Abstract
This chapter examines the use of action research to impact educational reform within the only teacher training university in Mongolia. Teacher educators sought a research approach that would encourage them and their students to be active change agents in democratic educational reform efforts within the climate of Mongolian national political transformation. The chapter identifies major trends characterizing the current movement including (a) development of conceptual frameworks for education reform; (b) experiments in action research dissemination; and (c) use of action research as a transformative paradigm for reforming teacher education. It is argued that educational reform practice and scholarship are being enhanced through a participatory approach to teacher education and practitioner research focused on classroom and school issues in the context of Mongolian culture and history.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. Boston, MA: Center for International Higher Education.
Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2002). Virtual knowledge—Sharing communities of practice: Success factors and barriers. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 15(3), 94–113.
Bat-Erdene, R. (2007, February). The academic profession in a transition society: A case from Mongolia. In Reports of COE international seminar on constructing university visions and the mission of academic profession in Asian countries: A comparative perspective (pp. 23, 25). Hiroshima, Japan: Hiroshima University, Research Institute for Higher Education.
Batliwala, S., & Patel, S. (1997). A census as participatory research. In Participatory action research (pp. 263–277).
Bryant, J., & Bates, A. (2010). The power of student resistance in action research: Teacher educators respond to classroom challenges. Educational Action Research, 18(3), 305–318.
Bryman, A. (2004). Qualitative research on leadership: A critical but appreciative review. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 729–769.
Carboni, L. W., Wynn, S., & McGuire, C. (2002). Action research with undergraduate preservice teachers: Emerging and merging voices. Action in Teacher Education, 29(3), 50–59.
Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (2003). Becoming critical: Education knowledge and action research. New York: Routledge.
Chant, R. H., Heafner, T. L., & Bennet, K. R. (2004). Connecting personal theorizing and action research in pre-service teacher development. Teacher Education Quarterly, 31(3), 25–42.
Crossley, M., & Holmes, K. (2001). Challenges for educational research: International development, partnerships and capacity building in small states. Oxford Review of Education, 27(3), 395–409.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 35–47.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2012). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. Chicago: Wiley.
Engel, J., Prizzon, A., & Amgaabazar, G. (2014, July). From decline to recovery: Post-primary education in Mongolia: A case study summary. Development progress: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.developmentprogress.org/publication/унaлтaac-cэpгэлтэд-мoнгoл-улcын-бaгaac-дээш-шaтны-бoлoвcpoл
Fetterman, D., Rodríguez-Campos, L., Wandersman, A., & O’Sullivan, R. G. (2014). Collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation: Building a strong conceptual foundation for stakeholder involvement approaches to evaluation (A response to Cousins, Whitmore, and Shulha, 2013). American Journal of Evaluation, 35(1), 144–148.
Friedman, V. J., & Rogers, T. (2009). There is nothing so theoretical as good action research. Action Research, 7(1), 31–47.
Government of Mongolia. (2006). Master plan to develop education of Mongolia (2006–2015).Retrieved from http://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/upload/Mongolia/Mongolia%20Education%20Master%20Plan%202006-2015.pdf
Heyneman, S. P. (1993). Educational quality and the crisis of educational research. International Review of Education, 39(6), 511–517.
Hollingsworth, S. (Ed.). (2005). International action research: Educational reform. New York: Routledge.
Innes, R. B. (2007). Dialogic communication in community problem solving groups. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1–19.
Jadambaa, B. (2010). Nature development for learning through action. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: Mongolian National University of Education Press.
Jadambaa, B., Narantsetseg, D., Batdelger, J., Baigalmaa, C., & Altangoo, O. (2014, March). How can action research support educational reform? New Mexico State University Action Research Virtual Symposium Presentation, Las Cruces, New Mexico [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from http://ibp.nmsu.edu/5-nations-participate-in-virtual-international-symposium-on-action-research/
Johansson, A. W., & Lindhult, E. (2008). Emancipation or workability? Critical versus pragmatic scientific orientation in action research. Action Research, 6(1), 95–115.
Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the relevance of critical theory for action research: Emancipatory action research in the footsteps of Jurgen Habermas. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 91–102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Krueger, J. R. (1961). Education in the Mongolian People’s Republic. Comparative Education Review, 4(3), 183–187.
Lincoln, Y. S. (2001). Engaging sympathies: Relationships between action research and social constructivism. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 124–132). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Liston, D. P., & Zeichner, K. M. (1990). Reflective teaching and action research in preservice teacher education. British Journal of Teacher Education, 16(3), 235–254.
MacBeath, J., & Dempster, N. (Eds.). (2008). Connecting leadership and learning: Principles for practice. New York: Routledge.
McKernan, J., & McKernan, J. (2013). Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner. New York: Routledge.
McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: Principles and practice. New York: Routledge.
McTaggart, R. (1997). Participatory action research: International contexts and consequences. New York: SUNY Press.
Mongol ardiin zuir ugs (2008). Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: Ulaanbaatar Publishing House.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schulz, A. J., Israel, B. A., & Lantz, P. (2003). Instrument for evaluating dimensions of group dynamics within community-based participatory research partnerships. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26(3), 249–262.
Silova, I., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Eds.). (2008). How NGOs react: Globalization and education reform in the Caucasus, Central Asia and Mongolia. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
Somekh, B., & Zeichner, K. (2009). Action research for educational reform: Remodelling action research theories and practices in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 5–21.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (Ed.). (2004). The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Stolpe, I. (2004). Decentralization and recentralization reform in Mongolia: Tracing the swing of the pendulum. Comparative Education, 40(1), 29–53.
Stringer, E. T. (2013). Action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Subramaniam, K. (2010). Images in action: Preservice teachers’ action researcher images. Qualitative Report, 15(3), 535–546.
Sveiby, K. E., & Simons, R. (2002). Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work—An empirical study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(5), 422–433.
Tessema, K. D. (2007). The teacher education reform process in Ethiopia: Some consequences on educators and its implications. Teaching Education, 18(1), 29–48.
Tu, C. H. (2002). The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment. International Journal on E-learning, 1(2), 34–45.
UNESCO. (2011). World data on education 2010–2011: Mongolia (7th ed.). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002113/211308e.pdf.
Weidman, J. C., & Bat-Erdene, R. (2002). Higher education and the state in Mongolia: Dilemmas of democratic transition. In D. W. Chapman & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Higher education in the developing world (pp. 110–129). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
Wicks, P. G., & Reason, P. (2009). Initiating action research: Challenges and paradoxes of opening communicative space. Action Research, 7(3), 243–262.
Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1994). Professional development in higher education: A theoretical framework for action research. New York: Psychology Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaye, C., Badrakh, J., Dorjgotov, N., Jamsrandorj, B., Chultum, B., Orchirbat, A. (2017). Using Action Research for Educational Reform in the Nation of Mongolia: A Catalyst for Democratic Transformation. In: Rowell, L., Bruce, C., Shosh, J., Riel, M. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Action Research. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-44108-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-40523-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)