaming, D., B. Hayolamak, and P. Jossart. 2005. Hopeful workers, Marginal jobs: LA’s off-the-books labor force, economic roundtable. Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, M.H., J. Roman, and G. Farrel. 2000. The shadow economy. Journal of International Affairs 53/2(Spring ): 64–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S., and W. Pommerehne. 1984. The hidden economy: State and prospect for measurement. Review of Income and Wealth 30(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eck, R., and B. Kazemier. 1988. Features of the hidden economy in the Netherlands. Review of Income and Wealth 34(3): 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaetani-d’Aragona, G. 1979. I sommersi. Nord e Sued 7(1): 26–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D.E.A. 1999a. Measuring the hidden economy: Implications for econometric modelling. Economic Journal 109(3): 370–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D.E.A. 1999b. Modelling the hidden economy in the tax-gap in New Zealand. Empirical Economics 24(4): 621–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D.E.A. 1999c. The rise and fall of the New Zealand underground economy: Are the reasons symmetric? Applied Economic Letters 6: 185–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigner, S., S. Jenewein, F. Schneider, and F. Wakolbinger. 2013. Driving forces of informal labour supply and demand supply in Germany. International Labour Review 152(3–4): 507–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heintz, E., and G.B. Chang. 2007. Report of informal employment for the ILO. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herwartz, H., F. Schneider, and E. Tafenau. 2009. One share fits it all? Regional variation in the shadow economy in the EU regions. Discussion paper, Universities of Linz and Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isachsen, A.J., and S. Strøm. 1985. The size and growth of the hidden economy in Norway. Review of Income and Wealth 31(1): 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannianen V., Pääkkönen J. and Schneider Johannes Kepler F. 2004. Fiscal and Ethical Determinants of Shadow Economy: Theory and Evidence Discussion Paper No. 30 HECER – Helsinki Center of Economic Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastlunger, B., E. Kirchler, L. Mittore, and J. Pitters. 2009. Sequences of audits, tax compliance, and taxpaying strategies. Journal of Economic Psychology 30(4): 405–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemier, B. 2005a. The underground economy: A survey of methods and estimates. Discussion Paper, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemier, B. 2005b. Monitoring the underground labor market: What surveys can do. Discussion Paper, Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazemir, B. 2006. Monitoring the underground economy: A survey of methods and estimates. In Jahrbuch Schattenwirtschaft 2006/07. Zum Spannungsfeld von Politik und Ökonomie, ed. F. Schneider and D. Enste, 11–53. Berlin: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E. 2007. The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E., B. Maciejovsky, and F. Schneider. 2003. Everyday representations of tax avoidance, tax evasion and tax flight: do legal differences matter? Journal of Economic Psychology 24(4): 535–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E., E. Hoelzl, and I. Wahl. 2007. Enforces versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope“ framework. Journal of Economic Psychology 29(2): 210–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, R.J., W.W. Pommerehne, and N. Schwarz. 1997. Determining the value of non-marketed goods: Economic, psychological, and policy relevant aspects of contingent valuation methods. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kucera, D., and L. Roncolato. 2008. Informal employment: Two contested policy issues. International Labor Review 147(3): 321–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loayza, N.V. 1996. The economics of the informal sector: A simple model and some empirical evidence from Latin America. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 45: 129–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, H. 1991. The informal sector in the 1980’s and 1990’s. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcelli, E.A. 2004. Unauthorized Mexican immigration, the labour and other lower-wage informal employment in California. Regional Studies 38(1): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcelli, E.A., Mjr Pastor, and P.M. Joassart. 1999. Estimating the effects of informal economic activity: Evidence from Los Angeles county. Journal of Economic Issues 33: 579–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz, J., and K.G. Wolff. 1993. The shadow economy: Illicit work and household production – A microanalysis of West Germany. Review of Income and Wealth 39(2): 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mogensen, G.V., H.K. Kvist, E. Körmendi, and S. Pedersen. 1995. The shadow economy in Demark 1994: Measurement and results, study no. 3. Copenhagen: The Rockwool Foundation Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2009a. Is informal normal? Towards more and better jobs. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2009b. Policy round tables, competition policy and the informal economy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, S. 2003. The shadow economy in Germany, Great Britain and Scandinavia: A measurement based on questionnaire service, study no. 10. Copenhagen: The Rockwool Foundation Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozo, S. (ed.). 1996. Exploring the underground economy: Studies of illegal and unreported activity, W.E. Upjohn. Michigan: Institute for Employment Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renooy, P., S. Ivarsson, O. van der Wusten-Gritsai, and E. Meijer. 2004. Undeclared work in an enlarged Union – An analysis of undeclared work: An in-depth study of specific items. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruesga, B.S.M. 1984. Economia oculta y mercado de trabajo: Aproximación al caso espaniol. Información commercial espaniola 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. 1986. Estimating the size of the danish shadow economy using the currency demand approach: An attempt. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 88(4): 643–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. 1994a. Measuring the size and development of the shadow economy. Can the causes be found and the obstacles be overcome? In Essays on economic psychology, ed. H. Brandstaetter and W. Güth, 193–212. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. 1994b. Determinanten der Steuerhinterziehung der Schwarzarbeit im internationalen Vergleich. In Stand und Entwicklung der Finanzpsychologie, ed. C. Smekal and E. Theurl, 247–288. Nomos: Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. 1994c. Can the shadow economy be reduced through major tax reforms? An empirical investigation for Austria. Supplement to Public Finance/ Finances Publiques 49: 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. 1998a. Stellt das Anwachsen der Schwarzarbeit eine wirtschaftspolitische Herausforderung dar? Einige Gedanken aus volkswirtschaftlicher Sicht. Mitteilungen des Instituts für angewandte Wirtschaftsforschung (IAW) I/98: 4–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. 1998b. Further empirical results of the size of the shadow economy of 17 OECD-countries over time. Paper to be presented at the 54. Congress of the IIPF Cordoba, Argentina and Discussion Paper, Department of Economics, University of Linz, Linz, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. 2001. Die Schattenwirtschaft – Tatbestand, Ursachen, Auswirkungen. In Die Arbeitswelt im Wandel, ed. A. Rauscher, 127–143. Köln: J.P. Bachem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. 2003. Shadow economy. In Encyclopedia of public choice Vol. II, ed. C.K. Rowley and F. Schneider, 286–296. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. 2005. Shadow economies around the world: What do we really know? European Journal of Political Economy 21(4): 598–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. 2006. Shadow economies and corruption all over the world: What do we really know? Universität Linz: Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Diskussionspapier, Aug 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. (ed.). 2011. Handbook on the shadow economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. 2014. The shadow economy and shadow labor force: Results, problems and open questions, discussion paper, Department of Economics, University of Linz, Linz, June 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., and D. Enste. 2000a. Schattenwirtschaft und Schwarzarbeit – Umfang, Ursachen, Wirkungen und wirtschaftspolitische Empfehlungen. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., and D. Enste. 2000b. Shadow economies: Size, causes and consequences. Journal of Economic Literature 38(1): 73–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., and D. Enste. 2002. The shadow economy: Theoretical approaches, empirical studies, and political implications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., and D. Enste (eds.). 2006. Jahrbuch Schattenwirtschaft 2006/07. Zum Spannungsfeld von Poltik und Ökonomie. Berlin: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., and C.C. Williams. 2013. The shadow economy. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., J. Volkert, and S. Caspar. 2002. Schattenwirtschaft und Schwarzarbeit: Beliebt bei vielen – Ein Problem für alle?: Eine Analyse der schattenwirtschaftlichen Aktivitäten in Deutschland (am Beispiel Baden-Württemberg) und mögliche politische Konsequenzen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F., A. Buehn, and C.E. Montenegro. 2010. New estimates for the shadow economies all over the world. International Economic Journal 24(4): 443–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. 1994. Assessing the size of the underground economy: The Canadian statistical perspectives. Canadian Economic Observer, Catalogue No. 11–010, 16–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tafenau, Egle, Helmut Herwartz, and Friedrich Schneider. 2010. Regional estimates for the shadow economy in Europe. International Economic Journal 24(4): 629–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi, V. 1999. Uses and abuses of estimates of the underground economy. Economic Journal 109(3): 338–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.J. 1992. Informal economic activity. New York: Harvester/Weatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.J. 1999. Quantifying the black economy: “Measurement without theory” yet again? Economic Journal 109: 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. 2002. Speaking to theorists and searching for facts: Tax morale and tax compliance in experiments. Journal of Economic Survey 16(4): 657–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgler, B. 2007. Tax compliance and tax morale: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schneider, F. (2016). Outside the State: The Shadow Economy and Shadow Economy Labour Force. In: Grugel, J., Hammett, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of International Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-42724-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics