Advertisement

Federalism and European Disintegration

  • Hans Vollaard
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics book series (PSEUP)

Abstract

Comparative federalism can shed light on the disintegration of the EU, a federal system characterised by a combination of shared rule and self-rule. Comparative federalist studies focus on the sustainability and failure of an entire federal system and on the secession of individual member states. The maintenance and failure of federal systems have been contributed to a wide range of factors, ranging from the presence of an external security threat and shared economic interests, to cultural commonalities and an ideological commitment to the federal division of power. However, it is not clear what the relative importance of these factors is and how they are interconnected in the dynamic process of disintegration. At present, they constitute no more than a checklist, indicating the likelihood of European disintegration. Similar criticism also holds for explanations of secession by individual states. These explanations also suffer from a state bias. In spite of this, comparative federalism does offer some useful building blocks in the pursuit of a convincing explanation of European disintegration.

Keywords

European disintegration Comparative federalism Federal failure Secession 

References

  1. Anderson, L. (2004). Exploring the paradox of autonomy: Federalism and secession in North America. Regional & Federal Studies, 14(1), 89–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, L. (2007). Federalism and secessionism: Institutional influences on nationalist policies in Québec. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 13(2), 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andeweg, R. B. (2000). Consociational democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 509–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Athanassiou, P. (2009). Withdrawal and expulsion from the EU and EMU: Some reflections. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.Google Scholar
  5. Bednar, J. (2009). The robust federation: Principles of design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Benson, D., & Jordan, A. (2008). Understanding task allocation in the European Union: Exploring the value of federal theory. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(1), 78–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Börzel, T., & Hosli, M. (2003). Brussels between Bern and Berlin: Comparative federalism meets the European Union. Governance, 16(2), 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burgess, M. (2000). Federalism and the European Union: The building of Europe, 1950–2000. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burgess, M. (2006). Comparative federalism: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Burgess, M. (2012). In search of the federal spirit: New theoretical and empirical perspectives in comparative federalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chryssochoou, D. N. (2001). Theorizing European integration. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Costa, O., & Magnette, P. (2003). The European Union as a consociation? A methodological assessment. West European Politics, 26(3), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deutsch, K. W., with Burrell, S. A., Kann, R. A., Lee Jr, M., Lichterman, M., Lindgren, R. E., Loewenheim, F. L., & Van Wagenen, R. W. (1957). Political community and the North Atlantic area: International organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dion, S. (1996). Why is secession difficult in well-established democracies? Lessons from Quebec. British Journal of Political Science, 26(2), 269–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elazar, D. (1987). Exploring federalism. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  16. Elazar, D. J. (1991). Introduction: Federalist responses to current democratic revolutions. In D. J. Elazar (Ed.), Federal systems of the world: A handbook of federal, confederal and autonomy arrangements (pp. i–xxi). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  17. Erk, J., & Anderson, L. (2009). The paradox of federalism: Does self-rule accommodate or exacerbate ethnic division? Ethnopolitics, 19(2), 191–202.Google Scholar
  18. Etzioni, A. (2001). Political unification revisited. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  19. Fischer, J. (2000). From confederacy to federation: Thoughts on the finality of European integration. Retrieved July 8, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/dorie/fileDownload.do?docId=192161&cardId=192161
  20. Filippov, M., Ordeshook, P. C., & Shvetsova, O. (2004). Designing federalism: A theory of self-sustaining federal institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Forsyth, M. (2007). Federalism, nationality, statehood: The problem of the European Union. In M. Burgess & J. Pinder (Eds.), Multinational federations (pp. 150–179). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Franck, T. (1968). Why federations fail: An inquiry into the requisites for successful federation. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
  23. Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2011). How the European Union constrains the state: Multilevel governance of taxation. European Journal of Political Research, 50, 293–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Glencross, A. (2009). What makes the EU viable? European integration in the light of the antebellum US experience. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Hale, H. (2000). The parade of sovereignties: Testing theories of secession in the Soviet setting. British Journal of Political Science, 30(1), 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hale, H. (2004). Divided we stand: Institutional sources of ethnofederal state survival and collapse. World Politics, 56(2), 165–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haldén, P. (2009). Stability without statehood: Lessons from Europe’s history before the sovereign state. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Hechter, M. (1992). The dynamics of secession. Acta Sociologica, 35, 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Henderson, K. (2002). Slovakia: The escape from invisibility. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hicks, U. K. (1978). Federalism: Failure or success, a comparative study. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Hix, S. (1994). The study of the European community: The challenge to comparative politics. West European Politics, 17(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Horowitz, D. (2003). The cracked foundations of the right to secede. Journal of Democracy, 14(2), 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelemen, R. (2003). The structure and dynamics of EU federalism. Comparative Political Studies, 36(1/2), 184–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelemen, R. D. (2007). Built to Last? The Durability of EU Federalism. In S. Meunier & K. R. McNamara (Eds.), Making history: European integration and institutional change at fifty (pp. 51–66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kölliker, A. (2006). Flexibility and European unification: The logic of differentiated integration. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  36. Kovačević, B., & Samardžić, S. (2016). Internal crisis of compound polities: Understanding the EU’s crisis in light of the ex-Yugoslav federation’s failure. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 18(3), 241–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lijphart, A. (1977). Democracy in plural societies: A comparative exploration. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  38. McGarry, J., & O’Leary, B. (2007). Federations and managing nations. In M. Burgess & J. Pinder (Eds.), Multinational federations (pp. 180–211). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. McGarry, J., & O’Leary, B. (2009). Must pluri-national federations fail? Ethnopolitics, 8(1), 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McKay, D. (2004). William Riker on federalism: Sometimes wrong but more right than anyone else? Regional and Federal Studies, 14(2), 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nicolaidis, K., & Howse, R. (Eds.). (2001). The federal vision: Legitimacy and levels of governance in the United States and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Obinger, H., Leibfried, S., & Castles, F. G. (Eds.). (2005). Federalism and the welfare state: New world and European experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Papadopoulos, Y., & Magnette, P. (2010). On the politicisation of the European Union. Lessons from consociational polities. West European Politics, 33(4), 711–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pavkovic, A. (2015). Secession: A much contested concept. In D. Kingsbury & C. Laoutides (Eds.), Territorial separatism in global politics: Causes, outcomes and resolution (pp. 13–28). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Pavkovic, A., with Radan, P. (Eds.). (2009). Creating new states: Theory and practice of secession. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  46. Riker, W. H. (1964). Federation/federalism: Origins, operation, significance. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  47. Riker, W. H. (1975). Federalism. In F. I. Greenstein & N. Polsby (Eds.), The handbook of political science, Volume V: Government institutions and processes (pp. 93–172). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  48. Scharpf, F. (1988). The joint-decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66(3), 239–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Slapin, J. (2009). Exit, voice, and cooperation: Bargaining power in international organizations and federal systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 21(2), 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Spinelli Group. (2012, June 28). Only a European federal union can solve the crisis: Federal Union or disintegration. Brussels: The Spinelli Group.Google Scholar
  51. Stepan, A. (1999). Federalism and democracy. Journal of Democracy, 10(4), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Taylor, P. (1990). Consociationalism and federalism as approaches to international integration. In A. J. R. Groom & P. Taylor (Eds.), Frameworks for international cooperation (pp. 172–184). London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  53. Verdun, A. (2015). The federal features of the EU: Lessons from Canada. Politics and Governance, 4(3), 100–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vollaard, H., Van de Bovenkamp, H., & Martinsen, D. S. (2016). The making of a healthcare union: A federalist perspective. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(2), 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Walter, B. (2006). Information, uncertainty, and the decision to secede. International Organization, 60(1), 105–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Watts, R. (1977). Survival or disintegration. In R. Simeon (Ed.), Must Canada fail? (pp. 42–60). Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Watts, R. (1998). Federalism, federal political systems, and federations. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Watts, R. (2007). Multinational federations in comparative perspective. In I. M. Burgess & J. Pinder (Eds.), Multinational federations (pp. 225–247). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Wood, J. (1981). Secession: A comparative analytical framework. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 14(1), 107–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zbíral, R. (2007). Searching for an optimal withdrawal clause for the European Union. In M. Niedobitek & J. Zemánek (Eds.), The constitutional treaty: A critical appraisal (pp. 308–323). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Vollaard
    • 1
  1. 1.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations