A Radical Plurality: Re-thinking Cultural and Religious Diversity in Sexuality Education

  • Louisa Allen
  • Kathleen Quinlivan
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter engages with debates about addressing cultural and religious diversity in sexuality education. It argues Sharon Todd’s concept of radical plurality offers a reconfiguration of the pedagogical encounter for sexuality education students, by disrupting a view of cultural and religious diversity as a set of identity characteristics which inevitably engender classroom conflicts. Instead, the idea of a radical plurality sets a different pedagogical scene. It means encountering the pedagogical space of education beyond instrumental terms and as an unpredictable site, ‘where we cannot know … what the future holds and what subjects will unfold in its midst—subjects both unique and different, in relation’ (Todd, Stud Philos Educ 30: 511, 2010). As a new form of pedagogical ethics, it may constitute a radical proposition for the future of sexuality education.

References

  1. Allen, L., Rasmussen, M., Quinlivan, K., Aspin, C., Sanjakdar, F., & Bromdal, N. (2013). Who’s afraid of sex at school? The politics of researching culture, religion and sexuality at school. International Journal of Research and Method in Education. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2012.754006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1959). The human condition. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durhman: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barad, K. (2012). Nature’s queer performativity (the authorised version). Women, Gender and Research, 1(2), 25–53.Google Scholar
  6. Batelaan, P. (2003). Intercultural education in the 21st century: Learning to live together. Council of Europe Standing Conference of European Ministers of Education. MED21–5.Google Scholar
  7. Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hoskins, T., & Jones, A. (2013). Object lessons: ‘Vital materiality’, methodology and indigenous studies in education. Te Puna Wānanga Research Seminar 2013. Thursday 31 October. Epsom Campus: Faculty of Education, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  9. Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment. (2014). Migration trends key indicators report, June 2014. Wellington: Crown Copyright.Google Scholar
  11. Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  12. Ministry of Education. (2009). Deciles information. Retrieved June 07, 2009 from http://www.minedu.govt.nz
  13. Rasmussen, M., Sanjakdar, F., Aspin, C., Allen, L., & Quinlivan, K. (2011). Sexuality education in Australia and New Zealand: Responding to religious and cultural difference. Australian Research Council Discovery Grant.Google Scholar
  14. Simon-Kumar, R. (2009). The ‘problem’ of Asian women’s sexuality: Public discourses in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 11(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tasker, G. (2004). Health education: Contributing to a just society through curriculum change. In A. O'Neill, J. Clark, & R. Openshaw (Eds.), Reshaping culture, knowledge and learning? Policy and content in the New Zealand curriculum framework (pp. 203–224). Palmerston North: Dunmore.Google Scholar
  16. Todd, S. (2003). Learning from the other: Levinas, psychoanalysis, and ethical possibilities in education. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  17. Todd, S. (2010). Educating beyond cultural diversity: Redrawing the boundaries of a democratic plurality. Studies in the Philosophy of Education, 30(2), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Todd, S. (2011a). Going to the heart of the matter. Studies in the Philosophy of Education, 30, 507–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Todd, S. (2011b). Standing at the crossroads of the ethical and the political: Education, feminism and narrativity. Paper presented at the presentation at EDGE symposium, Stockholm University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License, which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louisa Allen
    • 1
  • Kathleen Quinlivan
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Education and Social WorkUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.School of Educational Studies and LeadershipCollege of Education, Health and Human Development, University of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations