Advertisement

Towards a Proper Explanation of European Disintegration

  • Hans Vollaard
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

An explanation of European disintegration should account for the EU’s multi-dimensional nature and the continuous presence of disintegrative and integrative forces it is subject to. Avoiding a static checklist of factors, mechanisms help to grasp the dynamic processes of (dis)integration. The mechanism of exit, voice, and loyalty explains actors’ partial or full withdrawal from the EU. The mutual dependence between external consolidation and internal construction (the bounding-bonding mechanism) explains (dis)integration at the systemic level. Four propositions spell out how European (dis)integration might evolve: (1) integration may start and continue due to the lack of better alternatives and limited voice options; (2) the EU’s weak external consolidation (enlargement) has constrained its internal construction; (3) the external de-consolidation of member states has increased dissatisfaction; and (4) with loyalty low, voice opportunities limited, and better external exit options available, actors will seek full withdrawal from the EU. In the absence of better external alternatives, dissatisfied actors will opt for partial exits.

Keywords

European disintegration Exit, voice and loyalty Bounding-bonding mechanism Bartolini Hirschman Rokkan 

References

  1. Barry, B. (1974). Review article: “Exit, voice, and loyalty”. British Journal of Political Science, 4, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartolini, S. (1998). Exit options, boundary building, political structuring. Working Paper 98/1. Florence: EUI.Google Scholar
  3. Bartolini, S. (2004). Old and new peripheries in the processes of European territorial integration. In C. K. Ansell & G. di Palma (Eds.), Restructuring territoriality: Europe and the United States compared (pp. 19–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartolini, S. (2005). Restructuring Europe: Centre formation, system building and political structuring between the nation-state and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bednar, J. (2009). The robust federation: Principles of design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Deutsch, K. W., with Burrell, S. A., Kann, R. A., Lee Jr, M., Lichterman, M., Lindgren, R. E., Loewenheim, F. L., & Van Wagenen, R. W. (1957). Political community and the North Atlantic area: International organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dowding, K., John, P., Mergoupis, T., & van Vugt, M. (2000). Exit, voice and loyalty: Analytic and empirical developments. European Journal of Political Research, 37, 469–495.Google Scholar
  8. Doyle, M. (1986). Empires. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Easton, D. (1965). A framework for analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  10. Elazar, D. J. (1987). Exploring federalism. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  11. Eppler, A., & Scheller, H. (2013). Zug- und Gegenkräfte im Europäischen Integrationsprozess. In A. Eppler & H. Scheller (Eds.), Zur Konzeptualisierung Europäischer Desintegration (pp. 11–44). Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Etzioni, A. (2001). Political unification revisited: On building supranational communities. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  13. Ferrera, M. (2003). European integration and national social citizenship: Changing boundaries, new structuring? Comparative Political Studies, 36(6), 611–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferrera, M. (2004). Social citizenship in the European Union: Towards a spatial reconfiguration? In C. Ansell & G. Di Palma (Eds.), The restructuring of territoriality (pp. 90–121). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferrera, M. (2005). The boundaries of welfare: European integration and the new spatial politics of social protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferrera, M. (2007). Book review: Restructuring Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 215–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Filippov, M., Ordeshook, P. C., & Shvetsova, O. V. (2004). Designing federalism: A theory of self-Sustainable federal institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finer, S. (1974). State-building, state boundaries and border control: An essay on certain aspects of the first phase of state-building in Western Europe considered in the light of the Rokkan-Hirschman model. Social Science Information, 13(4/5), 79–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flora, P. (1999). Introduction and interpretation. In S. Rokkan (Ed.), State Formation, Nation-Building and Mass Politics in Europe: The Theory of Stein Rokkan (ed. by P. Flora) (pp. 1–91). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Flora, P. (2000). Externe Grenzbildung und Interne Strukturierung: Europa und seinen Nationen: Eine Rokkanische Forschungperspektive. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 10, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franck, Th. M. (Ed.). (1968). Why federations fail: An inquiry into the requisites for successful federalism. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social mechanisms: An introductory essay. In P. Hedström & R. Swedberg (Eds.), Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory (pp. 1–31). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hintze, O. (1975). In F. Gilbert (Ed.), The historical essays of Otto Hintze. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hirschman, A. O. (1974). “Exit, voice, and loyalty”: Further reflections and a survey of recent contributions. Social Science Information, 13(1), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirschman, A. O. (1981). Essays in trespassing: Economics to politics and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karvonen, L. (2007). Europe’s spaces and boundaries. Comparative European Politics, 5, 441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelemen, R. D. (2007). Built to last? The durability of EU federalism. In S. Meunier & K. R. McNamara (Eds.), Making history: European integration and institutional change at fifty (pp. 51–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kennedy, P. (1987). The rise and fall of the great powers: Economic change and military conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  31. Lindberg, L. (1971). Political integration as multidimensional phenomenon requiring multivariate measurement. In L. Lindberg & S. Scheingold (Eds.), Regional integration: Theory and research (pp. 45–127). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lindberg, L., & Scheingold, S. (1970). Europe’s would-be polity: Patterns of change in the European community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  33. Marsh, D., & Furlong, P. (2002). A skin not a sweater: Ontology and epistemology in political science. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science (pp. 17–41). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mason, K., Easton, G., & Lenney, P. (2013). Causal social mechanisms: From the what to the why. Industrial Marketing Management, 42, 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mearsheimer, J. (1990). Back to the future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security, 15(1), 5–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mjøset, L. (2000). Stein Rokkan’s thick comparisons. Acta Sociologica, 43(4), 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moisio, S., & Paasi, A. (2013). Beyond state-centricity: Geopolitics of changing state spaces. Geopolitics, 18(2), 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morgan, G. (2006). The nation-state, European (dis)integration, and political development. European Political Science, 5, 341–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Motyl, A. (2001). Imperial ends: The decay, collapse, and revival of empires. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Niemann, A., & Bergmann, J. (2013). Zug- und Gegenkräfte im Spiegel der Theorien der Europäischen Integration. In A. Eppler & H. Scheller (Eds.), Zur Konzeptualisierung Europäischer Desintegration (pp. 45–70). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  41. Parsons, C. (2007). How to map arguments in political science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Popescu, G. (2012). Bordering and ordering in the twenty-first century: Understanding borders. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  43. Riker, W. H. (1964). Federation/federalism: Origins, operation, significance. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  44. Rokkan, S. (1970). Citizens, elections, parties. Oslo: Universitets Forlaget.Google Scholar
  45. Rokkan, S. (1975). Dimensions of state formation and nation-building: A possible paradigm for research on variations within Europe. In C. Tilly (Ed.), The formation of national states in western Europe (pp. 562–600). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rokkan, S. (1999). State formation, nation-building, and mass politics in Europe: The theory of Stein Rokkan (P. Flora, S. Kuhnle, & D. Urwin, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rosato, S. (2011). Europe united: Power politics and the making of the European Community. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sadeh, T., & Verdun, A. (2009). Explaining Europe’s Monetary Union: A survey of the literature. International Studies Review, 11, 277–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schmitter, P. (1971). A revised theory of regional integration. In L. Lindberg & S. A. Scheingold (Eds.), Regional integration: Theory and research (pp. 232–264). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, capital and European states: AD 990-1990. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  51. Vollaard, H. (2009). The logic of political territoriality. Geopolitics, 14(4), 687–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vollaard, H. (2014). Explaining European disintegration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(5), 1142–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Webber, D. (2013). How likely is it that the European Union will disintegrate? A critical analysis of competing theoretical perspectives. European Journal of International Relations, 19(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
  54. Zielonka, J. (2014). Is the EU doomed? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Vollaard
    • 1
  1. 1.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations